Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix typo. #168

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

fix typo. #168

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

SeUkKim
Copy link
Collaborator

@SeUkKim SeUkKim commented Nov 21, 2024

fix typo.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated formatting of string literals in the GitHub Actions workflow for consistency.
    • Corrected a typo in the source file name to ensure proper functionality.

@SeUkKim SeUkKim requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2024 09:32
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow file .github/workflows/publish.yml. The updates include changing string literals from single quotes to double quotes for several parameters in the push-to-repo action steps and correcting a typo in a source file name. The overall structure and logic of the workflow, which is triggered by the completion of another workflow named "Release rust libmovevm," remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/publish.yml Updated string literals from single quotes to double quotes for parameters; corrected typo from api/licompiler.dylib to api/libcompiler.dylib.

Possibly related PRs

  • add github actions to publish. #137: This PR introduces a new GitHub Actions workflow in the same file (.github/workflows/publish.yml) and is related to the automation of publishing processes.
  • test trigger. #152: This PR modifies the triggering mechanism of the workflow in .github/workflows/publish.yml, focusing on the workflow's structure and logic.

🐇 In the garden where we play,
Strings now dance in a new way.
Quotes have swapped, a typo's gone,
Our workflow hums a brighter song!
With every push, we leap and cheer,
Automation's magic, oh so near! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@SeUkKim SeUkKim requested review from beer-1 and djm07073 November 21, 2024 09:32
Copy link
Contributor

@djm07073 djm07073 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SeUkKim SeUkKim merged commit 7e80abb into main Nov 21, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@SeUkKim SeUkKim deleted the fix/typo branch November 21, 2024 09:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants