PWX-35451-pt2: NFS-proxy volumes fix #2394
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* adding `VolumeSpec.IsNFSProxyVolume()` Signed-off-by: Zoran Rajic <[email protected]>
|
Thanks for the review Adam -- As the next step, need to figure out how to get this change into |
zoxpx
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 22, 2023
* adding `VolumeSpec.IsNFSProxyVolume()` Signed-off-by: Zoran Rajic <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
VolumeSpec.IsNFSProxyVolume()What this PR does / why we need it:
Adding a convenient method to query if a volume is a NFS-proxy volume.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional)
PWX-35451 - part2
Testing Notes
Tested together w/ https://github.com/portworx/porx/pull/12814 PR
Special notes for your reviewer: