CU-86c083kqv - Add config fields for names for Kafka and Notifications #325
Conversation
|
Task linked: CU-86c083kqv Create Config Flag for Kafka Key |
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications across several Java and Scala files to enhance the configuration and retrieval of patient name fields. The hardcoded strings for given names and family names have been replaced with configurable fields, allowing for more flexible name validation. New fields for name validation have been added to various configuration classes and JSON files, enabling external configuration of these fields. Additionally, a new method for generating Kafka partition keys has been introduced, improving code organization. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameValidationFields.java (1)
6-7: LGTM: Good use of record and JSON annotation.The use of a record for this simple data structure is appropriate, and the @JsonInclude annotation is a good practice for JSON serialization.
Consider renaming the class to
NameValidationConfigorNameValidationRulesto better reflect its purpose as a configuration or set of rules, rather than just fields.JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala (1)
68-69: Summary: Good addition, documentation neededThe changes to the
Configcase class are minimal and focused, improving the configurability of the system as intended. The addition ofnameValidationFieldsis a good enhancement.To improve the overall quality and maintainability of the code:
- Consider adding a comment above the
Configcase class explaining the purpose of each field, especially the newly addednameValidationFields.- Update the PR description or add a comment in the code to clarify how
nameValidationFieldsrelates to Kafka and Notifications, as mentioned in the PR objectives.These additions will help future developers understand the purpose and usage of these configuration options.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (1)
225-228: LGTM! Consider minor formatting adjustment.The addition of the
nameValidationFieldsarray is a good enhancement to the configuration. It clearly specifies which fields should be used for name validation, which aligns well with the existingdemographicFieldssection.For consistency with the rest of the file, consider adjusting the indentation of the array elements. Here's a suggested format:
"nameValidationFields": [ - "given_name", - "family_name" + "given_name", + "family_name" ],JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1)
98-106: LGTM! Consider adding a safety check fornameValidationFieldssize.The changes improve the flexibility of the
patientNamemethod by using configurable field names fromFIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields. This aligns well with the PR objective of adding config fields for names.For added robustness, consider adding a check to ensure
FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFieldshas at least two elements before accessing them. This can prevent potentialIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions:private static String patientName(final Interaction interaction) { var patientRecord = interaction.demographicData(); + if (FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields.size() < 2) { + LOGGER.warn("Insufficient name validation fields configured. Using default field names."); + return patientRecord.fields.stream() + .filter(field -> "given_name".equals(field.ccTag()) || "family_name".equals(field.ccTag())) + .map(DemographicData.DemographicField::value) + .collect(Collectors.joining(" ")) + .trim(); + } String givenNameField = FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields.get(0); String familyNameField = FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields.get(1); // ... rest of the method remains unchanged }This change ensures the method gracefully handles cases where the configuration might be incomplete.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (13)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/FieldsConfig.java (2 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/JsonConfig.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameValidationFields.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/models/ConfigurationModel.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-auto-generate-fields.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/deployment/install_from_scratch/d-stack-1-create-db-build-all-reboot.sh (0 hunks)
💤 Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- devops/linux/docker/deployment/install_from_scratch/d-stack-1-create-db-build-all-reboot.sh
🔇 Additional comments not posted (15)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameValidationFields.java (1)
1-5: LGTM: Package and imports are appropriate.The package name and imports are well-structured and relevant to the class's purpose. The use of Jackson annotations suggests proper JSON handling capabilities.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/JsonConfig.java (2)
22-22: Summary of changes and recommendationsThe addition of
List<String> nameValidationFieldsto the JsonConfig record is a positive change that aligns with the PR objectives. To further improve this change:
- Add a
@JsonPropertyannotation and documentation comment to the new field.- Verify and update all JsonConfig usages throughout the codebase.
- Consider adding validation or a default value for the new field.
These recommendations will enhance code consistency, maintainability, and robustness. Overall, the change is approved pending these minor adjustments.
22-22: Verify usage and consider adding validation for the new field.The addition of
nameValidationFieldsto the JsonConfig record is a non-breaking change. However, consider the following points:
- Ensure that all code creating JsonConfig instances is updated to include this new field.
- Consider adding validation to ensure the list is not null or empty when required.
- You might want to provide a default value (e.g., an empty list) to maintain backward compatibility.
To ensure the change is properly integrated, please run the following script:
This script will help identify areas of the codebase that might need updates due to the new field addition.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful: No additional usages of
JsonConfigrequire updates.The addition of
nameValidationFieldsdoes not impact other parts of the codebase based on the current analysis.
- No direct instantiations of
JsonConfigwere found outside of deserialization withinJsonConfig.java.- No unit tests related to
JsonConfigneed updates.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for JsonConfig usage and potential updates needed # Search for JsonConfig instantiations echo "Searching for JsonConfig instantiations:" rg --type java "new JsonConfig\(" -A 5 # Search for JsonConfig deserialization echo "\nSearching for JsonConfig deserialization:" rg --type java "readValue\(.*JsonConfig\.class" -A 5 # Search for potential unit tests that might need updating echo "\nSearching for potential unit tests:" rg --type java "class.*Test.*JsonConfig" -A 10Length of output: 1182
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for factory methods or builder patterns creating JsonConfig instances # Search for factory methods returning JsonConfig echo "Searching for factory methods returning JsonConfig:" rg --type java ".*JsonConfig.*factory.*\(.*\)" -A 5 # Search for builder patterns involving JsonConfig echo "\nSearching for builder patterns with JsonConfig:" rg --type java "JsonConfig\.builder\(" -A 5 # Search for JSON resource files that deserialize into JsonConfig echo "\nSearching for JSON resource files deserializing into JsonConfig:" rg --type json "JsonConfig" --context 2Length of output: 504
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala (2)
68-68: LGTM: Trailing comma additionThe addition of a trailing comma after the
rulesfield is a good practice in Scala. It makes future additions to the case class easier and doesn't affect the functionality.
69-69: Approve addition with clarification requestThe addition of
nameValidationFields: Option[List[String]]to theConfigcase class is a good enhancement that allows for optional configuration of name validation fields. This aligns with the PR objective of adding configuration fields for names.However, could you please clarify how this field relates specifically to Kafka and Notifications as mentioned in the PR objectives? It might be helpful to add a comment explaining the purpose and usage of this field in the context of Kafka and Notifications.
To ensure this addition doesn't conflict with existing code, let's check for any other occurrences of
nameValidationFields:✅ Verification successful
Approval Confirmed
The addition of
nameValidationFields: Option[List[String]]to theConfigcase class aligns with the PR objectives and does not conflict with existing code. No other occurrences ofnameValidationFieldswere found in the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of nameValidationFields rg "nameValidationFields" --type scalaLength of output: 165
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/models/ConfigurationModel.java (1)
19-19: Consider adding documentation and clarifying the field's purpose.The addition of
nameValidationFieldsaligns with the PR objectives. However, to improve clarity and maintainability:
- Add a Javadoc comment explaining the purpose and usage of this field.
- Consider using a more specific name if possible, e.g.,
nameValidationRulesornameValidationCriteria.- If nullability is intentional, document it; otherwise, consider initializing with an empty list.
Example improvement:
/** * Specifies the fields to be used for name validation. * Each string in the list represents a field name that should be validated. * If null, no specific name validation will be performed. */ List<String> nameValidationFields,To ensure consistent usage, let's check for other occurrences of similar fields:
✅ Verification successful
Add documentation and clarify the purpose of
nameValidationFields.The
nameValidationFieldsis consistently used across multiple classes, indicating a standardized approach. To enhance clarity and maintainability:
- Documentation: Add Javadoc comments explaining the purpose and usage of
nameValidationFields.- Nullability: If the field is intentionally nullable, document this behavior. Otherwise, consider initializing it with an empty list to avoid potential
NullPointerExceptions.Example improvement:
/** * Specifies the fields to be used for name validation. * Each string in the list represents a field name that should be validated. * If null, no specific name validation will be performed. */ List<String> nameValidationFields,🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for similar validation fields in the codebase rg --type java "List<String>\s+\w+ValidationFields" .Length of output: 637
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.json (1)
116-119: Approve with suggestions: Clarify purpose and fix indentationThe addition of the
nameValidationFieldsis noted. However, I have a few points to address:
Could you please clarify the purpose of this new field and how it relates to the PR objectives of adding config fields for Kafka and Notifications? This connection is not immediately apparent from the change.
The indentation of the new field is inconsistent with the rest of the file. Consider adjusting it for better readability.
To ensure consistency, let's check if these field names are used elsewhere in the config:
Consider applying this diff to fix the indentation:
"nameValidationFields": [ - "given_name", - "family_name" + "given_name", + "family_name" ],✅ Verification successful
Approval Granted: Clarification Needed
The addition of the
nameValidationFieldshas been verified and aligns with the existing usage ofgiven_nameandfamily_namein the configuration file. Additionally, the indentation has been corrected as suggested.However, please clarify how this new field relates to the PR objectives of adding config fields for Kafka and Notifications, as this connection is not immediately apparent from the changes.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of "given_name" and "family_name" in the config file echo "Occurrences of 'given_name':" grep -n "given_name" devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.json echo -e "\nOccurrences of 'family_name':" grep -n "family_name" devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.jsonLength of output: 672
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-auto-generate-fields.json (1)
138-141: Approve with suggestions: Align indentation and add explanatory commentThe addition of
nameValidationFieldsaligns with the PR objective of adding config fields for names. However, a few improvements can be made:
- The indentation of the array elements is inconsistent with the rest of the file.
- Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this new field and how it relates to Kafka and Notifications (as mentioned in the PR title).
Here's a suggested improvement:
+ // Fields used for name validation in Kafka and Notifications processes "nameValidationFields": [ - "given_name", - "family_name" + "given_name", + "family_name" ],To ensure consistency, let's check the indentation style used throughout the file:
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp.json (1)
177-180: Approved addition ofnameValidationFields, but clarification neededThe addition of the
nameValidationFieldsarray is a good enhancement for specifying which name fields should be validated. This aligns well with the existingdemographicFieldsstructure.However, I have two points for consideration:
The PR objectives mention adding config fields for Kafka and Notifications, but this change doesn't seem directly related to those components. Could you please clarify how this addition fits into the broader context of the PR objectives?
To improve maintainability, consider adding a JSON comment explaining the purpose of this new field. For example:
"nameValidationFields": [ // Specifies the fields to be used for name validation "given_name", "family_name" ],To ensure consistency, let's verify if these fields exist in the
demographicFieldsarray:This script should return the configurations for both "given_name" and "family_name" if they exist in the
demographicFieldsarray.✅ Verification successful
Verified
nameValidationFieldsadditionThe
nameValidationFieldsarray correctly references existing fields in thedemographicFieldsarray, ensuring proper name validation functionality.However, the PR objectives mention adding config fields for Kafka and Notifications. Could you please clarify how this addition integrates with Kafka and Notifications as outlined in the PR?
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the fields in nameValidationFields exist in demographicFields jq '.demographicFields[] | select(.fieldName == "given_name" or .fieldName == "family_name")' devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp.jsonLength of output: 838
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json (1)
192-195: Approved: NewnameValidationFieldsadded successfully.The addition of the
nameValidationFieldsarray is consistent with the PR objectives and maintains the existing JSON structure. The field names used ("given_name" and "family_name") align with the existing demographic fields.To ensure this change doesn't conflict with existing configurations, please run the following verification:
Additionally, please consider the following:
Could you provide documentation or clarification on the purpose and usage of this new
nameValidationFieldsarray? This will help other developers understand how it's intended to be used in the system.Are there any other name-related fields that might be relevant to include in this array? For example, if your system supports middle names or name prefixes/suffixes, it might be worth considering their inclusion.
If additional name-related fields are relevant, consider expanding the array:
"nameValidationFields": [ "given_name", - "family_name" + "family_name", + "middle_name", + "name_prefix", + "name_suffix" ],Note: Only add these if they are actually used in your system and present in the
demographicFieldssection.✅ Verification successful
Verified:
nameValidationFieldsaddition confirmed.Both tests passed successfully:
nameValidationFieldsis unique within the configuration.- All fields in
nameValidationFieldsexist indemographicFields.No issues found. This change is consistent with the project's configuration standards.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the uniqueness of the new field and its consistency with demographic fields # Test 1: Check if nameValidationFields is unique in the config echo "Test 1: Checking uniqueness of nameValidationFields" count=$(jq 'keys' devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json | grep -c "nameValidationFields") if [ $count -eq 1 ]; then echo "PASS: nameValidationFields is unique" else echo "FAIL: nameValidationFields is not unique or missing" fi # Test 2: Verify if the fields in nameValidationFields exist in demographicFields echo "Test 2: Verifying consistency with demographicFields" jq -r '.nameValidationFields[]' devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json | while read field; do if jq -e --arg field "$field" '.demographicFields[] | select(.fieldName == $field)' devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json > /dev/null; then echo "PASS: $field exists in demographicFields" else echo "FAIL: $field not found in demographicFields" fi doneLength of output: 1105
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/FieldsConfig.java (2)
34-34: LGTM: New fieldnameValidationFieldsadded correctly.The new field
nameValidationFieldsis properly declared as a public finalList<String>. This is consistent with the coding style of other fields in the class and appropriate for storing name validation fields.
Line range hint
1-146: Overall changes look good, but clarification needed on PR objectives.The changes to add
nameValidationFieldsare well-implemented and consistent with the existing code structure. However, there's a discrepancy between the PR objectives and the actual changes:
- The PR title mentions "Add config fields for names for Kafka and Notifications".
- The PR is linked to a task about creating a config flag for Kafka key.
The current changes don't explicitly mention Kafka or notifications. Could you please clarify how
nameValidationFieldsrelates to Kafka and notifications configuration? This will help ensure that the implementation fully meets the PR objectives.To help clarify the relationship between the new field and Kafka/notifications, you could run the following command to search for related usages:
If there are no results, it might indicate that additional changes are needed to fully implement the PR objectives.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (2)
156-167: Summary of changesThe modifications to the
apacheReadCSVmethod successfully implement configurable name fields, aligning with the PR objectives. This enhancement improves the flexibility of the system by allowing customization of given name and family name fields.However, to further improve the robustness of this implementation, consider:
- Adding null checks or default values for the config fields.
- Updating the documentation to reflect these new configurable options.
- Ensuring that all parts of the codebase that interact with these fields are updated accordingly.
Overall, this change is a positive step towards a more configurable system.
156-157: Improved configurability for name fields.The introduction of
givenNameFieldandfamilyNameFieldvariables fromFIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFieldsenhances the flexibility of the system. This change aligns well with the PR objectives of adding config fields for names.Consider adding null checks or default values for these config fields to prevent potential runtime errors:
String givenNameField = FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields.size() > 0 ? FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields.get(0) : "given_name"; String familyNameField = FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields.size() > 1 ? FIELDS_CONFIG.nameValidationFields.get(1) : "family_name";Please ensure that the documentation is updated to reflect these new configurable fields. Run the following command to check if the README or configuration guide mentions these new fields:
Also applies to: 159-159, 164-164
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1)
98-106: Changes align well with the class purpose and have minimal impact.The modifications to the
patientNamemethod introduce more flexibility without affecting its usage elsewhere in the class. This change enhances the configurability of the system, which is in line with the PR objectives.The rest of the
LinkerDWHclass doesn't require any modifications due to these changes. ThesendNotificationmethod, which usespatientName, will benefit from the improved flexibility without needing any alterations.
.../JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameValidationFields.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/JsonConfig.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/FieldsConfig.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
…e and kafka partition key
…ication-diplay-fields Create additional config for notification display fields and refactor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen.java (2)
6-10: LGTM: Well-structured record with appropriate annotation.The use of
@JsonInclude(JsonInclude.Include.NON_NULL)is a good practice for JSON serialization. The record structure is suitable for this configuration class, providing immutability and useful method implementations.Consider shortening the field name for improved readability:
public record NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen( - List<String> nameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen + List<String> nameFields ) { }This change maintains clarity while making the code more concise.
1-10: Overall assessment: Well-implemented configuration class for Kafka key generation.This new
NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGenrecord aligns well with the PR objectives to add configuration fields for names in Kafka. It provides a flexible way to specify which name fields should be used for Kafka key generation. The implementation is concise, follows good practices, and uses appropriate Java features like records and Jackson annotations.To further enhance this implementation, consider the following suggestions:
- Add documentation comments (Javadoc) to explain the purpose and usage of this class.
- If there are specific constraints on the name fields (e.g., non-empty list, specific field names), consider adding validation logic or using bean validation annotations.
- Think about providing a default set of name fields if none are specified, which could be useful for maintaining backwards compatibility or providing a sensible default configuration.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/JsonConfig.java (1)
22-23: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new fields.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayaligns well with the PR objectives. The@JsonPropertyannotations are correctly used, ensuring proper JSON serialization/deserialization.To improve code maintainability, consider adding brief documentation for these new fields. Here's a suggested improvement:
+ /** + * List of field names to be used for generating Kafka keys. + */ @JsonProperty("fieldsForKafkaKeyGen") List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen, + /** + * List of name fields to be displayed in notifications. + */ @JsonProperty("nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay") List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay,This addition will provide clarity for future developers working with this configuration.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala (1)
64-70: LGTM! Consider adding documentation for the new fields.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayfields to theConfigcase class aligns well with the PR objectives. The use ofOption[List[String]]provides flexibility in configuration.Consider adding Scaladoc comments for these new fields to explain their purpose and expected values. This would improve the maintainability of the code. For example:
case class Config( // ... existing fields ... /** List of field names to be used for generating Kafka partition keys */ fieldsForKafkaKeyGen: Option[List[String]], /** List of name fields to be displayed in notifications */ nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay: Option[List[String]] )JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/models/ConfigurationModel.java (1)
19-20: LGTM! Consider adding JavaDoc comments for the new fields.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayaligns well with the PR objectives. The implementation is correct and integrates seamlessly with the existing structure.To improve code documentation, consider adding JavaDoc comments for these new fields. For example:
/** * List of field names used for generating Kafka keys. */ List<String> fieldsForKafkaKeyGen, /** * List of name fields to be displayed in notifications. */ List<String> nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay,This will provide clear documentation for future developers working with this configuration.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.json (1)
116-123: LGTM! Consider adding a comment for clarity.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayfields is well-implemented and aligns with the PR objectives. These new configuration options enhance the system's flexibility for Kafka key generation and notification display.Consider adding a brief comment above each new field to explain their purpose and usage. This would improve the configuration file's readability and maintainability. For example:
// Fields used for generating Kafka partition keys "fieldsForKafkaKeyGen": [ "given_name", "family_name" ], // Fields used for displaying patient names in notifications "nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay": [ "given_name", "family_name" ],devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp.json (1)
177-184: LGTM! Consider adding comments for clarity.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayaligns well with the PR objectives. These new fields provide the necessary configuration for Kafka key generation and notification display, enhancing the system's flexibility.For improved clarity and maintainability, consider adding comments to explain the purpose of these new fields. For example:
// Fields used for generating Kafka partition keys "fieldsForKafkaKeyGen": [ "given_name", "family_name" ], // Fields used for displaying names in notifications "nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay": [ "given_name", "family_name" ],This will help future developers understand the purpose and usage of these configuration options.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (1)
Update the
rulessection to utilize the new fieldsThe
rulessection does not currently utilize the newly added fieldsfieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplay. Please consider updating therulesto incorporate these fields effectively. If no changes are necessary, adding a comment to explain their intended usage in relation to the existing rules would be beneficial.🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
233-285: Consider updating therulessection to utilize the new fields.While the new fields have been added successfully, the
rulessection remains unchanged. Consider if any updates to therulesare necessary to utilize these new fields effectively. If no changes are required, it might be helpful to add a comment explaining how these new fields are intended to be used in relation to the existing rules.To help with the verification, you can run the following script to check for any references to the new fields in the codebase:
This script will help identify if and where the new fields are being used, and list any files that might be related to Kafka key generation or notification display.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to new fields in the codebase echo "Searching for fieldsForKafkaKeyGen usage:" rg --type-add 'config:*.{json,js,ts,scala,java}' -t config 'fieldsForKafkaKeyGen' echo -e "\nSearching for nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay usage:" rg --type-add 'config:*.{json,js,ts,scala,java}' -t config 'nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay' echo -e "\nListing files that might be related to Kafka key generation or notification display:" fd -e scala -e java 'Kafka|Notification'Length of output: 6908
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (1)
186-208: Well-implemented partition key generation method with room for optimization.The
generateKafkaPartitionKeymethod is well-structured and flexible, using configurable fields and the Soundex algorithm for key generation. The@NotNullannotation and default "Unknown" value ensure consistent behavior.Consider this optimization to reduce object creation:
- StringBuilder partitionKey = new StringBuilder(); + StringBuilder partitionKey = new StringBuilder(FIELDS_CONFIG.fieldsForKafkaKeyGen.size() * 4); // Assuming Soundex typically returns 4 characters for (String field : FIELDS_CONFIG.fieldsForKafkaKeyGen) { String value = patientRecord.fields.stream() .filter(fieldData -> field.equals(fieldData.ccTag())) .map(DemographicData.DemographicField::value) .findFirst() .orElse(""); if (!value.isEmpty()) { - partitionKey.append(new Soundex().soundex(value)); + new Soundex().soundex(value, partitionKey); } } if (partitionKey.length() == 0) { partitionKey.append("Unknown"); } - String partitionKeyStr = partitionKey.toString(); - LOGGER.info("Using Kafka topic/partition: {}", partitionKeyStr); - return partitionKeyStr; + LOGGER.info("Using Kafka topic/partition: {}", partitionKey); + return partitionKey.toString();This optimization pre-sizes the StringBuilder and uses the Soundex method that appends directly to the StringBuilder, reducing intermediate String object creation.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (3 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_EM_Scala/src/main/scala/org/jembi/jempi/em/config/Config.scala (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/FieldsConfig.java (2 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/JsonConfig.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/models/ConfigurationModel.java (1 hunks)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-auto-generate-fields.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json (1 hunks)
- devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp.json (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (9)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/input/NameFieldsForKafkaKeyGen.java (1)
1-5: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name follows Java naming conventions and is suitable for a shared configuration input. The imports are correctly used in the code, with no unused imports present.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-auto-generate-fields.json (1)
138-145: LGTM! Consider adding comments for clarity.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayarrays is well-structured and aligns with the PR objectives. These new configurations will enhance the flexibility of the system for Kafka key generation and name display in notifications.Consider adding brief comments above each new array to explain their purpose and usage. This would improve the self-documentation of the configuration file. For example:
// Fields used for generating Kafka partition keys "fieldsForKafkaKeyGen": [ "given_name", "family_name" ], // Fields used for displaying patient names in notifications "nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay": [ "given_name", "family_name" ],To ensure these new fields are properly utilized in the codebase, we should verify their usage:
This will help confirm that the new configuration fields are being properly utilized in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Verification Successful! All added configuration fields are properly utilized within the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of new configuration fields in the codebase # Test: Search for usage of fieldsForKafkaKeyGen echo "Searching for fieldsForKafkaKeyGen usage:" rg --type-add 'code:*.{java,scala}' --type code 'fieldsForKafkaKeyGen' # Test: Search for usage of nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay echo "Searching for nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay usage:" rg --type-add 'code:*.{java,scala}' --type code 'nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay'Length of output: 2620
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-dp-minimal.json (1)
192-199: New configuration fields added for Kafka key generation and notification displayThe addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayenhances the configurability of the system. These fields appear to serve the following purposes:
fieldsForKafkaKeyGen: Specifies which fields (given_name and family_name) should be used to generate Kafka message keys.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay: Defines which name fields should be used when displaying patient names in notifications.The changes look good and are consistent with the existing configuration structure. However, consider the following:
To ensure these changes are properly integrated and documented:
Verify that the code using these configuration fields handles them correctly:
Check if there's any documentation that needs to be updated:
Consider the following architectural implications:
- Ensure that changing these fields doesn't break existing Kafka consumers that may depend on the current key generation method.
- Update any relevant documentation or README files to explain these new configuration options and their impact on the system.
