Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation on how to run the Istio-proxy as a container on VM's instead of the istio-proxy runtime(rpm/deb) #16217

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KristiaanHoogendoorn
Copy link

Description

Some documentation on how someone could run the Istio proxy as a container on their preferred VM platform.

  • A user can iterate on the existing VM documentation (and is required to understand it).
  • The user is responsible for automation around it.

Disclaimer, sorry for possible bad spelling but I'm dyslectic and probably have missed some/ created some weird sentences.

Overall feedback is very welcome.

Reviewers

  • Ambient
  • Docs
  • Installation
  • Networking
  • Performance and Scalability
  • Extensions and Telemetry
  • Security
  • Test and Release
  • User Experience
  • Developer Infrastructure
  • Localization/Translation

Some documentation on how someone could run the Istio proxy as a container on their preferred VM platform.

- A users can iterate on the existing VM documentation (and is required to understand it.)
- The use is responsible for automation around it.
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Feb 3, 2025

CLA Missing ID CLA Not Signed

@istio-policy-bot
Copy link

😊 Welcome! This is either your first contribution to the Istio documentation repo, or
it's been a while since you've been here. A few things you should know:

  • You can learn about how we write and maintain documentation, our style guidelines,
    and the available web site features by visiting Contributing to the Docs.

  • In the next few minutes, an automatic preview of your change will be built with
    a full copy of the istio.io website. You can find this preview by clicking on
    the Details link next to the deploy/netlify entry in the status section of this
    page.

  • We care about quality, so we've put in place a number of checks to ensure our documentation
    is top-notch. We do spell checking, sanitize the Markdown, ensure all hyperlinks point to a
    valid location, and more. If your PR doesn't pass one of these checks, you'll see a red X in the
    lint_istio.io entry in the status section. Click on the Details link to get a list of the
    problems with your PR. Fix those problems and push an update; this will automatically re-run the
    tests. Hopefully this time everything will be perfect!

  • Once your changes are accepted and merged into the repository, they will initially show up
    on https://preliminary.istio.io. The changes will be published to https://istio.io
    the next time we do a major release (which typically happens every 3 months or so).
    To publish them sooner, add a cherrypick/release-x.xx label, where x.xx is the current
    release of Istio.

Thanks for contributing!

Courtesy of your friendly welcome wagon.

@istio-testing istio-testing added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 3, 2025
@istio-testing
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @KristiaanHoogendoorn. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a istio member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@Arhell Arhell left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/ok-to-test

@istio-testing istio-testing added ok-to-test Set this label allow normal testing to take place for a PR not submitted by an Istio org member. and removed needs-ok-to-test labels Feb 4, 2025
.spelling Outdated
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@ DNS
DNS_AUTO_ALLOCATE
docker-compose's
docker.io
Podman
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

failing test due to not being sorted properly

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should be fixed

- docker
- containers
owner: istio/wg-environments-maintainers
test: yes
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unless you're writing a test for this page - which would be great if you could - you don't need this set.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey Craig thanks for checking. Are there docs available to get me started? I might be able to setup something similar to the VM setup with docker in docker but have to see.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have no idea how we would go about testing something involving a VM. Have a look to see if we have any kind of testing for the existing VM docs?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/environments ok-to-test Set this label allow normal testing to take place for a PR not submitted by an Istio org member. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants