fix: support accesslist type tx and handle rpc transaction #73
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to multiple test files and the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (30)
proto/minievm/evm/v1/types.proto (1)
63-70: LGTM! Consider enhancing comments for clarity.The new
AccessTuplemessage is well-structured and appropriately integrated into the file. The field types are suitable for representing Ethereum access lists.To improve clarity, consider adding a brief explanation of the purpose of access lists in Ethereum transactions. For example:
message AccessTuple { + // AccessTuple represents a list of addresses and storage keys that a transaction plans to access. + // This information can be used to optimize gas costs in Ethereum transactions. + // Address of the contract that will be accessed during the transaction execution. string address = 1; // A list of storage keys that the transaction will interact with within the specified contract. // These keys represent specific storage slots in the contract's storage that are accessed or modified. repeated string storage_keys = 2; }app/ibc-hooks/timeout_test.go (3)
51-51: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for the new parameter.The addition of the
nilparameter aligns with the updatedEVMCreatemethod signature. To improve code readability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new parameter and why it's set tonilin this context.
84-84: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for consistency.The addition of the
nilparameter aligns with the updatedEVMCallmethod signature. For consistency with the previous suggestion, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new parameter and why it's set tonilin this context.
139-139: LGTM. Consider adding comments for consistency.The changes to
EVMCreateandEVMCallmethod calls in theTest_onTimeoutPacket_memo_ICS721function are consistent with the previous modifications in the file. For consistency, consider adding comments explaining the purpose of the newnilparameters in both method calls.Also applies to: 172-172
proto/minievm/evm/v1/tx.proto (1)
45-46: LGTM! Consider enhancing the comment for clarity.The addition of the
access_listfield to theMsgCreatemessage is well-implemented and aligns with Ethereum's EIP-2930. The field is correctly defined as repeated and non-nullable.Consider enhancing the comment for better clarity:
- // AccessList is a predefined list of Ethereum addresses and their corresponding storage slots that a transaction will interact with during its execution. can be none + // AccessList is an optional list of Ethereum addresses and their corresponding storage slots that the transaction will access. + // It's used to reduce gas costs for transactions that specify their access patterns in advance.x/evm/keeper/msg_server_test.go (1)
Line range hint
86-115: Summary of changesThe modifications in this file involve adding an extra
nilparameter toEVMCreateandEVMCallfunction calls. These changes appear to be part of a broader update to the EVM keeper's interface, potentially related to the introduction of access list type transactions mentioned in the PR objectives.While the changes are consistent within this file, it's crucial to ensure that they align with the corresponding updates in the
keeper.gofile and other related components of the system. The impact of these changes should be carefully considered, especially in terms of backwards compatibility and any potential effects on existing functionality.Consider the following:
- Ensure that all calls to
EVMCreateandEVMCallthroughout the codebase have been updated to include the new parameter.- Update any documentation or comments related to these methods to reflect the new parameter and its purpose.
- If the new parameter is intended to support access list type transactions, consider adding test cases that specifically cover this functionality.
x/evm/keeper/precompiles_test.go (2)
82-82: Approve the change and suggest a refactor for better readability.The modification to
EVMCallis consistent with the previous change. However, to improve code readability and maintainability, consider refactoring thenilparameters into named variables or constants.Consider refactoring the
EVMCallinvocation as follows:const ( noGasLimit = nil noAccessList = nil ) retBz, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, evmAddr, types.CosmosPrecompileAddress, inputBz, noGasLimit, noAccessList)This refactoring would make the purpose of each
nilparameter more explicit and easier to understand.
162-162: Approve the change and reinforce consistent naming suggestion.The modification to
EVMCallis consistent with the previous changes.To maintain consistency across the entire file, please apply the previously suggested refactoring:
const ( noGasLimit = nil noAccessList = nil ) retBz, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, evmAddr, types.CosmosPrecompileAddress, inputBz, noGasLimit, noAccessList)This will improve code readability and make the purpose of each
nilparameter more explicit.x/evm/keeper/context_test.go (7)
31-31: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the extra
nilparameter toEVMCreateis consistent with the updated method signature. However, it might be helpful to add a comment explaining the purpose of this new parameter for better code readability.Consider adding a comment like this:
// nil is passed for the new 'extra' parameter as it's not needed for this test case retBz, contractAddr, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCreate(ctx, caller, counterBz, nil, nil)
56-56: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the two extra
nilparameters toEVMCreateWithTraceris consistent with the updated method signature. However, it might be helpful to add a comment explaining the purpose of these new parameters for better code readability.Consider adding a comment like this:
// nil values are passed for the new 'extra' and 'additional' parameters as they're not needed for this test case retBz, contractAddr, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCreateWithTracer(ctx, caller, counterBz, uint256.NewInt(100), nil, nil, tracer)
78-78: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for consistency.The addition of the extra
nilparameter toEVMCreateis consistent with the updated method signature. For consistency with the previous suggestions, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new parameter.Consider adding a comment like this:
// nil is passed for the new 'extra' parameter as it's not needed for this test case retBz, contractAddr, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCreate(ctx, caller, counterBz, nil, nil)
89-89: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the extra
nilparameter toEVMCallis consistent with the updated method signature. To maintain consistency and improve code readability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new parameter.Consider adding a comment like this:
// nil is passed for the new 'extra' parameter as it's not needed for this test case queryRes, logs, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, caller, contractAddr, queryInputBz, nil, nil)
98-98: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for consistency.The addition of the extra
nilparameter toEVMCallis consistent with the updated method signature. For consistency with the previous suggestions, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new parameter.Consider adding a comment like this:
// nil is passed for the new 'extra' parameter as it's not needed for this test case res, logs, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, caller, contractAddr, inputBz, uint256.NewInt(100), nil)
108-108: LGTM. Consider adding comments for consistency.The addition of the extra
nilparameter toEVMCallandEVMCreatemethod calls is consistent across all instances. To maintain consistency and improve code readability, consider adding comments explaining the purpose of this new parameter for each of these calls.For each of these method calls, consider adding a comment like this:
// nil is passed for the new 'extra' parameter as it's not needed for this test caseAlso applies to: 120-120, 135-135, 158-158, 167-167, 176-176, 185-185
Line range hint
1-189: Overall LGTM. Consider adding a global comment explaining the new parameter.The changes in this file consistently add an extra
nilparameter toEVMCreate,EVMCreateWithTracer, andEVMCallmethod calls, which aligns with the updated method signatures mentioned in the summary. While the changes themselves are correct, consider adding a global comment at the beginning of the file explaining the purpose of this new parameter and why it's set tonilin these test cases. This would improve code readability and make it easier for other developers to understand the context of these changes.Consider adding a comment at the beginning of the file like this:
// Note: All EVMCreate, EVMCreateWithTracer, and EVMCall method calls in this file include an additional // 'extra' parameter (set to nil) to align with updated method signatures. This parameter is not used // in these test cases but may be utilized in other scenarios.app/ibc-hooks/ack_test.go (4)
54-54: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of the
nilparameter toEVMCreatealigns with the updated method signature. This change is correct and necessary for the new access list feature.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the new parameter, e.g.:
// nil parameter added for access list (can be updated with actual access list in future tests) _, contractAddr, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCreate(ctx, evmAddr, codeBz, nil, nil)
90-91: LGTM. Consider adding a comment for consistency.The addition of the
nilparameter toEVMCallis correct and aligns with the updated method signature.For consistency with the previous suggestion, consider adding a brief comment here as well:
// nil parameter added for access list (can be updated with actual access list in future tests) queryRes, logs, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, evmAddr, contractAddr, queryInputBz, nil, nil)
105-107: LGTM. Maintain comment consistency.The update to
EVMCallis correct and consistent with previous changes.For consistency, add the same comment as suggested for the previous
EVMCall:// nil parameter added for access list (can be updated with actual access list in future tests) queryRes, logs, err = input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, evmAddr, contractAddr, queryInputBz, nil, nil)
117-117: LGTM. Ensure comment consistency across all instances.All instances of
EVMCallandEVMCreatehave been correctly updated with the newnilparameter, maintaining consistency across different test cases.For completeness and consistency, add the suggested comment to all these instances:
// nil parameter added for access list (can be updated with actual access list in future tests)Also applies to: 160-160, 200-200, 215-215, 227-227
app/ibc-hooks/receive_test.go (3)
55-55: LGTM. Consider updating documentation.The addition of the
nilparameter toEVMCreatealigns with the updated method signature. This change appears correct and consistent with the modifications described in the AI summary.Consider updating the documentation for the
EVMCreatemethod to reflect the new parameter, if not already done.
225-226: LGTM. Note the change in return values.The addition of the
nilparameter toEVMCallis correct and aligns with the updated method signature.Note that the method now returns three values instead of two, with the addition of
logs. Ensure this change is intentional and documented appropriately.
Line range hint
1-334: Overall LGTM. Consider documentation updates and verifyEVMCallchanges.The changes in this file consistently update the method calls to
EVMCreate,EVMStaticCall, andEVMCallby adding anilparameter, aligning with the updated method signatures mentioned in the AI summary. These modifications appear to be part of a broader update to support new functionality, possibly related to access lists as mentioned in the PR objectives.
- Consider updating the documentation for these methods to reflect the new
extra *ExtraTypeparameter and its usage.- Verify that the change in return values for
EVMCall(now includinglogs) is intentional and properly documented, as this wasn't mentioned in the AI summary.- If not already done, consider adding test cases that utilize non-nil values for the new parameter to ensure proper functionality.
x/evm/keeper/erc721.go (1)
Line range hint
1-408: Summary of changes and recommendations for ERC721 keeper implementation.The changes in this file consistently add a
nilparameter to various EVM-related function calls (EVMCreate,EVMCall, andEVMStaticCall). This pattern suggests a systematic update to support access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions, as mentioned in the PR objectives.To ensure the correctness and robustness of these changes, consider the following recommendations:
- Update unit tests to cover the new parameter in all affected functions.
- Review and update documentation for the
ERC721Keeperand its methods to reflect the changes in function signatures.- Implement integration tests to verify the correct handling of access lists in various ERC721 operations.
- Consider adding error handling or validation for the new parameter, if necessary.
- Update any external interfaces or clients that may be affected by these changes.
To maintain code quality and ensure proper implementation of the new feature:
- Create a separate test file for access list related functionality in ERC721 operations.
- Consider abstracting the access list handling into a separate helper function or middleware to promote code reusability and maintainability.
- Update the project's documentation to explain the purpose and usage of access lists in the context of ERC721 token operations.
#!/bin/bash # Check for existing tests related to access lists grep -n "accesslist" $(find . -name "*_test.go") # Verify if documentation has been updated grep -n "accesslist" $(find . -name "*.md")integration-tests/erc721_transfer_test.go (3)
138-138: LGTM. Consider adding a test case with a non-nil access list.The addition of the
nilparameter toevmKeeper.EVMCreatealigns with the PR objective of supporting JSON RPC access list type transactions. However, this test case doesn't exercise the new functionality.Consider adding a test case that uses a non-nil access list to ensure the new functionality is properly tested.
169-169: LGTM. Consider adding a test case with a non-nil access list.The addition of the
nilparameter tonftKeeper.EVMCallis consistent with the changes made to support JSON RPC access list type transactions. However, like the previous case, this test doesn't exercise the new functionality.To ensure comprehensive testing, consider adding a test case that uses a non-nil access list for the
EVMCallfunction.
Line range hint
1-424: Consider enhancing test coverage for access list functionalityThe changes made to
CreateNftClassandMintNftmethods are consistent with the PR objective of adding support for JSON RPC access list type transactions. However, the current test suite doesn't actively test this new functionality as all calls usenilfor the access list parameter.To ensure robust testing of the new feature:
- Add test cases that use non-nil access lists in both
EVMCreateandEVMCallfunction calls.- Include tests that verify the behavior with both valid and invalid access lists.
- Consider adding specific tests for the JSON RPC interface to ensure it correctly handles access list type transactions.
These additions would significantly improve the test coverage and help validate the new functionality.
x/evm/keeper/erc20.go (1)
Line range hint
1-534: Summary of changes and request for documentation.The modifications in this file consistently add a
nilparameter toEVMCallandEVMStaticCallmethod calls. These changes appear to be related to the access list feature mentioned in the PR objectives. To ensure clarity and maintainability:
- Please provide comprehensive documentation explaining the purpose of these changes and their relationship to the access list feature.
- Update the function comments to reflect the new parameter and its usage.
- Consider adding examples of how to use these methods with non-nil access lists, if applicable.
x/evm/state/statedb_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-416: Summary of changes to EVMCreate and EVMCall method callsThroughout this file,
nilparameters have been added to allEVMCreateandEVMCallmethod calls. These changes are consistent with the updated method signatures mentioned in the AI-generated summary. While the modifications themselves are straightforward, it's crucial to ensure that:
- Passing
nilfor the newopts *Optionsparameter doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.- The test coverage remains comprehensive, considering the new parameter.
- Any logic depending on the new
opts *Optionsparameter is properly tested, including cases where it's notnil.Consider adding additional test cases that:
- Pass non-nil
opts *OptionstoEVMCreateandEVMCall.- Verify the behavior when different values are set in the
opts *Optionsstruct.- Ensure that the
nilvalue is handled gracefully in the implementation ofEVMCreateandEVMCall.x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (2)
215-223: Simplify Signature Bytes CreationThe manual copying of
randsbytes intosigBytescan be simplified using existing utilities to reduce complexity and potential errors.Consider using the
crypto.PubkeyToAddressorcrypto.SignatureBytesutility functions if available.- sigBytes := make([]byte, 65) - copy(sigBytes[32-len(r.Bytes()):32], r.Bytes()) - copy(sigBytes[64-len(s.Bytes()):64], s.Bytes()) - sigBytes[64] = byte(v.Uint64()) + sigBytes := append(r.Bytes(), s.Bytes()...) + sigBytes = append(sigBytes, byte(v.Uint64()))
227-229: Error Handling: Missing Checks After Converting Ethereum TransactionAfter calling
EqualEthTransaction, consider checking for any differences in fields that might not be covered by the helper function. This ensures all aspects of the conversion are validated.Add assertions to verify all relevant fields are correctly converted.
require.Equal(t, signedTx.Hash(), ethTx2.Hash())
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
x/evm/types/tx.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.gox/evm/types/types.pb.gois excluded by!**/*.pb.go
📒 Files selected for processing (20)
- app/ibc-hooks/ack_test.go (8 hunks)
- app/ibc-hooks/receive_test.go (9 hunks)
- app/ibc-hooks/timeout_test.go (6 hunks)
- integration-tests/erc721_transfer_test.go (2 hunks)
- proto/minievm/evm/v1/tx.proto (3 hunks)
- proto/minievm/evm/v1/types.proto (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/context.go (6 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/context_test.go (12 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20.go (9 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20_stores_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (9 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/erc721.go (8 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/genesis.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (6 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_server_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/precompiles_test.go (6 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/query_server.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (7 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/state/statedb_test.go (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (58)
x/evm/keeper/erc20_stores_test.go (1)
28-28: LGTM. Verify consistency across the codebase.The addition of the
nilparameter to theEVMCreatemethod call aligns with the PR objective of adding support for JSON RPC access list type transactions. This change doesn't affect the logic of the test function itself.To ensure consistency, let's verify that this change has been applied to all
EVMCreatemethod calls across the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Change Verified and Consistent Across Codebase
All instances of the
EVMCreatemethod now include the newnilparameter, ensuring consistency with the PR objective of supporting JSON RPC access list type transactions.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistency in EVMCreate method calls # Search for EVMCreate method calls rg --type go 'EVMCreate\(' -A 1 # The output should show all EVMCreate calls. # Manually review to ensure they all have the new parameter (either nil or a valid access list).Length of output: 4121
x/evm/keeper/genesis.go (1)
30-30: LGTM. Verify EVMCreate2 implementation and update documentation if needed.The addition of the
nilparameter to theEVMCreate2method call aligns with the PR objective of adding support for JSON RPC access list type transactions. This change appears to be part of a broader update to the EVM-related methods.To ensure consistency and proper implementation, please run the following verification steps:
Consider updating the documentation for the
EVMCreate2method to reflect the new parameter and its purpose, if not already done.app/ibc-hooks/timeout_test.go (2)
99-99: LGTM. Consistent with previous change.This change is consistent with the previous
EVMCallmodification. Please refer to the earlier comment regarding adding an explanatory comment for the new parameter.
51-51: Consider a broader consistency check across the codebase.The changes in this file consistently update the
EVMCreateandEVMCallmethod calls to include an additionalnilparameter, aligning with the new method signatures. While these changes don't alter the core functionality of the tests, it's important to ensure that similar updates have been made consistently across the entire codebase where these methods are used.To maintain consistency and prevent potential issues:
- Conduct a codebase-wide search for all occurrences of
EVMCreateandEVMCall.- Ensure that all calls to these methods have been updated with the new parameter.
- Add explanatory comments for the new parameter where appropriate.
This will help prevent any potential runtime errors and maintain code consistency.
To assist in verifying the consistency of these changes across the codebase, you can run the following script:
Also applies to: 84-84, 99-99, 139-139, 172-172, 187-187
✅ Verification successful
Consistency Across Codebase Verified
The codebase-wide search for
EVMCreateandEVMCallmethod calls confirms that all usages have been updated with the new parameters, aligning with the updated method signatures. No inconsistencies were found, ensuring maintained codebase consistency.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for inconsistent usage of EVMCreate and EVMCall methods # Search for EVMCreate and EVMCall method calls echo "Searching for EVMCreate method calls:" rg --type go 'EVMCreate\s*\([^)]*\)' -g '!*_test.go' echo "\nSearching for EVMCall method calls:" rg --type go 'EVMCall\s*\([^)]*\)' -g '!*_test.go' # Note: This script excludes test files to avoid false positives from the changes we've already reviewed. # The results should be manually inspected to ensure all calls have the correct number of arguments.Length of output: 1756
x/evm/keeper/query_server.go (3)
84-86: Changes align with PR objectivesThe modifications to
EVMCreateWithTracerandEVMCallWithTracerfunction calls, adding a newnilparameter, are consistent with the PR objective of adding support for JSON RPC access list type transactions.These changes suggest that:
- The underlying functions have been updated to potentially handle access lists.
- In this specific context (the
Callmethod), access lists are not being used (hence thenilvalue).- The infrastructure for supporting access list type transactions is being put in place.
Please ensure that appropriate documentation and tests have been added to cover this new functionality.
86-86: Verify the new parameter inEVMCallWithTracerA
nilparameter has been added to theEVMCallWithTracerfunction call. This change suggests a modification in the function signature.Please ensure that:
- This change is consistent with the
EVMCallWithTracerfunction definition.- The change is documented in the function's documentation.
- Similar changes have been made in other parts of the codebase where
EVMCallWithTraceris called.Run the following script to verify the function usage and definition:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage and definition of EVMCallWithTracer # Test 1: Search for the function definition echo "EVMCallWithTracer function definition:" rg --type go -A 5 'func.*EVMCallWithTracer' # Test 2: Search for other usages of the function echo "\nOther usages of EVMCallWithTracer:" rg --type go 'EVMCallWithTracer'
84-84: Verify the new parameter inEVMCreateWithTracerA
nilparameter has been added to theEVMCreateWithTracerfunction call. This change suggests a modification in the function signature.Please ensure that:
- This change is consistent with the
EVMCreateWithTracerfunction definition.- The change is documented in the function's documentation.
- Similar changes have been made in other parts of the codebase where
EVMCreateWithTraceris called.Run the following script to verify the function usage and definition:
proto/minievm/evm/v1/tx.proto (3)
84-86: LGTM! Consider applying the same comment enhancement as suggested for MsgCreate.The addition of the
access_listfield to theMsgCreate2message is consistent with the changes made toMsgCreateand is well-implemented.Please apply the same comment enhancement as suggested for the
access_listfield in theMsgCreatemessage to maintain consistency and clarity across the file.
125-127: LGTM! Consider comment enhancement and verify AccessTuple type.The addition of the
access_listfield to theMsgCallmessage is consistent with the changes made toMsgCreateandMsgCreate2and is well-implemented.Please apply the same comment enhancement as suggested for the
access_listfield in theMsgCreatemessage to maintain consistency and clarity across the file.Ensure that the
AccessTupletype is properly defined in the codebase. Run the following script to verify:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definition of AccessTuple type # Test: Search for the AccessTuple type definition rg --type proto 'message AccessTuple'If the
AccessTupletype is not found, it needs to be defined or imported from the appropriate protobuf file.
Line range hint
1-165: Summary: Changes are well-implemented, with minor suggestions for improvement.The addition of the
access_listfield toMsgCreate,MsgCreate2, andMsgCallmessages is consistent and aligns with Ethereum's EIP-2930. The implementation is correct and maintains consistency across the file.Next steps:
- Enhance the comments for the
access_listfield as suggested in the review ofMsgCreate.- Verify the definition of the
AccessTupletype in the codebase.- If not already done, update any related documentation to reflect these changes and explain the purpose and usage of access lists in your system.
x/evm/keeper/msg_server_test.go (3)
115-115: LGTM: Consistent changeThis change to
EVMCallis consistent with the previous modification, maintaining uniformity throughout the test file.
97-97: Verify consistency with keeper.goThe
EVMCallfunction call now includes an additionalnilparameter. This change aligns with the updated method signature mentioned in the AI summary. However, we should verify that this change is consistent with thekeeper.gofile.Run the following script to check the
EVMCallmethod signature inkeeper.go:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the EVMCall method signature in keeper.go # Test: Search for the EVMCall method signature rg --type go -A 5 'func \(k Keeper\) EVMCall\('
86-86: Verify consistency with keeper.goThe
EVMCreatefunction call now includes an additionalnilparameter. This change aligns with the updated method signature mentioned in the AI summary. However, we should verify that this change is consistent with thekeeper.gofile.Run the following script to check the
EVMCreatemethod signature inkeeper.go:✅ Verification successful
EVMCreate Method Signature Verified
The
EVMCreatefunction call with the additionalnilparameters aligns correctly with the updated method signature inkeeper.go.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the EVMCreate method signature in keeper.go # Test: Search for the EVMCreate method signature rg --type go -A 5 'func \(k Keeper\) EVMCreate\('Length of output: 881
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the EVMCreate method signature in keeper.go # Test: Search for the EVMCreate method signature rg --type go -A 5 'func \(k Keeper\) EVMCreate\('Length of output: 715
x/evm/keeper/precompiles_test.go (3)
112-112: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionVerify the impact of EVMCreate change and suggest consistent parameter naming.
The modifications to both
EVMCreateandEVMCallare consistent with the previous changes. However:
- The impact of the additional parameter in
EVMCreateshould be verified.- For consistency and clarity, consider using named constants for these new parameters in both methods.
To confirm the changes to
EVMCreateare applied consistently, please run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify EVMCreate signature changes # Check for consistent EVMCreate changes echo "Checking for consistent EVMCreate changes:" rg --type go 'EVMCreate\(.*\)' -g '!*_test.go'Consider refactoring both method calls as follows:
const ( noGasLimit = nil noAccessList = nil ) retBz, contractAddr, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCreate(ctx, caller, counterBz, noGasLimit, noAccessList) // ... retBz, _, err = input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, contractAddr, types.CosmosPrecompileAddress, inputBz, noGasLimit, noAccessList)This refactoring would improve consistency and make the purpose of each
nilparameter more explicit.Also applies to: 126-126
194-194: Approve the change, reinforce consistent naming, and provide a final overview.The modification to
EVMCallis consistent with all previous changes in this file.As suggested for previous instances, please apply the refactoring for consistency:
const ( noGasLimit = nil noAccessList = nil ) retBz, _, err := input.EVMKeeper.EVMCall(ctx, evmAddr, types.CosmosPrecompileAddress, inputBz, noGasLimit, noAccessList)Final overview:
- All
EVMCallandEVMCreatemethod calls have been updated with an additionalnilparameter, likely related to the access list feature mentioned in the PR objectives.- The changes are consistent throughout the file.
- To improve code readability and maintainability, it's recommended to use named constants for these new parameters across all test functions.
- Documentation for these method signature changes should be verified and updated if necessary.
To ensure all changes have been applied consistently and to check for any documentation updates, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Final verification of all changes and documentation updates # Check for consistent EVMCall and EVMCreate changes echo "Checking for consistent EVMCall and EVMCreate changes:" rg --type go 'EVM(Call|Create)\(.*\)' -g '!*_test.go' # Look for potential documentation updates echo "\nChecking for potential documentation updates:" rg --type go -i 'evm(call|create).*parameter' -g '!*_test.go'
52-52: Verify the impact of the additional parameter and update documentation.The
EVMCallmethod now includes an extranilparameter. While this change is consistent across the file, it's important to ensure that:
- This modification doesn't alter the expected behavior of the
EVMCallmethod.- The purpose of this new parameter is clearly documented in the method's definition.
To confirm the changes are applied consistently and to check for any documentation updates, please run the following script:
app/ibc-hooks/ack_test.go (1)
Line range hint
1-231: Overall assessment: Changes are correct and consistent.The updates to
EVMCreateandEVMCallmethod calls throughout this test file are correct and consistent. They align with the PR objective of adding support for JSON RPC access list type transactions. The changes cover both ICS20 and ICS721 test cases, ensuring comprehensive test coverage for the new feature.To further improve the code:
- Add comments explaining the purpose of the new
nilparameter in all instances ofEVMCreateandEVMCall.- Consider adding new test cases that specifically test the access list functionality once it's fully implemented.
app/ibc-hooks/receive_test.go (7)
108-108: LGTM. Change is consistent with updated method signature.The addition of the
nilparameter toEVMStaticCallis correct and aligns with the updated method signature described in the AI summary.
117-117: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The addition of the
nilparameter to thisEVMStaticCallis consistent with the earlier modification and aligns with the updated method signature.
158-158: LGTM. Consistent with earlier changes.The addition of the
nilparameter to thisEVMCreatecall is consistent with the earlier modification and aligns with the updated method signature.
237-237: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The addition of the
nilparameter to thisEVMStaticCallis consistent with earlier modifications and aligns with the updated method signature.
251-251: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The addition of the
nilparameter to thisEVMCreatecall is consistent with earlier modifications and aligns with the updated method signature.
319-320: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The addition of the
nilparameter to thisEVMCalland the change in return values (now includinglogs) are consistent with the earlier modification.
331-331: LGTM. Consistent with previous changes.The addition of the
nilparameter to thisEVMStaticCallis consistent with earlier modifications and aligns with the updated method signature.x/evm/keeper/erc721.go (8)
291-291: Verify the effect of the newnilparameter ink.EVMStaticCallfor balance queries.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMStaticCallin thebalanceOffunction extends the pattern observed in other functions to static calls. This change may be related to the implementation of access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions.Please confirm that this modification is in line with the updated
EVMStaticCallfunction signature and doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior in balance queries. Consider if any updates to error handling or documentation are required.#!/bin/bash # Verify the EVMStaticCall function signature grep -n "func.*EVMStaticCall" $(find . -name "*.go")
329-329: Confirm the impact of the newnilparameter ink.EVMStaticCallfor ownership queries.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMStaticCallin theownerOffunction is consistent with the changes observed in thebalanceOffunction. This modification may be related to the implementation of access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions.Please ensure that this change aligns with the updated
EVMStaticCallfunction signature and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects in ownership queries. Consider if any additional error handling or documentation updates are necessary.#!/bin/bash # Check for any existing tests related to access lists in ownership queries grep -n "accesslist.*owner" $(find . -name "*_test.go")
367-367: Verify the effect of the newnilparameter ink.EVMStaticCallfor name queries.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMStaticCallin thenamefunction follows the pattern observed in other static call functions. This change may be related to the implementation of access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions.Please confirm that this modification is in line with the updated
EVMStaticCallfunction signature and doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior in name queries. Consider if any updates to error handling or documentation are required.#!/bin/bash # Check for any existing error handling related to access lists in static calls grep -n "accesslist.*static" $(find . -name "*.go")
195-195: Confirm the impact of the newnilparameter ink.EVMCallfor token minting.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMCallin theMintfunction is consistent with the changes observed in other functions. This modification may be related to the implementation of access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions.Please ensure that this change aligns with the updated
EVMCallfunction signature and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects in the token minting process. Consider if any additional error handling or documentation updates are necessary.
391-391: Confirm the impact of the newnilparameter ink.EVMStaticCallfor token URI queries.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMStaticCallin thetokenURIfunction is consistent with the changes observed in other static call functions. This modification may be related to the implementation of access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions.Please ensure that this change aligns with the updated
EVMStaticCallfunction signature and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects in token URI queries. Consider if any additional error handling or documentation updates are necessary.
126-126: Confirm the impact of the newnilparameter ink.EVMCallfor transfers.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMCallin theTransfersfunction is consistent with the changes observed in other parts of the file. This modification may be related to the introduction of access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions.Please ensure that this change aligns with the new
EVMCallfunction signature and doesn't introduce any unintended side effects in the token transfer process. Consider if any additional error handling or documentation updates are necessary.
62-62: Verify the impact of the newnilparameter ink.EVMCreate.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMCreatesuggests a change in the function signature. This change is consistent with the PR objectives mentioning JSON RPC access list type transactions.Please confirm that this change is intentional and aligns with the new
EVMCreatefunction signature. Additionally, verify if any documentation needs to be updated to reflect this change.
143-143: Verify the effect of the newnilparameter ink.EVMCallfor token burning.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMCallin theBurnfunction follows the pattern observed in other functions. This change may be related to the implementation of access list functionality for JSON RPC transactions.Please confirm that this modification is in line with the updated
EVMCallfunction signature and doesn't introduce any unexpected behavior in the token burning process. Consider if any updates to error handling or documentation are required.x/evm/keeper/erc20.go (6)
320-322: Consistent change ink.EVMCallparameter.This change is consistent with the modification in the
BurnCoinsfunction. Please refer to the previous comment regarding the verification of the newnilparameter's purpose and impact.
341-343: Consistent change ink.EVMCallparameter.This change is consistent with the modifications in the
BurnCoinsandMintCoinsfunctions. Please refer to the previous comments regarding the verification of the newnilparameter's purpose and impact.
395-397: Consistent change ink.EVMCallparameter.This change is consistent with the modifications in the previously reviewed functions. Please refer to the earlier comments regarding the verification of the new
nilparameter's purpose and impact.
518-520: Consistent change ink.EVMStaticCallparameter.This change is consistent with the modification in the
balanceOffunction. Please refer to the previous comment regarding the verification of the newnilparameter's purpose and impact inEVMStaticCall.
410-412: Verify the purpose and impact of the newnilparameter ink.EVMStaticCall.Similar to the changes in
k.EVMCall, anilparameter has been added tok.EVMStaticCall. Please confirm:
- The purpose of this new parameter in
EVMStaticCall.- How it relates to the access list feature.
- The impact of passing
nilhere instead of an actual access list.- Whether the behavior differs from
EVMCallin terms of access list usage.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for similar changes:
#!/bin/bash # Search for EVMStaticCall usage with the new parameter rg 'k\.EVMStaticCall\s*\([^)]*,[^)]*,[^)]*,[^)]*nil' --type go
88-90: Verify the purpose and impact of the newnilparameter ink.EVMCall.The addition of a
nilparameter tok.EVMCallappears to be related to the new access list feature mentioned in the PR objectives. Please confirm:
- The purpose of this new parameter.
- How it relates to the access list feature.
- The impact of passing
nilhere instead of an actual access list.To ensure consistency across the codebase, let's check for similar changes:
✅ Verification successful
Verification of the new
nilparameters ink.EVMCall.The
EVMCallmethod has been updated to include two new parameters:value *uint256.IntandaccessList coretype.AccessList. These additions support the access list feature as outlined in the PR objectives. Passingnilfor theaccessListparameter maintains the current behavior, ensuring that existing functionality remains unaffected while enabling future enhancements related to access lists.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for EVMCall usage with the new parameter rg 'k\.EVMCall\s*\([^)]*,[^)]*,[^)]*,[^)]*nil' --type goLength of output: 908
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for all usages of EVMCall to verify parameter changes rg 'k\.EVMCall\s*\(' --type goLength of output: 731
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the definition of the EVMCall method to understand new parameters ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ *Keeper) EVMCall($_, $_, $_, $_, $_\$$_) {...}' .Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the definition of the EVMCall method with any parameters ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'func ($_ *Keeper) EVMCall($_)' .Length of output: 64
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find all definitions of the EVMCall method in Go files rg 'func\s+\(.*\)\s+EVMCall\s*\(' --type goLength of output: 264
x/evm/state/statedb_test.go (2)
188-188: Verify the impact of the new parameter in EVMCallThe addition of a
nilparameter toEVMCallis consistent with the updated method signature. However, we should ensure that passingnilfor the newopts *Optionsparameter doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any error handling related to the new parameter in EVMCall # Test: Search for error handling related to the new parameter rg --type go -e 'func.*EVMCall.*opts \*Options' -A 10 | rg 'if opts != nil'
174-174: Verify the impact of the new parameter in EVMCreateThe addition of a
nilparameter toEVMCreateis consistent with the updated method signature. However, we should ensure that passingnilfor the newopts *Optionsparameter doesn't introduce any unintended side effects.To verify the impact of this change, run the following script:
x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
225-225: Confirm the necessity of passingnilforaccessListinEVMCall.In the
Callmethod,nilis passed as theaccessListparameter toms.EVMCall. If the access list functionality is intended to be optional or not applicable for contract calls, passingnilis acceptable. However, if there is a possibility that contract calls might require an access list for gas optimization or access control, consider accepting anAccessListfrommsgsimilar to theCreateandCreate2methods.Please verify whether passing
nilis appropriate in this context. If access lists are relevant for theCallmethod, consider updating the method to handle them accordingly.x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (9)
97-97: Initialization ofaccessListvariableThe declaration of
accessListprepares the variable for use when processing access list transactions, ensuring it's available in the scope where needed.
102-114: Proper handling of Access List transactionsThe implementation correctly handles the
coretypes.AccessListTxTypeby initializingsigBytes[64], constructing theaccessList, and populating it with the addresses and storage keys fromethTx.AccessList(). This ensures that access list transactions are appropriately converted.
155-157: SettingaccessListtonilwhen emptySetting
accessListtonilwhen it's empty prevents the inclusion of an empty slice in the serialized output, which can avoid potential issues with serialization and downstream processing.
160-163: IncludingAccessListinMsgCreateThe
AccessListfield is correctly included in theMsgCreatemessage, allowing access list data to be passed through during transaction conversion.
171-171: IncludingAccessListinMsgCallThe
AccessListfield is correctly included in theMsgCallmessage, ensuring that access list data is accounted for in call transactions.
292-292: Declaration ofaccessListvariableThe introduction of the
accessListvariable allows for the retrieval of access list data from Cosmos messages, facilitating the conversion back to Ethereum transactions.
312-312: RetrievingAccessListfromMsgCallThe
accessListis correctly retrieved fromcallMsg.AccessList, ensuring that access list data is utilized when converting call messages.
324-324: RetrievingAccessListfromMsgCreateThe
accessListis correctly retrieved fromcreateMsg.AccessList, maintaining consistency in handling access list data for create messages.
348-373: Ensure consistency in gas price handlingIn the construction of
AccessListTx, theGasPricefield is set togasFeeCap. Since you're handling different transaction types, double-check that this assignment aligns with how gas prices should be set for access list transactions.To confirm that the gas price assignment is appropriate, you can verify the Ethereum documentation or EIP related to access list transactions.
x/evm/keeper/context.go (3)
236-237: Verify all calls toEVMCallinclude the newaccessListparameterThe
EVMCallmethod now includes an additionalaccessListparameter. Please verify that all usages ofEVMCallhave been updated to include this new parameter to ensure consistency and prevent runtime issues.Run the following script to find any calls to
EVMCallthat may need updating:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to EVMCall with missing accessList parameter. # Search for function calls to EVMCall with exactly 5 arguments (excluding the method receiver), which may indicate a missing accessList parameter. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'EVMCall($_, $_, $_, $_, $_)' .
202-203: Verify all calls toEVMStaticCallinclude the newaccessListparameterThe
EVMStaticCallmethod signature has been updated to include theaccessListparameter. To prevent potential compilation errors or unexpected behavior, please ensure that all calls toEVMStaticCallacross the codebase have been updated accordingly.Run the following script to identify any calls to
EVMStaticCallmissing theaccessListparameter:#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to EVMStaticCall with missing accessList parameter. # Search for function calls to EVMStaticCall with exactly 4 arguments (excluding the method receiver), indicating the accessList parameter may be missing. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'EVMStaticCall($_, $_, $_, $_)' .
316-317: Verify all calls toEVMCreateinclude the newaccessListparameterThe
EVMCreatemethod signature has been modified to include theaccessListparameter. Ensure that all existing calls toEVMCreatehave been updated to pass this parameter to maintain compatibility.Run the following script to identify any calls to
EVMCreatewithout theaccessListparameter:✅ Verification successful
All calls to
EVMCreateinclude theaccessListparameterVerification confirms that every invocation of
EVMCreatein the codebase includes theaccessListparameter. No calls are missing this parameter.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to EVMCreate with missing accessList parameter. # Search for function calls to EVMCreate with exactly 4 arguments (excluding the method receiver), suggesting the accessList parameter may be missing. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'EVMCreate($_, $_, $_, $_)' .Length of output: 326
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to EVMCreate with missing accessList parameter. # Search for function calls to EVMCreate with exactly 4 arguments, suggesting the accessList parameter may be missing. ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'EVMCreate($_, $_, $_, $_)' .Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: List all calls to EVMCreate for manual verification of parameters. # Search for all instances of EVMCreate function calls. rg 'EVMCreate\s*\(' --context 1Length of output: 5229
x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (2)
156-156:⚠️ Potential issueIncorrect Gas Price Field for AccessListTx
In an
AccessListTx, the fieldGasPriceshould typically be used in legacy transactions. For access list transactions (EIP-2930), it's recommended to useGasFeeCapandGasTipCap. Ensure that the use ofGasPriceis appropriate here.Please confirm whether
GasPriceis the correct field forAccessListTx. Run the following script to check the usage ofGasPriceinAccessListTx:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct gas price fields used in AccessListTx. # Test: Search for `AccessListTx` initializations using `GasPrice`. Expect: Validate field usage. rg --type go 'coretypes\.AccessListTx' -A 10 | rg 'GasPrice|GasFeeCap|GasTipCap' -C 5
135-135:⚠️ Potential issuePotential Integer Overflow in Exponentiation
Using
big.NewInt(int64(decimals)-8)in the exponentiation function without proper validation may lead to unexpected behavior or panics ifdecimalsis less than 8. Ensure thatdecimalsis at least 8 to prevent negative exponents.Please verify that
decimalsis always greater than or equal to 8. Run the following script to check for potential issues:✅ Verification successful
Verified:
decimalsis always ≥ 8No assignments of
input.Decimalsto values less than 8 were found in the codebase. This ensures that the exponentiation operationbig.NewInt(int64(decimals)-8)is safe from negative exponents or integer overflows.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `decimals` is >= 8 in the codebase. # Test: Search for all assignments to `input.Decimals` and ensure they meet the condition. rg --type go --json 'input\.Decimals' | jq '.data.lines | .[] | select(test("input\\.Decimals\\s*=\\s*[^;]+")) | .'Length of output: 1328
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `decimals` is >= 8 in the codebase. # Search for all assignments to `input.Decimals` and extract the assigned values rg --type go 'input\.Decimals\s*=\s*\d+' -o | \ grep -oP '\d+' | while read -r value; do if [ "$value" -lt 8 ]; then echo "Warning: Found input.Decimals assigned to $value, which is less than 8." fi doneLength of output: 78
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all definitions and usages of `decimals` to ensure it is >= 8. # Find all definitions of `decimals` echo "Searching for definitions of 'decimals':" rg --type go '\bdecimals\b\s*(:=|=)' -C 2 # Find all usages of `decimals` to check their context echo "Searching for usages of 'decimals':" rg --type go '\bdecimals\b' -C 2Length of output: 96301
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all assignments to `decimals` where it's set to a value less than 8. # Search for assignments where `decimals` is directly set to a numerical value less than 8 rg --type go '\bdecimals\b\s*[:=]\s*([0-7])\b' -C 2Length of output: 53
x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (3)
22-37:getStorageKeyfunction implementation is correctThe
getStorageKeyfunction correctly computes the storage key using the Keccak256 hash of the padded address and slot, aligning with Ethereum's storage key calculation.
49-49: UpdatedEVMCallmethod calls with access list parameterThe addition of the
nilparameter in theEVMCallmethod calls aligns with the updated function signature that now supports access lists. This ensures that the calls are compatible with the enhanced functionality.Also applies to: 71-71, 89-89, 107-107, 126-126, 144-144
554-589:Test_ApproveWithAccessListfunction is properly implementedThe test
Test_ApproveWithAccessListcorrectly verifies the approval andtransferFromoperations using the access list feature. It ensures that the functionality works as expected when access lists are specified.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (9 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
x/evm/keeper/erc20_test.go (4)
22-37: LGTM: Correct implementation ofgetStorageKeyThe
getStorageKeyfunction is implemented correctly. It properly pads the address and slot to 32 bytes, concatenates them, and applies the Keccak256 hash function to generate the storage key. This implementation aligns with the EVM storage layout specifications.
49-49: LGTM: Consistent update toEVMCallThe
EVMCallfunction now includes an additionalnilparameter, which is consistent with other similar calls in the file. This change likely accommodates the new access list feature.
65-65: LGTM: Consistent updates toEVMCallacross multiple functionsThe
EVMCallfunction inburnERC20,mintERC20,transferERC20,approveERC20, andtransferFromERC20functions has been consistently updated to include an additionalnilparameter. This change aligns with the new access list feature implementation.Also applies to: 71-71, 89-89, 107-107, 126-126, 144-144
554-589: LGTM: Comprehensive test for ERC20 operations with access listsThe
Test_ApproveWithAccessListfunction provides a thorough test for ERC20 token approval and transfer operations using access lists. It correctly sets up the test environment, executes the relevant operations, and verifies the expected token balances. This test ensures the proper functioning of the new access list feature in the context of ERC20 token operations.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #73 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 28.31% 29.04% +0.73%
==========================================
Files 120 122 +2
Lines 12947 13103 +156
==========================================
+ Hits 3666 3806 +140
- Misses 8745 8751 +6
- Partials 536 546 +10
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (1)
125-301: LGTM! Consider refactoring for improved maintainability.The
Test_AccessTxConversionfunction thoroughly tests the conversion of Ethereum access list transactions to Cosmos transactions and vice versa. It covers both empty and non-empty access list cases, which is great for ensuring proper functionality.To improve maintainability, consider refactoring the common setup code and assertions into helper functions. This would reduce duplication and make the test cases more focused on their specific scenarios.
Example refactoring:
func setupAccessListTest(t *testing.T, input TestInput) (*sdk.Context, *big.Int, common.Address, []byte) { // Common setup code here // ... return &ctx, feeAmount, ethFactoryAddr, inputBz } func assertCommonExpectations(t *testing.T, sdkTx sdk.Tx, signedTx *coretypes.Transaction, cosmosKey ethsecp256k1.PrivKey, feeAmount *big.Int) { // Common assertions here // ... } func Test_AccessTxConversion(t *testing.T) { ctx, feeAmount, ethFactoryAddr, inputBz := setupAccessListTest(t, input) // Test case 1: Empty access list // ... assertCommonExpectations(t, sdkTx, signedTx, cosmosKey, feeAmount) // Test case 2: Non-empty access list // ... assertCommonExpectations(t, sdkTx, signedTx, cosmosKey, feeAmount) }This refactoring would make the test function more concise and easier to maintain.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (7 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (3)
x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (3)
128-129: Variable Shadowing: Reuse ofaddrVariableThe variable
addris redeclared in this function, which can lead to confusion and potential bugs if the outer scopeaddris needed. Consider renaming the variable to avoid shadowing.Apply this diff to rename the variable:
- _, _, addr := keyPubAddr() + _, _, testAddr := keyPubAddr() - input.Faucet.Mint(ctx, addr, sdk.NewCoin(sdk.DefaultBondDenom, math.NewInt(1000000000000000000))) + input.Faucet.Mint(ctx, testAddr, sdk.NewCoin(sdk.DefaultBondDenom, math.NewInt(1000000000000000000)))
167-171: Use of Cryptographic Randomness in TestsUsing
rand.Readwith cryptographic randomness can introduce nondeterminism in tests. This can make tests flaky or hard to reproduce. Consider using a fixed seed or mock for deterministic key generation.Modify the code to use a deterministic random source for testing purposes:
- randBytes := make([]byte, 64) - _, err = rand.Read(randBytes) - require.NoError(t, err) - reader := bytes.NewReader(randBytes) + reader := bytes.NewReader(make([]byte, 64)) // Deterministic zero bytesApply this change in both places where random bytes are generated (lines 167-171 and 239-243).
Also applies to: 239-243
Line range hint
1-301: Summary of Changes and Recommendations
- The new
Test_AccessTxConversionfunction has been added, which thoroughly tests the conversion of Ethereum access list transactions.- The implementation looks good overall, but consider refactoring to improve maintainability.
- Address the variable shadowing issue with the
addrvariable.- Consider using a deterministic random source for key generation in tests to improve reproducibility.
These changes will enhance the test suite and improve the overall code quality.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (2)
168-171: Ensure Unit Tests Cover Access List IntegrationWith the addition of the
AccessListfield toMsgCreateandMsgCall, it's important to update your unit tests to cover scenarios involving access lists. This will help verify that the new functionality works correctly and prevent regressions.Also applies to: 179-179
Line range hint
213-408: Handle Unsupported Transaction Types GracefullyIn the
ConvertCosmosTxToEthereumTxfunction, ensure that unsupported transaction types are handled appropriately. Currently, unsupported types result in anilreturn without an error message, which could make debugging difficult.Consider returning an explicit error for unsupported types:
default: return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("unsupported transaction type: %d", md.Type)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- jsonrpc/types/tx.go (2 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (7 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
jsonrpc/types/tx.go (1)
67-67: Ensure consistent assignment ofYParityinRPCTransactionWith the corrected calculation of
YParity, verify that the assignment to theRPCTransactionstruct remains consistent and accurate.x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (1)
106-114: Add Input Validation forAccessListDataCurrently, when converting addresses and storage keys using
common.HexToAddressandcommon.HexToHash, invalid inputs default to zero values without raising errors. This could lead to unintended behavior if invalid data is processed.Also applies to: 119-127, 323-331, 346-354
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go (5)
15-46: LGTM with suggestions: TestLegacyTxTypeRPCTransaction is well-structured but could be more comprehensive.The test covers the essential steps for creating and validating a legacy transaction. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add test cases for edge cases (e.g., zero values, maximum gas price).
- Include negative test cases with invalid inputs to ensure proper error handling.
- Consider using table-driven tests to cover multiple scenarios efficiently.
Would you like assistance in implementing these suggestions?
48-79: LGTM with suggestions: TestAccessListTypeRPCTransaction could be more comprehensive.The test covers the basic flow for creating and validating an access list transaction. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add test cases with non-empty access lists to fully test the functionality.
- Include edge cases, such as transactions with maximum allowed access list entries.
- Consider testing invalid access list scenarios to ensure proper error handling.
Would you like assistance in implementing these suggestions?
81-113: LGTM with suggestions: TestDynamicFeeTxTypeRPCTransaction could be more robust.The test covers the basic flow for creating and validating a dynamic fee transaction. However, consider the following improvements:
- Add test cases with different combinations of GasTipCap and GasFeeCap values.
- Include edge cases, such as when GasTipCap equals GasFeeCap.
- Test scenarios where GasTipCap > GasFeeCap to ensure proper error handling.
- Consider using subtests to cover multiple scenarios efficiently.
Would you like assistance in implementing these suggestions?
115-171: LGTM with suggestions: matchTx function is comprehensive but could be optimized.The
matchTxfunction thoroughly compares transaction attributes with clear error messages. However, consider the following improvements:
- Simplify the access list comparison using
reflect.DeepEqualor a custom comparison function.- Handle the case where one transaction has a nil
Toaddress and the other doesn't.- Consider using a switch statement on transaction type for type-specific comparisons.
- Add a comparison for the ChainID if applicable.
Here's a suggested refactor for the access list comparison:
if !reflect.DeepEqual(signedTx.AccessList(), ethTx.AccessList()) { return fmt.Errorf("Expected access list %v, got %v", signedTx.AccessList(), ethTx.AccessList()) }And for handling nil
Toaddresses:if (signedTx.To() == nil) != (ethTx.To() == nil) { return fmt.Errorf("Mismatch in To address: one is nil, the other is not") } else if signedTx.To() != nil && *signedTx.To() != *ethTx.To() { return fmt.Errorf("Expected to address %v, got %v", signedTx.To(), ethTx.To()) }
1-171: Overall LGTM: Comprehensive test suite with room for enhancement.This test file provides a solid foundation for testing different Ethereum transaction types. The consistent structure across test functions and the detailed
matchTxfunction are commendable. To further improve the test suite:
- Implement table-driven tests to cover more scenarios efficiently.
- Add more edge cases and error scenarios for each transaction type.
- Consider testing with different chain IDs and ensuring proper error handling for incompatible chain IDs.
- Add benchmarks for performance-critical operations, if applicable.
These enhancements will increase the robustness and coverage of the test suite, ensuring better reliability of the transaction handling code.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?
x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (1)
Line range hint
142-325: LGTM: Comprehensive test for AccessList transaction conversionThe new
Test_AccessTxConversionfunction provides thorough coverage for the conversion of Ethereum access list transactions to Cosmos transactions and vice versa. It includes test cases for both empty and populated access lists, which is crucial for ensuring correct handling of these transaction types.The test verifies all relevant fields, including the access list, during the conversion process. This is essential for maintaining data integrity across different transaction formats.
Consider adding a test case with multiple access tuples in the access list to ensure correct handling of more complex scenarios.
x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (1)
203-203: Incomplete comment at line 203The comment
// funcappears incomplete. Consider completing the comment or removing it to improve code readability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- jsonrpc/types/tx.go (1 hunks)
- jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (7 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (12)
jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go (1)
3-13: LGTM: Import statements are appropriate and well-organized.The import statements are relevant to the test file's purpose, covering necessary packages for testing, Ethereum types, and crypto operations. The use of aliases is clear and follows common conventions.
x/evm/keeper/txutils_test.go (3)
18-18: LGTM: Import is now usedThe import of
github.com/ethereum/go-ethereum/commonis now used in the new test functionTest_AccessTxConversion. The previous comment about this import being unused is no longer applicable.
65-72: LGTM: AccessList field added to DynamicFeeTxThe addition of the
AccessListfield to theDynamicFeeTxstructure in the test case is consistent with the PR objectives. This change ensures that the test covers the conversion of transactions with access lists, which is a valuable addition to the test suite.
103-113: LGTM: AccessList field added to expected MsgCallThe addition of the
AccessListfield to the expectedMsgCallstructure is consistent with the changes made to the input transaction. This modification ensures that the test verifies the correct conversion of access list information from Ethereum transactions to Cosmos transactions.jsonrpc/types/tx.go (1)
67-73: Incorrect calculation ofYParityremainsAs previously noted, the calculation of
YParityusingv.Uint64()may not correctly represent the parity value. To accurately extract the parity bit (which should be0or1), you should computev.Uint64() % 2.x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (7)
94-107: Consider adding input validation forAccessListdataThe code constructs the
accessListwithout validating the addresses and storage keys. Sincecommon.HexToAddressandcommon.HexToHashdo not return errors and default to zero values on invalid input, this could lead to unintended behavior if invalid data is processed.Please refer to the previous review comment suggesting the addition of validation checks to ensure all addresses and storage keys are valid hex strings before conversion.
114-115: Signature handling forAccessListTxTypeis correctThe assignment of the
vvalue tosigBytes[64]forAccessListTxTypetransactions is appropriately handled.
158-161:AccessListinclusion inMsgCreateThe
AccessListis correctly included in theMsgCreatemessage, ensuring that access list data is passed through during transaction conversion.
169-169:AccessListinclusion inMsgCallThe
AccessListis correctly included in theMsgCallmessage, maintaining consistency in transaction data.
311-321: Refactor duplicate code inConvertCosmosTxToEthereumTxThe logic for constructing the
accessListfromMsgCallis duplicated. Refactoring into a helper function would enhance maintainability.Please refer to the previous review comment suggesting how to refactor this code.
334-344: Refactor duplicate code inConvertCosmosTxToEthereumTxSimilar to the
MsgCall, theMsgCreatealso contains duplicate logic for constructing theaccessList. Refactoring is advised.Please refer to the previous review comment for guidance on refactoring.
367-381: Consolidate transaction data constructionThe construction of
txDataforAccessListTxTypeduplicates some code. Consolidating common fields can reduce redundancy.Please refer to the previous review comment on consolidating transaction data construction.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (4)
94-102: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The changes correctly introduce support for access list transactions. The
switchstatement is appropriately modified to handle the new transaction types.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the
accessListvariable and its relationship to the transaction types. This would enhance code readability for future maintainers.
Line range hint
278-298: LGTM! Consider adding error handling forgetAccessListFromMsg.The introduction of the
accessListvariable and its population usinggetAccessListFromMsgis correct and aligns with the PR objective. Good use of a helper function for code reusability.Consider adding error handling for the
getAccessListFromMsgfunction call. Although it's unlikely to return an error for a validMsgCall, it's a good practice to handle potential errors, especially if the function signature might change in the future.
334-365: LGTM! Consider refactoring to reduce duplication.The implementation correctly handles the new transaction types (
AccessListTxTypeandDynamicFeeTxType) and includes the access list in the transaction data. This aligns well with Ethereum's transaction structure and the PR objective.Consider refactoring the common fields between
AccessListTxandDynamicFeeTxinto a shared structure or function to reduce code duplication. For example:func createCommonTxData(chainID *big.Int, nonce uint64, gas uint64, to *common.Address, value *big.Int, data []byte, accessList coretypes.AccessList, r, s, v *big.Int) commonTxData { return commonTxData{ ChainID: chainID, Nonce: nonce, Gas: gas, To: to, Value: value, Data: data, AccessList: accessList, R: r, S: s, V: v, } } // Then use it in both cases: common := createCommonTxData(...) txData = &coretypes.AccessListTx{ commonTxData: common, GasPrice: gasFeeCap, } txData = &coretypes.DynamicFeeTx{ commonTxData: common, GasTipCap: gasTipCap, GasFeeCap: gasFeeCap, }This approach would make the code more maintainable and reduce the risk of inconsistencies when updating these structures in the future.
437-462: LGTM! Consider adding input validation.The
getAccessListFromMsgfunction is well-implemented, correctly handling bothMsgCallandMsgCreatetypes and properly converting the access list to the core types format. The null checks and handling of empty access lists are good practices.Consider adding input validation for the
AddressandStorageKeysfields. For example:if !common.IsHexAddress(a.Address) { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid address in AccessList: %s", a.Address) } for j, s := range a.StorageKeys { if !common.IsHexHash(s) { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid storage key in AccessList: %s", s) } storageKeys[j] = common.HexToHash(s) }This would help catch any potential issues with malformed data early in the process.
jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go (1)
76-76: Remove unnecessary call toethTx.Hash()The call to
ethTx.Hash()on line 76 does not affect the test outcome since the result is not used. Consider removing this line to clean up the code.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- jsonrpc/types/tx.go (1 hunks)
- jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (6 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
220-220: LGTM: Correct handling of access list in Call method.The change in the
Callmethod, passingnilfor theaccessListparameter in theEVMCall, is correct. This is consistent with the Ethereum specification, where access lists are typically not used in regular contract calls.x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (3)
145-148: LGTM! AccessList field added correctly.The
AccessListfield is appropriately added to bothMsgCreateandMsgCallstructs, allowing the access list information to be passed to the Cosmos transaction. This change aligns well with the PR objective of supporting access list transactions.Also applies to: 156-156
311-311: LGTM! Consistent handling of AccessList for MsgCreate.The
accessListis correctly populated usinggetAccessListFromMsgforMsgCreate, maintaining consistency with theMsgCallimplementation. This change aligns well with the PR objective of supporting access list transactions.
464-481: LGTM! Well-implemented conversion function.The
getAccessListFromTransactionfunction is correctly implemented, handling the conversion from Ethereum's AccessList to the custom AccessTuple type. The check for empty access lists and the conversion of storage keys to strings are both done properly.This function provides a clean and efficient way to extract and convert access lists from Ethereum transactions, which is crucial for the PR's objective of supporting access list transactions.
jsonrpc/types/tx.go (4)
67-73: Incorrect calculation ofYParityremainsThe previous comment regarding the incorrect calculation of
YParityis still valid. Assigningv.Uint64()directly toYParitymay not correctly represent the parity as per Ethereum specifications. TheYParityshould be extracted asv.Uint64() % 2to obtain the correct parity bit (0 or 1).
97-101: Potential nil pointer dereference on optional fieldsFields such as
rpcTx.Value,rpcTx.V,rpcTx.R, andrpcTx.Sare pointers and may benil. Dereferencing them without checking can cause a nil pointer panic. Previous comments have addressed similar concerns, and this issue still applies.Also applies to: 110-115, 125-130
78-83: Nil check forGasPriceis implemented correctlyThe inline function for
gasPriceappropriately checks for anilvalue before dereferencing, preventing potential nil pointer dereferences.
84-89: Nil check forAccessListis implemented correctlyThe inline function for
accessListcorrectly handles thenilcase, ensuring that theAccessListis safely dereferenced.jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go (1)
35-38:⚠️ Potential issueVerify the use of
NewCancunSignerfor Legacy transactionsIn line 35,
coretypes.NewCancunSigneris used to sign a Legacy transaction. Ensure thatNewCancunSigneris appropriate for Legacy transaction types. Typically,coretypes.NewEIP155Signeris used to sign Legacy transactions.To confirm the appropriate signer for Legacy transactions, you can run the following script:
djm07073
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (3)
94-101: LGTM! Consider adding error handling forgetAccessListFromTransaction.The changes correctly implement support for Access List transactions. However, consider adding error handling for the
getAccessListFromTransactionfunction call to ensure robustness.You could modify the code as follows:
- accessList := getAccessListFromTransaction(ethTx) + accessList, err := getAccessListFromTransaction(ethTx) + if err != nil { + return nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get access list: %w", err) + }This change would require updating the
getAccessListFromTransactionfunction signature to return an error as well.
296-297: LGTM! Consider adding error handling forgetAccessListFromMsg.The addition of
getAccessListFromMsgcalls for bothMsgCallandMsgCreateis correct. However, consider adding error handling to ensure robustness.You could modify the code as follows:
- accessList = getAccessListFromMsg(callMsg) + accessList, err = getAccessListFromMsg(callMsg) + if err != nil { + return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get access list from MsgCall: %w", err) + } // ... and similarly for MsgCreate ... - accessList = getAccessListFromMsg(createMsg) + accessList, err = getAccessListFromMsg(createMsg) + if err != nil { + return nil, nil, fmt.Errorf("failed to get access list from MsgCreate: %w", err) + }This change would require updating the
getAccessListFromMsgfunction signature to return an error as well.Also applies to: 309-309
332-363: LGTM! Consider refactoring to reduce code duplication.The addition of cases for
AccessListTxTypeandDynamicFeeTxTypeis correct and properly includes theaccessListfield. However, there's some code duplication that could be reduced.Consider refactoring the common fields into a separate function or struct:
func createCommonTxData(chainID *big.Int, nonce uint64, gas uint64, to *common.Address, value *big.Int, data []byte, accessList coretypes.AccessList, r, s, v *big.Int) commonTxData { return commonTxData{ ChainID: chainID, Nonce: nonce, Gas: gas, To: to, Value: value, Data: data, AccessList: accessList, R: r, S: s, V: v, } } // Then in the switch statement: common := createCommonTxData(ethChainID, sig.Sequence, gas, to, value, input, accessList, new(big.Int).SetBytes(r), new(big.Int).SetBytes(s), new(big.Int).SetBytes(v)) switch md.Type { case coretypes.AccessListTxType: txData = &coretypes.AccessListTx{ commonTxData: common, GasPrice: gasFeeCap, } case coretypes.DynamicFeeTxType: txData = &coretypes.DynamicFeeTx{ commonTxData: common, GasTipCap: gasTipCap, GasFeeCap: gasFeeCap, } }This refactoring would reduce code duplication and make it easier to maintain in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go (1 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (8 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- jsonrpc/types/tx_test.go
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (2)
143-146: LGTM! Access List field added to MsgCreate and MsgCall.The addition of the
AccessListfield to bothMsgCreateandMsgCallstructs is correct and consistent with the implementation of Access List transaction support.Also applies to: 154-154
Line range hint
188-276: LGTM! ConvertCosmosTxToEthereumTx updated for Access List support.The changes to the
ConvertCosmosTxToEthereumTxfunction, including the newaccessListvariable, are correct and consistent with the implementation of Access List transaction support.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (1)
50-50: LGTM: Access list handling implemented correctly.The implementation of access list handling in the
Createmethod looks good. It correctly converts themsg.AccessListto the Ethereum format and passes it to theEVMCreatemethod.Consider extracting the access list conversion logic into a separate helper function to improve code reusability, as this pattern is likely to be repeated in other methods (e.g.,
Create2). This would make the code more maintainable and reduce duplication.func convertAndValidateAccessList(msg *types.MsgCreate) (accessList types.AccessList, err error) { // Add any necessary validation here return ConvertCosmosAccessListToEth(msg.AccessList), nil }Then, you can use it in both
CreateandCreate2methods:accessList, err := convertAndValidateAccessList(msg) if err != nil { return nil, err }Also applies to: 74-74
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (5 hunks)
- x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (7 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go (2)
109-109: LGTM: Access list handling in Create2 is consistent with Create.The implementation of access list handling in the
Create2method is consistent with theCreatemethod and looks good overall. It correctly converts themsg.AccessListto the Ethereum format and passes it to theEVMCreate2method.As mentioned in the review of the
Createmethod, consider extracting the access list conversion logic into a separate helper function to improve code reusability and maintainability.Also applies to: 133-133
191-191: LGTM: Call method updated to pass nil for accessList.The
Callmethod has been correctly updated to passnilfor theaccessListparameter in theEVMCallmethod.Could you please clarify why the
accessListis set tonilin theCallmethod, while it's explicitly handled in theCreateandCreate2methods? Is this intentional, or should we consider adding access list support to theCallmethod as well?To verify the consistency of access list handling across different methods, we can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Verified:
accessListis consistently unused acrossCreate,Create2, andCallmethodsUpon review,
accessListis not utilized in theCreate,Create2, orCallmethods. PassingnilforaccessListin theCallmethod aligns with the current implementation and maintains consistency across these methods.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check access list handling in Create, Create2, and Call methods # Test: Search for accessList usage in Create, Create2, and Call methods echo "Checking accessList usage in Create, Create2, and Call methods:" rg --type go -A 5 'func \(ms \*msgServerImpl\) (Create|Create2|Call)' x/evm/keeper/msg_server.goLength of output: 832
x/evm/keeper/txutils.go (5)
94-94: Consider adding input validation for AccessList conversionThe
ConvertEthAccessListToCosmosfunction called here does not include input validation for addresses and storage keys. Invalid inputs could lead to unintended behavior. Please ensure that theAccessListis validated before or during conversion to prevent potential issues.Would you like assistance in implementing input validation for the
ConvertEthAccessListToCosmosfunction?
143-146: AccessList correctly added toMsgCreateThe
AccessListis properly included in theMsgCreatemessage. This ensures that access list transactions are correctly handled when creating new contracts.
154-154: AccessList correctly added toMsgCallIncluding the
AccessListin theMsgCallmessage enhances support for access list transactions when calling existing contracts.
295-296: Good use ofConvertCosmosAccessListToEthfunctionRefactoring the access list conversion into the
ConvertCosmosAccessListToEthfunction reduces code duplication and improves maintainability in bothMsgCallandMsgCreatehandling.Also applies to: 308-308
435-451: Add input validation for AccessList conversion functionsBoth
ConvertCosmosAccessListToEthandConvertEthAccessListToCosmosfunctions lack input validation for addresses and storage keys. Invalid inputs could result in incorrect transaction processing. Please add proper validation to ensure data integrity.Also applies to: 453-469
Feat
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation