Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Reputation: CNS-1006 - Reputation queries #1631

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: CNS-1005-reputation-pairing-score
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

oren-lava
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Closes: #XXXX

In this PR, I implemented two queries for the reputation score:

  1. provider-reputation: query to show a provider's rank compared to other providers with the same chain+cluster by their reputation pairing score (that is calculated using the QoS excellence reports from the relays)
  2. provider-reputation-details: developer query to show the raw structures that are used to calculate the provider's reputation pairing score

Each query expected 3 arguments: address, chain ID and cluster. To get the results for all the chains/clusters, you can use "*".


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • read the contribution guide
  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title, you can find examples of the prefixes below:
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the main branch
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification, including comments for documenting Go code
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic, API design and naming, documentation is accurate, tests and test coverage

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant