Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CID-3277: Add rate limit handling for manifest file searching #59

Conversation

mohamedlajmileanix
Copy link
Contributor

@mohamedlajmileanix mohamedlajmileanix commented Dec 13, 2024

πŸ›  Changes made

Add rate limit handling for manifest file searching

✨ Type of change

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

πŸ§ͺ How Has This Been Tested?

  • Tested manually
    Screenshot 2024-12-13 at 17 25 56

🏎 Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • My commit message clearly reflects the changes made
  • Assigned the appropriate labels (version, PR type, etc.)

@mohamedlajmileanix mohamedlajmileanix added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 13, 2024
@mohamedlajmileanix mohamedlajmileanix marked this pull request as ready for review December 13, 2024 15:02
@mohamedlajmileanix mohamedlajmileanix requested a review from a team as a code owner December 13, 2024 15:02
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 13, 2024

LeanIX GitHub Agent Code Coverage

File Coverage [69.65%] 🍏
GitHubClient.kt 100% 🍏
FeignClientConfig.kt 100% 🍏
GitHubScanningService.kt 94.16% 🍏
RateLimitHandler.kt 27.27% ❌
RateLimitResponseInterceptor.kt 3.45% ❌
RateLimitMonitor.kt 0% ❌
Total Project Coverage 70.14% 🍏

@mohamedlajmileanix mohamedlajmileanix merged commit 7f6cdcf into main Dec 17, 2024
4 checks passed
@mohamedlajmileanix mohamedlajmileanix temporarily deployed to ghcr:leanix-github-agent December 17, 2024 10:34 — with GitHub Actions Inactive
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants