Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: CLI menu driven user flow #42

Closed
6 of 9 tasks
dipankardas011 opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 1 comment Β· Fixed by #37
Closed
6 of 9 tasks

[Feature]: CLI menu driven user flow #42

dipankardas011 opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 1 comment Β· Fixed by #37

Comments

@dipankardas011
Copy link
Member

✨ Feature Name

Menu Driven user flow

🎯 Purpose

No need to remember complex cli flags

πŸ“ Feature Description

This will reduce the user load on remembering all the cmd flags and much better control over provising users low to no need to enter details about their cluster.

addition of pricing details of blueprint cluster creation.

🎁 Benefits

  • Improves Users productivity
  • Better options like preferred storage driver, cost of infrastructure before the blueprint becomes the reality
  • New Logging interface

βš–οΈ Potential Drawbacks

No response

πŸ”„ Alternatives Considered

No response

🎯 Impact Areas

  • πŸ–₯️ CLI - Command line interface
  • 🎨 UI - User interface
  • πŸ“š Documentation
  • βš™οΈ Core Features
  • πŸ”Œ External Integrations
  • πŸ§ͺ Testing Infrastructure

πŸ› οΈ Implementation Details

πŸ“‹ Agreements

  • 🀝 I agree to follow the Contribution Guidelines
  • πŸ” I have searched for similar feature requests
  • πŸ’¬ I will participate in the discussion about this feature
@dipankardas011
Copy link
Member Author

Fixed by #37

@dipankardas011 dipankardas011 linked a pull request Feb 10, 2025 that will close this issue
6 tasks
@dipankardas011 dipankardas011 self-assigned this Feb 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant