Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting all-zeroes gateway IP for NI is not allowed #41

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

milan-zededa
Copy link
Contributor

Previous commit "Clarification on default route propagation" is wrong - EVE does not allow to set all-zeroes gateway IP for network instance (parsing would fail among other things). To suppress default route propagation to apps, NI should be without uplink or the uplink should be configured as app-shared with all-zeroes gateway (in NetworkConfig unspecified GW is allowed).

This is defined in a design document for static and connected routes: https://wiki.lfedge.org/display/EVE/Connected+and+Static+IP+Route

Previous commit "Clarification on default route propagation"
is wrong - EVE does not allow to set all-zeroes gateway IP for network
instance (parsing would fail among other things). To suppress default
route propagation to apps, NI should be without uplink or the uplink
should be configured as app-shared with all-zeroes gateway
(in NetworkConfig unspecified GW is allowed).

This is defined in a design document for static and connected routes:
https://wiki.lfedge.org/display/EVE/Connected+and+Static+IP+Route

Signed-off-by: Milan Lenco <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Milan Lenco <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@eriknordmark eriknordmark left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for clarifying this.

@eriknordmark eriknordmark merged commit d4c463c into lf-edge:main Dec 19, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants