feat: ibc testing framework #165
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve enhancements to multiple modules related to Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) and message handling. Key modifications include the introduction of new modules and functions for testing IBC operations, updates to existing functions to return additional options, and improvements in JSON handling. New structures for managing IBC states and requests have been added, along with comprehensive testing frameworks to validate the functionality. Additionally, configuration files have been updated to reflect new address entries and testing capabilities. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 21
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (40)
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/Move.toml (1)
15-16: LGTM: Good separation of development addressesThe introduction of a separate [dev-addresses] section with a concrete test address for cafe (
0xcafe) is a good practice, providing clear separation between production and test configurations.This pattern will help maintain clean separation between production and test environments, making it easier to manage different address configurations across environments.
crates/natives/src/ibctesting.rs (2)
5-8: Add comprehensive module documentationThe module documentation block is empty. Since this is a testing framework, please add documentation covering:
- Module purpose and scope
- Usage examples for IBC testing scenarios
- Safety considerations and limitations
- Relationship with the production IBC implementation
/*************************************************************************************************** * module * - **************************************************************************************************/ + * This module provides native function implementations for IBC testing scenarios. + * + * # Usage + * The native functions registered here are used in conjunction with the Move-based + * IBC testing framework to simulate cross-chain communication scenarios. + * + * # Safety Considerations + * These functions should only be enabled in testing environments as they may + * bypass normal IBC security checks for testing purposes. + **************************************************************************************************/
9-22: Ensure testing-only availability of these functionsThese native functions provide powerful capabilities for testing but could be dangerous if exposed in production.
Consider:
- Adding a feature flag to ensure these are only available in test builds
- Adding runtime checks to prevent usage in production environments
- Adding documentation about the security implications
Would you like me to provide an example implementation of these safety measures?
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move (1)
30-38: Optimize string operations and add symbol length validationThe current implementation uses multiple vector operations where string operations would be more appropriate.
Consider this optimization:
public fun counterparty_symbol(metadata: Object<Metadata>): String { let symbol = fungible_asset::symbol(metadata); - let symbol_bytes = string::bytes(&symbol); - let counterparty_symbol = vector::empty(); - vector::append(&mut counterparty_symbol, b"counterparty_"); - vector::append(&mut counterparty_symbol, *symbol_bytes); - utf8(counterparty_symbol) + let counterparty_symbol = string::utf8(b"counterparty_"); + string::append(&mut counterparty_symbol, symbol); + assert!( + string::length(&counterparty_symbol) <= 128, + 0x1, + b"Resulting counterparty symbol too long" + ); + counterparty_symbol }precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move (2)
14-18: Consider making the account address configurableThe function currently hardcodes the
@stdaccount for accessing coin metadata. This might limit testing flexibility.Consider modifying the function to accept the account address as a parameter:
-public fun counterparty_metadata(metadata: Object<Metadata>): Object<Metadata> { +public fun counterparty_metadata(metadata: Object<Metadata>, account: address): Object<Metadata> { let counterparty_symbol = counterparty_symbol(metadata); - coin::metadata(@std, counterparty_symbol) + coin::metadata(account, counterparty_symbol) }
30-37: Consider optimizing string concatenationThe current implementation uses multiple vector operations. This can be optimized.
Consider this more efficient approach:
public fun counterparty_symbol(metadata: Object<Metadata>): String { let symbol = fungible_asset::symbol(metadata); - let symbol_bytes = string::bytes(&symbol); - let counterparty_symbol = vector::empty(); - vector::append(&mut counterparty_symbol, b"counterparty_"); - vector::append(&mut counterparty_symbol, *symbol_bytes); - utf8(counterparty_symbol) + string::append(&mut utf8(b"counterparty_"), symbol) }precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/README.md (6)
1-8: Consider adding more context about IBCWhile the introduction is clear, it would be helpful to briefly explain what IBC (Inter-Blockchain Communication) is and why testing it is important for developers who might be new to the concept.
16-16: Add comma for better readabilityAdd a comma after "callback" to improve readability:
-If a message is registered with options at `cosmos::stargate_with_options`, it will check and execute the given callback function if option contains callback. There are four cases for these options excluding callback options: +If a message is registered with options at `cosmos::stargate_with_options`, it will check and execute the given callback function if option contains callback, and there are four cases for these options excluding callback options:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...allback. There are four cases for these options excluding callback options: | Success ...(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
18-24: Enhance the options table explanationThe table would benefit from additional context about what each column represents:
- Success: Whether the operation succeeded
- Option (allow_failure): Whether failures are permitted
- Abort: Whether the operation should abort on failure
- Revert: Whether changes should be reverted
39-39: Simplify wordingReplace "with success" with "successfully" for more concise language:
-Based on the response of `on_receive`, the IBC packet relaying actions decide whether to execute acknowledgment with success or failure. +Based on the response of `on_receive`, the IBC packet relaying actions decide whether to execute acknowledgment successfully or with failure.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~39-~39: ‘with success’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ecide whether to execute acknowledgment with success or failure. Refer to [ibc_transfer_test...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_SUCCESS)
47-47: Improve JSON example formatting and explanationConsider formatting the JSON example for better readability and adding explanations for each field:
-If a message contains a memo field like `{"move": {"message": {}, "async_callback": {"id": "100", "module_address": "0xabc", "module_name": "testing"}}}`, it will execute... +If a message contains a memo field like: +```json +{ + "move": { + "message": {}, // Custom message payload + "async_callback": { + "id": "100", // Unique callback identifier + "module_address": "0xabc", // Address of the callback module + "module_name": "testing" // Name of the callback module + } + } +} +``` +it will execute...
49-53: Make the re-entrancy warning more prominentConsider making this important warning more visible:
-## Avoid Re-entrancy in Unit Tests +## ⚠️ Important: Avoid Re-entrancy in Unit Testsprecompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/README.md (6)
13-13: Clarify the purpose of @std addressConsider explaining why tokens are transferred to the
@stdaddress and what role it plays in the testing framework.
16-16: Fix grammar in the options description-If a message is registered with options at `cosmos::stargate_with_options`, it will check and execute the given callback function if option contains callback. +If a message is registered with options at `cosmos::stargate_with_options`, it will check and execute the given callback function if the option contains a callback.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~16-~16: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... execute the given callback function if option contains callback. There are four cases...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
33-35: Document the boolean return value's significanceThe
on_receivefunction returns a boolean, but its significance isn't explained. Consider documenting whattrueandfalsereturn values indicate and how they affect the packet handling.
47-47: Improve JSON example formatting and add callback signaturesConsider formatting the JSON example in a code block for better readability and adding the expected signatures for
ibc_ackandibc_timeoutcallback functions.-If a message contains a memo field like `{"move": {"message": {}, "async_callback": {"id": "100", "module_address": "0xabc", "module_name": "testing"}}}`, it will execute... +If a message contains a memo field like: +```json +{ + "move": { + "message": {}, + "async_callback": { + "id": "100", + "module_address": "0xabc", + "module_name": "testing" + } + } +} +``` +it will execute...
51-51: Consider emphasizing the re-entrancy warningThis is a critical warning that could prevent serious issues. Consider adding a warning emoji or "
⚠️ IMPORTANT" prefix to make it more noticeable.-The IBC testing package is built with the dispatch function of Aptos Move, which does not allow re-entrancy. +⚠️ IMPORTANT: The IBC testing package is built with the dispatch function of Aptos Move, which does not allow re-entrancy.
1-53: Well-structured and comprehensive documentationThe documentation effectively explains the IBC testing framework with good technical depth, clear examples, and important warnings. The structure follows a logical flow from basic concepts to advanced usage.
Consider adding a troubleshooting section or common pitfalls section to help users debug common issues they might encounter while using the framework.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~16-~16: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... execute the given callback function if option contains callback. There are four cases...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~39-~39: ‘with success’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ecide whether to execute acknowledgment with success or failure. Refer to [ibc_transfer_test...(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_SUCCESS)
crates/natives/src/lib.rs (1)
89-91: LGTM! Consider documenting testing framework setup.The registration of IBC testing natives follows the established pattern and is properly feature-flagged.
Since this is part of a larger IBC testing framework:
- Consider adding a README.md in the
ibctestingmodule directory explaining:
- How to enable and use the testing framework
- Example test cases
- Integration with the broader IBC testing strategy
- Document any assumptions or requirements for using these native functions in tests
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move (1)
88-105: Add documentation explaining the IBC testing context.While the implementation is solid, these functions would benefit from documentation explaining their role in the IBC testing framework. Consider adding doc comments describing:
- How these functions are used in IBC testing scenarios
- Example usage in the context of IBC message handling
- Any preconditions or assumptions when using in tests
Example documentation:
+ /// Wrapper for load_module_from_function to support IBC testing scenarios. + /// This function is used in IBC tests to load modules that handle IBC messages. #[test_only] public fun load_module_from_function_for_testing(f: &FunctionInfo) {precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move (1)
88-105: Consider adding documentation for test functionsWhile the implementation is correct, adding documentation would improve usability:
- Explain the purpose of each test function
- Provide usage examples
- Document any test-specific considerations
Example documentation:
#[test_only] +/// Test wrapper for load_module_from_function. Enables testing of module loading behavior. +/// Example: +/// ``` +/// let info = new_function_info_for_testing(addr, mod_name, fn_name); +/// load_module_from_function_for_testing(&info); +/// ``` public fun load_module_from_function_for_testing(f: &FunctionInfo) {precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests_helpers.move (2)
45-54: Refactorstore_on_*_requestfunctions to reduce code duplicationThe functions
store_on_callback_request,store_on_receive_request,store_on_ack_request, andstore_on_timeout_requestshare similar logic for creating a signer and moving a resource to it. Consider refactoring common code into a helper function to improve maintainability and reduce duplication.Apply this diff to create a helper function and refactor:
+public fun store_request<T: key>( + resource: T +) { + let chain_signer = create_signer_for_test(@std); + move_to<T>(&chain_signer, resource); +} public fun store_on_callback_request( sender: address, amount: u64, expected_result: bool, id: u64 ) { - let chain_signer = create_signer_for_test(@std); - move_to<OnCallbackRequest>( - &chain_signer, - OnCallbackRequest { sender, amount, result: expected_result, id } - ); + store_request(OnCallbackRequest { sender, amount, result: expected_result, id }); } public fun store_on_receive_request( msg_opt: &Option<ibctesting::MoveMessage>, on_receive_result: bool ) { - let chain_signer = create_signer_for_test(@std); - move_to<OnReceiveRequest>( - &chain_signer, - OnReceiveRequest { msg_opt: *msg_opt, result: on_receive_result } - ); + store_request(OnReceiveRequest { msg_opt: *msg_opt, result: on_receive_result }); } public fun store_on_ack_request( id: u64, expected_result: bool, sender: address, amount: u64 ) { - let chain_signer = create_signer_for_test(@std); - move_to<OnAckRequest>( - &chain_signer, - OnAckRequest { id, result: expected_result, sender, amount } - ); + store_request(OnAckRequest { id, result: expected_result, sender, amount }); } public fun store_on_timeout_request(id: u64, sender: address) { - let chain_signer = create_signer_for_test(@std); - move_to<OnTimeoutRequest>(&chain_signer, OnTimeoutRequest { id, sender }); + store_request(OnTimeoutRequest { id, sender }); }Also applies to: 59-68, 73-82, 87-91
56-57: Use descriptive error messages inassert!statementsCurrently, the
assert!statements use numeric error codes (e.g.,assert!(condition, 0);). Replacing them with descriptive error messages will improve readability and make debugging easier.Apply this diff to update the
assert!statements:-assert!(called == exists<OnCallbackResponse>(@std), 0); +assert!(called == exists<OnCallbackResponse>(@std), b"OnCallbackResponse existence mismatch"); -assert!(called == exists<OnReceiveResponse>(@std), 0); +assert!(called == exists<OnReceiveResponse>(@std), b"OnReceiveResponse existence mismatch"); -assert!(called == exists<OnAckResponse>(@std), 0); +assert!(called == exists<OnAckResponse>(@std), b"OnAckResponse existence mismatch"); -assert!(called == exists<OnTimeoutResponse>(@std), 0); +assert!(called == exists<OnTimeoutResponse>(@std), b"OnTimeoutResponse existence mismatch"); -assert!(request.id == id, 0); +assert!(request.id == id, b"Request ID does not match"); -assert!(option::is_some(&request.msg_opt) == option::is_some(msg_opt), 2); +assert!(option::is_some(&request.msg_opt) == option::is_some(msg_opt), b"Message option presence mismatch"); -assert!(request.id == id, 0); +assert!(request.id == id, b"Request ID does not match"); -assert!(request.id == id, 0); +assert!(request.id == id, b"Request ID does not match");Also applies to: 70-71, 83-84, 92-93, 98-99, 128-130, 147-149, 169-171
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move (5)
125-125: Use standard resource existence check for consistencyInstead of
object::object_exists<Metadata>(counterparty_metadata_addr), you can use the standardexists<Metadata>(counterparty_metadata_addr)for consistency with the rest of the codebase.Apply this diff:
-if (!object::object_exists<Metadata>(counterparty_metadata_addr)) { +if (!exists<Metadata>(counterparty_metadata_addr)) {
130-136: Ensure consistent logic in recipient determinationDouble-check the logic used to determine the
recipientaddress. Ensure that the conditions correctly reflect the intended behavior and that variable shadowing is avoided.Review the conditional structure to confirm the recipient is accurately assigned.
30-36: Organize error codes for clarityThe error codes are defined but could be better organized or documented for maintainability. Grouping related error codes and providing comments can improve readability.
Consider grouping error codes by functionality and adding descriptive comments.
88-91: Consider early exit ifChainStoredoes not existThe function returns immediately if
ChainStoredoes not exist. Ensure this behavior is intentional and that any necessary cleanup or logging is performed before exiting.If appropriate, add a log message to indicate why the function exited early.
331-334: Consistent naming for callback functionsEnsure that the naming of
ibc_ack_callback_function_infoandibc_timeout_callback_function_infofollows a consistent pattern. This enhances readability and maintainability.Consider renaming functions for consistency if needed.
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move (1)
336-358: Refactor to reduce code duplication in function info creationThe functions
dispatchable_on_receive_function_info,dispatchable_callback_function_info,dispatchable_ibc_ack_function_info, anddispatchable_ibc_timeout_function_infoall create aFunctionInfousingnew_function_info_for_testingwith similar parameters. Consider refactoring these functions to reduce duplication by introducing a helper function.Apply this diff to refactor the code:
fun dispatchable_function_info(function_name: String): FunctionInfo { new_function_info_for_testing( @std, utf8(b"ibctesting"), function_name ) } fun dispatchable_on_receive_function_info(): FunctionInfo { dispatchable_function_info(utf8(b"dispatchable_on_receive")) } fun dispatchable_callback_function_info(): FunctionInfo { dispatchable_function_info(utf8(b"dispatchable_callback")) } fun dispatchable_ibc_ack_function_info(): FunctionInfo { dispatchable_function_info(utf8(b"dispatchable_ibc_ack")) } fun dispatchable_ibc_timeout_function_info(): FunctionInfo { dispatchable_function_info(utf8(b"dispatchable_ibc_timeout")) }precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move (2)
426-426: Update documentation to reflect the signature change ofrequested_messages()The return type of
requested_messages()has changed fromvector<String>to(vector<String>, vector<Options>). Please ensure that any related documentation or comments are updated to reflect this change for clarity and to assist other developers.
541-571: Consider expanding test coverage intest_stargate_with_optionsTo improve robustness, consider adding test cases for scenarios such as:
- Invalid
callback_id(e.g., zero or negative values).- Empty or malformed
callback_fid.- Different combinations of
Options, includingdisallow_failure_with_callback.This will ensure that the function behaves correctly under various conditions.
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests.move (2)
32-39: Refactor repeated test setup code into a helper functionThe test functions contain repeated code for initializing tokens, setting block info, creating signers, mapping addresses, and funding tokens. Refactoring this common setup into a helper function will reduce duplication and improve maintainability.
Example helper function:
fun setup_test_environment(): (vector<signer>, vector<address>) { create_init_token(); block::set_block_info(1u64, 0u64); let signers = create_signers_for_testing(2); let addrs = vector::map_ref(&signers, |s| signer::address_of(s)); fund_init_token(*vector::borrow(&addrs, 0), 1_000_000u64); return (signers, addrs); }Then, in your test functions, you can call:
let (signers, addrs) = setup_test_environment();Also applies to: 111-118, 167-174, 223-230, 265-272, 347-350, 426-429
341-417: Refactor duplicate code intest_ibc_transfer_ack_successandtest_ibc_transfer_ack_failureThe functions
test_ibc_transfer_ack_successandtest_ibc_transfer_ack_failureshare significant duplicated code. Consider extracting the common code into helper functions to reduce redundancy and enhance maintainability.Also applies to: 420-496
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests.move (7)
41-41: Misleading comment: Code includes a callbackThe comment
// without callbacksuggests that the following code does not use a callback, but thecosmos::stargate_with_optionsfunction is being called withcosmos::allow_failure_with_callback, indicating that a callback is indeed used. Please update the comment to accurately reflect the code.
120-120: Misleading comment: Code includes a callbackSimilarly, the comment
// without callbackhere implies no callback is used, but the code includes a callback viacosmos::allow_failure_with_callback. Consider correcting the comment for clarity.
176-176: Clarify comment: Code does not use a callbackThe comment
// without callbackis accurate here. For consistency and clarity, you might want to explicitly state that this test is designed to operate without a callback, contrasting it with previous tests that include callbacks.
32-39: Refactor repeated setup code into helper functionsThe initialization steps involving
create_init_token(), setting block info, creating signers, and funding tokens are repeated across multiple test functions. Extracting these repeated code blocks into helper functions (e.g.,setup_test_environment(),initialize_signers_and_fund()) would improve code maintainability and reduce duplication.Also applies to: 111-118, 167-174, 342-349, 421-428
105-107: Add balance verification to strengthen the testWhile the test checks for the successful reception of the transfer via
check_on_receive_response(true);, it would be beneficial to verify the sender's and receiver's balances to ensure that the transfer amount has been correctly debited and credited. This adds an extra layer of validation to the test.
152-153: Consider checking for unintended side effects after failureIn
test_ibc_transfer_fail_with_allow_failure, after simulating a transfer that is expected to fail, it might be useful to verify that the sender's and receiver's balances remain unchanged to ensure that no unintended state changes have occurred.
498-549: Document helper functions and structs for clarityThe helper functions and structs are essential for understanding the test setup and execution. Adding documentation comments to
init_metadata(),create_init_token(),fund_init_token(), and the structsTransferRequest,CosmosCoin, andTimeoutHeightwould improve code readability and maintainability.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (24)
crates/natives/src/cosmos.rs(1 hunks)crates/natives/src/ibctesting.rs(1 hunks)crates/natives/src/lib.rs(2 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/Move.toml(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/address.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move(3 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/README.md(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/json.move(2 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests_helpers.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/Move.toml(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/address.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move(3 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/README.md(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/json.move(2 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests_helpers.move(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/Move.toml
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/address.move
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/staking.move
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/address.move
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/README.md
[uncategorized] ~16-~16: Possible missing comma found.
Context: ...allback. There are four cases for these options excluding callback options: | Success ...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
[style] ~39-~39: ‘with success’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ecide whether to execute acknowledgment with success or failure. Refer to [ibc_transfer_test...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_SUCCESS)
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/README.md
[uncategorized] ~16-~16: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... execute the given callback function if option contains callback. There are four cases...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
[style] ~39-~39: ‘with success’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...ecide whether to execute acknowledgment with success or failure. Refer to [ibc_transfer_test...
(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_WITH_SUCCESS)
🔇 Additional comments (41)
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/Move.toml (1)
13-13: LGTM: Appropriate use of placeholder address
The use of "_" as a placeholder for the cafe address in the production configuration follows Move's best practices for unassigned addresses.
crates/natives/src/ibctesting.rs (1)
1-3: Verify the appropriate dispatch handler import
The native_dispatch is being imported from dispatchable_fungible_asset, but this module is being used for IBC message handling. Consider whether this is the correct dispatch handler or if a dedicated IBC dispatch handler should be created.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the dispatch handler usage.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
The use of native_dispatch from dispatchable_fungible_asset is appropriate
The native_dispatch implementation is a generic dispatcher that:
- Extracts module and function information from arguments
- Verifies module visitation status
- Performs function call dispatch with proper gas accounting
This implementation is suitable for both fungible asset and IBC dispatching as it's a generic control flow mechanism, not specific to fungible assets despite its module location. The function is being correctly reused for IBC-related dispatches.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any IBC-specific dispatch handlers in the codebase
rg -l "dispatch.*ibc" --type rust
# Check the implementation of the current dispatch handler
ast-grep --pattern 'fn native_dispatch($$$) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 125
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of ibctesting.rs to understand how native_dispatch is used
cat crates/natives/src/ibctesting.rs
# Check the implementation of dispatchable_fungible_asset module
cat crates/natives/src/dispatchable_fungible_asset.rs
# Search for any other dispatch-related implementations
rg "fn.*dispatch" --type rust -A 5
Length of output: 4370
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move (2)
1-13: LGTM: Module declaration and imports are well-structured
The module is correctly marked as test-only and includes all necessary imports for the functionality it provides.
14-18:
Add error handling for metadata retrieval
The function assumes the counterparty metadata always exists under the @std account. This assumption might not hold true in all test scenarios.
Consider adding error handling or verification:
public fun counterparty_metadata(metadata: Object<Metadata>): Object<Metadata> {
let counterparty_symbol = counterparty_symbol(metadata);
+ assert!(
+ coin::is_registered_coin_type(@std, counterparty_symbol),
+ 0x1, // Add appropriate error code
+ b"Counterparty metadata not found"
+ );
coin::metadata(@std, counterparty_symbol)
}precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move (3)
1-13: LGTM! Well-structured module declaration and imports
The module is correctly marked as test-only and imports are properly organized with all necessary dependencies.
1-52: Verify test coverage for the module
While the module is well-structured, we should ensure comprehensive test coverage for all utility functions, especially edge cases in address generation and token creation.
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files and usages
rg -l "ibctesting_utils" --type move | grep "test"19-28: LGTM! Secure implementation of address generation
The implementation follows secure practices with proper prefix isolation and double hashing. However, let's verify if this prefix is consistently used across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Prefix consistency verified across implementations
The prefix "ibc-move-hook-intermediary" is consistently implemented in both stdlib locations (minitia and initia), and the intermediate_sender function is identical in both implementations. The function is properly used in the testing modules for address generation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of the intermediary prefix to ensure consistency
rg -l "ibc-move-hook-intermediary"
Length of output: 200
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the prefix string without file type restriction
rg "ibc-move-hook-intermediary" -l
# Also search for similar patterns that might be variations
rg "ibc.*hook.*intermediary" -l
# Search for any references to intermediate sender
rg "intermediate.*sender" -l
Length of output: 683
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation in both locations to ensure consistency
rg "intermediate_sender" -A 10 precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move
rg "intermediate_sender" -A 10 precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move
# Also check how it's used in the ibctesting.move files
rg "intermediate_sender" -A 3 precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move
rg "intermediate_sender" -A 3 precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move
Length of output: 1801
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/README.md (1)
1-8: LGTM! Clear and concise introduction.
The introduction effectively sets up the context and structure for the IBC testing documentation.
crates/natives/src/lib.rs (2)
Line range hint 34-91: Verify complete IBC testing framework setup.
The changes look good, but let's ensure all necessary components are in place for the IBC testing framework.
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the complete setup of the IBC testing framework
# Check for the main testing module file
echo "Checking for main testing module:"
fd -t f "ibctesting.rs$" crates/
# Check for test utilities and helpers
echo "Checking for test utilities:"
fd -t f "ibc.*test.*\.(rs|move)$"
# Check for example tests using the framework
echo "Checking for example tests:"
rg -l "use.*ibctesting" --type rust | grep "_test\.rs$"34-35: LGTM! Verify feature flag configuration.
The module declaration is properly guarded by the "testing" feature flag, which is appropriate for test-only functionality.
Let's verify the feature flag configuration:
✅ Verification successful
Feature flag configuration verified and properly implemented
The testing feature flag is correctly configured in crates/natives/Cargo.toml with appropriate dependencies. The module is only referenced in the main lib.rs file under the feature flag, and there are no unconditional imports of the testing module in non-test code. The implementation follows Rust's best practices for test-only functionality.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the testing feature is properly configured in Cargo.toml
# and that no production code depends on this testing module
# Check feature definition in Cargo.toml
echo "Checking feature definition:"
rg -l 'testing.*=.*\[.*\]' '**/Cargo.toml'
# Verify no unconditional imports of ibctesting exist
echo "Checking for unconditional imports:"
rg -l 'use.*ibctesting' --type rust | grep -v '_test\.rs$'
Length of output: 959
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the Cargo.toml files for the testing feature configuration
echo "Checking natives Cargo.toml:"
cat crates/natives/Cargo.toml
# Check if ibctesting module is only used in test files
echo -e "\nChecking ibctesting usage:"
rg -l "ibctesting" --type rust
# Check if there are any non-test files importing ibctesting
echo -e "\nChecking for non-test imports:"
rg "use.*ibctesting" --type rust -C 2
Length of output: 1793
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move (2)
87-87: LGTM! Appropriate test module friend declaration.
The friend declaration for the test module follows Move's best practices for test organization.
89-91: LGTM! Well-structured test wrapper functions.
The implementation follows best practices for exposing friend functions in tests:
- Correct usage of
#[test_only]attribute - Clear naming convention with
_for_testingsuffix - Direct pass-through to friend functions maintaining exact signatures
Also applies to: 94-98, 101-105
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/function_info.move (2)
87-87: LGTM: Proper test module friend declaration
The test-only friend module declaration follows Move best practices for testing friend functions.
88-105: LGTM: Well-structured test function implementations
The test functions are properly implemented as clean wrappers around their production counterparts, maintaining the exact behavior while enabling testing access. All functions are correctly marked with #[test_only].
crates/natives/src/cosmos.rs (2)
103-128: LGTM: Clean implementation of options extraction
The implementation properly handles callback details extraction and creates a well-structured options vector. The code follows good practices by:
- Properly handling both cases where callback exists and doesn't exist
- Using clear variable names that reflect their purpose
- Following consistent formatting and style
103-133: Verify test coverage for the new options functionality
Since this is a testing-only function (marked with #[cfg(feature = "testing")]), ensure that there are corresponding tests that verify:
- Options extraction for messages with callbacks
- Options extraction for messages without callbacks
- Correct formatting of callback function IDs
✅ Verification successful
The previous search might have been too specific. Let's broaden our search to find relevant test files and usage of the testing functions.
The previous searches didn't reveal test files directly. Let's try to find tests within the cosmos module itself and any related test structures.
I can now generate the final response based on the search results. The codebase shows extensive testing of the cosmos message functionality in crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/cosmos.rs, which includes tests for both messages with and without callbacks.
Test coverage for the options functionality is verified
The codebase has comprehensive end-to-end tests that verify:
- Messages without callbacks in multiple test cases (e.g.,
test_delegate,test_undelegate, etc.) - Messages with callbacks, including correct formatting of callback function IDs (in
test_ibc_transfer_with_callback) - Correct handling of allow_failure flag
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files that might contain tests for this functionality
rg -l "requested_messages.*testing" -t rust
Length of output: 45
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for test files related to cosmos functionality
fd "test.*\.rs" | xargs rg -l "cosmos"
# Also search for any tests using vector_for_testing_only
rg "vector_for_testing_only" -A 5 -B 5 -t rust
Length of output: 7892
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for test files in the cosmos module directory
fd "test.*\.rs" crates/natives/src/cosmos/
# Let's also look for any test functions in cosmos.rs itself
rg "fn.*test" -A 5 crates/natives/src/cosmos.rs
# Search for any usage of the cosmos message types in tests
rg "CosmosMessage|CosmosContext" -A 5 -B 5 -t rust
Length of output: 34029
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/json.move (2)
24-24: LGTM: Consistent internal function usage
The change to use unmarshal_internal directly is consistent with the module's pattern and maintains the same behavior.
54-54: LGTM: Verify IBC testing compatibility
The change to use unmarshal_internal is consistent and well-tested. Since this is part of the IBC testing framework, let's verify its usage in IBC message handling.
✅ Verification successful
Change to unmarshal_internal is safe and verified in IBC testing
The verification shows that json::get_elem is used consistently in IBC testing modules (ibctesting.move) for both initia and minitia implementations. The function is used to parse JSON memo objects and extract Move messages and callbacks, following the same pattern:
- Unmarshaling the memo bytes into a JSONObject
- Getting the "move" element as a nested JSONObject
- Extracting "message" and "async_callback" from the move object
Since get_elem internally uses unmarshal_internal in a type-safe manner and the IBC testing code demonstrates proper usage with correct type parameters, the change is safe.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of json::get_elem in IBC-related code
# This will help ensure the JSON parsing changes work correctly with IBC messages
# Look for usage of get_elem in IBC-related code
rg -A 3 "json::get_elem" | grep -i "ibc"
# Look for JSON object handling in IBC test files
fd -e move | grep -i "ibc.*test" | xargs rg "JSONObject"
Length of output: 2979
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/json.move (2)
54-54: LGTM: Consistent optimization of internal function calls.
The change to use unmarshal_internal<T> directly in get_elem aligns with the module's optimization pattern and maintains the same functionality.
Let's verify the test coverage for this function:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for get_elem function
# Look for test cases that exercise this function with different types
rg -A 10 "get_elem" precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/json.move24-24: LGTM: Optimized internal function call.
The change to use unmarshal_internal directly instead of going through the unmarshal wrapper function maintains the same functionality while potentially reducing function call overhead.
Let's verify the test coverage ensures this change works correctly:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM: Verified test coverage for unmarshal_json_value function
The change to use unmarshal_internal is well-tested through:
- Direct usage in
unmarshal_json_valuefunction - Comprehensive test cases including
test_json_marshal_unmarshal()that exercises the full marshaling/unmarshaling flow - Tests covering various data types (empty objects, u64, vector, complex objects)
- Edge cases like module permission tests
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for unmarshal_json_value function
# Look for test cases that exercise this function
rg -A 5 "unmarshal_json_value" precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/json.move
Length of output: 1711
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's search for unmarshal_json_value and unmarshal_internal with more context
rg -A 10 "unmarshal_json_value|unmarshal_internal" precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/json.move
# Also search for test cases
rg -A 10 "#\[test\]" precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/json.move
Length of output: 3163
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests_helpers.move (1)
181-181: Verify the correctness of the coin symbol 'uinit' in init_metadata
The function init_metadata initializes metadata with the coin symbol 'uinit'. Please confirm that 'uinit' is the intended symbol. If it's a typo, consider correcting it to the desired value (e.g., 'unit' or 'uint').
Run the following script to check for the usage of 'uinit' across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
uinit is the correct symbol and is used consistently throughout the codebase
The symbol uinit appears to be the intentional and standardized token symbol used across the Initia blockchain codebase. It is consistently used in:
- Staking module as the reward token symbol
- Fungible asset implementations
- IBC transfer tests
- Minitswap module
- Compatibility layers
The prefix 'u' likely denotes 'micro' following the common cryptocurrency denomination pattern (e.g., 'uatom' for micro-ATOM in Cosmos), and 'init' appears to be the token's base name.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for 'uinit' usage in the codebase to verify if it's intentional.
# Search for 'uinit' in all Move files
rg -t move '"uinit"' -A 2
Length of output: 56
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for 'uinit' string in all files since the file extension might not be recognized
rg "uinit" -A 2
Length of output: 15841
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move (4)
234-235: Ensure cosmos::unpack_options function exists and is correctly used
The function cosmos::unpack_options(opt) must exist and return the expected tuple (bool, u64, String). Verify that this function is properly defined in the cosmos module and that it correctly unpacks the options.
Please confirm that cosmos::unpack_options is implemented and behaves as expected.
429-440: Verify native functions are properly registered
Ensure that the declared native functions (dispatchable_callback, dispatchable_on_receive, dispatchable_ibc_ack, and dispatchable_ibc_timeout) are properly implemented and registered in the native functions resolver. Mismatches between declarations and implementations can cause runtime errors.
Please confirm that these native functions are correctly defined and linked.
