implement statedb #52
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@beer-1 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 53 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes encompass enhancements to the EVM integration within the Cosmos SDK, focusing on state management, testing infrastructure, and the introduction of transient storage capabilities. Key modifications include the addition of new methods and constants, updates to existing functionalities, and improvements to error handling and API documentation. These adjustments aim to streamline operations related to smart contract interactions and state transitions, ensuring a more robust framework for developers. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant API
participant Keeper
participant StateDB
User->>API: Request to update parameters
API->>Keeper: Validate parameters
Keeper->>StateDB: Check fee denomination
StateDB-->>Keeper: Return validity
Keeper-->>API: Parameter update success
API-->>User: Confirm update success
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #52 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 26.45% 28.33% +1.88%
==========================================
Files 112 114 +2
Lines 11895 12189 +294
==========================================
+ Hits 3147 3454 +307
+ Misses 8301 8235 -66
- Partials 447 500 +53
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
jsonrpc/types/overrides.go (1)
Block Overrides Not Supported
The
BlockOverridesfunctionality is currently not supported, as indicated by the explicit error message in theCallmethod withinjsonrpc/backend/eth.go. Please verify if this is an intentional change or if there are plans to reintroduce the functionality.
jsonrpc/backend/eth.go: TheCallmethod returns an error for block overrides.Analysis chain
Line range hint
19-19: Verify the impact of the removal of theApplymethod forBlockOverrides.The removal of the
Applymethod suggests a change in how block overrides are applied. Ensure that the functionality is not broken and that the new mechanism for applying block overrides is correctly implemented.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Applymethod forBlockOverrides:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `Apply` method for `BlockOverrides`. # Test: Search for the usage of the `Apply` method. Expect: No occurrences of the old method. rg --type go -A 5 $'BlockOverrides.Apply'Length of output: 40
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any new methods or mechanisms related to block overrides. # Test: Search for functions related to block overrides in the codebase. rg --type go 'BlockOverrides' -A 10Length of output: 3285
proto/minievm/evm/v1/genesis.proto (1)
15-25: Issues found with the incomplete removal of thestate_rootfield and potential impact of field reordering.The
state_rootfield is still referenced in thegenesis.pulsar.gofile, indicating that its removal is incomplete. This could lead to inconsistencies in the codebase. Additionally, the reordering of fields in theGenesisStatemessage may impact serialization and deserialization processes, which are critical for system functionality.
api/minievm/evm/v1/genesis.pulsar.go: Multiple references tostate_rootfield.Please ensure that these changes are compatible with the existing system and address any lingering references to the
state_rootfield.Analysis chain
Verify the impact of the removal of the
state_rootfield and reordering of other fields.The removal of the
state_rootfield and reordering of other fields may impact serialization and deserialization. Ensure that these changes are compatible with the existing system.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
state_rootfield and the impact of reordering other fields:Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `state_root` field and the impact of reordering other fields. # Test: Search for the usage of the `state_root` field. Expect: No occurrences of the old field. rg --type proto -A 5 $'state_root' # Test: Search for the usage of the `GenesisState` message. Expect: Ensure compatibility with the existing system. rg --type proto -A 5 $'GenesisState'Length of output: 129
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `state_root` field and the impact of reordering other fields. # Test: Search for the usage of the `state_root` field. Expect: No occurrences of the old field. rg -A 5 'state_root' # Test: Search for the usage of the `GenesisState` message. Expect: Ensure compatibility with the existing system. rg -A 5 'GenesisState'Length of output: 67782
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumintegration-tests/go.sumis excluded by!**/*.sumx/evm/types/genesis.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
Files selected for processing (37)
- app/ibc-hooks/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- app/keepers/keepers.go (1 hunks)
- app/keepers/keys.go (1 hunks)
- client/docs/config.json (1 hunks)
- client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (2 hunks)
- cmd/minitiad/launch.go (2 hunks)
- go.mod (5 hunks)
- integration-tests/go.mod (5 hunks)
- jsonrpc/types/overrides.go (3 hunks)
- proto/minievm/evm/v1/genesis.proto (1 hunks)
- types/const.go (1 hunks)
- x/bank/keeper/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/bank/keeper/grpc_query.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/common_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/context.go (14 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/genesis.go (4 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/genesis_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (5 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_server_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/precompiles.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/query_server.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/state/common_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/state/keys.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/state/snapshot.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/state/state_account.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/state/statedb.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/state/statedb_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/types/errors.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/types/events.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/types/expected_keeper.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/types/genesis.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/types/keys.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- integration-tests/go.mod
- x/evm/keeper/genesis_test.go
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/evm/keeper/query_server.go
[warning] 108-108: x/evm/keeper/query_server.go#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests
[warning] 126-126: x/evm/keeper/query_server.go#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by testsx/evm/keeper/msg_server.go
[warning] 211-211: x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go#L211
Added line #L211 was not covered by tests
[warning] 218-219: x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go#L218-L219
Added lines #L218 - L219 were not covered by tests
[warning] 223-224: x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go#L223-L224
Added lines #L223 - L224 were not covered by testsx/bank/keeper/grpc_query.go
[warning] 196-196: x/bank/keeper/grpc_query.go#L196
Added line #L196 was not covered by testsx/evm/keeper/keeper.go
[warning] 141-141: x/evm/keeper/keeper.go#L141
Added line #L141 was not covered by testsx/evm/keeper/context.go
[warning] 148-149: x/evm/keeper/context.go#L148-L149
Added lines #L148 - L149 were not covered by tests
[warning] 153-154: x/evm/keeper/context.go#L153-L154
Added lines #L153 - L154 were not covered by testsx/evm/state/statedb.go
[warning] 84-85: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L84-L85
Added lines #L84 - L85 were not covered by tests
[warning] 88-89: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L88-L89
Added lines #L88 - L89 were not covered by tests
[warning] 92-93: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L92-L93
Added lines #L92 - L93 were not covered by tests
[warning] 127-127: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L127
Added line #L127 was not covered by tests
[warning] 132-133: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L132-L133
Added lines #L132 - L133 were not covered by tests
[warning] 141-142: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L141-L142
Added lines #L141 - L142 were not covered by tests
[warning] 146-146: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L146
Added line #L146 was not covered by tests
[warning] 151-152: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L151-L152
Added lines #L151 - L152 were not covered by tests
[warning] 160-160: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L160
Added line #L160 was not covered by tests
[warning] 165-166: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L165-L166
Added lines #L165 - L166 were not covered by tests
[warning] 169-170: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L169-L170
Added lines #L169 - L170 were not covered by tests
[warning] 174-174: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L174
Added line #L174 was not covered by tests
[warning] 179-179: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L179
Added line #L179 was not covered by tests
[warning] 189-189: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L189
Added line #L189 was not covered by tests
[warning] 194-194: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L194
Added line #L194 was not covered by tests
[warning] 202-202: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L202
Added line #L202 was not covered by tests
[warning] 206-206: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L206
Added line #L206 was not covered by tests
[warning] 211-211: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L211
Added line #L211 was not covered by tests
[warning] 219-219: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L219
Added line #L219 was not covered by tests
[warning] 232-232: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L232
Added line #L232 was not covered by tests
[warning] 240-240: x/evm/state/statedb.go#L240
Added line #L240 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (94)
client/docs/swagger-ui/swagger.yaml (8)
Line range hint
1-1: New endpointGET /initia/ibchooks/v1/aclsThe endpoint is correctly defined with a clear response schema for ACL entries and pagination.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-1: New endpointGET /initia/ibchooks/v1/acls/{address}The endpoint is correctly defined with a clear response schema for the ACL entry.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-1: New endpointGET /initia/ibchooks/v1/paramsThe endpoint is correctly defined with a clear response schema for the
default_allowedsetting.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-1: New object definitioninitia.ibchooks.v1.ACLThe object definition is correctly defined with clear properties.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-1: New object definitioninitia.ibchooks.v1.ParamsThe object definition is correctly defined with clear properties.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-1: New object definitioninitia.ibchooks.v1.QueryACLResponseThe object definition is correctly defined with clear properties.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-1: New object definitioninitia.ibchooks.v1.QueryACLsResponseThe object definition is correctly defined with clear properties.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
1-1: New object definitioninitia.ibchooks.v1.QueryParamsResponseThe object definition is correctly defined with clear properties.
The code changes are approved.
types/const.go (1)
5-5: LGTM! But verify the constant usage in the codebase.The constant value is correctly updated. However, ensure that all references to
BaseDenomare updated accordingly.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the constant usage:
Verification successful
All references to
BaseDenomare correctly updated. The constant is used in several files, and all references are consistent with the updated value"GAS". No further changes are necessary.
cmd/minitiad/launch.go:denom = types.BaseDenomcmd/minitiad/init.go:cmd.Flags().String(FlagDenom, minitiatypes.BaseDenom, "genesis file default denom")cmd/minitiad/config.go:srvCfg.MinGasPrices = fmt.Sprintf("0%s", types.BaseDenom)Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `BaseDenom` are updated accordingly. # Test: Search for the constant usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new value. rg --type go 'BaseDenom'Length of output: 354
x/evm/state/snapshot.go (3)
9-12: LGTM!The struct is correctly defined with necessary fields.
The code changes are approved.
14-21: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
23-25: LGTM!The method is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
x/evm/types/genesis.go (2)
6-10: Verify the impact of removing theStateRootassignment.The
DefaultGenesisfunction no longer sets theStateRoottocoretypes.EmptyRootHash[:]. Ensure that this change does not introduce any unintended side effects.Run the following script to verify the impact of removing the
StateRootassignment:
20-22: Verify the impact of removing theStateRootvalidation.The
Validatemethod no longer checks the length ofStateRootor compares it tocoretypes.EmptyRootHash. Ensure that this change aligns with the expected structure or requirements of the genesis state.Run the following script to verify the impact of removing the
StateRootvalidation:x/evm/types/events.go (1)
9-9: Verify the usage of the new constant.The new constant
EventTypeContractCreatedenhances the functionality by allowing for the identification of contract creation events. Ensure that this addition does not introduce any unintended side effects.Run the following script to verify the usage of the new constant:
Verification successful
Usage of
EventTypeContractCreatedis appropriate.The constant
EventTypeContractCreatedis used correctly in the event emission process for contract creation, aligning with its intended functionality. No unintended side effects were found.
- Location:
x/evm/state/statedb.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new constant `EventTypeContractCreated`. # Test: Search for the constant usage. Expect: No unintended side effects. rg --type go 'EventTypeContractCreated'Length of output: 168
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract surrounding lines of code where `EventTypeContractCreated` is used in `x/evm/state/statedb.go`. rg --type go --context 5 'EventTypeContractCreated' x/evm/state/statedb.goLength of output: 421
x/evm/state/state_account.go (4)
12-17: LGTM!The function correctly initializes a
StateAccountwith default values.The code changes are approved.
19-21: LGTM!The function correctly checks if the
StateAccountis empty.The code changes are approved.
23-29: LGTM!The function correctly serializes the
StateAccountto a byte slice.The code changes are approved.
31-35: LGTM!The function correctly deserializes a byte slice to a
StateAccount.The code changes are approved.
jsonrpc/types/overrides.go (1)
Line range hint
12-12: Verify the impact of the removal of theApplymethod forStateOverride.The removal of the
Applymethod suggests a change in how state overrides are applied. Ensure that the functionality is not broken and that the new mechanism for applying state overrides is correctly implemented.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
Applymethod forStateOverride:x/evm/state/keys.go (7)
16-18: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for key generation.
The code changes are approved.
20-22: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for key generation.
The code changes are approved.
24-26: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for key generation.
The code changes are approved.
28-30: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for key generation.
The code changes are approved.
32-34: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for key generation.
The code changes are approved.
36-39: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for byte conversion.
The code changes are approved.
42-44: LGTM!The function is correctly implemented and follows best practices for byte conversion.
The code changes are approved.
proto/minievm/evm/v1/genesis.proto (3)
Line range hint
28-31: LGTM!The message is correctly defined and follows best practices for protobuf messages.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
34-37: LGTM!The message is correctly defined and follows best practices for protobuf messages.
The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
40-43: LGTM!The message is correctly defined and follows best practices for protobuf messages.
The code changes are approved.
cmd/minitiad/launch.go (1)
54-58: LGTM!The conditional check for converting "umin" to
types.BaseDenomenhances the functionality by providing specific handling for a known denomination.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/precompiles.go (1)
67-73: LGTM!The function
toAddrsis correctly implemented and enhances the functionality of theprecompilesstruct by providing a convenient way to retrieve all associated addresses.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/types/keys.go (9)
24-24: LGTM!The constant
TransientVMStorePrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient VM store.The code changes are approved.
25-25: LGTM!The constant
TransientExecIndexPrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient execution index.The code changes are approved.
26-26: LGTM!The constant
TransientCreatedPrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient created accounts.The code changes are approved.
27-27: LGTM!The constant
TransientSelfDestructPrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient self-destruct accounts.The code changes are approved.
28-28: LGTM!The constant
TransientLogsPrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient logs.The code changes are approved.
29-29: LGTM!The constant
TransientLogSizePrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient log size.The code changes are approved.
30-30: LGTM!The constant
TransientAccessListPrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient access list.The code changes are approved.
31-31: LGTM!The constant
TransientRefundPrefixis correctly defined and enhances the functionality by providing a prefix for transient refund.The code changes are approved.
43-43: Verify the change in byte value.The change in byte value for
ERC20FactoryAddrKeyfrom0x71to0x61might affect how the contract interacts with the associated storage. Ensure that this change is intentional and does not break any existing functionality.Run the following script to verify the usage of
ERC20FactoryAddrKey:x/evm/types/errors.go (1)
35-35: LGTM!The addition of
ErrInvalidFeeDenomenhances error handling for invalid fee denominations and follows the existing pattern for error definitions.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/types/expected_keeper.go (1)
23-23: LGTM!The addition of
RemoveAccountmethod enhances theAccountKeeperinterface by providing a mechanism to delete accounts. Ensure that all implementations ofAccountKeeperinclude logic for account removal.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/genesis.go (3)
60-60: LGTM!The modification to check if the
KeyValuesslice is empty instead of the state root simplifies the initialization process.The code changes are approved.
60-66: LGTM!The removal of code that sets the
VMRootwith theStateRootsimplifies the control flow and logic surrounding state management.The code changes are approved.
60-66: LGTM!The removal of code that retrieves the
stateRootfromVMRootsimplifies the genesis export process by removing dependencies on the state root.The code changes are approved.
app/keepers/keys.go (1)
60-60: LGTM!The addition of
evmtypes.TStoreKeytoNewTransientStoreKeysenhances the key generation logic to handle a broader range of transient store keys.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/query_server.go (2)
108-108: LGTM!The use of
NewStateDBwith additional parameters enhances the initialization of the state database, potentially improving its configuration or access.The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 108-108: x/evm/keeper/query_server.go#L108
Added line #L108 was not covered by tests
126-126: LGTM!The use of
NewStateDBwith additional parameters enhances the initialization of the state database, potentially improving its configuration or access.The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 126-126: x/evm/keeper/query_server.go#L126
Added line #L126 was not covered by testsclient/docs/config.json (1)
149-156: LGTM!The addition of the new entry for the IBCHooks API endpoint enhances the API's documentation and operational clarity.
The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/msg_server_test.go (3)
141-149: LGTM!The test case correctly ensures that unsupported fee denominations are rejected.
The code changes are approved.
163-177: LGTM!The test case correctly ensures that fee denominations without
sudoMintandsudoBurncapabilities are rejected.The code changes are approved.
162-162: LGTM!The test case correctly ensures that fee denominations without
sudoMintandsudoBurncapabilities are rejected.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (1)
111-116: LGTM!The modification ensures that the signature bytes are correctly constructed and zero-padded.
The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (2)
Line range hint
76-119: LGTM! Verify the initialization of new transient fields.The initialization of the new transient fields occurs within the constructor. Ensure that the transient data structures are properly set up during the instantiation of the
Keeper.Run the following script to verify the initialization of the new transient fields:
Verification successful
Initialization of Transient Fields Verified: The transient fields in the
NewKeeperfunction are properly initialized using the appropriatecollectionsmethods. The setup of transient data structures during instantiation appears to be correctly implemented.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization of new transient fields in the constructor. # Test: Search for the initialization of the new fields. Expect: Proper initialization. rg --type go 'collections.NewMap|collections.NewKeySet|collections.NewSequence' -A 5Length of output: 5515
45-55: LGTM! Verify the usage of new transient storage fields.The addition of transient storage fields enhances the functionality of the
Keeperstruct. Ensure that the new fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of the new transient storage fields:
Verification successful
Transient storage fields are correctly initialized and used.
The transient storage fields in the
Keeperstruct are properly initialized with appropriate prefixes and codecs. They are also used incontext.go, indicating integration into the broader system.
- Initialization is done in
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go.- Prefixes are defined in
x/evm/types/keys.go.- Usage is evident in
x/evm/keeper/context.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new transient storage fields in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the new fields. Expect: Proper initialization and usage. rg --type go 'TransientVMStore|TransientLogs|TransientLogSize|TransientRefund|TransientCreated|TransientSelfDestruct|TransientAccessList|TransientExecIndex'Length of output: 3495
x/evm/keeper/common_test.go (1)
190-195: LGTM! Verify the integration of transient store services.The addition of transient store keys enhances the testing capabilities. Ensure that the transient store services are properly integrated into the application context.
Run the following script to verify the integration of transient store services:
Also applies to: 262-262
Verification successful
Integration of Transient Store Services Verified
The transient store services are properly integrated into the application context across various modules. The consistent use of
NewTransientStoreKeysandNewTransientStoreServiceconfirms the correct setup. No issues found in the integration process.
- Verified in files such as
x/evm/state/common_test.go,x/evm/keeper/common_test.go,x/bank/keeper/common_test.go, andapp/ibc-hooks/common_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of transient store services in the test setup. # Test: Search for the integration of transient store services. Expect: Proper integration. rg --type go 'NewTransientStoreService|NewTransientStoreKeys' -A 5Length of output: 3732
x/bank/keeper/common_test.go (2)
302-302: LGTM!The transient store service is correctly initialized for the EVM keeper.
The code changes are approved.
230-235: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The transient store keys are correctly introduced and mounted. Ensure that all function calls to
_createTestInputpass the newtkeysparameter correctly.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the function usage:
x/evm/state/common_test.go (1)
1-316: LGTM!The new file and its functions are well-structured and follow best practices for setting up the test environment for the EVM module.
The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/context.go (6)
28-37: LGTM!The
NewStateDBfunction is correctly implemented and enhances the state management for the EVM context.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
53-112: LGTM!The changes to
buildBlockContextensure that the fee contract is appropriately utilized during EVM calls, enhancing the robustness of the contract execution process.The code changes are approved.
140-170: LGTM!The changes to
CreateEVMenhance the EVM context management by integrating the fee contract, improving the overall robustness of the contract execution process.The code changes are approved.
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 148-149: x/evm/keeper/context.go#L148-L149
Added lines #L148 - L149 were not covered by tests
[warning] 153-154: x/evm/keeper/context.go#L153-L154
Added lines #L153 - L154 were not covered by tests
Line range hint
231-266: LGTM!The changes to
EVMCallWithTracerensure that the newCreateEVMmethod is utilized, enhancing the functionality related to state management and contract interactions.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
318-363: LGTM!The changes to
EVMCreateWithTracerensure that the newCreateEVMmethod is utilized, enhancing the functionality related to state management and contract interactions.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
404-409: LGTM!The changes to
NextContractAddressensure that the newNewStateDBmethod is utilized, enhancing the functionality related to state management and contract interactions.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (1)
91-106: Add comments for clarity.The test function is correctly implemented but lacks comments explaining the test steps. Adding comments will improve readability and maintainability.
func Test_BalanceOf(t *testing.T) { ctx, input := createDefaultTestInput(t) // Generate two addresses _, _, addr := keyPubAddr() _, _, addr2 := keyPubAddr() // Fund the first address with 100 units of "foo" input.Faucet.Fund(ctx, addr, sdk.NewCoin("foo", math.NewInt(100))) // Check the balance of the first address amount, err := input.EVMKeeper.ERC20Keeper().GetBalance(ctx, addr, "foo") require.NoError(t, err) require.Equal(t, math.NewInt(100), amount) // Check the balance of the second address amount, err = input.EVMKeeper.ERC20Keeper().GetBalance(ctx, addr2, "foo") require.NoError(t, err) require.Equal(t, math.NewInt(0), amount) }go.mod (6)
36-36: LGTM!The update from
v1.3.0tov1.3.1forgithub.com/holiman/uint256is a minor version update, likely including bug fixes or minor improvements.The code changes are approved.
76-76: LGTM!The update from
v1.12.1tov1.12.2forgithub.com/VictoriaMetrics/fastcacheis a minor version update, likely including bug fixes or minor improvements.The code changes are approved.
110-110: LGTM!The update from
v0.0.0-20231025140028-3c0104f4b233tov0.0.0-20240223125850-b1e8a79f509cforgithub.com/crate-crypto/go-ipais a significant version update, likely including substantial updates or changes in functionality.The code changes are approved.
126-126: LGTM!The addition of
github.com/ethereum/go-verkleat versionv0.1.1-0.20240306133620-7d920df305f0is likely introduced to provide new functionality.The code changes are approved.
126-126: LGTM!The removal of
github.com/gballet/go-verkleis likely due to it being replaced bygithub.com/ethereum/go-verkle.The code changes are approved.
286-286: LGTM!The update for the replacement directive of
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereumto point to a new version ofgithub.com/initia-labs/evmis likely to include important changes or improvements in theevmmodule.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/keeper/erc20.go (1)
333-333: LGTM!The change from
nextContractAddresstoNextContractAddressaligns with Go's idiomatic practices for exported functions. Ensure that the method is correctly implemented and that the change does not introduce any issues.The code changes are approved.
app/ibc-hooks/common_test.go (2)
230-235: LGTM!The transient store keys are correctly introduced and mounted.
The code changes are approved.
310-310: LGTM!The transient store service is correctly integrated into the application codec setup.
The code changes are approved.
x/evm/state/statedb_test.go (8)
23-110: LGTM!The
Test_SnapshotRevertfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various state changes before and after reverting to the snapshot.The code changes are approved.
112-128: LGTM!The
Test_SimpleSnapshotRevertfunction is correctly implemented and verifies refunds before and after reverting to the snapshot.The code changes are approved.
130-142: LGTM!The
Test_GetStroageRoot_NonEmptyStatefunction is correctly implemented and verifies the storage root for a non-empty state.The code changes are approved.
144-160: LGTM!The
Test_GetStorageRoot_NonEmptyCosmosAccountfunction is correctly implemented and verifies the storage root for a non-empty Cosmos account.The code changes are approved.
162-225: LGTM!The
Test_SelfDestructfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various state changes before and after self-destruct.The code changes are approved.
227-280: LGTM!The
Test_Selfdestruct6780_InDifferentTxfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various state changes before and after self-destruct in different transactions.The code changes are approved.
282-334: LGTM!The
Test_Selfdestruct6780_InSameTxfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various state changes before and after self-destruct in the same transaction.The code changes are approved.
336-368: LGTM!The
Test_Emptyfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various state changes for empty and non-empty states.The code changes are approved.
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract_test.go (9)
Line range hint
38-78: LGTM!The
Test_CosmosPrecompile_IsBlockedAddressfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for blocked and non-blocked addresses.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
80-120: LGTM!The
Test_CosmosPrecompile_IsModuleAddressfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for module and non-module addresses.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
122-162: LGTM!The
Test_CosmosPrecompile_ToCosmosAddressfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for conversion to Cosmos address.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
164-204: LGTM!The
Test_CosmosPrecompile_ToEVMAddressfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for conversion to EVM address.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
206-276: LGTM!The
Test_ExecuteCosmosfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for successful and unauthorized executions.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
278-328: LGTM!The
Test_QueryCosmosfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for successful queries.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
330-370: LGTM!The
Test_ToDenomfunction is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for conversion to denom.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
372-412: LGTM!The
Test_ToErc20function is correctly implemented and verifies various scenarios for conversion to ERC20 address.The code changes are approved.
482-486: LGTM!The
RemoveAccountmethod is correctly implemented and handles the account removal from theaccountsmap.The code changes are approved.
app/keepers/keepers.go (1)
552-552: Verify the initialization and usage of the transient store key.Ensure that
appKeepers.tkeys[evmtypes.TStoreKey]is correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.Run the following script to verify the initialization and usage of the transient store key:
Verification successful
Initialization and usage of the transient store key are correct.
The transient store key
evmtypes.TStoreKeyis properly initialized inapp/keepers/keys.gousingstoretypes.NewTransientStoreKeys. This ensures its correct usage in theNewAppKeeperfunction.
- Initialization found in
app/keepers/keys.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the initialization and usage of the transient store key. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of the transient store key. Expect: Correct initialization and usage. rg --type go 'appKeepers\.tkeys\[evmtypes\.TStoreKey\]'Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the initialization of appKeepers.tkeys to verify if evmtypes.TStoreKey is included. # Test: Search for the initialization of appKeepers.tkeys. Expect: Initialization including evmtypes.TStoreKey. rg --type go 'appKeepers\.tkeys\s*=' -A 5Length of output: 416
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (3 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go
[warning] 214-215: x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go#L214-L215
Added lines #L214 - L215 were not covered by tests
[warning] 219-220: x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go#L219-L220
Added lines #L219 - L220 were not covered by tests
[warning] 224-225: x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go#L224-L225
Added lines #L224 - L225 were not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (2)
x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
5-8: LGTM!The new imports are necessary for the added functionality.
The code changes are approved.
186-194: Improve error handling.Provide more context in the error messages to improve debugging.
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
err := ms.testFeeDenom(cacheCtx, msg.Params) if err != nil { return nil, sdkerrors.Wrap(err, "failed to validate fee denomination") }Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Documentation