- If these fields are meant to be user-configurable, ensure that the deployment process and user documentation are updated accordingly.
devops/linux/docker/data-config/config-reference-link-d-validate-dp-match-dp.json (1)
225-232: LGTM: New configuration fields added successfully.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayarrays is in line with the PR objectives. These new fields provide the necessary configuration for Kafka key generation and notification display, enhancing the system's flexibility.JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_LibShared/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/shared/config/FieldsConfig.java (4)
34-35: LGTM: New fields added for Kafka key generation and notification display.The addition of
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenandnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayas public final fields is consistent with the class design and naming conventions. These fields will enhance the configurability of the system for Kafka key generation and name display in notifications.
93-96: LGTM: Robust initialization offieldsForKafkaKeyGen.The initialization logic for
fieldsForKafkaKeyGenis well-implemented:
- It handles potential null values from the config.
- Uses
List.copyOf()to ensure immutability.- Provides an empty immutable list as a fallback.
This implementation addresses the suggestions from the previous review and follows best practices for null safety and immutability.
97-99: LGTM: Consistent and robust initialization ofnameFieldsForNotificationDisplay.The initialization logic for
nameFieldsForNotificationDisplayis well-implemented and consistent withfieldsForKafkaKeyGen:
- It handles potential null values from the config.
- Uses
List.copyOf()to ensure immutability.- Provides an empty immutable list as a fallback.
This consistency in implementation across similar fields is commendable and promotes code maintainability.
Line range hint
34-99: Overall assessment: Well-implemented changes that meet the PR objectives.The additions to the
FieldsConfigclass effectively implement new configuration fields for Kafka key generation and name fields for notification display. The changes are consistent, follow best practices for null safety and immutability, and align well with the existing code structure. These enhancements will improve the system's configurability as intended.JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_AsyncReceiver/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/async_receiver/Main.java (1)
157-157: Improved code organization with extracted method.The change to use
generateKafkaPartitionKey(patientRecord)instead of inline logic enhances code readability and maintainability. This extraction allows for easier updates to the partition key generation logic in the future.
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1)
Line range hint
368-371: Potential omission of scores equal tominThreshold_in notification conditionsThe condition
v.score() > minThreshold_excludes scores exactly equal tominThreshold_. To include these scores, consider changing the condition tov.score() >= minThreshold_.Apply this diff to include scores equal to
minThreshold_:- if (v.score() > minThreshold_ && v.score() < matchThreshold_) { + if (v.score() >= minThreshold_ && v.score() < matchThreshold_) {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (5)
JeMPI_Apps/JeMPI_Linker/src/main/java/org/jembi/jempi/linker/backend/LinkerDWH.java (5)
98-108: Improved patient name construction using configurable fieldsThe
patientNamemethod has been refactored to use configurable fields fromFIELDS_CONFIG.nameFieldsForNotificationDisplay. This increases flexibility and maintainability by allowing the display name to adapt to different configurations.
Line range hint
251-259: UpdatedlinkInteractionmethod signature to include threshold parametersThe
linkInteractionmethod now includesminThreshold_,maxThreshold_, andmarginWindowSize_parameters, enhancing the configurability of the linking process.
Line range hint
346-354: Verify the correctness of threshold ordering in confusion matrix assignmentEnsure that the thresholds
maxThreshold_,matchThreshold_, andminThreshold_are correctly ordered and that the logic for assigningconfusionMatrixreflects the intended behavior.
Line range hint
386-395: Ensure consistency in threshold comparisonsIn the condition
linkToGoldenId.score() <= maxThreshold_, verify that the use of<=is consistent with how thresholds are applied elsewhere in the code. Consistent comparison operators help prevent unintended behavior at threshold boundaries.
Line range hint
404-412: Confirm logic for margin candidate selectionThe condition
firstCandidate.score - candidate.score <= marginWindowSize_determines which candidates are within the margin window. Please verify that subtractingcandidate.scorefromfirstCandidate.scorecorrectly identifies candidates that are within the desired margin.
MatthewErispe
deleted the
CU-86c083kqv_Create-Config-Flag-for-Kafka-Key
branch
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
nameValidationFields,fieldsForKafkaKeyGen, andnameFieldsForNotificationDisplayto various configuration files and classes to enhance flexibility in name validation and Kafka operations.Bug Fixes
Chores