Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create 03-scatter-gather-pyobj #7

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chengs
Copy link

@chengs chengs commented Nov 21, 2017

the example of the scatter on python array. In the Mpi4py document, it says "The lower-case variants MPI.Comm.bcast(), MPI.Comm.scatter(), MPI.Comm.gather(), MPI.Comm.allgather() and MPI.Comm.alltoall() can communicate general Python objects."

the example of the scatter on python array. In the Mpi4py document, it says "The lower-case variants MPI.Comm.bcast(), MPI.Comm.scatter(), MPI.Comm.gather(), MPI.Comm.allgather() and MPI.Comm.alltoall() can communicate general Python objects."
@jbornschein
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

thanks for the contribution!

I think it would be better to give this example a separate number instead of cramping it together with the other scatter-gather example. I guess thats a rather subjective decision. But if we only have 1 (or a few) examples for py-objects instead of replicxating all of them, that seems cleaner to me.

Can you rename it? I will merge it shortly after then.

@chengs
Copy link
Author

chengs commented Nov 24, 2017

Of course, which number you prefer? 11-scatter-gather-pyobj ?

P.S. In fact the project maintainer can edit, so you can directly edit as you like.

@chengs
Copy link
Author

chengs commented Nov 24, 2017

If it is OK to you, I suggest we work together and add all the py-object examples into your project.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants