fix cosmos messages #158
fix cosmos messages #158
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications across multiple files to incorporate base64 encoding for various data types. A new dependency, Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/cosmos.rs (1)
446-448: LGTM! Base64 encoding is correctly implemented.The implementation correctly uses the standard base64 engine for encoding binary data.
Consider extracting the base64 engine initialization to avoid repetition. Here's a suggested implementation:
// At the top of the file with other constants const BASE64: base64::engine::GeneralPurpose = base64::engine::general_purpose::STANDARD;Then replace the repeated initialization with the constant:
- let base64 = base64::engine::general_purpose::STANDARD; - let arg1_base64 = base64.encode(arg1.clone()); + let arg1_base64 = BASE64.encode(arg1.clone());Also applies to: 537-540, 581-582
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
crates/e2e-move-tests/Cargo.toml(1 hunks)crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/cosmos.rs(5 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move(9 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move(9 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
crates/e2e-move-tests/Cargo.toml (1)
25-25: Verify workspace configuration for base64 dependency.
The addition of the base64 dependency is aligned with the codebase's dependency management approach and supports the transition from hex to base64 encoding for cosmos messages.
Let's verify the workspace configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Base64 dependency is properly configured in workspace
The base64 dependency is correctly configured in the workspace's dependencies section with version "0.21.7", and the e2e-move-tests crate properly references it using workspace = true. This addition is consistent with the workspace's dependency management approach and supports the transition from hex to base64 encoding for cosmos messages.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify base64 dependency configuration in workspace
# Expected: base64 should be defined in workspace dependencies
# Check if base64 is properly configured in workspace
rg '"base64"' -A 1 Cargo.toml
# Verify no duplicate base64 dependencies exist
rg 'base64.*=.*{.*}' **/Cargo.toml
Length of output: 208
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify the workspace configuration
# Check workspace dependencies in root Cargo.toml
echo "=== Checking workspace dependencies ==="
cat Cargo.toml
# List all Cargo.toml files that mention base64
echo -e "\n=== Finding base64 usage across Cargo.toml files ==="
rg -l "base64" **/Cargo.toml
# Check the specific content of e2e-move-tests/Cargo.toml
echo -e "\n=== Checking e2e-move-tests/Cargo.toml ==="
cat crates/e2e-move-tests/Cargo.toml
Length of output: 9418
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move (3)
14-14: LGTM! Base64 encoding changes are well-documented.
The changes to use base64 encoded strings instead of raw bytes are consistent and well-documented. The field type changes in the structs and the addition of the base64 module import align with the goal of standardizing base64 encoding across the codebase.
Also applies to: 82-82, 147-147, 149-149, 177-177
93-93: Verify base64 encoding compatibility with external systems.
The implementation of base64 encoding is correct and consistent across all functions. The use of vector::map for encoding arrays of arguments is an efficient approach.
Let's verify that the base64 encoding implementation matches the encoding used in the test files:
Also applies to: 158-159, 188-188
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a conclusive response about the base64 encoding implementation:
Base64 encoding implementation is verified and consistent with external systems
The implementation is verified to be compatible with external systems because:
- The base64 module is implemented as a native function using the standard base64 encoding (STANDARD variant) in the Rust implementation
- The encoding is consistently used in both test files and production code
- The e2e tests verify the encoding compatibility by comparing encoded values between Move and Rust implementations
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for base64 encoding usage in test files to verify consistency
rg -A 3 "base64.*encode" "tests/"
Length of output: 80
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find test files in the repository
fd -t f "test" -E "node_modules"
# Then search for base64 usage across all files
rg -g "!node_modules" "base64" -A 3
Length of output: 27884
364-365: Verify impact of breaking field name changes in PayFeeRequest.
The renaming of fields from source_port/source_channel to source_port_id/source_channel_id improves clarity but introduces a breaking change.
Let's verify the impact on dependent code:
Also applies to: 389-390
✅ Verification successful
Field renaming in PayFeeRequest is consistently applied across the codebase
The field renaming from source_port/source_channel to source_port_id/source_channel_id has been consistently applied in both the initia and minitia stdlib modules. The struct is only defined and used within these modules, with no instances of the old field names remaining in the codebase.
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move: Updated struct definition and usageprecompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move: Matching changes in minitia stdlib
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of the old field names to ensure all occurrences are updated
rg -l "source_port[^_]|source_channel[^_]" --type move
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any occurrences of the old or new field names without file type restriction
rg -l "source_port|source_channel"
Length of output: 280
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for struct PayFeeRequest to understand its usage
rg -A 5 "struct PayFeeRequest"
Length of output: 1031
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for PayFeeRequest instantiation or field access
rg "PayFeeRequest"
Length of output: 382
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move (4)
14-14: LGTM: Base64 import added for standardized binary encoding.
The addition of the base64 module import aligns with the PR's objective to standardize binary data encoding across the codebase.
82-82: LGTM: Request structures updated to use base64 encoded strings.
The changes consistently update binary data fields to use base64 encoded strings, improving data handling consistency across the module. The added comments clearly indicate the expected encoding format.
Also applies to: 147-149, 177-177
364-365: LGTM: Field names improved for clarity.
The renaming of fields from source_port/source_channel to source_port_id/source_channel_id improves clarity and better reflects their purpose in the ICS-29 specification.
Also applies to: 389-390
93-93: Verify base64 encoding transformation correctness.
The implementation correctly transforms binary data to base64 encoded strings. However, we should verify that all consumers of these functions are prepared to handle base64 encoded data.
Also applies to: 158-159, 188-188
✅ Verification successful
Base64 encoding transformation is correctly integrated
The base64 encoding changes are consistent and properly integrated:
- All base64 encoding operations use
base64::to_string()uniformly - The encoding is used in both minitia and initia stdlib modules
- The encoded data is passed to
stargate()function which expects base64 encoded strings - Other modules like
minitswap.movealready use the same base64 encoding pattern for their data
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct callers of these functions to verify they handle base64 encoded data
echo "Searching for move_execute callers..."
rg -l "move_execute.*vector<u8>" --type move
echo "Searching for move_script callers..."
rg -l "move_script.*vector<u8>" --type move
echo "Searching for move_script_with_json callers..."
rg -l "move_script_with_json.*vector<u8>" --type move
Length of output: 506
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for direct callers of these functions without file type restriction
echo "Searching for move_execute callers..."
rg -l "move_execute.*vector" -g "*.move"
echo "Searching for move_script callers..."
rg -l "move_script.*vector" -g "*.move"
echo "Searching for move_script_with_json callers..."
rg -l "move_script_with_json.*vector" -g "*.move"
# Also search for base64 usage to understand encoding/decoding patterns
echo "Searching for base64 usage..."
rg "base64::(encode|decode|to_string|from_string)" -g "*.move" -A 2
Length of output: 2902
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/cosmos.rs (2)
11-11: LGTM! Base64 import is correctly structured.
The import brings in both the base64 module and the Engine trait, which is necessary for the encoding operations.
401-401: LGTM! Field names updated for consistency with Cosmos SDK.
The field names source_channel_id and source_port_id now match the standard Cosmos SDK message format.
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation