-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 766
[CI] 2nd attempt to skip filtering large PR #17761
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
2b82995
[CI] 2nd attempt to skip filtering large PR
jsji 3fabf43
Revert "[CI] 2nd attempt to skip filtering large PR"
jsji 3bdf5e2
try fromJSON
jsji 65fddfb
Revert "try fromJSON"
jsji 3df7c33
Revert "Revert "[CI] 2nd attempt to skip filtering large PR""
jsji File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"For numerical comparison, the fromJSON() function can be used to convert a string to a number. For more information on the fromJSON() function, see fromJSON."
https://docs.github.com/en/enterprise-cloud@latest/actions/writing-workflows/choosing-what-your-workflow-does/evaluate-expressions-in-workflows-and-actions
Can we just use this in the
if
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we can. My understanding is that
if
in steps is not Javascript. We can only accesscontext
only inJavaScript
( script in steps)."The script directly accesses
context.payload.pull_request.changed_files and performs the comparison
within the JavaScript environment, which is more flexible and allows for
direct manipulation of data."
"The if condition in GitHub Actions is evaluated using the expression
syntax, which requires correct access to step outputs and proper
handling of data types. "
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Where is that explanation from?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh, you meant we call
fromJSON
to convert the value to number inif
.Certainly we can try.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
GPT. :P