Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Make model configurable #6

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024
Merged

Conversation

kmesiab
Copy link
Owner

@kmesiab kmesiab commented Jan 17, 2024

Introduces a configuration option: CADRE_AI_MODEL
and command line switch: --model for supplying
the OpenAI GPT Model string. 'gpt-4' is the
default when non is set or supplied

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced the ability to configure the OpenAI model used in the CLI.
    • Added a new model option to enhance user control over the application's functionality.
  • Documentation

    • Updated the README with new configuration instructions and command-line switches.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured proper file permissions when saving reviews.
  • Tests

    • Implemented tests to verify command-line overrides for model configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 17, 2024

Walkthrough

The project has undergone significant changes to improve user experience and extend functionality. The updates encompass refining the CLI for better usability, enhancing OpenAI model configuration options, and introducing a new model choice. Notably, the codebase now supports multiple AI models for generating code reviews, with provisions for command-line overrides and saving the output to files.

Changes

File(s) Summary of Changes
README.md, main.go Enhanced CLI usability, added model configuration details, introduced a new model option, and implemented functions for managing different AI models and saving reviews.
main_test.go Added a test for CLI model configuration override.

🐇✨
In the burrow of the code, changes abound,
A clever hare tweaks, and new paths are found.
With a hop and a skip, the CLI now sings,
As the models take flight, on binary wings. 🚀🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 3

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a529b8c and bd227d5.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • main.go (4 hunks)
  • main_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
Additional comments: 4
main.go (4)
  • 17-18: The constants DefaultFilePerms and DefaultOpenAIModel have been added correctly with appropriate values. The file permissions are set to 0o644, which is a common default for read and write permissions for the owner, and read-only for others.
  • 58-63: The getCodeReviews function has been updated to accept an additional model argument. The main function correctly passes the CompletionModel from the argT struct to this function. Ensure that all calls to getCodeReviews throughout the codebase have been updated to include the new argument.
Verification successful

The output from the shell script indicates that there is only one call to the getCodeReviews function in main.go, and it has been updated to include the new model argument as argv.CompletionModel. This confirms that the getCodeReviews function is being called with the correct number of arguments in the codebase, at least within the scope of the main.go file.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for calls to getCodeReviews to ensure they include the new model argument.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'getCodeReviews($$$, $_, $_, $_)'

Length of output: 64



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any calls to getCodeReviews to verify that all instances have been updated with the new model argument.
ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'getCodeReviews($$$)'

Length of output: 266

* 171-171: The `saveReviewToFile` function uses the `DefaultFilePerms` constant correctly when writing the file. This is a good use of constants for maintainability. * 195-197: The `coalesceConfiguration` function has been updated to use the `DefaultOpenAIModel` constant when no model is provided. This is a good practice as it uses a single source of truth for the default value.

main_test.go Outdated
Comment on lines 27 to 40
func TestCoalesceConfiguration_Model_CLIOverride(t *testing.T) {
// Set up to restore the value later
currentEnvVar := os.Getenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL")
defer os.Setenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL", currentEnvVar)

// Set up an override
err := os.Setenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL", "gpt-4")
require.NoError(t, err)

args := &argT{CompletionModel: "overridden_key"}
result, _ := coalesceConfiguration(args)

assert.Equal(t, "overridden_key", result.ApiKey)
}
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Jan 17, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test function TestCoalesceConfiguration_Model_CLIOverride is intended to verify the CLI override functionality for the model setting. However, there is a discrepancy in the assertion statement on line 39, where it checks result.ApiKey instead of result.CompletionModel.

- assert.Equal(t, "overridden_key", result.ApiKey)
+ assert.Equal(t, "overridden_key", result.CompletionModel)

Committable suggestion

IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
func TestCoalesceConfiguration_Model_CLIOverride(t *testing.T) {
// Set up to restore the value later
currentEnvVar := os.Getenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL")
defer os.Setenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL", currentEnvVar)
// Set up an override
err := os.Setenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL", "gpt-4")
require.NoError(t, err)
args := &argT{CompletionModel: "overridden_key"}
result, _ := coalesceConfiguration(args)
assert.Equal(t, "overridden_key", result.ApiKey)
}
func TestCoalesceConfiguration_Model_CLIOverride(t *testing.T) {
// Set up to restore the value later
currentEnvVar := os.Getenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL")
defer os.Setenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL", currentEnvVar)
// Set up an override
err := os.Setenv("CADRE_AI_MODEL", "gpt-4")
require.NoError(t, err)
args := &argT{CompletionModel: "overridden_key"}
result, _ := coalesceConfiguration(args)
assert.Equal(t, "overridden_key", result.CompletionModel)
}

