Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pull] master from NixOS:master #242

Merged
merged 2,576 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024
Merged

[pull] master from NixOS:master #242

merged 2,576 commits into from
Oct 8, 2024

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Oct 2, 2024

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Oct 2, 2024
lukegb and others added 29 commits October 7, 2024 17:46
This is a red-herring, and I suspect due to a unit test that's
too close to the underlying implementation. I've tested building
a couple of snaps with the new version of craft-parts (including)
ones which use the `python` plugin, and things seem to work
fine.
OpenJFX 11 has been EOL for over a year; upstream
uses OpenJFX 15 which is also EOL. According
to <bisq-network/bisq#6758>, the
application does not function with later versions, and has a
limited remaining lifespan as there is a new major version that
uses more modern versions. It looks like that version officially
supports OpenJDK 22, which is also EOL, but hopefully it will
work with 21 or 23. Some work was done already to package it here:
<#318594>.
The derivation doesn’t support Darwin anyway, and OpenJFX 11 is EOL.
OpenJFX 11 reached end‐of‐life in 2023.
NickCao and others added 29 commits October 8, 2024 16:11
Allows reusing it in more places
Also post a comment in case base branch is wrong
  This guides newcomers in how to smoothly handle the potentially scary
  situation of having thousands of commits listed in a PR.

  While CI shows the same, people might not even look at CI if the PR
  looks botched.
Since #336261 we have CI that
checks that the codeowners file is valid:

https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/actions/runs/11243668280/job/31260095472#step:7:34

Which files are correct (or whether they were removed) was determined
using the Git history and some grepping
@khaneliman khaneliman merged commit e8597a0 into khaneliman:master Oct 8, 2024
10 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.