feat: Reputation: CNS-1000 - LegacyDec pairing score #1599
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the precision of score calculations by transitioning from unsigned integers to decimal representations. This shift accommodates a broader range of values, including negative scores, improving the handling of latencies and costs in geolocation and pairing logic. These changes refine the scoring system, enabling more nuanced and accurate computations throughout the codebase. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant App
participant Keeper
participant GeoReq
App->>Keeper: Request Pairing Score
Keeper->>GeoReq: Calculate Geo Latency
GeoReq-->>Keeper: Return Latency (int64)
Keeper->>Keeper: Calculate Total Score (LegDec)
Keeper-->>App: Return Pairing Score (LegDec)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.go (1)
Update required in
pairing_test.goThe test
TestNoZeroLatencyinpairing_test.goneeds to be updated to useint64instead ofuint64for the latency comparison.
- File:
x/pairing/keeper/pairing_test.go- Line: 94
- Change: Update
require.NotEqual(t, uint64(0), latency)torequire.NotEqual(t, int64(0), latency)Analysis chain
Line range hint
109-137:
Verify the usage ofGEO_LATENCY_MAPin the codebase.The values in
GEO_LATENCY_MAPhave been changed fromuint64toint64. Ensure that all usages of this constant are compatible with the new type.
The search results show several usages of
GEO_LATENCY_MAPin test files and one in thegeo_req.gofile. Let's review the context around these usages to verify compatibility withint64.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of `GEO_LATENCY_MAP` in the codebase. # Test: Search for the constant usage. Expect: Only occurrences compatible with `int64`. rg --type go -A 5 $'GEO_LATENCY_MAP'Length of output: 3851
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather more context around the usages of `GEO_LATENCY_MAP` to verify compatibility with `int64`. # Get 10 lines of context around the usage in pairing_test.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'GEO_LATENCY_MAP' x/pairing/keeper/pairing_test.go # Get 10 lines of context around the usage in geo_req_test.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'GEO_LATENCY_MAP' x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go # Get 10 lines of context around the usage in geo_req.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'GEO_LATENCY_MAP' x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.goLength of output: 4533
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- protocol/lavasession/common.go (1 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go (1 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.go (5 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/pairing_score.go (2 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/qos_req.go (2 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go (5 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_req.go (1 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/stake_req.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (24)
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_req.go (1)
13-13: LGTM! But verify the impact on implementations of theScoreReqinterface.The change from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecenhances the precision and representation of the score calculation.However, ensure that all implementations of the
ScoreReqinterface are updated to match the new return type.x/pairing/keeper/scores/stake_req.go (1)
18-23: LGTM! But verify the impact on theStakeReqstruct.The change from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecenhances the functionality of theScoremethod by allowing it to handle fractional scores.However, ensure that all usages of the
StakeReqstruct are updated to match the new return type.Verification successful
The impact on the
StakeReqstruct has been verified and all usages of theScoremethod handle the new return type correctly.
- In
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go, the result ofScoreis compared tomath.LegacyZeroDec().- In
x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go, the result ofScoreis compared using theEqualmethod.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `StakeReq` struct are updated to match the new return type. # Test: Search for the usages of the `StakeReq` struct. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type. rg --type go -A 5 $'StakeReq'Length of output: 2116
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Score` method in the `StakeReq` struct are updated to match the new return type. # Test: Search for the calls to the `Score` method. Expect: Usages handling the new return type. rg --type go 'Score('Length of output: 86
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all usages of the `Score` method in the `StakeReq` struct are updated to match the new return type. # Test: Search for the calls to the `Score` method. Expect: Usages handling the new return type. rg --type go 'Score\('Length of output: 4118
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the calls to the `Score` method in `x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go` and `x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go` handle the new return type correctly. # Extract context around calls to the `Score` method in `x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go` rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'Score\(' x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go # Extract context around calls to the `Score` method in `x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go` rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'Score\(' x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.goLength of output: 1724
x/pairing/keeper/scores/qos_req.go (1)
Line range hint
24-34:
LGTM! But verify the impact on theQosReqstruct.The change from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecenhances the functionality of theScoremethod by allowing it to handle fractional scores.However, ensure that all usages of the
QosReqstruct are updated to match the new return type.x/pairing/keeper/scores/pairing_score.go (2)
17-18: Ensure correct initialization ofmath.LegacyDecfields.The transition from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecforScoreandScoreComponentsenhances precision. Ensure that these fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.Verification successful
Ensure correct initialization of
math.LegacyDecfields.The transition from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecforScoreandScoreComponentsenhances precision. Ensure that these fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
Initialization and usage of
math.LegacyDecfields are correct.The transition from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecforScoreandScoreComponentshas been handled properly. The fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
- Initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyOneDec().- Initialization of
ScoreComponentsas an empty map.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Score: math.LegacyDec' rg --type go -A 5 $'ScoreComponents: map[string]math.LegacyDec'Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents` fields. # Test: Search for any usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents` fields in the codebase. rg --type go 'Score' -A 5 rg --type go 'ScoreComponents' -A 5Length of output: 77149
46-47: LGTM! Ensure proper initialization and usage.The initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyOneDec()andScoreComponentswithmap[string]math.LegacyDec{}aligns with the new data types.However, ensure that these fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
Verification successful
LGTM! Ensure proper initialization and usage.
The initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyOneDec()andScoreComponentswithmap[string]math.LegacyDec{}aligns with the new data types. The search results confirm that these fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
ScoreandScoreComponentsare properly initialized inx/pairing/keeper/scores/pairing_score.go.ScoreComponentsis also correctly initialized inx/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.go.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 $'math.LegacyOneDec()' rg --type go -A 5 $'map[string]math.LegacyDec{}'Length of output: 2047
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 'math.LegacyOneDec()' rg --type go -A 5 'map\[string\]math.LegacyDec{}'Length of output: 2053
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 'math.LegacyOneDec()' rg --type go -A 5 'map\[string\]math\.LegacyDec{}'Length of output: 2056
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 'math.LegacyOneDec()' rg --type go -A 5 'map\[string\]math\.LegacyDec\{\}'Length of output: 3109
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.go (3)
62-63: LGTM! Ensure proper initialization and usage.The initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyNewDec(100)andScoreComponentswithmap[string]math.LegacyDec{}aligns with the new data types.However, ensure that these fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
Verification successful
Ensure proper initialization and usage of
math.LegacyDecfields.The search results show that
math.LegacyDecandmath.LegacyNewDecare correctly initialized and used in various parts of the codebase, including theScoreandScoreComponentsfields.
x/pairing/keeper/scores/pairing_score.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/score_req.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/score.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/stake_req.goThese usages confirm that the fields are properly initialized and utilized throughout the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Score: math.LegacyNewDec(100)' rg --type go -A 5 $'ScoreComponents: map[string]math.LegacyDec{}'Length of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Score: math.LegacyNewDec(100)' rg --type go -A 5 $'ScoreComponents: map[string]math\\.LegacyDec\\{\\}'Length of output: 121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go 'math.LegacyNewDec' rg --type go 'math.LegacyDec'Length of output: 4558
45-45: LGTM! Ensure proper initialization and usage.The initialization of
calculatedScorewithmath.LegacyZeroDec()aligns with the new data types.However, ensure that this field is correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
78-79: LGTM! Ensure proper initialization and usage.The initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyNewDec(100)andScoreComponentswithmap[string]math.LegacyDec{}aligns with the new data types.However, ensure that these fields are correctly initialized and used throughout the codebase.
Verification successful
Initialization and usage of
math.LegacyNewDecandmath.LegacyDecverified.The fields
ScoreandScoreComponentsare correctly initialized and used withmath.LegacyNewDecandmath.LegacyDecin the following files:
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/pairing_score.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.goThese changes align with the new data types and ensure proper initialization and usage.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. rg --type go -A 5 $'Score: math.LegacyNewDec(100)' rg --type go -A 5 $'ScoreComponents: map[string]math.LegacyDec{}'Length of output: 288
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for the initialization and usage of `Score` and `ScoreComponents`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. # Using rg with simpler patterns to avoid regex errors rg --type go -A 5 'Score: math.LegacyNewDec' rg --type go -A 5 'ScoreComponents: map[string]math.LegacyDec' # Using ast-grep for more precise searches ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'Score: math.LegacyNewDec($_)' ast-grep --lang go --pattern 'ScoreComponents: map[string]math.LegacyDec{}'Length of output: 251
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct initialization and usage of `math.LegacyDec` fields. # Test: Search for any usage of `math.LegacyNewDec` and `math.LegacyDec`. Expect: Correct usage of `math.LegacyDec`. # Using rg to search for any usage of `math.LegacyNewDec` and `math.LegacyDec` rg --type go 'math.LegacyNewDec' rg --type go 'math.LegacyDec'Length of output: 4558
x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go (2)
19-19: LGTM! Ensure proper usage ofint64forexpectedCostUint.The change in data type from
uint64toint64allows for a broader range of values.However, ensure that the new data type is correctly used and does not introduce any issues.
Verification successful
The change from
uint64toint64forexpectedCostUintis correctly implemented and does not introduce any issues.
- The
GEO_LATENCY_MAPandmaxGeoLatencyare both defined withint64values, ensuring compatibility withexpectedCostUint.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `int64` for `expectedCostUint`. # Test: Search for the usage of `expectedCostUint`. Expect: Correct usage of `int64`. rg --type go -A 5 $'expectedCostUint int64'Length of output: 502
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for all occurrences of `expectedCostUint` in the `geo_req_test.go` file to verify its usage. # Test: Search for all occurrences of `expectedCostUint`. Expect: Correct usage of `int64`. rg 'expectedCostUint' x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 1567
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the definitions and usages of `GEO_LATENCY_MAP` and `maxGeoLatency` to verify their compatibility with `int64`. # Test: Search for the definition of `GEO_LATENCY_MAP`. Expect: Correct type and values. rg 'GEO_LATENCY_MAP' # Test: Search for the definition of `maxGeoLatency`. Expect: Correct type and values. rg 'maxGeoLatency'Length of output: 1777
62-62: LGTM! Ensure proper usage ofint64forexpectedLatency.The change in data type from
uint64toint64allows for a broader range of values.However, ensure that the new data type is correctly used and does not introduce any issues.
Verification successful
The usage of
int64forexpectedLatencyis correct.The variable
expectedLatencyis used appropriately within the test cases inTestGeoReqScore. The values assigned and its usage in assertions are compatible with theint64data type.
expectedLatencyis assigned values fromminGeoLatencyandGEO_LATENCY_MAP.- It is used in assertions with
calculateCostFromLatency.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `int64` for `expectedLatency`. # Test: Search for the usage of `expectedLatency`. Expect: Correct usage of `int64`. rg --type go -A 5 $'expectedLatency int64'Length of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all instances of `expectedLatency` to ensure correct usage of `int64`. # Search for all instances of `expectedLatency` in the codebase. rg --type go 'expectedLatency'Length of output: 2503
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify correct usage of `int64` for `expectedLatency` in `x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go`. # Extract relevant lines around the instances of `expectedLatency` in the specified file. rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 'expectedLatency' x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.goLength of output: 1552
x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.go (5)
Line range hint
76-87:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The return type of
CalcGeoLatencyhas been changed fromuint64toint64. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
CalcGeoLatencymatch the new return type.
97-102: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The parameter and return type of
calculateCostFromLatencyhave been changed fromuint64toint64and frommath.Uinttomath.LegacyDec, respectively. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
calculateCostFromLatencymatch the new parameter and return types.Verification successful
All function calls to
calculateCostFromLatencymatch the new parameter and return types.The arguments passed to
calculateCostFromLatencyare of typeint64, and the return values are used asmath.LegacyDec, which is consistent with the updated function signature.
x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.gox/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `calculateCostFromLatency` match the new parameter and return types. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new parameter and return types. rg --type go -A 5 $'calculateCostFromLatency'Length of output: 2045
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the types of arguments passed to `calculateCostFromLatency` and how the return values are used. # Extract context lines around the function calls to `calculateCostFromLatency` for detailed inspection. rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'calculateCostFromLatency'Length of output: 6809
70-74: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The return type of
CalcGeoCosthas been changed frommath.Uinttomath.LegacyDec. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
CalcGeoCostmatch the new return type.Verification successful
Verify all usages of
CalcGeoCosthandle the new return type correctly.The function
CalcGeoCosthas been updated to returnmath.LegacyDec. The identified usages ingeo_req.goandgeo_req_test.goappear to handle the new return type correctly. However, ensure that all other usages in the codebase match the new return type.
Verification successful.
The return type of
CalcGeoCosthas been changed frommath.Uinttomath.LegacyDec. All usages of the function in the codebase handle the new return type correctly.
geo_req.gogeo_req_test.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CalcGeoCost` match the new return type. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type. rg --type go -A 5 $'CalcGeoCost'Length of output: 2052
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CalcGeoCost` match the new return type. # Test: Search for the function usage across the entire codebase. rg --type go 'CalcGeoCost'Length of output: 808
Line range hint
28-35:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The return type of
GeoReq.Scorehas been changed frommath.Uinttomath.LegacyDec. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
GeoReq.Scorematch the new return type.Verification successful
No issues found with the return type change of
GeoReq.Score.The function
GeoReq.Scoreis not directly called anywhere in the codebase, so the change in its return type does not impact the current implementation.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `GeoReq.Score` match the new return type. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type. rg --type go -A 5 $'GeoReq.Score'Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `GeoReq.Score` match the new return type. # Re-run the search for the function usage with a more comprehensive approach. rg 'GeoReq\.Score' -t go -A 5Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `GeoReq.Score` match the new return type. # Locate the definition of the GeoReq struct. rg 'type GeoReq struct' -t go -A 5 # Search for instances of GeoReq and method calls on these instances. rg '\bGeoReq\b' -t go -A 10Length of output: 9066
18-18: Verify the usage ofmaxGeoLatencyin the codebase.The type of
maxGeoLatencyhas been changed fromuint64toint64. Ensure that all usages of this constant are compatible with the new type.protocol/lavasession/common.go (1)
Line range hint
183-191:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The return type of the inner function
latencyToGeowithinSortByGeolocationshas been changed fromuint64toint64. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
SortByGeolocationsmatch the new return type.Verification successful
Let's verify the function usage in the codebase to ensure compatibility with the new return type of
latencyToGeo.
LGTM! The change in the return type of the inner function
latencyToGeowithinSortByGeolocationsfromuint64toint64does not impact the functionality in the provided contexts.
protocol/lavasession/common_test.goprotocol/statetracker/updaters/pairing_updater.goThe function usage is compatible with the new return type.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `SortByGeolocations` match the new return type. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type. rg --type go -A 5 $'SortByGeolocations'Length of output: 1519
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the function usage of `SortByGeolocations` in the codebase to ensure compatibility with the new return type. # Check the context in which SortByGeolocations is used in common_test.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SortByGeolocations' protocol/lavasession/common_test.go # Check the context in which SortByGeolocations is used in pairing_updater.go rg --type go -A 10 -B 10 $'SortByGeolocations' protocol/statetracker/updaters/pairing_updater.goLength of output: 1853
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go (5)
Line range hint
249-258:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function
AddProviderToSelectionhas been modified to usemath.LegacyDecinstead ofmath.Uint. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
AddProviderToSelectionmatch the new types.Verification successful
Verification Successful!
All calls to the function
AddProviderToSelectionmatch the new typesmath.LegacyDecandmap[int]math.LegacyDec. No further occurrences were found across the codebase.
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AddProviderToSelection` match the new types. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new types. rg --type go -A 5 $'AddProviderToSelection'Length of output: 1160
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `AddProviderToSelection` match the new types across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new types. rg --type go -A 5 'AddProviderToSelection'Length of output: 1160
Line range hint
261-270:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function
RemoveProviderFromSelectionhas been modified to usemath.LegacyDecinstead ofmath.Uint. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
RemoveProviderFromSelectionmatch the new types.Verification successful
Function usage verified!
The function
RemoveProviderFromSelectionhas been updated to usemath.LegacyDecinstead ofmath.Uint, and all occurrences in the codebase match the new types.
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.goScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RemoveProviderFromSelection` match the new types. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new types. rg --type go -A 5 $'RemoveProviderFromSelection'Length of output: 1090
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `RemoveProviderFromSelection` across the entire codebase match the new types. # Test: Search for the function usage across the entire codebase. Expect: Only occurrences of the new types. rg 'RemoveProviderFromSelection'Length of output: 655
229-244: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function
CalculateTotalScoresForGrouphas been modified to usemath.LegacyDecinstead ofmath.Uint. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
CalculateTotalScoresForGroupmatch the new types.Verification successful
Function usage verified!
The function
CalculateTotalScoresForGroupand its usage withmath.LegacyDecandmath.LegacyZeroDecare correctly implemented and consistent across the codebase.
- The function calls in
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.goandx/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.gomatch the new types.- The definitions and usages of
math.LegacyDecandmath.LegacyZeroDecare correctly integrated.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CalculateTotalScoresForGroup` match the new types. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new types. rg --type go -A 5 $'CalculateTotalScoresForGroup'Length of output: 1499
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the definitions and usages of `math.LegacyDec` and `math.LegacyZeroDec`. # Search for the definition of `LegacyDec` rg --type go 'LegacyDec' # Search for the definition of `LegacyZeroDec` rg --type go 'LegacyZeroDec'Length of output: 5391
Line range hint
201-211:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function
PickProvidershas been modified to usemath.LegacyDecinstead ofmath.Uint. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
PickProvidersmatch the new types.Verification successful
Let's verify the parameters passed to the
PickProvidersfunction inx/pairing/keeper/pairing.goto ensure they match the expected types.
Let's verify the return types of
group.Indexes()andpairingscores.PrepareHashDatato ensure they match the expected types in thePickProvidersfunction signature.
Let's search for the definition of the
Indexesmethod in the codebase to verify its return type.
Function usage verified
The parameters passed to the
PickProvidersfunction inx/pairing/keeper/pairing.gomatch the expected types in the function signature.
providerScoresis[]*PairingScoregroup.Indexes()returns[]inthashDatais[]byteNo issues found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `PickProviders` match the new types. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new types. rg --type go -A 5 $'PickProviders'Length of output: 1304
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the parameters passed to `PickProviders` in `x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go`. # Search for the definition of `providerScores` to check its type. rg --type go -A 10 'providerScores' x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go # Search for the definition of `group.Indexes()` to check its type. rg --type go -A 10 'group.Indexes' x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go # Search for the definition of `hashData` to check its type. rg --type go -A 10 'hashData' x/pairing/keeper/pairing.goLength of output: 3839
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return types of `group.Indexes()` and `pairingscores.PrepareHashData`. # Search for the definition of `Indexes` method in the `group` type. rg --type go 'func (g *Group) Indexes' # Search for the definition of `PrepareHashData` function in the `pairingscores` package. rg --type go 'func PrepareHashData'Length of output: 198
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Locate the definition of the `Indexes` method in the codebase to verify its return type. # Search for the definition of the `Indexes` method. rg --type go 'Indexes'Length of output: 7196
151-164: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The function
CalcPairingScorehas been modified to usemath.LegacyDecinstead ofmath.Uint. The changes are approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
CalcPairingScorematch the new types.Verification successful
Verify the function calls to
CalcPairingScorematch the new types.The function
CalcPairingScoreis used in the following files:
x/pairing/keeper/pairing_test.gox/pairing/keeper/pairing.goEnsure that the arguments passed to
CalcPairingScorein these files are of the correct types.
Verify the types of arguments passed to
CalcPairingScorematch the new types.The function
CalcPairingScoreis called with the following arguments:
providerScorespairingscores.GetStrategy()slotordiffSlotEnsure that the types of these arguments are compatible with the new types expected by
CalcPairingScore.
Verify the return types of
pairingscores.GetStrategy()andpairingscores.CalcSlots.Ensure that the return types of these functions are compatible with the new types expected by
CalcPairingScore.
Function calls to
CalcPairingScoreare compatible with the new types.The types of arguments passed to
CalcPairingScoreinpairing_test.goandpairing.goare consistent with the expected types after the modification to usemath.LegacyDec.
providerScoresis of type[]*pairingscores.PairingScorepairingscores.GetStrategy()returns aScoreStrategyslotanddiffSlotare of type*pairingscores.PairingSlotScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CalcPairingScore` match the new types. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new types. rg --type go -A 5 $'CalcPairingScore'Length of output: 1603
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the types of arguments passed to `CalcPairingScore` in `pairing_test.go` rg --type go -A 5 'CalcPairingScore' x/pairing/keeper/pairing_test.go # Verify the types of arguments passed to `CalcPairingScore` in `pairing.go` rg --type go -A 5 'CalcPairingScore' x/pairing/keeper/pairing.goLength of output: 521
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the types of `providerScores`, `pairingscores.GetStrategy()`, and `slot` in `pairing_test.go` rg --type go -A 10 'providerScores|pairingscores.GetStrategy|slot' x/pairing/keeper/pairing_test.go # Verify the types of `providerScores`, `pairingscores.GetStrategy()`, and `diffSlot` in `pairing.go` rg --type go -A 10 'providerScores|pairingscores.GetStrategy|diffSlot' x/pairing/keeper/pairing.goLength of output: 7183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify the return type of `pairingscores.GetStrategy()` rg --type go -A 5 'func GetStrategy' x/pairing/keeper/scores # Verify the return type of `pairingscores.CalcSlots` rg --type go -A 5 'func CalcSlots' x/pairing/keeper/scoresLength of output: 1019
x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go (3)
Line range hint
101-102:
Approve the conversion to decimal.The conversion of scores to decimal using
cosmosmath.LegacyNewDecFromIntis correct and necessary.
Line range hint
104-104:
Approve the calculation of the pairing chance as a decimal.Returning the ratio of
providerScoreDectototalScoreDecas a decimal improves precision.
89-90: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
CalculatePairingChanceare compatible with the new type.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (10)
- protocol/lavasession/common.go (1 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go (1 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.go (5 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go (2 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/pairing_score.go (2 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/qos_req.go (2 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go (5 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_req.go (1 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.go (3 hunks)
- x/pairing/keeper/scores/stake_req.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (24)
x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_req.go (1)
13-13: Update the return type in theScoreReqinterface.The return type of the
Scoremethod has been changed frommath.Uinttomath.LegacyDec. Ensure that all implementations of this interface are updated accordingly.x/pairing/keeper/scores/stake_req.go (2)
18-18: Update the return type in theStakeReqstruct.The return type of the
Scoremethod has been changed frommath.Uinttomath.LegacyDec. Ensure that all dependent components are updated accordingly.
21-23: Ensure consistency in return types.The return statement for non-positive effective stakes has been updated to return
math.LegacyOneDec(). For positive effective stakes, the return statement has been updated tomath.LegacyNewDecFromInt(effectiveStake). Ensure that this change is consistent with the expected behavior of theScoremethod.x/pairing/keeper/scores/qos_req.go (2)
24-24: Update the return type in theQosReqstruct.The return type of the
Scoremethod has been changed frommath.Uinttomath.LegacyDec. Ensure that all dependent components are updated accordingly.
34-34: Ensure consistency in return types.The return statement has been updated to return
math.LegacyOneDec(). Ensure that this change is consistent with the expected behavior of theScoremethod.x/pairing/keeper/scores/pairing_score.go (2)
17-18: LGTM! Improved precision with decimal-based calculations.The transition from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecfor theScoreandScoreComponentsfields enhances the accuracy and flexibility of score handling.
46-47: LGTM! Consistent initialization with decimal-based values.The initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyOneDec()andScoreComponentsas a map ofmath.LegacyDecensures consistency with the updated struct fields.x/pairing/keeper/scores/score_test.go (3)
45-45: LGTM! Consistent initialization with decimal-based values.The initialization of
calculatedScorewithmath.LegacyZeroDec()aligns with the transition to decimal-based calculations.
62-63: LGTM! Consistent initialization with decimal-based values.The initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyNewDec(100)andScoreComponentsas a map ofmath.LegacyDecensures consistency with the updatedPairingScorestruct.
78-79: LGTM! Consistent initialization with decimal-based values.The initialization of
Scorewithmath.LegacyNewDec(100)andScoreComponentsas a map ofmath.LegacyDecensures consistency with the updatedPairingScorestruct.x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req_test.go (2)
19-19: LGTM! Broader range of values for expected cost.Changing the type of
expectedCostUinttoint64allows for a broader range of values, including negative values, which may be necessary for certain test scenarios.
62-62: LGTM! Broader range of values for expected latency.Changing the type of
expectedLatencytoint64allows for a broader range of values, including negative values, which may be necessary for certain test scenarios.x/pairing/keeper/scores/geo_req.go (5)
Line range hint
28-34:
LGTM!The change in return type from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecis consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in score calculations.
70-74: LGTM!The change in return type from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecis consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in cost calculations.
Line range hint
76-89:
LGTM!The change in return type from
uint64toint64is consistent with the PR objective of handling a broader range of latency values, including negative values.
97-102: LGTM!The change in parameter and return types from
uint64andmath.Uinttoint64andmath.LegacyDecrespectively, is consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in cost calculations.
Line range hint
109-155:
LGTM!The change in variable type from
map[planstypes.Geolocation]map[planstypes.Geolocation]uint64tomap[planstypes.Geolocation]map[planstypes.Geolocation]int64is consistent with the PR objective of handling a broader range of latency values, including negative values.protocol/lavasession/common.go (1)
183-185: LGTM!The change in return type from
uint64toint64is consistent with the PR objective of handling a broader range of latency values, including negative values.x/pairing/keeper/scores/score.go (5)
151-157: LGTM!The change in return type from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecis consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in score calculations.
Line range hint
201-211:
LGTM!The change in return type from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecis consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in score calculations.
229-244: LGTM!The change in return type from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecis consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in score calculations.
Line range hint
249-256:
LGTM!The change in return type from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecis consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in score calculations.
Line range hint
261-268:
LGTM!The change in return type from
math.Uinttomath.LegacyDecis consistent with the PR objective of improving precision in score calculations.x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go (1)
89-90: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
CalculatePairingChancecorrectly handle the new decimal types.Verification successful
The function usage correctly handles the new decimal types.
The
CalculatePairingChancefunction is used correctly ingrpc_query_provider_pairing_chance.go, with thecalculatedChancevariable being managed appropriately.
grpc_query_provider_pairing_chance.go: Lines around the function call show proper handling ofcalculatedChance.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `CalculatePairingChance` correctly handle the new decimal types. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new signature. rg --type go -A 5 $'CalculatePairingChance'Length of output: 1304
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract relevant portions of grpc_query_provider_pairing_chance.go to verify handling of CalculatePairingChance's return type. # Display 10 lines before and after the function call to capture the context. rg --type go -C 10 $'CalculatePairingChance' x/pairing/keeper/grpc_query_provider_pairing_chance.goLength of output: 694
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- protocol/lavasession/common.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
protocol/lavasession/common.go (1)
183-185: LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.The change to the return type of
latencyToGeofromuint64toint64is approved.However, ensure that all function calls to
latencyToGeohandle the new return type correctly.Verification successful
The function usage of
latencyToGeocorrectly handles the new return type.The instances where
latencyToGeois used cast theint64return type toint, ensuring that the new return type is managed appropriately.
protocol/lavasession/common.go:
latencyA := int(latencyToGeo(a.Geolocation, currentGeo))latencyB := int(latencyToGeo(b.Geolocation, currentGeo))Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `latencyToGeo` handle the new return type correctly. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new return type. rg --type go -A 5 $'latencyToGeo'Length of output: 809
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
x/pairing/keeper/pairing.go (1)
Line range hint
89-107:
Handle potential division by zero inCalculatePairingChance.The change to decimal types improves precision, but ensure that
totalScoreDecis not zero before performing the division to avoid runtime errors. Consider adding a check for zero before the division operation.Additionally, verify that the conversion from
LegacyDectoIntand back toLegacyDecis necessary and correct, as it might introduce unintended truncation or precision loss.+ if totalScoreDec.IsZero() { + return cosmosmath.LegacyZeroDec(), fmt.Errorf("total score is zero, cannot calculate pairing chance") + }
Description
Closes: #XXXX
Prerequisite to the reputation feature: make the pairing score to be Dec rather than Uint
Author Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.
I have...
!in the type prefix if API or client breaking changemainbranchReviewers Checklist
All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.
I have...
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style