Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add option to execute cosmos message with options #91

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 30, 2024

Conversation

beer-1
Copy link
Collaborator

@beer-1 beer-1 commented Oct 29, 2024

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Introduced callback_received and recursive_called events in the Counter contract for better tracking of operations.
    • Added execute_cosmos_with_options method in multiple contracts for enhanced execution flexibility.
    • Implemented ICosmosOptions struct and corresponding methods for improved execution options in the ICosmos contract.
    • New ICosmosCallback interface for handling callback mechanisms in contracts.
    • Added a new Context() method in the Snapshot struct to provide access to the underlying context.
    • Introduced ExecuteRequest struct to manage execution requests with additional options.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling in various contract methods to improve robustness during execution.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments and method signatures for clarity and improved readability across contracts.
  • Tests

    • Added new test cases for execute_cosmos_with_options and updated existing tests to reflect changes in message handling.

@beer-1 beer-1 requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2024 06:09
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces significant updates to various smart contracts and their Go bindings within the EVM module. Key changes include the addition of new methods and events in the Counter contract, updates to the ABI and binary representations in multiple contracts, and the introduction of a new ICosmosCallback interface. The handling of Cosmos messages has been refined to utilize a new request structure, enhancing the execution model. Additionally, several tests have been added or modified to ensure proper functionality of the new features.

Changes

File Change Summary
x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.go Added methods and events for handling callbacks and recursive calls; updated ABI and binary.
x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.sol Introduced new events and methods for executing cosmos with options; clarified existing logic.
x/evm/contracts/erc20/ERC20.go Regenerated Go bindings with updated ABI and bytecode; added new functions.
x/evm/contracts/erc20_acl/ERC20ACL.go Updated binary representation in Erc20AclMetaData.
x/evm/contracts/erc20_factory/ERC20Factory.go Updated binary representation; deprecated old ABI and Bin variables.
x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.go Updated binary representation; deprecated old ABI and Bin variables.
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.go Added new struct and methods for executing cosmos with options.
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.sol Added new function and struct for executing cosmos with options; improved formatting.
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.go Introduced new Go bindings for the ICosmosCallback contract.
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.sol Added new interface for callback functionality.
x/evm/contracts/initia_erc20/InitiaERC20.go Regenerated Go bindings with updated ABI and bytecode.
x/evm/keeper/context.go Updated context handling for EVM execution; modified methods to accommodate new request structure.
x/evm/keeper/context_test.go Added tests for new execute_cosmos_with_options functionality; updated existing tests.
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go Added new field for cosmos callback ABI in the Keeper struct.
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract.go Updated methods to handle new execution options; modified message handling.
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract_test.go Updated tests to reflect new message handling structure; added tests for new options.
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/types.go Replaced argument struct and added new options struct for execute_cosmos method.
x/evm/state/snapshot.go Added new method to access context in Snapshot struct.
x/evm/types/dispatch.go Introduced new ExecuteRequest struct and log extraction function.
x/evm/types/events.go Added new event type and attribute key constants.
x/evm/types/keys.go Renamed context key for handling messages.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: use snapshot to support revert #90: Modifications to context handling for EVM execution, relating to the new execute_cosmos_with_options method introduced in this PR, enhancing the execution model and message handling.

"In the meadow, where bunnies hop,
New contracts bloom, and never stop.
With callbacks and options, oh what a sight,
EVM dances, in the moonlight!
Let's celebrate with a joyful cheer,
For the code has changed, and spring is near!" 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 29, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 22.51462% with 265 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 28.06%. Comparing base (0ff2791) to head (057af2d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.go 0.00% 166 Missing ⚠️
...evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.go 0.00% 48 Missing ⚠️
x/evm/types/dispatch.go 0.00% 26 Missing ⚠️
x/evm/keeper/context.go 79.26% 10 Missing and 7 partials ⚠️
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.go 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go 50.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #91      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   28.24%   28.06%   -0.19%     
==========================================
  Files         124      126       +2     
  Lines       13756    14074     +318     
==========================================
+ Hits         3886     3950      +64     
- Misses       9317     9567     +250     
- Partials      553      557       +4     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
x/evm/contracts/erc20/ERC20.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/contracts/erc20_acl/ERC20ACL.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/contracts/erc20_factory/ERC20Factory.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/contracts/initia_erc20/InitiaERC20.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract.go 51.46% <100.00%> (+1.24%) ⬆️
x/evm/state/snapshot.go 81.81% <ø> (ø)
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go 70.80% <50.00%> (-0.63%) ⬇️
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
x/evm/keeper/context.go 76.55% <79.26%> (+1.63%) ⬆️
... and 3 more

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 10

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (17)
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.sol (3)

2-2: Consider pinning the Solidity version.

Using ^0.8.24 allows minor version updates which could potentially introduce compatibility issues. Consider pinning to a specific version (e.g., 0.8.24) to ensure consistent behavior across different environments.

-pragma solidity ^0.8.24;
+pragma solidity 0.8.24;

4-6: Add NatSpec documentation to improve code clarity.

The interface and function lack documentation. Consider adding NatSpec comments to explain the purpose and parameters.

+/// @title ICosmosCallback
+/// @notice Interface for handling callbacks from Cosmos messages
 interface ICosmosCallback {
+    /// @notice Callback function called after Cosmos message execution
+    /// @param callback_id Unique identifier for the callback
+    /// @param success Indicates if the Cosmos message execution was successful
     function callback(uint64 callback_id, bool success) external;
 }

5-5: Consider enhancing error handling capabilities.

The current boolean success flag provides limited information about failure cases. Consider enhancing the callback to include:

  1. Error codes or messages for better error handling
  2. Additional data parameter for successful executions
-    function callback(uint64 callback_id, bool success) external;
+    function callback(
+        uint64 callback_id,
+        bool success,
+        string calldata error_message,
+        bytes calldata data
+    ) external;
x/evm/types/dispatch.go (1)

10-17: Add documentation and follow Go naming conventions

The struct needs documentation to explain its purpose and usage. Additionally, the CallbackId field doesn't follow Go naming conventions.

Consider applying these improvements:

+// ExecuteRequest encapsulates a cosmos message execution request along with its context and options.
 type ExecuteRequest struct {
+    // Msg is the cosmos SDK message to be executed
     Msg    sdk.Msg
+    // Caller represents the contract reference initiating this request
     Caller vm.ContractRef

     // options
+    // AllowFailure when true permits the execution to continue even if this message fails
     AllowFailure bool
-    CallbackId   uint64
+    // CallbackID uniquely identifies the callback for this request
+    CallbackID   uint64
 }
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/types.go (2)

29-32: Add documentation for the ExecuteCosmos struct.

Consider adding a documentation comment explaining the purpose of this struct and its fields, similar to other structs in the file.

+// ExecuteCosmos represents the arguments for executing a cosmos message with options.
 type ExecuteCosmos struct {
     Msg     string         `abi:"msg"`
     Options ExecuteOptions `abi:"options"`
 }

34-36: Add documentation and make struct tags consistent.

The struct needs documentation and should maintain consistent tag usage with ExecuteCosmos.

+// ExecuteOptions defines the execution options for a cosmos message.
 type ExecuteOptions struct {
-    AllowFailure bool   `json:"allow_failure"`
-    CallbackId   uint64 `json:"callback_id"`
+    AllowFailure bool   `abi:"allow_failure"`
+    CallbackId   uint64 `abi:"callback_id"`
 }
x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.sol (2)

42-49: Consider enhancing error handling and tracking

While the function works correctly, consider these improvements:

  1. Use a more descriptive revert message
  2. Add an event to track cosmos message execution attempts
 function execute_cosmos(string memory exec_msg, bool call_revert) external {
+    emit cosmos_execution_attempted(exec_msg);
     COSMOS_CONTRACT.execute_cosmos(exec_msg);
 
     if (call_revert) {
-        revert("revert");
+        revert("Counter: cosmos execution reverted as requested");
     }
 }

50-59: Consider validating callback_id

The function correctly implements the options-based execution, but consider validating the callback_id to prevent potential issues.

 function execute_cosmos_with_options(
     string memory exec_msg,
     bool allow_failure,
     uint64 callback_id
 ) external {
+    require(callback_id > 0, "Counter: invalid callback ID");
     COSMOS_CONTRACT.execute_cosmos_with_options(
         exec_msg,
         ICosmos.Options(allow_failure, callback_id)
     );
 }
x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.sol (1)

59-65: LGTM! Well-structured Options struct

The Options struct is well-designed with clear parameters. Consider adding @param documentation tags for better IDE integration.

 // @args
-// - `allow_failure`: if `true`, the transaction will not be reverted even if the execution fails.
-// - `callback_id`: the callback id to be called after the execution. `0` means no callback.
+/// @param allow_failure if `true`, the transaction will not be reverted even if the execution fails
+/// @param callback_id the callback id to be called after the execution. `0` means no callback
 struct Options {
     bool allow_failure;
     uint64 callback_id;
 }
x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (2)

82-82: Add documentation for the new field.

Consider adding a comment to document the purpose of cosmosCallbackABI field, following the documentation style of other fields in the Keeper struct.

+	// cosmosCallbackABI holds the ABI for the ICosmosCallback interface used in handling callback transactions
 	cosmosCallbackABI    *abi.ABI

108-111: Consider adding ABI validation.

The initialization logic is correct, but consider adding validation to ensure the ABI contains the expected interface methods.

 	cosmosCallbackABI, err := i_cosmos_callback.ICosmosCallbackMetaData.GetAbi()
 	if err != nil {
 		panic(err)
 	}
+	// Validate that the ABI contains the required methods
+	if _, exists := cosmosCallbackABI.Methods["callback"]; !exists {
+		panic("cosmosCallbackABI is missing required 'callback' method")
+	}

Also applies to: 159-159

x/evm/keeper/context_test.go (2)

303-416: Consider refactoring for better test maintainability.

While the test cases provide good coverage, there are several opportunities for improvement:

  1. Extract common setup code into helper functions to reduce duplication
  2. Define constants for callback IDs instead of using magic numbers
  3. Add balance verification for the successful case

Here's a suggested refactor:

+const (
+    CallbackIDRevert       = uint64(100)
+    CallbackIDNoRevert     = uint64(101)
+    CallbackIDSuccess      = uint64(102)
+)
+
+func createMsgSend(from, to string, denom string, amount math.Int) string {
+    return fmt.Sprintf(
+        `{"@type":"/cosmos.bank.v1beta1.MsgSend","from_address":"%s","to_address":"%s","amount":[{"denom":"%s","amount":"%s"}]}`,
+        from, to, denom, amount,
+    )
+}

 func Test_ExecuteCosmosWithOptions(t *testing.T) {
     // ... setup code ...

-    inputBz, err := parsed.Pack("execute_cosmos_with_options",
-        fmt.Sprintf(`{"@type":"/cosmos.bank.v1beta1.MsgSend","from_address":"%s","to_address":"%s","amount":[{"denom":"%s","amount":"%s"}]}`,
-            sdk.AccAddress(contractAddr.Bytes()).String(),
-            addr.String(),
-            denom,
-            amount.AddRaw(1),
-        ),
-        true,
-        uint64(100),
-    )
+    inputBz, err := parsed.Pack("execute_cosmos_with_options",
+        createMsgSend(
+            sdk.AccAddress(contractAddr.Bytes()).String(),
+            addr.String(),
+            denom,
+            amount.AddRaw(1),
+        ),
+        true,
+        CallbackIDRevert,
+    )

     // ... rest of the test ...

     // Add balance verification for successful case
+    // After case 3
+    require.Equal(t, math.ZeroInt(), input.BankKeeper.GetBalance(ctx, sdk.AccAddress(contractAddr.Bytes()), denom).Amount)
+    require.Equal(t, amount, input.BankKeeper.GetBalance(ctx, addr, denom).Amount)

303-416: Consider adding more test cases for edge scenarios.

The current test suite could be enhanced with additional test cases:

  1. Zero amount transfer
  2. Invalid message format handling
  3. Different message types beyond bank transfers
  4. Empty or malformed callback IDs

Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?

x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.go (1)

272-291: Method implementations follow consistent patterns!

The ExecuteCosmosWithOptions implementations are properly structured across all three contexts (Transactor, Session, and TransactorSession) and maintain consistency with the existing codebase patterns.

However, consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of the dummy return value, as its usage might not be immediately clear to other developers.

x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.go (1)

Migration from deprecated variables needs attention in specific files

The verification reveals that while the codebase is transitioning to use Erc20WrapperMetaData, there are still instances where the deprecated variables are being used:

  • x/evm/keeper/genesis.go: Uses erc20_wrapper.Erc20WrapperBin directly instead of Erc20WrapperMetaData.Bin
  • x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.go: Uses Erc20WrapperBin in the DeployContract function

Recommended actions:

  • Update genesis.go to use erc20_wrapper.Erc20WrapperMetaData.Bin
  • Update the DeployContract function to use Erc20WrapperMetaData.Bin directly
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 39-42: Verify migration from deprecated variables.

The direct ABI and Bin variables are correctly marked as deprecated in favor of using the metadata struct. This change improves maintainability by centralizing contract metadata.


Let me analyze the usage of deprecated variables in more detail to ensure we have a complete picture.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining direct usage of deprecated variables.
# Test: Search for direct usage of deprecated variables that should be updated.

# Search for direct usage of deprecated ABI/Bin variables
rg "Erc20WrapperABI|Erc20WrapperBin" --type go

Length of output: 734


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the genesis.go file content to understand the context of wrapperCode usage
cat x/evm/keeper/genesis.go

Length of output: 7500


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any other files importing the erc20_wrapper package
rg -l "erc20_wrapper" --type go

Length of output: 243


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Look for any usage of ERC20WrapperMetaData to see if some code is already using the new approach
rg "Erc20WrapperMetaData" --type go

Length of output: 988

x/evm/keeper/context.go (1)

6-6: Import formatting nitpick

At line 6, the fmt package is imported without grouping it with the other standard library imports, which may affect readability.

Consider grouping standard library imports together:

 package keeper

 import (
-    "context"
-    "encoding/json"
+    "context"
+    "encoding/json"
+    "fmt"

     "math/big"

     "github.com/holiman/uint256"
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract_test.go (1)

291-363: Enhance test coverage in Test_ExecuteCosmosWithOptions

While Test_ExecuteCosmosWithOptions effectively tests execution with AllowFailure set to true and a non-zero CallbackId, consider adding additional test cases to ensure comprehensive coverage:

  • Test with AllowFailure set to false: Verify that failures are properly propagated when AllowFailure is false.
  • Test with edge CallbackId values: Test with CallbackId set to 0 and the maximum uint64 value to confirm correct handling.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0ff2791 and dfd0c4d.

📒 Files selected for processing (21)
  • x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.go (5 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.sol (2 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/erc20/ERC20.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/erc20_acl/ERC20ACL.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/erc20_factory/ERC20Factory.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.go (2 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.sol (3 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.sol (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/contracts/initia_erc20/InitiaERC20.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/context.go (5 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/context_test.go (2 hunks)
  • x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (4 hunks)
  • x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract.go (2 hunks)
  • x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract_test.go (3 hunks)
  • x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/types.go (3 hunks)
  • x/evm/state/snapshot.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/types/dispatch.go (1 hunks)
  • x/evm/types/events.go (2 hunks)
  • x/evm/types/keys.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
  • x/evm/contracts/erc20_acl/ERC20ACL.go
  • x/evm/contracts/erc20_factory/ERC20Factory.go
  • x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.go
  • x/evm/contracts/initia_erc20/InitiaERC20.go
🔇 Additional comments (31)
x/evm/state/snapshot.go (1)

27-30: Add proper Go doc comments for the Context method.

The implementation looks good and serves its purpose for testing. However, consider adding proper Go doc comments to better document the method's purpose and usage.

-// for mock testing
+// Context returns the underlying sdk.Context.
+// This method is primarily used for mock testing purposes.
 func (s *Snapshot) Context() sdk.Context {

Let's verify its usage in tests:

✅ Verification successful

Context() method is actively used in mock testing, suggestion approved

The Context() method is indeed used in mock testing as intended, specifically in:

  • x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/common_test.go
  • x/evm/precompiles/erc20_registry/common_test.go

Both test files use the method in their MockStateDB implementation for snapshot management, confirming its necessity for testing purposes. The suggested documentation improvement remains valid.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that Context() is used in test files
rg -g '*_test.go' 'Context\(\).*Snapshot' -A 3

Length of output: 48


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for test files that might use the Snapshot type
rg -g '*_test.go' 'Snapshot' -B 2 -A 2

# Also search for any direct usage of the Context method
rg -g '*_test.go' '\.Context\(\)' -B 2 -A 2

# Let's also check the implementation file to understand the full context
cat x/evm/state/snapshot.go

Length of output: 8269

x/evm/types/events.go (3)

7-7: LGTM: New event type for submessages

The EventTypeSubmsg constant follows the established naming convention and integrates well with the existing event types.


14-14: Improved code organization


31-32: LGTM: New attribute keys for tracking message execution results

The AttributeKeySuccess and AttributeKeyReason constants are well-named and will be useful for tracking the outcome of cosmos message executions, particularly in the context of callbacks.

x/evm/types/dispatch.go (1)

1-8: LGTM: Clean and well-organized imports

The package declaration and imports are appropriate for the functionality being implemented.

x/evm/types/keys.go (1)

52-53: LGTM! The renamed constant better reflects its purpose.

The rename from CONTEXT_KEY_COSMOS_MESSAGES to CONTEXT_KEY_EXECUTE_REQUESTS accurately represents the enhanced execution request system that includes additional options.

Let's verify the constant usage across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

Constant rename is consistently applied across the codebase

The verification shows:

  • No occurrences of the old constant name CONTEXT_KEY_COSMOS_MESSAGES
  • The new constant CONTEXT_KEY_EXECUTE_REQUESTS is properly used in all relevant files:
    • Defined in x/evm/types/keys.go
    • Used in precompiles (contract.go, contract_test.go)
    • Used in keeper's context handling (context.go)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that the old constant name is not used anywhere
# and the new constant is properly adopted.

echo "Checking for any remaining usage of old constant name..."
rg "CONTEXT_KEY_COSMOS_MESSAGES"

echo "Verifying usage of new constant name..."
rg "CONTEXT_KEY_EXECUTE_REQUESTS"

Length of output: 1334

x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/types.go (2)

66-66: LGTM!

The gas constant value and placement are consistent with other similar operations in the file.


78-80: Verify the coexistence of both execute methods.

The presence of both METHOD_EXECUTE_COSMOS and METHOD_EXECUTE_COSMOS_WITH_OPTIONS suggests these methods will coexist. Please clarify:

  1. Is this intentional for backward compatibility?
  2. Should we mark the basic version as deprecated?
  3. Should we document the recommended method to use?
✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough context about both methods:

Both execute methods serve different purposes and should coexist

The execute_cosmos and execute_cosmos_with_options methods are designed for different use cases:

  • execute_cosmos: Basic execution without additional options
  • execute_cosmos_with_options: Advanced execution with:
    • allow_failure: Boolean flag to control revert behavior
    • callback_id: Support for callbacks after execution

The methods should coexist as they serve different purposes, with the options version providing additional control flow features not available in the basic version.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if both methods are used in the codebase

# Test: Search for both method usages to understand their implementation
echo "Searching for basic execute_cosmos usage:"
rg "execute_cosmos[^_]" -A 5

echo -e "\nSearching for execute_cosmos_with_options usage:"
rg "execute_cosmos_with_options" -A 5

Length of output: 56070

x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.sol (2)

12-13: LGTM: Well-structured event declarations

The new events provide good visibility into callback results and recursive call tracking.


70-71: Verify the impact of double cosmos execution

The recursive function makes two identical cosmos calls which could be expensive. Also, let's verify the recursive call patterns in tests.

x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.sol (3)

12-14: LGTM! Improved function signature formatting

The reformatting enhances readability while maintaining the original functionality.

Also applies to: 17-19


41-42: LGTM! Enhanced documentation clarity

The updated documentation clearly specifies the failure behavior and provides a well-structured JSON example.

Also applies to: 44-44


67-87: LGTM! Well-documented new function with proper callback mechanism

The new function provides flexible cosmos message execution with proper documentation.

Let's verify the callback implementation:

✅ Verification successful

Callback implementation verified and properly integrated

The verification confirms that:

  • The ICosmosCallback interface is properly defined in ICosmosCallback.sol
  • The callback mechanism is correctly implemented in example contracts:
    • Counter.sol implements a simple callback that emits events
    • ERC20Wrapper.sol implements a more complex callback system for IBC transfers

The callback mechanism is well-integrated with the execute_cosmos_with_options function, allowing proper handling of asynchronous operations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for ICosmosCallback interface implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'interface ICosmosCallback {
  $$$
  callback(uint64 $_id, bool $_success) {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'

# Search for callback implementations in contracts
ast-grep --pattern 'function callback(uint64 $_id, bool $_success) $_visibility {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 211


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find the callback interface and implementations

# Search for ICosmosCallback interface definition
rg -l "interface ICosmosCallback"

# Search for callback function signature
rg "function callback\s*\(\s*uint64.*bool\s*\)"

# Search for files containing both ICosmos and callback references
rg -l "callback.*success"

Length of output: 859


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the ICosmosCallback interface definition and implementations

# Check the interface definition
cat x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos_callback/ICosmosCallback.sol

# Look for actual implementations in Counter and ERC20Wrapper contracts
cat x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.sol
cat x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.sol

Length of output: 9786

x/evm/keeper/keeper.go (2)

13-13: LGTM: Import additions are appropriate.

The new imports for Ethereum ABI and cosmos callback contract are necessary for the introduced functionality.

Also applies to: 17-17


82-82: Verify callback interface integration.

Let's verify that the callback interface implementation matches between the contract and the keeper.

Also applies to: 108-111, 159-159

x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract.go (2)

210-216: LGTM: Method handling is well-implemented.

The code appropriately handles both METHOD_EXECUTE_COSMOS and METHOD_EXECUTE_COSMOS_WITH_OPTIONS methods with proper gas consumption and read-only checks.


253-254: Consider adding validation for CallbackId.

The code accepts any value for CallbackId without validation. Consider adding validation to ensure the callback ID meets any required format or length constraints.

Let's check how callback IDs are used in the codebase:

x/evm/keeper/context_test.go (1)

231-233: LGTM! Accurate log count verification.

The verification of log count is mathematically correct. For a recursive depth of n, the total number of logs should be 2^n - 1, which matches the implementation.

x/evm/contracts/i_cosmos/ICosmos.go (2)

32-36: Well-structured options type definition!

The ICosmosOptions struct is well-designed with clear, purpose-specific fields that enhance the flexibility of cosmos message execution.


40-40: ABI definition is consistent with the new feature!

The ABI correctly defines the new execute_cosmos_with_options function with appropriate parameter types and structure.

x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.go (3)

Line range hint 428-429: LGTM: Well-structured IBC callback interface.

The contract correctly implements IBC acknowledgment and timeout handlers with proper type safety and error handling. This aligns with the PR objective of executing cosmos messages with options.

Also applies to: 435-436, 442-443, 449-450


Line range hint 45-54: LGTM: Robust error handling in deployment function.

The deployment function includes comprehensive error handling:

  1. Proper ABI parsing error check
  2. Important nil check for parsed ABI
  3. Appropriate error propagation

35-35: Verify the updated contract bytecode.

The contract's binary representation has been updated. Please ensure that:

  1. The bytecode matches the latest Solidity source code
  2. The contract has been compiled with the correct Solidity version and optimization settings
✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the contract source code to verify the bytecode changes.


Based on the source code analysis, I can now provide a final response regarding the bytecode verification:

Bytecode update is consistent with contract changes

The updated bytecode in ERC20Wrapper.go corresponds to the Solidity source code which:

  • Uses Solidity version ^0.8.24
  • Implements IBC async callback functionality
  • Includes proper decimal conversion for wrapped tokens
  • Contains the required state variables and mappings

The changes are valid and match the contract's implementation. Key points verified:

  • Contract inheritance (Ownable, ERC165, IIBCAsyncCallback)
  • State variables (callBackId, factory, wrappedTokens, ibcCallBack)
  • Core functionality (wrap, unwrap, ibc_ack, ibc_timeout)
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contract's source code matches the bytecode.
# Test: Search for the contract's source file to verify compilation settings.

