feat: masking api key for litellm #14420
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
dosubot
bot
added
the
size:L
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 1 Ignored Deployment
|
dosubot
bot
added
Ɑ: models
baskaryan
reviewed
Jan 29, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
out of curiosity, do these api keys even need to be passed in? doesn't seem like they're used anywhere?
ccurme
added
community
|
closing due to merge conflicts |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description: Masking API key for LiteLLM Chat Model to protect user secrets.
Issue: #12165
Dependencies: Litellm and LangChain
Tag maintainer: @eyurtsev
make testskips current unit_test and we are unable to install the dependencylitellmdue to a conflict withtiktokenSee #14419