-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
feat: reorganizing human system content (#35)
* Reorganizing content * Small updates based on current feedback * Update Observing Human Systems based on feedback * Include feedback for "observing human systems" * Feature: Awesome Content Co-authored-by: Adriel Perkins <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric Chapman <[email protected]> --------- Co-authored-by: Adriel Perkins <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Eric Chapman <[email protected]>
- Loading branch information
1 parent
7fd7864
commit 48d085e
Showing
11 changed files
with
186 additions
and
131 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | ||
# Business OKRs defined & measurable | ||
|
||
[Objectives & Key Results(OKRs)](https://www.productboard.com/blog/defining-objectives-and-key-results-for-your-product-team/) | ||
are defined, with clear and inspiring Objectives that align with the company's overall | ||
mission and vision. Key Results are specific, measurable, and quantifiable, providing a | ||
clear path towards achieving the Objectives. OKRs are regularly reviewed and updated as | ||
needed, with a strong commitment to achieving them. | ||
|
||
- _How to Measure:_ All team members understand the OKRs and how their work contributes to | ||
their achievement. The OKRs are logged in the company's OKR tracker. |
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
File renamed without changes.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ | ||
|
||
# Engineering Effectiveness and Delivery Metrics | ||
|
||
Below defines the approach for measuring engineering teams. The measuring approach will be uniform across engineering delivery. There is no one single metric that rules them all. Focusing on one metric will cause overemphasis in one direction and will negatively impact the others. The outcome is not “big brother is watching” nor is it a way to measure individual performance. Rather, it is a mechanism to provide quantitative and qualitative [signals](https://github.com/cncf/tag-observability/blob/main/whitepaper.md#observability-signals) to product teams that measure their delivery, culture, and joy against an opinionated set of engineering practices and principles. | ||
|
||
Metrics will be gathered real-time or as near real-time as possible. Product delivery will not be impacted if the observability platform is unavailable. |
File renamed without changes.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ | ||
# Safely Observing Human Systems | ||
|
||
## RFC 2119 | ||
|
||
Open O11y has very strong opinions on how to observe human systems ethically. While | ||
acknowledging it is social advice, this guidance is considered a specification. Thus, we | ||
use certain keywords in accordance with [RFC 2119](https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2119.txt). | ||
|
||
## Guiding Principles | ||
|
||
Many of us typically think of Observability in the context of observing a system of | ||
software (e.g. a collection of microservices that form a single product). Some of the | ||
advice provided herein describes how to observe human systems like teams or development | ||
organizations. This is a much more sensitive activity. Open O11y offers these guiding | ||
principles to observing human systems ethically. | ||
|
||
1. When observing human systems, individuals ***MUST*** feel and be safe while being | ||
observed. | ||
2. Telemetry data ***MUST*** be anonymized and/or aggregated to protect the privacy of the | ||
individuals. | ||
3. Leadership, and the organization as a whole, ***MUST*** proactively protect against the | ||
misuse of telemetry. | ||
4. The gathering and use of telemetry ***MUST*** be excessively transparent[^1] to all | ||
human systems impacted by the telemetry. | ||
5. Human evaluations and compensation ***MUST NOT*** rely on the telemetry data listed | ||
within Open o11y. | ||
6. When observing human systems, observers ***MUST*** continuously reevaluate the health | ||
and safety of the people and culture. | ||
7. Secondary contributors ***MUST NOT*** use telemetry to measure the teams they support | ||
in any way that violates these principles. | ||
8. Groups within a human system ***MUST NOT*** be compared to others in any way that | ||
violates these principles. | ||
9. You ***MUST NOT*** be an A$$hole[^2] | ||
|
||
---- | ||
|
||
## Building A Culture of Being Safely Observed | ||
|
||
Humans don't enjoy being watched, especially when observations are misused or directly | ||
used for measuring performance. Misusing telemetry can have a net negative effect, eroding | ||
trust in human systems and the individuals they are comprised of. | ||
|
||
> Tell me how you measure me and I will tell you how I will behave. If you measure me in | ||
> an illogical way, do not complain about illogical behavior | ||
> \- Eli Goldratt[^as81] | ||
*When observing human systems, it is critical to build a culture where individuals can | ||
both feel and be safe while being observed.* | ||
|
||
### Employee Evaluations and Compensation | ||
|
||
Being safely observed requires that employers ***MUST NOT*** use telemetry for reviews, | ||
compensation adjustments, employment decisions, etc. Because reviews and compensation are | ||
so impactful to employees, the use of telemetry data can dramatically shift an employee's | ||
focus to optimizing telemetry data. If employers misuse telemetry, then employees are | ||
negatively impacted and using telemetry to improve becomes unimportant. While it ***MAY*** | ||
seem like a positive change, optimizing telemetry often results in employees being less | ||
effective contributors. This is a problem that can be avoided. | ||
|
||
### Individual Telemetry | ||
|
||
Telemetry data ***MUST*** only contain aggregated data for systems (groups) of people. | ||
Observability over human systems ***MUST NOT*** gather telemetry from specific | ||