# Find the Solidity source file
fd --type f --extension sol "ERC20Wrapper"

# Search for compiler version and optimization settings
rg -A 2 "pragma solidity" 

Length of output: 4071


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the ERC20Wrapper contract source code
cat x/evm/contracts/erc20_wrapper/ERC20Wrapper.sol

# Check for any hardhat/foundry config files that might contain compiler settings
fd -t f "hardhat.config|foundry.toml"

Length of output: 6834

x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract_test.go (2)

44-44: Context initialization with EXECUTE_REQUESTS is correct

The context is properly initialized with the key types.CONTEXT_KEY_EXECUTE_REQUESTS and an empty slice of types.ExecuteRequest, aligning with the updated execution request handling.


333-333: This comment refers to the earlier issue about adding a nil check before the type assertion to prevent a potential panic when retrieving messages from the context.

x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.go (5)

34-35: Updated ABI and binary representations

The ABI and bytecode have been updated to reflect the new methods and events in the contract. The changes are consistent with the Solidity contract.


267-287: Addition of Callback methods

The Callback methods have been correctly implemented, matching the Solidity contract's callback function. The parameters and return types are accurate.


309-329: Addition of ExecuteCosmosWithOptions methods

The ExecuteCosmosWithOptions methods are properly implemented, aligning with the new Solidity function execute_cosmos_with_options. The function signatures correctly include the new parameters allow_failure and callback_id.


435-569: Implementation of CounterCallbackReceived event handling

The event struct CounterCallbackReceived and associated iterator and parsing methods have been correctly added to handle the callback_received event. The implementation follows Go best practices for event handling in Ethereum contracts.


704-837: Implementation of CounterRecursiveCalled event handling

The event struct CounterRecursiveCalled and associated iterator and parsing methods have been correctly added to handle the recursive_called event. The code is consistent and follows standard patterns.

x/evm/contracts/erc20/ERC20.go (1)

35-35: Verify Integration of New ABI Functions

The Erc20MetaData variable has updated ABI and Bin fields, introducing new functions: sudoBurn, sudoMint, and sudoTransfer. Please ensure that these new functions are properly integrated and that any necessary updates in the codebase are made to support these additions.

Run the following script to verify the usage of the new functions across the codebase:

✅ Verification successful

The new functions are properly integrated and used across the codebase

The verification shows that:

  1. The sudoBurn, sudoMint, and sudoTransfer functions are:

    • Properly defined in the Solidity contracts (ERC20.sol)
    • Correctly included in the ABI and bytecode
    • Have corresponding Go bindings generated
    • Are actively used in the codebase:
      • sudoBurn is used in x/evm/keeper/erc20.go and x/evm/state/statedb.go
      • sudoMint is used in x/evm/keeper/erc20.go and x/evm/state/statedb.go
      • sudoTransfer is used in x/evm/keeper/erc20.go
  2. The functions are also properly integrated into the fee denom validation logic in x/evm/keeper/msg_server.go which tests for sudoMint and sudoBurn support.

The changes are consistent and properly integrated across the codebase.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for references to the new functions in the Go codebase.

# Expected Result: Instances where `sudoBurn`, `sudoMint`, and `sudoTransfer` are called or implemented.

# Commands:
ast-grep --pattern 'sudoBurn($_, $_)'
ast-grep --pattern 'sudoMint($_, $_)'
ast-grep --pattern 'sudoTransfer($_, $_, $_)'

Length of output: 127


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for any references to these functions in the entire codebase
# using ripgrep which can handle both function names and method calls

echo "Searching for sudoBurn..."
rg -i "sudoBurn" -A 2 -B 2

echo "Searching for sudoMint..."
rg -i "sudoMint" -A 2 -B 2

echo "Searching for sudoTransfer..."
rg -i "sudoTransfer" -A 2 -B 2

# Let's also check the ABI definition in the file
echo "Checking ABI definition..."
rg -A 5 -B 5 '"type": "function",(\s*)"name": "sudo' x/evm/contracts/erc20/ERC20.go

Length of output: 117754

x/evm/types/dispatch.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/contracts/counter/Counter.sol Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/keeper/context.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/keeper/context.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/keeper/context.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/keeper/context.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/keeper/context.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/keeper/context.go Show resolved Hide resolved
x/evm/precompiles/cosmos/contract_test.go Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@Vritra4 Vritra4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM except just a comment lol

x/evm/types/keys.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@beer-1 beer-1 merged commit c101f70 into main Oct 30, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@beer-1 beer-1 deleted the feat/execute-cosmos-with-options branch October 30, 2024 04:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants