-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix node feature failures #34179
fix node feature failures #34179
Conversation
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kannon92 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ periodics: | |||
- '--node-test-args=--container-runtime-endpoint=unix:///run/containerd/containerd.sock --container-runtime-process-name=/home/containerd/usr/local/bin/containerd --container-runtime-pid-file= --kubelet-flags="--cgroups-per-qos=true --cgroup-root=/ --runtime-cgroups=/system.slice/containerd.service"' | |||
- --node-tests=true | |||
- --provider=gce | |||
- --test_args=--nodes=8 --focus="\[Feature:.+\]|\[Feature\]" --skip="\[Flaky\]|\[Serial\]|\[Feature:InPlacePodVerticalScaling\]|\[Feature:UserNamespacesSupport\]|\[Feature:PodLifecycleSleepActionAllowZero\]|\[Feature:UserNamespacesPodSecurityStandards\]|\[Feature:KubeletCredentialProviders\]|\[Feature:LockContention\]|\[Feature:SCTPConnectivity\]" | |||
- --test_args=--nodes=8 --focus="\[Feature:.+\]|\[Feature\]" --skip="\[Flaky\]|\[Serial\]|\[Feature:InPlacePodVerticalScaling\]|\[Feature:UserNamespacesSupport\]|\[Feature:UserNamespacesStatelessPodsSupport\]|\[Feature:PodLifecycleSleepActionAllowZero\]|\[Feature:UserNamespacesPodSecurityStandards\]|\[Feature:KubeletCredentialProviders\]|\[Feature:LockContention\]|\[Feature:SCTPConnectivity\]" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How are these currently passing if they were meant to be skipped 🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We want to get rid of NodeFeature and use Feature as a tag for features. These jobs were labeled as Feature so I think they were skipped before (we used NodeFeature before)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is what caused my confusion. 3 of them were passing in https://testgrid.k8s.io/sig-node-containerd#containerd-node-e2e-features-1.6
/lgtm |
@kannon92: Updated the
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Fixes #kubernetes/kubernetes#129695