Add micros keybinds to lisp-mode

[jfaz1]

Starting/restarting slime (micros) is a common-enough task I think it makes sense for it to have default keybinds.

I used the C-c m prefix, so e.g. C-c m s to start micros, C-c m r to restart, etc. Originally wanted C-c C-m but C-m is reserved for return.

Side-note, we should rename the slime-* commands at some point to micros-*. I didn't want to include that here since that's a breaking change.

Also, merry christmas 🎄 🎅

[SequentialDesign]

i don't know what kind of keybind conventions LEM has, but at least in GNU Emacs, C-c <letter> is reserved for the user. i think that is an important convention to have. how about using C-c C-s as in slime/swank since micros is micro slime/swank ?

[cxxxr]

I think it's good PR, thank you.
I also agree with changing the command name from slime to micros.
I'd like to do it someday, but first I have to make the existing slime commands deprecated and add micros commands, which is a bit of a hassle, so I haven't done it yet.

i don't know what kind of keybind conventions LEM has, but at least in GNU Emacs, C-c is reserved for the user. i think that is an important convention to have. how about using C-c C-s as in slime/swank since micros is micro slime/swank ?

If C-c s is allowed, then C-c m should be fine, right? (Because lem uses micros instead of slime)

I thought that anything starting with C-c was a mode-specific definition.
This has the potential to conflict with user-specific definitions, so how about adopting a different prefix that is only used by the user?
For example, S-, but this can't be used on a terminal.

[cxxxr]

And, although it was a little late, Merry Christmas!

[SequentialDesign]

I think C-c C-m is a good place to put it, but that is currently lisp-macrostep-expand which i like. i could also see lisp-macrostep-expand on C-c C-x. i like S- for the user, but i disagree with using C-c <letter> since modes usually take C-c C-<letter>, and that should be plenty of keys to choose from without infringing on the user's safe space

[jfaz1]

i don't know what kind of keybind conventions LEM has, but at least in GNU Emacs, C-c <letter> is reserved for the user. i think that is an important convention to have. how about using C-c C-s as in slime/swank since micros is micro slime/swank ?

I generally agree which is why C-c C-m fits the best (but would break in the shell). That being said, there are other default binds like C-c z for switch to repl, C-c g for interrupt, C-c i/C-c I for inspect, etc. that don't follow the convention already, so I felt it's most likely fine for micros as well. Those binds are also in sly/emacs by default.

[SequentialDesign]

ahh, i did not know about C-c z, C-c g, and C-c I. good to know. C-c C-m works for me in either sdl2 or the terminal, but it is lisp-macrostep-expand currently

i don't want to be pedantic about it, but i hope we can move those keys to C-c C-<letter> or at least a moratorium on adding new ones. it's one of the conventions from GNU Emacs that i really like since it gives users an area that is just for them

[jfaz1]

ahh, i did not know about C-c z, C-c g, and C-c I. good to know. C-c C-m works for me in either sdl2 or the terminal, but it is lisp-macrostep-expand currently

i don't want to be pedantic about it, but i hope we can move those keys to C-c C-<letter> or at least a moratorium on adding new ones. it's one of the conventions from GNU Emacs that i really like since it gives users an area that is just for them

Isn't macroexpand C-c M-m? I also use C-c Return