-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ dotnet provider treesitter #204
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: David Zager <[email protected]>
This seems very promising. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me 👍
(I don't have good .net analyzer background, so giving just +1)
Sticking this in here for my future reference https://chatgpt.com/share/3fd9d6b9-eb81-4fd6-9fa2-427b5f527924 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would like to understand how we plan on also finding issues in dependencies.
If we currently can't do that, and this is not worse then that is ok, but we should at least think about this.
Is TreeSitter able to generate an AST from a .dll library?
We can't do this currently...or at least we don't do this currently.
I don't believe so, it looks like we can generate an AST for each file individually. So a dll would need to be unpacked first. |
That makes sense, I was just wondering. If this is not worse than before then I don't see a downside. I do want to have a plan, If we do make sure that we can unpack .DLL's and get the AST from them, then I will be completely satisfied that we can achieve what we need to in the future. |
No description provided.