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed in a532b06

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kmesiab Great to hear that the issue has been addressed! If there's anything else you need reviewed or any other assistance, feel free to let me know. 😊


If you found this review helpful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on X?
Thank you for using CodeRabbit!

main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
main.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Introduces a configuration option: CADRE_AI_MODEL
and command line switch: `--model` for supplying
the OpenAI GPT Model string.  'gpt-4' is the
default when non is set or supplied
@kmesiab kmesiab force-pushed the feat/make-model-configurable branch from bd227d5 to a532b06 Compare January 17, 2024 15:52
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a529b8c and a532b06.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • README.md (2 hunks)
  • main.go (4 hunks)
  • main_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
  • README.md
  • main.go
  • main_test.go

@kmesiab
Copy link
Owner Author

kmesiab commented Jan 17, 2024

CADRE SELF REVIEW: Code Review for Git Diff

Technical Accuracy

No apparent bugs or coding errors were detected from the given diff. However, one potential security vulnerability is the use of an API key without a clear sanitization or validation process upon retrieval from either the command line or environment variables. Ensure that this key cannot be logged or exposed in error messages.

Best Practices

  • The os.WriteFile permission constants 0644 and 0o644 should be consistent in numeric notation; the latter is preferred for clarity (Octal).
  • Model strings like "gpt-4-1106-preview" are specified literals, which suggest this code will only work for specific models. It's better to allow flexibility through configuration without hardcoding values.
  • Always check if the directory exists and is writable before trying to save reviews.

Performance and Scalability

  • The processing of diff files and API calls in getCodeReviews appears to be synchronous. This may not scale well with a large number of diff files. Consider concurrent processing with a worker pool or goroutines.
  • Calling os.Stat and then os.MkdirAll could be simplified since os.MkdirAll already does the check and won't recreate the directory.

Readability and Clarity

  • Clear function names and methodical step-by-step process improves readability.
  • The saveReviews function has a deeply nested structure, which can be simplified by breaking down the operations into smaller, more focused functions.

Maintainability

  • The introduction of constants for file permissions and default model is a step towards maintainable code.
  • The saveReviews functionality is assuming the presence of a directory structure that correlates with the filename. However, the current implementation could lead to issues because it assumes the path.Base() call extracts a directory from the FilePathNew.

Testability

  • No unit test changes are shown in the diff, so there's no evidence of test coverage or testing strategies for the new code.
  • The saveReviews function's use of fmt.Printf makes it difficult to test without capturing stdout, which could be refactored to use a logger interface.

Contextual Fit

Assuming the project's goal is to integrate AI-powered code reviews, the changes seem aligned with introducing flexibility in AI model selection for code reviews.

Actionable Feedback

const (
    // Use consistent octal notation for file permissions
    DefaultFilePerms   = 0o644
    DefaultOpenAIModel = "gpt-4-1106-preview" // Consider external configuration for models
)

...

func saveReviews(reviews []ReviewedDiff) {
    // Break down into smaller functions to improve maintainability and readability
    for _, review := range reviews {
        // Skip if there's an error in the review. This is clean.
        // ...

        // Reconsider the creation of directories based on filenames
        // as it could be error-prone and might not adequately reflect the project's directory structure.
        // ...

        // Write the review to disk in a separate function for testability
        // ...
    }
}

func getCodeReviews(diffs []*gh.GitDiff, model, apiKey string, svc CompletionServiceInterface) ([]ReviewedDiff, error) {
    // Consider refactoring for asynchronous processing of diffs to improve performance
    // ...
}

...

func coalesceConfiguration(cliArgs *argT) (*argT, error) {
    // Good use of fallback to environment variables
    // ...

    // Recommend error handling for sensitive data like the API key.
    // ...
}

Remember to provide clear guidelines and examples if suggesting changes to code styles and patterns. Provide documentation references where applicable, and always iterate that the suggested changes are for collective improvement and adherence to coding standards.

Lastly, regularly engage with team members not just in code reviews but in proactive discussions around best practices and code quality to foster a positive and continuous learning environment.

@kmesiab kmesiab merged commit 0dc6cd2 into main Jan 17, 2024
5 checks passed
@kmesiab kmesiab deleted the feat/make-model-configurable branch January 17, 2024 16:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant