-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Don't try to explain binding properties #94
Conversation
Approved, but for posterity, why do you want to remove the extra explanation? For simplicity or to avoid inaccuracies? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approved, with minor suggestion to fix. Not mandatory as it is already implied in the text. But I am suggesting to change it for clarity.
Co-authored-by: Daniel Van Geest <daniel.vangeest@cryptonext-security.com>
Co-authored-by: Daniel Van Geest <daniel.vangeest@cryptonext-security.com>
Explaining these binding properties accurately and clearly, requires more than a sentence or two. At that point, I felt it's more appropriate to cover it in a different document. |
Will merge at the end of WGLC; see WGLC messages. |
No description provided.