fix: compare semver standard

[Benzbeeb]

Description

Closes: #XXXX

---

Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.

I have...

• included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
• confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
• targeted the correct branch
• provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
• reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
• included the necessary unit and integration tests
• updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
• confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

• confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
• confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
• reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated explanations and examples to clarify the behavior of semantic version comparisons.
• Bug Fixes
  • Refined the ordering logic for pre-release versions to ensure that normal releases take precedence and that equality is handled correctly.
• Tests
  • Expanded test coverage with new cases for complex pre-release version scenarios to ensure reliable version ordering.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes update the CompareSemVer function by enhancing its documentation and refining its logic for comparing semantic version strings, particularly in handling pre-release identifiers. The function now correctly returns false when both versions are identical. Test cases in cosmosutils/binary_test.go have been revised: outdated cases were removed and new tests focusing on complex prerelease identifier comparisons were added.

Changes

File	Change Summary
cosmosutils/binary.go	Updated CompareSemVer: enhanced comment, clarified behavior for pre-release vs. normal versions, refined identifier comparison, added example cases.
cosmosutils/binary_test.go	Removed obsolete tests and added new cases for complex prerelease comparisons, covering both forward and reverse scenarios.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant Caller
  participant CompareSemVer
  participant PreReleaseComparator
  
  Caller->>CompareSemVer: Call CompareSemVer(v1, v2)
  alt Versions are equal
      CompareSemVer->>Caller: Return false
  else Versions differ
      CompareSemVer->>PreReleaseComparator: Compare pre-release segments
      PreReleaseComparator-->>CompareSemVer: Return comparison result
      CompareSemVer->>Caller: Return final result (true/false)
  end

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• fix: selecting minitia version #141: Addresses similar documentation and logical enhancements in CompareSemVer, paralleling changes in this PR.
• fix(rollup): selecting minitia version #120: Refactors version comparison functionality by replacing CompareSemVerStrict, which directly relates to the updated logic in this PR.

Suggested reviewers

• traviolus
• WasinWatt

Poem

I'm a little bunny with a codeful flair,
Hopping over bugs with a gentle care,
My semantic hops compare each version right,
Turning pre-release woes into pure delight,
With every leap of logic, I celebrate tonight!
🥕🐇

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f9dd081 and 888d7d1.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• cosmosutils/binary.go (2 hunks)
• cosmosutils/binary_test.go (1 hunks)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)

• GitHub Check: Run Integration Tests on Ubuntu

🔇 Additional comments (8)

cosmosutils/binary_test.go (4)

47-51: LGTM: Comprehensive test case added for prerelease identifiers

This test case properly validates the semver comparison where version "1.0.0-alpha.2" should be greater than "1.0.0-alpha.1", following semantic versioning standards.

---

53-56: Good inverse test case coverage

This test case appropriately tests the reverse condition of the previous case, ensuring that when comparing "1.0.0-alpha.1" and "1.0.0-alpha.2", the function correctly returns false.

---

58-63: LGTM: Test for different prerelease identifiers

This test properly validates that "beta" prerelease identifier has higher precedence than "alpha" according to semantic versioning rules.

---

64-69: LGTM: Test for release vs prerelease comparison

This test correctly validates that a release version ("1.0.0") has higher precedence than any prerelease version ("1.0.0-beta.1").

cosmosutils/binary.go (4)

219-225: Great documentation improvements

The function documentation now clearly specifies the return value semantics with relevant examples, which significantly improves clarity for users of this function.

---

247-248: Fixed incorrect comment about prerelease versioning

The comment now correctly states that a prerelease version has lower precedence than a normal version, following semantic versioning specification.

---

255-286: Excellent implementation of semver prerelease comparison

This implementation correctly follows the semantic versioning specification for comparing prerelease identifiers:

1. Numerically compares identifiers that are integers
2. Lexically compares identifiers with letters
3. Handles different length prerelease identifier sets

The implementation is robust and handles all the test cases added to the test file.

---

288-288: Bug fix for equal versions

This line fixes a critical issue by explicitly returning false when versions are exactly equal, which aligns with the function's documentation stating it returns true only if v1 is greater than v2.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.