Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate to starknet foundry::deploy contracts using snforge in test #91

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mubarak23
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
vault ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 1, 2024 11:32am

@mubarak23
Copy link
Author

@LucasLvy have a look at it here

@mubarak23 mubarak23 changed the title deploy contracts using snforge in test Migrate to starknet foundry::deploy contracts using snforge in test Jun 19, 2024
@@ -6,9 +6,18 @@ version = "0.1.0"
starknet = "2.6.0"
openzeppelin = { git = "https://github.com/openzeppelin/cairo-contracts", branch = "main" }

[dev-dependencies]
snforge_std = { git = "https://github.com/foundry-rs/starknet-foundry", tag = "v0.22.0" }
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

use the latest release

Suggested change
snforge_std = { git = "https://github.com/foundry-rs/starknet-foundry", tag = "v0.22.0" }
snforge_std = { git = "https://github.com/foundry-rs/starknet-foundry", tag = "v0.25.0" }

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, 0.25.0 is stable, am using it now, i will push some changes i made that pass the first 11 test with snforge

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants