-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Init for backend switching action #388
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ | |||
name: e2e-on-k8s |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why not just e2e
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we have another workflow e2e-without-lifecycle-manager
, which should be renamed to e2e
IMO. Thats why I added the k8s to convey the msg that this workflow uses real k8s on gardener.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is e2e-without-lifecycle-manager
also running on gardener?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about we use the following prefixes when it make sense e2e-k3d
e2e-gardener
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I will do it in next PR.
pull_request_target: | ||
branches: | ||
- main | ||
- "release-*" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this understandable by gh-workflows? because it is not a valid regex.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I copied it from the other workflow. But I am sure atm, I will confirm this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As this is an initial work for the coming PRs, we agreed to approve for now, and fix the review comments in the next PRs.
Description
Changes proposed in this pull request:
wait-until-build-succeeds
action to centralize waiting for build prow job.Related issue(s)