1-1: Confirm #[test_only] attribute usage
The module is marked with #[test_only]. Verify that this attribute is intended and that the module will not be included in production builds inadvertently.
Ensure that the build process respects the #[test_only] attribute.
93-94:
Time conversion may cause overflow
When converting the block timestamp to nanoseconds by multiplying by 1_000_000_000u64, there is a risk of integer overflow if the timestamp value is large. Consider using a safe multiplication method or a built-in time conversion function that handles large values.
Example fix:
-let (height, timestamp) = block::get_block_info();
+let (height, timestamp_seconds) = block::get_block_info();
+let timestamp = u64::checked_mul(timestamp_seconds, 1_000_000_000u64).expect("Timestamp overflow");Likely invalid or redundant comment.
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move (6)
131-138: Review the use of source_channel as a temporary solution
In determining the recipient address, the code uses packet.source_channel due to the unavailability of the destination channel. This is noted as a temporary solution. Ensure that this approach does not introduce issues and consider updating the implementation when the destination channel becomes available.
Consider the potential impact of using source_channel and plan for updating this logic in future revisions.
232-278: Validate balance check and withdrawal logic in execute function
The balance verification and token withdrawal logic correctly ensure that the sender has sufficient funds before proceeding. The callback mechanism properly handles both success and failure cases.
43-79: Function execute_cosmos_messages correctly processes messages
The implementation effectively validates incoming messages, checks for required fields, and accumulates packets to store in the ChainStore. All validation asserts are appropriate and contribute to robust message processing.
81-165: relay_packets function properly handles packet relaying and timeouts
The function accurately determines whether packets have timed out and processes them accordingly. The minting of tokens to the recipient and execution of the on_receive callback are handled correctly.
183-196: Ensure proper refund handling on transfer failure
When a transfer fails, the code refunds the token amount to the sender. Verify that the refund logic correctly handles all failure scenarios and that the sender receives the accurate amount.
Run the following script to confirm refund correctness:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that failed transfers result in accurate refunds to the sender.
# Search for all instances of refund logic
rg 'refund|transfer' precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/
# Ensure that the amount refunded matches the original transfer amount103-109: Verify time units when comparing timestamps for packet timeouts
When checking for packet timeouts, the code multiplies the current timestamp by 1_000_000_000u64. Ensure that the units of packet.timeout_timestamp and the computed timestamp are consistent (both in nanoseconds) to avoid incorrect timeout evaluations.
Run the following script to verify the time units and ensure consistency:
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the timestamp units by checking the block module and any related test files.
Let me check one more thing to verify the timestamp units in the Cosmos SDK integration.
Based on the evidence found, I can now provide the final response:
Timestamp conversion is correctly implemented for IBC packet timeouts
The code comment explicitly states that the multiplication by 1_000_000_000 is intentionally converting seconds to nanoseconds: "multiply timeout timestamp by 1_000_000_000 to convert to nanoseconds". This aligns with the IBC protocol specification where packet timeout timestamps are in nanoseconds, while block timestamps are typically in seconds.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that packet.timeout_timestamp and timestamp * 1_000_000_000u64 are in the same units.
# Assuming packet.timeout_timestamp unit is nanoseconds
# Expected: Both timestamps should be in nanoseconds
# Check where packet.timeout_timestamp is set and its units
rg 'timeout_timestamp' precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/
# Verify that block::get_block_info() returns timestamp in seconds
rg 'get_block_info' precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/
# Confirm that multiplying by 1_000_000_000u64 converts seconds to nanoseconds
Length of output: 5337
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check block module implementation for timestamp units
rg -A 5 'get_block_info' precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/block/
# Check test files for timestamp usage patterns
rg -A 5 'set_block_info|timeout_timestamp' precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/tests/
Length of output: 10288
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for any Cosmos SDK timestamp or IBC packet timeout related code
rg -A 5 'Timestamp|NANOSECONDS|timestamp.*nano' precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/
# Look for any documentation about timestamp units
fd -t f -e md . precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/ -x rg -l 'timestamp|time'
Length of output: 2251
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move (5)
426-426: Updated requested_messages function to return messages and options
The modification of requested_messages() to return a tuple (vector<String>, vector<Options>) enhances functionality by providing both messages and their associated options. This change appears to be correctly integrated with the rest of the codebase.
430-431: Refactored was_message_requested to use was_message_requested_with_options
The was_message_requested function now delegates to was_message_requested_with_options, passing disallow_failure() as the default options. This refactoring maintains existing functionality while integrating the new options mechanism.
435-440: Ensure safe access when message is not found
In was_message_requested_with_options, when found is false, the idx may not be a valid index in opts. Ensure that the language guarantees short-circuit evaluation for the && operator so that vector::borrow(&opts, idx) is not evaluated when found is false.
To confirm, consider this behavior:
- If
foundisfalse,found && ...should short-circuit, preventing access to an invalid index. - If the language does not guarantee short-circuit evaluation, this could lead to a runtime error.
510-512: Added unpack_options function for external use
The new unpack_options function correctly extracts the fields from the Options struct, facilitating external access to allow_failure, callback_id, and callback_fid.
541-571: Test test_stargate_with_options validates stargate_with_options functionality
The test function test_stargate_with_options effectively tests the stargate_with_options function by:
- Creating a
VoteRequestmessage. - Sending the message using
stargate_with_optionswithallow_failure_with_callback. - Asserting that the message was requested with the specified options.
This ensures that messages are correctly processed with options and that callbacks are handled appropriately.
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/cosmos.move (3)
430-431: Ensure consistent use of default options in was_message_requested
In was_message_requested, the function now calls was_message_requested_with_options with &disallow_failure(). Confirm that this default option aligns with the expected behavior throughout the codebase.
433-440: was_message_requested_with_options function is correctly implemented
The implementation correctly checks for both the message and its associated options, ensuring accurate verification of requested messages.
509-512: unpack_options function properly extracts option fields
The unpack_options function correctly unpacks the Options struct into its constituent fields, facilitating external use.
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests.move (1)
221-222: Verify that the #[expected_failure] attribute matches the actual failure
Ensure that the abort code 0x3 and the location 0x1::ibctesting specified in the #[expected_failure] attribute match the actual abort code and location when test_ibc_transfer_failure fails. This verification is crucial to accurately capture the expected failure in the test.
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/tests/ibc_transfer_tests.move (1)
221-261:
Validate the expected failure abort code and location
The test is annotated with #[expected_failure(abort_code = 0x3, location = 0x1::ibctesting)]. Ensure that the abort code 0x3 and the location 0x1::ibctesting are correct and correspond to the intended failure conditions within the ibctesting module.
Run the following script to verify the abort code and location:
✅ Verification successful
The expected failure abort code and location are correctly defined
The verification confirms that:
- The abort code
0x3is defined in the ibctesting module asconst ECOSMOS_MESSAGE_FAILED: u64 = 0x3 - This matches with the test's expected failure annotation
#[expected_failure(abort_code = 0x3, location = 0x1::ibctesting)] - The test is correctly set up to validate the failure case when attempting to transfer more tokens than the available balance
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Confirm that abort code 0x3 is defined in 0x1::ibctesting module.
# Search for the abort code definition
ast-grep --pattern $'module 0x1::ibctesting {
$$$
abort $CODE = 0x3;
$$$
}'
Length of output: 82
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for abort codes in ibctesting module
rg -A 5 -B 5 "module ibctesting" precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/
# Also search for any abort constants or codes in the module
rg "const.*0x3|abort.*0x3" precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/
# Search for test failures with similar abort codes
rg "#\[expected_failure.*0x3.*ibctesting" precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/tests/
Length of output: 2074
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move
Show resolved
Hide resolved
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move
Show resolved
Hide resolved
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting_utils.move
Show resolved
Hide resolved
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/move_unit.rs (1)
73-74: Consider CI pipeline implications.Since we're explicitly setting compiler and language versions, ensure that:
- CI pipelines are configured to use compatible Move compiler versions
- Version requirements are documented in the project's README or contribution guidelines
Makefile (2)
76-78: Include test-unit in the main test target.The implementation looks good, but consider including this target in the main
testtarget to ensure it runs during the complete test suite.- test: precompile test-rust test-go + test: precompile test-rust test-go test-unit
76-78: Add documentation for the test-unit target.Please add a comment explaining the purpose of this target and when it should be used, similar to other test targets in the Makefile. This will help other developers understand when to use this specific test target versus the other available testing options.
+# Run unit tests for stdlib_move_unit_tests package with testing features enabled test-unit: cargo test stdlib_move_unit_tests --features testing -p e2e-move-testsprecompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move (1)
284-290: Safely handleOptiontypes when unmarshalling JSONIn
unmarshal_memo, after checkingmove_objwithoption::is_none, you proceed tooption::destroy_somewithout handling theNonecase. Since you already check forNone, this is safe, but consider using pattern matching for clarity.Refactor using pattern matching:
match move_obj { option::some(move_obj) => { // Existing logic }, option::none() => { return (option::none<MoveMessage>(), option::none<MoveAsyncCallback>()); } }precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move (1)
244-255: Refactor callback handling to eliminate code duplicationThe logic for handling callbacks when
callback_id > 0is duplicated in theexecutefunction. Refactoring this code into a helper function would improve maintainability and adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.Consider extracting the callback logic into a separate function:
fun handle_callback(callback_id: u64, success: bool, callback_fid: String) { if (callback_id > 0) { let function_info = callback_function_info(callback_fid); check_dispatch_type_compatibility_for_testing( &dispatchable_callback_function_info(), &function_info, ); dispatchable_callback(callback_id, success, &function_info); } }Then, in
execute, replace the duplicated code with calls tohandle_callback:// Balance not enough; send failure message // If allow_failure is false, then abort the transaction assert!(allow_failure, ECOSMOS_MESSAGE_FAILED); - if (callback_id > 0) { - let function_info = callback_function_info(callback_fid); - check_dispatch_type_compatibility_for_testing( - &dispatchable_callback_function_info(), &function_info - ); - dispatchable_callback(callback_id, false, &function_info); - }; + handle_callback(callback_id, false, callback_fid); return false; // ... // After successful transfer - if (callback_id > 0) { - let function_info = callback_function_info(callback_fid); - check_dispatch_type_compatibility_for_testing( - &dispatchable_callback_function_info(), &function_info - ); - dispatchable_callback(callback_id, true, &function_info); - }; + handle_callback(callback_id, true, callback_fid);This refactoring reduces code duplication and makes future maintenance easier.
Also applies to: 267-274
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
Makefile(1 hunks)crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/move_unit.rs(2 hunks)crates/natives/src/cosmos.rs(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/Move.toml(1 hunks)precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/Move.toml(1 hunks)precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- crates/natives/src/cosmos.rs
- precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/Move.toml
- precompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/Move.toml
🔇 Additional comments (3)
crates/e2e-move-tests/src/tests/move_unit.rs (2)
23-23: LGTM: Import statement is correctly placed and necessary.
The import provides the required types for compiler version configuration.
73-74: Verify compatibility with IBC testing framework.
The compiler and language versions are both set to V2_1, which is good for consistency. However, we should verify:
- That V2_1 is compatible with the IBC testing framework
- That existing tests will continue to work with these versions
Let's verify the compatibility:
Consider adding a comment explaining why these specific versions were chosen to help future maintainers understand the version requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Version configuration is consistent with codebase standards
The verification shows that:
- V2_1 is the latest supported version in the codebase for both compiler and language versions
- The IBC testing framework (in
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/andprecompile/modules/minitia_stdlib/) exists and is actively maintained - The version configuration is consistent with other test configurations in the codebase, particularly in
crates/compiler/src/test_package.rswhich also defaults to V2_1
The changes are safe and follow the established patterns in the codebase. The original concern about IBC compatibility is mitigated as the framework is part of the standard library and maintained alongside the compiler versions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if any tests are using features not supported in V2_1
rg -l "experimental" ../../precompile/modules/
rg -l "#\[feature\]" ../../precompile/modules/
# Check if there are any version-specific dependencies or configurations
rg -l "version.*=.*2" ../../precompile/modules/
Length of output: 343
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct paths in the repository
fd precompile
fd ibc
# Check for version-related configurations and dependencies
rg -l "version.*=.*2"
# Look for Move compiler version usage across the codebase
rg -A 3 "CompilerVersion|LanguageVersion"
# Check for IBC-related test configurations
rg -A 3 "build_config.*compiler" "tests/"
Length of output: 6694
precompile/modules/initia_stdlib/sources/ibctesting/ibctesting.move (1)
121-126: Ensure counterparty token creation handles existing metadata
In the token creation logic, you check if the counterparty metadata exists using object::object_exists. However, there might be a scenario where metadata exists but is in an unexpected state. Consider using option types to safely handle metadata retrieval and potential errors.
Run the following script to verify metadata handling:
| let idx = string::index_of(&callback_fid, &string::utf8(b"::")); | ||
| let module_addr = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, 0, idx); | ||
| let callback_fid = | ||
| string::sub_string(&callback_fid, idx + 2, string::length(&callback_fid)); | ||
| let idx = string::index_of(&callback_fid, &string::utf8(b"::")); | ||
| let module_name = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, 0, idx); | ||
| let function_name = | ||
| string::sub_string(&callback_fid, idx + 2, string::length(&callback_fid)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle missing :: separators in callback_fid to prevent panics
In the callback_function_info function, you assume that callback_fid contains :: separators without validating. If callback_fid lacks these separators, string::index_of will return None, and using option::destroy_some without checking can cause a panic. Ensure you handle the None case to prevent runtime errors.
Apply this diff to add necessary checks:
fun callback_function_info(callback_fid: String): FunctionInfo {
let idx_option = string::index_of(&callback_fid, &string::utf8(b"::"));
assert!(option::is_some(&idx_option), EINVALID_CALLBACK_FID);
let idx = option::destroy_some(idx_option);
let module_addr = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, 0, idx);
let remainder = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, idx + 2, string::length(&callback_fid));
let idx_option = string::index_of(&remainder, &string::utf8(b"::"));
assert!(option::is_some(&idx_option), EINVALID_CALLBACK_FID);
let idx = option::destroy_some(idx_option);
let module_name = string::sub_string(&remainder, 0, idx);
let function_name = string::sub_string(&remainder, idx + 2, string::length(&remainder));
new_function_info_for_testing(
address::from_string(module_addr), module_name, function_name
)
}Also, define a new error code:
const EINVALID_CALLBACK_FID: u64 = 0x13;| let metadata = coin::denom_to_metadata(denom); | ||
| let sender_addr = address::from_sdk(transfer_req.sender); | ||
| let balance = coin::balance(sender_addr, metadata); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential None value from denom_to_metadata
When retrieving metadata with coin::denom_to_metadata(denom), there's a possibility it returns None if the denomination doesn't exist. To prevent runtime errors, add error handling for the None case.
Apply this diff to handle the None case:
let metadata_option = coin::denom_to_metadata(denom);
assert!(option::is_some(&metadata_option), EMETADATA_NOT_FOUND);
let metadata = option::destroy_some(metadata_option);Also, define the error code if not already defined:
const EMETADATA_NOT_FOUND: u64 = 0x15;| fun callback_function_info(callback_fid: String): FunctionInfo { | ||
| let idx = string::index_of(&callback_fid, &string::utf8(b"::")); | ||
| let module_addr = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, 0, idx); | ||
| let callback_fid = | ||
| string::sub_string(&callback_fid, idx + 2, string::length(&callback_fid)); | ||
| let idx = string::index_of(&callback_fid, &string::utf8(b"::")); | ||
| let module_name = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, 0, idx); | ||
| let function_name = | ||
| string::sub_string(&callback_fid, idx + 2, string::length(&callback_fid)); | ||
|
|
||
| new_function_info_for_testing( | ||
| address::from_string(module_addr), module_name, function_name | ||
| ) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for string parsing in callback_function_info
The function callback_function_info assumes that callback_fid contains "::" separators. If callback_fid does not contain "::", string::index_of may return an invalid index, leading to incorrect substring operations or runtime errors.
Add assertions to ensure that the expected separators are present:
let idx = string::index_of(&callback_fid, &string::utf8(b"::"));
+ assert!(idx >= 0, ECALLBACK_FID_FORMAT_INVALID);
let module_addr = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, 0, idx);
let callback_fid =
string::sub_string(&callback_fid, idx + 2, string::length(&callback_fid));
let idx = string::index_of(&callback_fid, &string::utf8(b"::"));
+ assert!(idx >= 0, ECALLBACK_FID_FORMAT_INVALID);
let module_name = string::sub_string(&callback_fid, 0, idx);
let function_name =
string::sub_string(&callback_fid, idx + 2, string::length(&callback_fid));Define a new error code ECALLBACK_FID_FORMAT_INVALID for this assertion to handle cases where the format is incorrect.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| let (height, timestamp) = block::get_block_info(); | ||
|
|
||
| let chain_data = borrow_global_mut<ChainStore>(@std); | ||
| vector::for_each( | ||
| chain_data.packets, | ||
| |packet| { | ||
| let (message, async_callback) = unmarshal_memo(packet.memo); | ||
|
|
||
| // check timeout (multiply timeout timestamp by 1_000_000_000 to convert to nanoseconds) | ||
| if (( | ||
| packet.timeout_height.revision_height != 0 | ||
| && packet.timeout_height.revision_height <= height | ||
| ) | ||
| || ( | ||
| packet.timeout_timestamp != 0 | ||
| && packet.timeout_timestamp <= timestamp * 1_000_000_000u64 | ||
| )) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential integer overflow in timestamp multiplication
There is a risk of integer overflow when multiplying the block timestamp by 1_000_000_000u64 to convert seconds to nanoseconds. If the timestamp is large enough, the product could exceed the maximum value of a u64, leading to incorrect timeout checks or runtime errors.
Consider refactoring the comparison to avoid multiplication:
- && packet.timeout_timestamp <= timestamp * 1_000_000_000u64
+ && packet.timeout_timestamp / 1_000_000_000u64 <= timestampThis approach compares both timestamps in seconds, eliminating the need for multiplication and preventing potential overflows.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| let (height, timestamp) = block::get_block_info(); | |
| let chain_data = borrow_global_mut<ChainStore>(@std); | |
| vector::for_each( | |
| chain_data.packets, | |
| |packet| { | |
| let (message, async_callback) = unmarshal_memo(packet.memo); | |
| // check timeout (multiply timeout timestamp by 1_000_000_000 to convert to nanoseconds) | |
| if (( | |
| packet.timeout_height.revision_height != 0 | |
| && packet.timeout_height.revision_height <= height | |
| ) | |
| || ( | |
| packet.timeout_timestamp != 0 | |
| && packet.timeout_timestamp <= timestamp * 1_000_000_000u64 | |
| )) { | |
| let (height, timestamp) = block::get_block_info(); | |
| let chain_data = borrow_global_mut<ChainStore>(@std); | |
| vector::for_each( | |
| chain_data.packets, | |
| |packet| { | |
| let (message, async_callback) = unmarshal_memo(packet.memo); | |
| // check timeout (divide packet timeout timestamp by 1_000_000_000 to convert from nanoseconds to seconds) | |
| if (( | |
| packet.timeout_height.revision_height != 0 | |
| && packet.timeout_height.revision_height <= height | |
| ) | |
| || ( | |
| packet.timeout_timestamp != 0 | |
| && packet.timeout_timestamp / 1_000_000_000u64 <= timestamp | |
| )) { |
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changeReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Documentation
Tests