This paper explores the integration of symbolic logic knowledge into deep neural networks for learning from noisy crowd labels. We introduce Logic-guided Learning from Noisy Crowd Labels (Logic-LNCL), an EM-alike iterative logic knowledge distillation framework that learns from both noisy labeled data and logic rules of interest. Unlike traditional EM methods, our framework contains a “pseudo-E-step” that distills from the logic rules a new type of learning target, which is then used in the “pseudo-M-step” for training the classifier. Extensive evaluations on two real-world datasets for text sentiment classification and named entity recognition demonstrate that the proposed framework improves the state-of-the-art and provides a new solution to learning from noisy crowd labels.
This paper is accepted by ICDE2023.
- Download pre-trained word embeddings GoogleNews-vectors-negative300.bin, place it in
./sentiment/data/
conda env create -f sentiment.yaml
- python 3.6.12
- pytorch 1.7.1
- gensim 3.8.0
- numpy 1.19.2
- scikit-learn 0.23.2
python main.py --result_path Logic-LNCL_1
- Write a
*.sh
script to run multiple times, e.g.,run.sh
; andsh run.sh
- Test Logic-LNCL-student:
python main.py --result_path Logic-LNCL_student_1 --fewer_sample 4300
or sh run_fewer_samples_student.sh
- Test Logic-LNCL-teacher:
python main.py --result_path Logic-LNCL_teacher_1 --fewer_sample 3300 --validation_teacher True
or sh run_fewer_samples_teacher.sh
- Download pre-trained word embeddings with glove.6B.300D.txt, place it in
./NER/data/
conda env create -f ner.yaml
- python 3.5.6
- tensorflow 1.10.0
- keras 2.2.2
- numpy 1.15.2
- scikit-learn 0.20.2
python main.py Logic-LNCL_1
- Write a
*.sh
script to run multiple times, e.g.,run.sh
; andsh run.sh
- Test Logic-LNCL-student:
python main.py --result_path Logic-LNCL_student_1 --fewer_sample 5700
or sh run_fewer_samples_student.sh
- Test Logic-LNCL-teacher:
python main.py --result_path Logic-LNCL_teacher_1 --fewer_sample 4900 --validation_teacher True
or sh run_fewer_samples_teacher.sh
- The following figure shows more statistical information of the annotators.
Figure 2: Boxplots for the number of annotated instances (a) and the accuracies/F1 (b) of the AMT annotators for the sentiment dataset and the NER dataset.
- The following example shows the main errors that can arise from crowd annotation on the NER dataset, as presented in the paper.