Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: update templates #439

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from
Closed

feat: update templates #439

wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

Sonichigo
Copy link
Member

What has changed?

This PR works towards making the PR templates and Issue Templates more friendly for contributors and maintainers to work with.

How Has This Been Tested?

Please run npm run build and npm run serve to check if the changes are working as expected. Please include screenshots of the output of both the commands. Add screenshots/gif of the changes if possible.

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.

@Sonichigo Sonichigo self-assigned this Aug 5, 2024
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
---
id: idempotency
title: Idempotent REST API
title: Mastering Idempotent REST APIs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Change this to playbook..

sidebar_label: Idempotency
description: Optimize user experience with idempotent APIs. Ensure smooth interactions & error handling for satisfied users.
description: Discover how idempotent APIs enhance user experience, reliability, and error handling. Learn best practices for implementing and testing idempotent methods.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Idempotency is not directly related to UX.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants