-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SYCL][Graph] Adding new graph enqueue function to spec #15677
[SYCL][Graph] Adding new graph enqueue function to spec #15677
Conversation
sycl/doc/extensions/experimental/sycl_ext_oneapi_enqueue_functions.asciidoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we anticipate the need to pass any compile-time properties to these methods in future?
This PR modifies the |
sycl/doc/extensions/experimental/sycl_ext_oneapi_enqueue_functions.asciidoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sycl/doc/extensions/experimental/sycl_ext_oneapi_enqueue_functions.asciidoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Spec changes LGTM.
sycl/doc/extensions/experimental/sycl_ext_oneapi_graph.asciidoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sycl/test-e2e/Graph/RecordReplay/ext_oneapi_enqueue_functions_submit_with_event.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sycl/doc/extensions/experimental/sycl_ext_oneapi_graph.asciidoc
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
sycl/test-e2e/Graph/RecordReplay/ext_oneapi_enqueue_functions_submit_with_event.cpp
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Graph related functions have been renamed, and there has been a consensus that those variants with extra property parameters are not required for the new functions. |
@intel/llvm-gatekeepers This PR can be merged. Thanks! |
This needs a review from @intel/llvm-reviewers-runtime |
replacing #15385 after offline discussion.