-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deploy updated calldata verification #511
Conversation
@@ -2274,9 +2274,9 @@ | |||
"production": { | |||
"1.0.0": [ | |||
{ | |||
"ADDRESS": "0x77A13abB679A0DAFB4435D1Fa4cCC95D1ab51cfc", | |||
"ADDRESS": "0xFf296c17499C8eda2DdF61db580149bB819C804A", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is it correct that the address of the AccessManagerFacet gets overwritten by this PR?
"TIMESTAMP": "2023-08-29 17:09:43", | ||
"CONSTRUCTOR_ARGS": "0x", | ||
"SALT": "", | ||
"VERIFIED": "false" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No way to verify this?
@@ -33,6 +33,10 @@ | |||
"Name": "PeripheryRegistryFacet", | |||
"Version": "1.0.0" | |||
}, | |||
"0x50b4cB2C152322760a8fA59105A46745CE2B7Eac": { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wondering why we dont have the info for this contract in the log....shouldnt be, right?
No description provided.