Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Merge pull request #66 from yannickseurin/typos
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
Typos in Advanced Multiplication world
  • Loading branch information
joneugster authored Jun 14, 2024
2 parents bed66ee + 5d25d0f commit 2881a0f
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Game/Levels/AdvMultiplication/L03eq_succ_of_ne_zero.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ TheoremDoc MyNat.eq_succ_of_ne_zero as "eq_succ_of_ne_zero" in "≤"
Introduction
"Multiplication usually makes a number bigger, but multiplication by zero can make
it smaller. Thus many lemmas about inequalities and multiplication need the
hypothesis `a ≠ 0`. Here is a key lemma enables us to use this hypothesis.
hypothesis `a ≠ 0`. Here is a key lemma that enables us to use this hypothesis.
To help us with the proof, we can use the `tauto` tactic. Click on the tactic's name
on the right to see what it does.
"
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Game/Levels/AdvMultiplication/L05le_mul_right.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ TheoremDoc MyNat.le_mul_right as "le_mul_right" in "≤"
Introduction
"
In Prime Number World we will be proving that $2$ is prime.
To do this, we will have to rule out things like $2 37 × 42.$
To do this, we will have to rule out things like $2 = 37 × 42.$
We will do this by proving that any factor of $2$ is at most $2$,
which we will do using this lemma. The proof I have in mind manipulates the hypothesis
until it becomes the goal, using pretty much everything which we've proved in this world so far.
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Game/Levels/AdvMultiplication/L06mul_right_eq_one.lean
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ to the context, because you just supplied the proof of it (`succ_inj a b`).
## Example
If you have a proof to hand, then you don't even need to state what you
are proving. example
are proving. For example
`have h2 := succ_inj a b`
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 2881a0f

Please sign in to comment.