individuals. This is a foundational requirement of being safely observed. | ||
|
||
### Comparing Disparate Groups | ||
|
||
Being safely observed also extends to cross-group evaluations. Every team has distinct | ||
members, work responsibilities, personal responsibilities, opinions, etc. Every human | ||
system is unique. Thus, some of the telemetry produced by observing any two teams will | ||
differ naturally. | ||
|
||
The Agile Framework provides a useful example with the nature of `story points` in | ||
software development. As a unit of measurement, the value of a story point is defined by | ||
each team. Thus, giving story points are relative, comparing story points across teams | ||
isn't valuable. | ||
|
||
This is not inherently a problem. Yet, it does require us to be selective when comparing | ||
data across disparate groups. Considering the story points example, it is unreasonable to | ||
compare story points "completed" over a given time period between multiple teams. However, | ||
it ***MAY*** be reasonable to compare the `story points planned / story points completed` | ||
between multiple teams as an unusually low or high ratio could indicate a planning and/or | ||
capacity issue. | ||
|
||
> Don't ask people to collaborate if they know that, in the end, there will be a winner | ||
> and a loser | ||
> \- Bertrand Duperrin[^5] | ||
---- | ||
|
||
## Using Telemetry In Different Roles | ||
|
||
### Teams and Individual Contributors | ||
|
||
These are the ideal candidates for using telemetry data. Teams and individuals | ||
***SHOULD*** observe themselves to identify trends and establish their working norms. Once | ||
a baseline is established, teams ***SHOULD*** then use telemetry to identify issues and | ||
strive to improve individual and team performance based on an established set of | ||
engineering principles. | ||
|
||
### Secondary Contributors | ||
|
||
Open O11y uses this term to describe roles that exist to organize, improve, or facilitate | ||
the work of others. In the world of software development, these roles commonly include, | ||
but are not limited to, SCRUM Masters, Project Managers, Product Owners, and Management. | ||
Secondary contributors ***SHOULD NOT*** use telemetry to observe the teams they support. | ||
Doing so offers limited benefits but can significantly damage the the organizations | ||
culture of being safely observed. | ||
|
||
Senior Leadership ***MAY*** use this telemetry to solve a particular business case in the | ||
context of organizational transformation. Senior Leadership ***MUST*** ensure the use of | ||
this telemetry is done in a manner that promotes a safe working environment and culture. | ||
See [Gathering and Using Telemetry](#gathering-and-using-telemetry) for specifications on | ||
cultural use of telemetry. | ||
|
||
Senior Leadership ***MAY*** involve lower levels of leadership and management in the above | ||
exception, particularly with respect to Direct Managers whose direct reports are | ||
individual contributors. These leaders ***MUST*** be especially careful with how they use | ||
telemetry data. These team members ***MUST*** constantly evaluate if they are observing | ||
their team or themselves as a part of that team. | ||
|
||
All leaders ***MUST*** pay careful attention to reactions, team feedback, and changes in | ||
team behaviors. | ||
|
||
---- | ||
|
||
## Gathering And Using Telemetry | ||
|
||
When gathering and using telemetry, organizations ***MUST*** must respect the [Guiding | ||
Principles](#guiding-principles). The following list of actions can help ensure that | ||
leaders do not compromise the trust and safety of their organization while gathering and | ||
using telemetry data. | ||
|
||
1. **Transparency in Data Collection:** Leadership ***MUST*** clearly advertise what | ||
telemetry data is being collected and why. The purpose and benefits of the data | ||
collection ***MUST*** be communicated openly to all groups. | ||
2. **Purposeful Use:** Telemetry data ***MUST*** only be used for the openly communicated | ||
purposes. These purposes ***MAY*** be aligned with organizational goals such as | ||
improving productivity, identifying bottlenecks, enhancing efficiency, and fostering a | ||
culture of continuous improvement. However, the use of this telemetry data ***MUST | ||
NOT*** violate any [Guiding Principles](#guiding-principles). | ||
3. **Data Privacy and Security:** The implementing organization ***MUST*** implement | ||
robust data security measures to protect telemetry data and respect privacy. This data | ||
***MUST*** be anonymized and ***MUST NOT*** contain any PII[^3]. | ||
4. **No Misuse:** Telemetry data ***MUST NOT*** be used for punitive measures. Instead, it | ||
***SHOULD*** be used for constructive feedback, learning, and growth. | ||
5. **Feedback Mechanism:** Leadership ***MUST*** provide opportunities for team members to | ||
share their concerns or suggestions about how telemetry is collected and used. This | ||
helps in building trust and making improvements based on feedback. | ||
|
||
[^1]: Transparent - Characterized by visibility or accessibility of information especially | ||
concerning business practices. [Merriam Webster - Transparent](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transparent) | ||
|
||
[^2]: [The No A$$hole Rule](https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transparent) | ||
|
||
[^3]: [Personal Identifiable Information](https://www.dol.gov/general/ppii) | ||
|
||
[^as81]: [Eliyahu Goldratt](https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Eliyahu_M._Goldratt#The_Haystack_Syndrome_(1990)) | ||
|
||
[^5]: [Bertrand Duperrin](https://www.duperrin.com/english/2014/06/23/quote-tell-how-you-measure-and-i-will-tell-you-how-i-will-behave/) |
File renamed without changes.
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters