Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
sync
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
keithalewis committed Nov 29, 2024
1 parent b046e28 commit 373750e
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 216 additions and 183 deletions.
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion _apl.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ Let's give names to things.
The _primitive types_ are
booleans $\BB$,
integers $\ZZ$,
non-negative integers $\ZZ$,
non-negative integers $\NN$,
real numbers $\RR$,
and characters $\CC$.
We have $\BB\subseteq\NN\subseteq\ZZ\subseteq\RR$ as rings.
Expand All @@ -65,6 +65,8 @@ If $X$, $X_i$ are types

_array_ $x = [x_1,\ldots,x_n]\in X^n\cong n\to X$, $x[i] = x_i$.

$(I\times n)^A x (-n\times I)^A \to I^A$

_tuple_ $x = \langle x_1,\ldots,x_n\rangle\in\prod X_{i\in\NN}$, $n\to(\prod X_i\to X_i)$,
$n\mapsto π_i$,
$x\langle i\rangle = π_i(x) = x_i$.
Expand Down
19 changes: 11 additions & 8 deletions fm.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ This is a perfect hedge and the value of the derivative at time $t$
would be determined by equation (2): ${V_t D_t = (\sum_{\o{\tau}_j > t} \o{A}_j D_{\o{\tau}_j})|_{\AA_t}}$.

Perfect hedges do not exist in practice.
A fundamental (unsolved) problem in mathematical finance is how to hedge a
A fundamental problem in mathematical finance is how to hedge a
derivative when a perfect hedge does not exist.
A first attempt at a solution
is to assume a perfect hedge exists.
Expand All @@ -96,19 +96,22 @@ and ${V_0 D_0 = (\sum_{\o{\tau}_j > t} \o{A}_j D_{\o{\tau}_j})|_{\AA_0}}$.
$$
\Gamma_0 D_0 = D_{X_0}(\sum_{\o{\tau}_j > 0} \o{A}_j D_{\o{\tau}_j})|_{\AA_0},
$$
where $D_{X_0}$ is the Fréchet derivative.
where $D_{X_0}$ is the Fréchet derivative. Just as in the B-S/M theory, the (putative) initial hedge is
the derivative of value with respect to current prices. Note that value can be
computed using only the deflators and the contract specified amounts.

For $\tau_1 = t > 0$ we have $V_t = (\Delta_t + \Gamma_t)\cdot X_t$ so
$$
(\Delta_t + \Gamma_t) D_t = D_{X_t}(\sum_{\o{\tau}_j > t} \o{A}_j D_{\o{\tau}_j})|_{\AA_0}.
$$
For $t > 0$ sufficiently small we have $\Delta_t = \Gamma_0$ so we can solve for $\Gamma_t$.
This procedure does not specify what value $\tau_1 = t$ to choose.
This procedure does not specify what value of $\tau_1$ to choose.

The classical Black-Scholes/Merton theory gives the ludicrous answer that
you should trade "continuously". The Unified Model does not provide an
answer, it only puts your nose directly in the problem mathematical finance
has heretofore completely failed to answer: given an existing hedge, when
and how much do you rehedge?
The Unified Model does not provide an
answer to when hedge, it only puts your nose directly in the problem of
when and how much to hedge.
The classical Black-Scholes/Merton theory gives the inapplicable answer that
you should trade "continuously".

## Deflators

Expand Down
Loading

0 comments on commit 373750e

Please sign in to comment.