Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Fix rsm design export (#337)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
@JTPetter
JTPetter authored Nov 15, 2024
1 parent 2372326 commit ebd16f2
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion R/doeResponseSurfaceMethodology.R
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ doeResponseSurfaceMethodology <- function(jaspResults, dataset, options, ...) {
if (is.null(design))
return()

out_design <- design
out_design <- as.data.frame(design)
colnames(out_design)[1:2] <- c("RunOrder", "StandardOrder")
out_design[["Response"]] <- ""

Expand Down

2 comments on commit ebd16f2

@testastretta11
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hello, let me introduce my self, my name is Terra. I m very fond of the project JASP for statistic analysis, i have been interested in this software since it is open source. I have tested some of feature in the JASP, and one of them is JASP quality control response surface. I want to ask, is there a way to determine the "lack of fit and pure errror" under the error itself in its anova test. I realized that there is no lack of fit which it is important to determine the model if it suited to be analyzed using RSM or not.

I hope, if someone or u guys can add that in tghe next version or current version. oh for the further info, i use the JASP 0.19.1.0 for windows xD.... i really apreciate if this can be added....

thanks in advance, best regard
Terra.

@boutinb
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @testastretta11,
Thanks for your nice words.
If you want a new feature, it's better to make a new issue. Here as a comment of a commit, it might be lost, and I'm not sure that the Quality Control maintainer (@JTPetter )noticed your remark.

Please sign in to comment.