test: add environment e2e tests #143

rajdip-b · 2024-02-16T16:01:13Z

Type

enhancement, bug_fix

Description

Enhanced error handling in environment authority checks and service operations.
Added comprehensive e2e tests for environment management, covering creation, update, deletion, and fetching operations.
Improved validation and error messaging in environment service, particularly for operations involving default environments and duplicate names.
Introduced a unique constraint on environment names within a project to prevent duplicates.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Error handling

get-environment-with-authority.ts `Improve Error Handling in Environment Authority Check` apps/api/src/common/get-environment-with-authority.ts Replaced `ConflictException` with `UnauthorizedException` for unauthorized access attempts.	+2/-2

Tests

environment.e2e.spec.ts `Add Comprehensive e2e Tests for Environment Management` apps/api/src/environment/environment.e2e.spec.ts Added extensive e2e tests for environment management features including creation, update, deletion, and fetching of environments. Ensured proper error handling and validation in various scenarios such as duplicate environment names, unauthorized access, and operations on default environments.	+586/-0

Enhancement

environment.service.ts `Enhance Environment Service with Better Validation and Error Handling` apps/api/src/environment/service/environment.service.ts Introduced `BadRequestException` for invalid operations such as deleting the default or the last environment. Enhanced error messages for conflict exceptions during environment creation and update. Fixed the logic for updating environments to correctly handle the default status and prevent duplicate names within the same project.	+40/-16

Configuration changes

migration.sql `Enforce Unique Environment Names within Projects` apps/api/src/prisma/migrations/20240216155823_add_unique_key_to_environment/migration.sql Added a unique index on `projectId` and `name` columns in the `Environment` table to enforce unique environment names within a project.	+8/-0
schema.prisma `Update Prisma Schema to Enforce Unique Environment Names` apps/api/src/prisma/schema.prisma Added a unique constraint on `projectId` and `name` fields in the `Environment` model.	+2/-0

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The describe tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a description for the PR - title, type, summary, walkthrough and labels. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.

When commenting, to edit configurations related to the describe tool (pr_description section), use the following template:

/describe --pr_description.some_config1=... --pr_description.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_description]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the describe tool is: `pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.add_original_user_description=true" "--pr_description.keep_original_user_title=true", ...]` meaning the `describe` tool will run automatically on every PR, will keep the original title, and will add the original user description above the generated description. Markers are an alternative way to control the generated description, to give maximal control to the user. If you set: `pr_commands = ["/describe --pr_description.use_description_markers=true", ...]` the tool will replace every marker of the form `pr_agent:marker_name` in the PR description with the relevant content, where `marker_name` is one of the following: `type`: the PR type. `summary`: the PR summary. `walkthrough`: the PR walkthrough. Note that when markers are enabled, if the original PR description does not contain any markers, the tool will not alter the description at all.
Custom labels The default labels of the `describe` tool are quite generic: [`Bug fix`, `Tests`, `Enhancement`, `Documentation`, `Other`]. If you specify custom labels in the repo's labels page or via configuration file, you can get tailored labels for your use cases. Examples for custom labels: `Main topic:performance` - pr_agent:The main topic of this PR is performance `New endpoint` - pr_agent:A new endpoint was added in this PR `SQL query` - pr_agent:A new SQL query was added in this PR `Dockerfile changes` - pr_agent:The PR contains changes in the Dockerfile ... The list above is eclectic, and aims to give an idea of different possibilities. Define custom labels that are relevant for your repo and use cases. Note that Labels are not mutually exclusive, so you can add multiple label categories. Make sure to provide proper title, and a detailed and well-phrased description for each label, so the tool will know when to suggest it.
Inline File Walkthrough 💎 For enhanced user experience, the `describe` tool can add file summaries directly to the "Files changed" tab in the PR page. This will enable you to quickly understand the changes in each file, while reviewing the code changes (diffs). To enable inline file summary, set `pr_description.inline_file_summary` in the configuration file, possible values are: `'table'`: File changes walkthrough table will be displayed on the top of the "Files changed" tab, in addition to the "Conversation" tab. `true`: A collapsable file comment with changes title and a changes summary for each file in the PR. `false` (default): File changes walkthrough will be added only to the "Conversation" tab.
Utilizing extra instructions The `describe` tool can be configured with extra instructions, to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Notice that the general structure of the description is fixed, and cannot be changed. Extra instructions can change the content or style of each sub-section of the PR description. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_description] extra_instructions=""" - The PR title should be in the format: '<PR type>: <title>' - The title should be short and concise (up to 10 words) - ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the describe usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-16T16:01:58Z

PR Description updated to latest commit (07fd0f2)

nx-cloud · 2024-02-16T16:02:02Z

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 55961ad. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution

✅ Successfully ran 3 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-16T16:02:14Z

PR Review

PR feedback
⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, because the PR includes a wide range of changes across error handling, e2e tests, service logic, and database schema. The complexity and breadth of these changes require a thorough review to ensure correctness, security, and performance.
🧪 Relevant tests	Yes
🔍 Possible issues	The introduction of a unique constraint on environment names within a project could lead to migration issues if there are existing duplicates. It's important to ensure that the database is in a consistent state before applying this change. Changing the exception type from `ConflictException` to `UnauthorizedException` in `get-environment-with-authority.ts` might have implications on client error handling logic. Clients expecting a conflict error might not correctly handle unauthorized exceptions. The logic to prevent deletion of the default environment or the last environment in `environment.service.ts` is crucial. However, it's important to ensure that these checks are comprehensive and account for all possible edge cases to avoid unintentional data loss. The handling of `isDefault` in environment updates seems to allow for the possibility that no environment is marked as default if the update operation mistakenly sets `isDefault` to false without another environment taking its place. This could lead to inconsistencies in how default environments are determined.
🔒 Security concerns	No

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The review tool scans the PR code changes, and generates a PR review. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the review tool (pr_reviewer section), use the following template:

/review --pr_reviewer.some_config1=... --pr_reviewer.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_reviewer]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Utilizing extra instructions The `review` tool can be configured with extra instructions, which can be used to guide the model to a feedback tailored to the needs of your project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify the relevant sub-tool, and the relevant aspects of the PR that you want to emphasize. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_reviewer] # /review # extra_instructions=""" In the 'possible issues' section, emphasize the following: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
How to enable\disable automation When you first install PR-Agent app, the default mode for the `review` tool is: `pr_commands = ["/review", ...]` meaning the `review` tool will run automatically on every PR, with the default configuration. Edit this field to enable/disable the tool, or to change the used configurations
Auto-labels The `review` tool can auto-generate two specific types of labels for a PR: a `possible security issue` label, that detects possible security issues (`enable_review_labels_security` flag) a `Review effort [1-5]: x` label, where x is the estimated effort to review the PR (`enable_review_labels_effort` flag)
Extra sub-tools The `review` tool provides a collection of possible feedbacks about a PR. It is recommended to review the possible options, and choose the ones relevant for your use case. Some of the feature that are disabled by default are quite useful, and should be considered for enabling. For example: `require_score_review`, `require_soc2_ticket`, and more.
Auto-approve PRs By invoking: `/review auto_approve` The tool will automatically approve the PR, and add a comment with the approval. To ensure safety, the auto-approval feature is disabled by default. To enable auto-approval, you need to actively set in a pre-defined configuration file the following: `[pr_reviewer] enable_auto_approval = true` (this specific flag cannot be set with a command line argument, only in the configuration file, committed to the repository) You can also enable auto-approval only if the PR meets certain requirements, such as that the `estimated_review_effort` is equal or below a certain threshold, by adjusting the flag: `[pr_reviewer] maximal_review_effort = 5`
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the review usage page for a comprehensive guide on using this tool.

codiumai-pr-agent-free · 2024-02-16T16:02:17Z

PR Code Suggestions

Suggestions

enhancement

Improve exception message clarity by including the missing authority. Consider using a more specific exception message that includes the missing authority for clarity. apps/api/src/common/get-environment-with-authority.ts [38-39] throw new UnauthorizedException( - `User ${userId} does not have the required authorities` + `User ${userId} does not have the required authority: ${authority}` )
Simplify the condition for assigning `isDefault` using nullish coalescing. Refactor the condition to check `dto.isDefault` directly without comparing it to `undefined` or `null`, as it's a boolean value. apps/api/src/environment/service/environment.service.ts [151-154] -isDefault: - dto.isDefault !== undefined \|\| dto.isDefault !== null - ? dto.isDefault - : environment.isDefault, +isDefault: dto.isDefault ?? environment.isDefault,

maintainability

Use beforeEach for common setup tasks in tests. Refactor the test suite to use beforeEach for common setup tasks to reduce redundancy and improve test maintainability. apps/api/src/environment/environment.e2e.spec.ts [48-114] -beforeAll(async () => { +beforeEach(async () => { ... })
Reduce code duplication by using utility functions for entity creation. Use a centralized function or utility for creating test entities like users, workspaces, and projects to reduce code duplication. apps/api/src/environment/environment.e2e.spec.ts [81-88] -user1 = await prisma.user.create({ - data: { - id: user1Id, - email: '[email protected]', - name: 'John Doe', - isOnboardingFinished: true - } +user1 = await createUser({ + id: user1Id, + email: '[email protected]', + name: 'John Doe', + isOnboardingFinished: true })
Use helper functions for repeated payload structures. Extract repeated payload structures into a helper function to reduce redundancy and improve test readability. apps/api/src/environment/environment.e2e.spec.ts [126-130] -payload: { - name: 'Environment 1', - description: 'Environment 1 description', - isDefault: true -} +payload: createEnvironmentPayload('Environment 1', 'Environment 1 description', true)
Improve variable naming for better readability. Consider using a more descriptive variable name than `ops` for the array storing operations to be executed. This will improve code readability and maintainability. apps/api/src/environment/service/environment.service.ts [120] -const ops = [] +const environmentOperations = []
Simplify the condition for checking if an environment with the same name exists. Instead of manually checking if `dto.name` is not empty and then comparing names, you can simplify the condition by directly checking if the name exists and is different. apps/api/src/environment/service/environment.service.ts [111-113] if ( - dto.name && - (environment.name === dto.name \|\| - (await this.environmentExists(dto.name, environment.projectId))) + dto.name && await this.environmentExists(dto.name, environment.projectId) && + environment.name !== dto.name )

best practice

Improve test isolation by mocking `prisma.environment.findMany`. Consider using a mock function for `prisma.environment.findMany` to return controlled test data, ensuring test isolation and reliability. apps/api/src/environment/environment.e2e.spec.ts [152-156] -const environments = await prisma.environment.findMany({ - where: { - projectId: project1.id - } -}) +jest.spyOn(prisma.environment, 'findMany').mockResolvedValue([...])
Use template literals for error messages for consistency. Use template literals consistently for error messages to ensure code consistency and readability. apps/api/src/environment/service/environment.service.ts [269] -throw new BadRequestException('Cannot delete the default environment') +throw new BadRequestException(`Cannot delete the default environment`)
Define explicit return types for methods to improve type safety. For the `makeAllNonDefault` method, consider explicitly defining the return type to improve code readability and type safety. apps/api/src/environment/service/environment.service.ts [317] -private makeAllNonDefault(projectId: Project['id']) { +private makeAllNonDefault(projectId: Project['id']): Promise<Prisma.BatchPayload> {

✨ Usage guide:

Overview:
The improve tool scans the PR code changes, and automatically generates suggestions for improving the PR code. The tool can be triggered automatically every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on a PR.
When commenting, to edit configurations related to the improve tool (pr_code_suggestions section), use the following template:

/improve --pr_code_suggestions.some_config1=... --pr_code_suggestions.some_config2=...

With a configuration file, use the following template:

[pr_code_suggestions]
some_config1=...
some_config2=...

Enabling\disabling automation When you first install the app, the default mode for the improve tool is: `pr_commands = ["/improve --pr_code_suggestions.summarize=true", ...]` meaning the `improve` tool will run automatically on every PR, with summarization enabled. Delete this line to disable the tool from running automatically.
Utilizing extra instructions Extra instructions are very important for the `improve` tool, since they enable to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project. Be specific, clear, and concise in the instructions. With extra instructions, you are the prompter. Specify relevant aspects that you want the model to focus on. Examples for extra instructions: `[pr_code_suggestions] # /improve # extra_instructions=""" Emphasize the following aspects: - Does the code logic cover relevant edge cases? - Is the code logic clear and easy to understand? - Is the code logic efficient? ... """` Use triple quotes to write multi-line instructions. Use bullet points to make the instructions more readable.
A note on code suggestions quality While the current AI for code is getting better and better (GPT-4), it's not flawless. Not all the suggestions will be perfect, and a user should not accept all of them automatically. Suggestions are not meant to be simplistic. Instead, they aim to give deep feedback and raise questions, ideas and thoughts to the user, who can then use his judgment, experience, and understanding of the code base. Recommended to use the 'extra_instructions' field to guide the model to suggestions that are more relevant to the specific needs of the project, or use the custom suggestions 💎 tool With large PRs, best quality will be obtained by using 'improve --extended' mode.
More PR-Agent commands To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review: Request a review of your Pull Request. /describe: Update the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest code improvements. Extended mode provides a higher quality feedback. /ask <QUESTION>: Ask a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents. /add_docs 💎: Generate docstring for new components introduced in the PR. /generate_labels 💎: Generate labels for the PR based on the PR's contents. /analyze 💎: Automatically analyzes the PR, and presents changes walkthrough for each component. See the tools guide for more details. To list the possible configuration parameters, add a /config comment.

See the improve usage page for a more comprehensive guide on using this tool.

codecov · 2024-02-16T16:03:39Z

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7bb3d21) 62.20% compared to head (55961ad) 81.17%.
Report is 5 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##           develop     #143       +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage    62.20%   81.17%   +18.96%     
============================================
  Files           76       77        +1     
  Lines         1503     1503               
  Branches       260      255        -5     
============================================
+ Hits           935     1220      +285     
+ Misses         568      283      -285

Flag	Coverage Δ
api-e2e-tests	`81.17% <100.00%> (+18.96%)`	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

sonarqubecloud · 2024-02-16T16:19:28Z

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
7.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

rajdip-b · 2024-02-18T16:46:23Z

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

test: add environment e2e tests

07fd0f2

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added type: enhancement New feature or request bug_fix labels Feb 16, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot added the Review effort [1-5]: 4 label Feb 16, 2024

rajdip-b added 2 commits February 16, 2024 21:40

add minor improvements

3fce463

add minor improvements

55961ad

rajdip-b merged commit f0c2dcb into develop Feb 16, 2024
7 of 8 checks passed

rajdip-b deleted the test/environment branch February 16, 2024 16:21

rajdip-b added the released label Feb 18, 2024

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

test: add environment e2e tests #143

test: add environment e2e tests #143

rajdip-b commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited by codiumai-pr-agent-free bot

Loading

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 16, 2024

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 16, 2024

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

rajdip-b commented Feb 18, 2024

test: add environment e2e tests #143

test: add environment e2e tests #143

Conversation

rajdip-b commented Feb 16, 2024 • edited by codiumai-pr-agent-free bot Loading

Type

Description

Changes walkthrough

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 16, 2024

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 16, 2024 • edited Loading

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 16, 2024

PR Review

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 16, 2024 • edited Loading

PR Code Suggestions

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2024 • edited Loading

Codecov Report

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 16, 2024 • edited Loading

Quality Gate passed

rajdip-b commented Feb 18, 2024

rajdip-b commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited by codiumai-pr-agent-free bot

Loading

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codiumai-pr-agent-free bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 16, 2024 •

edited

Loading