Diamond cut auto propose to safe #764
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent updates enhance the deployment configuration across multiple JSON files by introducing new entries for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DeploymentScript
participant Network
participant ContractRegistry
User->>DeploymentScript: Initiate Deployment
DeploymentScript->>Network: Determine Environment
alt Production
DeploymentScript->>ContractRegistry: Deploy Contract
ContractRegistry-->>DeploymentScript: Confirm Deployment
else Staging
DeploymentScript->>ContractRegistry: Deploy Staging Contract
ContractRegistry-->>DeploymentScript: Confirm Staging Deployment
end
DeploymentScript-->>User: Deployment Complete
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
deployments/mainnet.diamond.json (1)
7-9: Initialize addresses for new entries before deployment.The entries for
GasRebateDistributorandLiFiDEXAggregatorindeployments/mainnet.diamond.jsoncurrently have empty addresses. Ensure these are initialized with valid addresses to avoid potential issues during deployment.
GasRebateDistributor: ""LiFiDEXAggregator: ""Analysis chain
Verify the initialization of new entries.
The entries for
GasRebateDistributorandLiFiDEXAggregatorcurrently have empty addresses. Ensure that these are correctly initialized with valid addresses before deployment.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify initialization of new entries in mainnet.diamond.json. # Test: Check for non-empty addresses for new entries. rg --type json -A 5 $'"GasRebateDistributor": ""' deployments/mainnet.diamond.json rg --type json -A 5 $'"LiFiDEXAggregator": ""' deployments/mainnet.diamond.jsonLength of output: 899
script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts (1)
98-98: Update console logging for network.Displaying
chain.namein the console log provides clearer information about the network being used.- console.info('Network', chain.name) + console.info('Network Name', chain.name)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (19)
- deployments/_deployments_log_file.json (15 hunks)
- deployments/arbitrum.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/aurora.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/avalanche.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/base.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/bsc.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/gravity.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/linea.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/mainnet.diamond.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/mainnet.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/mantle.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/metis.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/optimism.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/polygon.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/scroll.json (1 hunks)
- deployments/sei.json (1 hunks)
- script/deploy/deploySingleContract.sh (3 hunks)
- script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts (3 hunks)
- script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh (2 hunks)
Additional context used
Shellcheck
script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh
[warning] 116-116: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 116-116: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 121-121: script is referenced but not assigned (did you mean 'SCRIPT'?).
(SC2154)
[warning] 123-123: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 127-127: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 127-127: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 136-136: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 136-136: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 142-142: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 146-146: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 146-146: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
script/deploy/deploySingleContract.sh
[warning] 96-96: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
(SC2155)
Additional comments not posted (35)
deployments/mainnet.diamond.json (2)
11-11: Confirm theReceiverStargateV2address.The entry for
ReceiverStargateV2has been added with a specific address. Ensure that this address is correct and corresponds to the intended contract.
9-9: Update theLiFuelFeeCollectoraddress.The address for
LiFuelFeeCollectorhas been updated. Ensure that this change is reflected in all relevant documentation and that any dependencies are aware of the new address.deployments/gravity.json (1)
20-20: Validate the newStargateFacetV2address.The address for
StargateFacetV2has been updated. Confirm that this address is correctly deployed and that any interactions with this facet are tested with the new address.Verification successful
The new
StargateFacetV2address is tested in the codebase.The
StargateFacetV2contract is referenced and tested intest/solidity/Facets/StargateFacetV2.t.sol. This file contains various tests and setups involvingStargateFacetV2, indicating that interactions with this facet are indeed covered.
- File:
test/solidity/Facets/StargateFacetV2.t.solThis confirms that the new address is being utilized in tests, ensuring its functionality is verified.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Validate the new StargateFacetV2 address. # Test: Search for the new address usage in the codebase. rg --type json -A 5 $'"StargateFacetV2": "0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61"' deployments/Length of output: 2562
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to StargateFacetV2 in the codebase, focusing on potential test files. rg --type js --type ts --type py --type go --type rs --type java --type kt "StargateFacetV2" --glob "**/test/**" --glob "**/tests/**" -A 5Length of output: 165
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retry the search for references to StargateFacetV2 in test files, excluding the unrecognized file type. rg --type js --type ts --type py --type go --type java --type kt "StargateFacetV2" --glob "**/test/**" --glob "**/tests/**" -A 5Length of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Retry the search for references to StargateFacetV2 in test files, excluding the unrecognized file type. rg --type js --type ts --type py --type go --type java "StargateFacetV2" --glob "**/test/**" --glob "**/tests/**" -A 5Length of output: 5559
deployments/sei.json (1)
24-24: Validate the newStargateFacetV2address.The address for
StargateFacetV2has been updated. Confirm that this address is correctly deployed and that any interactions with this facet are tested with the new address.deployments/metis.json (1)
25-25: Verify the updated contract address.The address for
StargateFacetV2has been updated. Ensure that this new address is correct and consistent across all relevant configurations.Verification successful
Verified: Address Update for StargateFacetV2 in Metis Deployment
The updated address for
StargateFacetV2indeployments/metis.jsonis consistent with its intended use and does not conflict with other deployment configurations. This address is specific to the Metis deployment and is correctly reflected in the deployment log. Other deployments use different addresses, which is expected.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of the updated address across deployment files. # Test: Check for the new address across deployment files. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type json '0xCb667deA2894ab64e8e75EACB0d5d027AC672e25'Length of output: 257
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if there are any other instances of the address or conflicting addresses for StargateFacetV2. # Test: Check for any other instances of the address in the repository. rg '0xCb667deA2894ab64e8e75EACB0d5d027AC672e25' # Test: Check for any other addresses associated with StargateFacetV2 in the repository. rg '"StargateFacetV2": "0x'Length of output: 1743
deployments/mantle.json (1)
25-25: Verify the updated contract address.The address for
StargateFacetV2has been updated. Ensure that this new address is correct and consistent across all relevant configurations.Verification successful
Contract Address Consistency Verified
The updated contract address for
StargateFacetV2is consistently used across all relevant deployment files, includingmantle.json,sei.json,polygon.json,scroll.json,optimism.json,mainnet.json,gravity.json,base.json,avalanche.json,aurora.json,bsc.json, andarbitrum.json. No inconsistencies were found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify consistency of the updated address across deployment files. # Test: Check for the new address across deployment files. Expect: Consistent usage. rg --type json '0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61'Length of output: 2447
deployments/scroll.json (1)
27-27: Verify the updated contract address.The address for
StargateFacetV2has been updated. Ensure that this new address is correct and consistent across all relevant configurations.deployments/aurora.json (1)
31-31: Verify the address update forStargateFacetV2.Ensure that the new address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61is correct and has been properly updated in all relevant parts of the system.Verification successful
Address Update for
StargateFacetV2VerifiedThe new address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61is consistently used across multiple deployment files. Other addresses found in specific staging and network files indicate intended configurations for those environments. No issues found with the update.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new address for StargateFacetV2 is used consistently across the codebase. # Test: Search for the new address. Expect: Occurrences of the new address in relevant files. rg --type json '0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61'Length of output: 2447
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any instances of the old address to ensure it has been fully replaced. # Test: Search for the old address. Expect: No occurrences of the old address. rg --type json '0xOLD_ADDRESS_HERE'Length of output: 35
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for any addresses associated with StargateFacetV2 to identify potential old addresses. # Test: Search for any address pattern related to StargateFacetV2. rg --type json '"StargateFacetV2": "0x[a-fA-F0-9]{40}"'Length of output: 1525
deployments/linea.json (1)
35-35: Verify the address update forStargateFacetV2.Ensure that the new address
0x113E97921874646413572F2C43562463c378b6f5is correct and has been properly updated in all relevant parts of the system.Verification successful
Address Update Verified for
StargateFacetV2The new address
0x113E97921874646413572F2C43562463c378b6f5forStargateFacetV2is correctly updated in thedeployments/linea.jsonand_deployments_log_file.json. Other deployment files use different addresses, which seems intentional for network-specific configurations. No issues found with the update.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new address for StargateFacetV2 is used consistently across the codebase. # Test: Search for the new address. Expect: Occurrences of the new address in relevant files. rg --type json '0x113E97921874646413572F2C43562463c378b6f5'Length of output: 257
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for references to StargateFacetV2 and any occurrences of the old address to ensure complete updates. # Test: Search for occurrences of StargateFacetV2. rg 'StargateFacetV2' # Test: Search for occurrences of the old address. rg --type json '0xOLDADDRESS' # Replace '0xOLDADDRESS' with the actual old address if known.Length of output: 8191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new address is consistently used across all deployment files. # Test: Search for the new address in all deployment files. rg --type json '0x113E97921874646413572F2C43562463c378b6f5' deployments/ # Test: Attempt to identify the old address by searching for any other similar addresses in deployment files. rg --type json '"StargateFacetV2": "0x' deployments/Length of output: 1793
deployments/base.json (1)
38-38: Verify the address update forStargateFacetV2.Ensure that the new address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61is correct and has been properly updated in all relevant parts of the system.Verification successful
Address Update for
StargateFacetV2VerifiedThe new address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61forStargateFacetV2is consistently updated across multiple deployment files, includingmainnet.json,arbitrum.json,aurora.json,scroll.json,polygon.json,mantle.json,optimism.json,avalanche.json,sei.json,base.json,gravity.json, andbsc.json. This indicates a thorough update in these configurations.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new address for StargateFacetV2 is used consistently across the codebase. # Test: Search for the new address. Expect: Occurrences of the new address in relevant files. rg --type json '0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61'Length of output: 2447
deployments/avalanche.json (1)
45-45: Verify the new address forStargateFacetV2.Ensure that the updated address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61is correct and reflects the intended deployment forStargateFacetV2. This consistency is crucial for the correct functioning of the system.Verification successful
Address Consistency Verified for
StargateFacetV2.The address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61is consistently used across all relevant deployment files, ensuring uniformity in the configuration.
- Files checked include:
avalanche.json,scroll.json,sei.json,optimism.json,polygon.json,mantle.json,mainnet.json,bsc.json,gravity.json,aurora.json,base.json, andarbitrum.json.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the new address for StargateFacetV2 across all deployment files. # Test: Search for the new address in all JSON files. Expect: Consistent address across all relevant files. rg --type json '"StargateFacetV2": "0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61"'Length of output: 1174
deployments/bsc.json (1)
47-47: Verify the new address forStargateFacetV2.Ensure that the updated address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61is correct and reflects the intended deployment forStargateFacetV2. This consistency is crucial for the correct functioning of the system.deployments/optimism.json (1)
47-47: Verify the new address forStargateFacetV2.Ensure that the updated address
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61is correct and reflects the intended deployment forStargateFacetV2. This consistency is crucial for the correct functioning of the system.script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts (3)
12-12: Streamline network handling withgetViemChainForNetworkName.The introduction of
getViemChainForNetworkNamesimplifies the retrieval of chain information, reducing dependency on mappings and potential errors.
53-57: Directly use network name for configuration.Replacing
chainNamewithargs.networkin the configuration ensures that the network handling is more straightforward and less error-prone.
62-62: Ensure correct safe address usage.Using
args.network.toLowerCase()to accesssafeAddressesensures consistency with the network names. Verify that all network names are correctly mapped insafeAddresses.Verification successful
Safe address usage is correctly mapped.
The
safeAddressesobject contains correctly mapped network names in lowercase, ensuring consistent access withargs.network.toLowerCase(). No issues found.
- Located in
config/global.json:
- "mainnet"
- "arbitrum"
- "aurora"
- "avalanche"
- "base"
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all network names are correctly mapped in `safeAddresses`. # Test: Check for network names in `safeAddresses` to ensure they match expected values. rg --type json '"safeAddresses": {'Length of output: 137
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Correct the regex pattern and verify that all network names are correctly mapped in `safeAddresses`. # Corrected Test: Check for network names in `safeAddresses` to ensure they match expected values. rg '"safeAddresses"\s*:\s*\{' --type json -A 5Length of output: 487
deployments/arbitrum.json (1)
48-48: Verify the new contract address forStargateFacetV2.The address has been updated to
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61. Ensure that this address is correct and has been verified for the Arbitrum network.deployments/polygon.json (1)
51-51: Verify the new contract address forStargateFacetV2.The address has been updated to
0x6e378C84e657C57b2a8d183CFf30ee5CC8989b61. Ensure that this address is correct and has been verified for the Polygon network.deployments/mainnet.json (1)
56-56: Verify the new contract address integration.The address for
StargateFacetV2has been updated. Ensure that this change is reflected and correctly integrated in all relevant parts of the system, such as deployment scripts and any logic that interacts with this contract.script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh (1)
178-181: Ensure facet addresses are saved correctly.The logic for saving facet addresses is conditional on the environment. Verify that this behavior aligns with the intended deployment strategy and that no necessary data is omitted in production.
Verification successful
Facet addresses handling aligns with deployment strategy.
The logic for saving facet addresses is intentionally designed to only execute in non-production environments. In production, facet addresses are updated in logs before the transaction is signed in a secure environment, ensuring security and integrity. This approach aligns with the intended deployment strategy.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the logic for saving facet addresses based on the environment. # Test: Ensure that the facet addresses are saved correctly in non-production environments. grep -r "saveDiamondFacets" script/Length of output: 506
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract the implementation of saveDiamondFacets function ast-grep --lang bash --pattern 'function saveDiamondFacets() { $$$ }' script/helperFunctions.sh # Search for comments or documentation related to saveDiamondFacets usage, especially in production environments rg -A 3 "saveDiamondFacets" script/Length of output: 1630
deployments/_deployments_log_file.json (15)
21478-21487: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21502-21511: Verify the unverified contract status.The "VERIFIED" field is set to "false". Ensure that this is intentional and that the contract does not require verification.
21526-21535: Verify the unverified contract status.The "VERIFIED" field is set to "false". Ensure this is intentional and that the contract does not require verification.
21550-21559: Verify the unverified contract status.The "VERIFIED" field is set to "false". Ensure this is intentional and that the contract does not require verification.
21574-21583: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21598-21607: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21622-21631: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21646-21655: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21670-21679: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21694-21703: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21718-21727: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21742-21751: Verify the unverified contract status.The "VERIFIED" field is set to "false". Ensure this is intentional and that the contract does not require verification.
21766-21775: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
21802-21811: Entry for version 1.0.1 looks good.The entry is well-structured and the verification status is true.
Line range hint
21814-21819: New section for LiFiDEXAggregator looks good.The structure is consistent with previous entries and appears correct.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…AutoProposeToSafe
…ntracts into diamondCutAutoProposeToSafe
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- deployments/_deployments_log_file.json (2 hunks)
- deployments/mainnet.diamond.json (1 hunks)
- script/deploy/deploySingleContract.sh (3 hunks)
- script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- deployments/mainnet.diamond.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- deployments/_deployments_log_file.json
Additional context used
Shellcheck
script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh
[warning] 116-116: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 116-116: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 127-127: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 127-127: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 135-135: script is referenced but not assigned (did you mean 'SCRIPT'?).
(SC2154)
[warning] 136-136: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 136-136: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
[warning] 142-142: Quote this to prevent word splitting.
(SC2046)
[warning] 146-146: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 146-146: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
script/deploy/deploySingleContract.sh
[warning] 96-96: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
(SC2155)
Additional comments not posted (4)
script/tasks/diamondUpdateFacet.sh (3)
116-116: Fix variable assignment visibility.The assignment to
RAW_RETURN_DATAis only seen by the forked process. Ensure that the assignment is visible to the parent shell to avoid unexpected behavior.- RAW_RETURN_DATA=$(NO_BROADCAST=true NETWORK=$NETWORK FILE_SUFFIX=$FILE_SUFFIX USE_DEF_DIAMOND=$USE_MUTABLE_DIAMOND PRIVATE_KEY=$PRIVATE_KEY forge script "$UPDATE_SCRIPT" -f $NETWORK -vvvv --json --silent --skip-simulation --legacy) + RAW_RETURN_DATA=$(NO_BROADCAST=true NETWORK=$NETWORK FILE_SUFFIX=$FILE_SUFFIX USE_DEF_DIAMOND=$USE_MUTABLE_DIAMOND PRIVATE_KEY=$PRIVATE_KEY forge script "$UPDATE_SCRIPT" -f $NETWORK -vvvv --json --silent --skip-simulation --legacy)Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 116-116: This assignment is only seen by the forked process.
(SC2097)
[warning] 116-116: This expansion will not see the mentioned assignment.
(SC2098)
123-123: Quote command arguments to prevent word splitting.The command arguments should be quoted to prevent unintended word splitting, which can lead to incorrect command execution.
- ts-node script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts --to "$DIAMOND_ADDRESS" --calldata "$FACET_CUT" --network "$NETWORK" --rpcUrl $(getRPCUrl $NETWORK) --privateKey "$SAFE_SIGNER_PRIVATE_KEY" + ts-node script/deploy/safe/propose-to-safe.ts --to "$DIAMOND_ADDRESS" --calldata "$FACET_CUT" --network "$NETWORK" --rpcUrl "$(getRPCUrl $NETWORK)" --privateKey "$SAFE_SIGNER_PRIVATE_KEY"
135-135: Correct uninitialized variable usage.The variable
scriptis referenced but not assigned. It seems likeSCRIPTwas intended. Verify and correct the variable usage.- echoDebug "Calculating facet cuts for $script..." + echoDebug "Calculating facet cuts for $SCRIPT..."Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 135-135: script is referenced but not assigned (did you mean 'SCRIPT'?).
(SC2154)
script/deploy/deploySingleContract.sh (1)
96-96: Separate declaration and assignment to avoid masking return values.Declare
CONTRACTseparately from its assignment to prevent masking any return values from the command substitution.- local CONTRACT=$(echo $SCRIPT | sed -e 's/Deploy//') + local CONTRACT + CONTRACT=$(echo $SCRIPT | sed -e 's/Deploy//')Tools
Shellcheck
[warning] 96-96: Declare and assign separately to avoid masking return values.
(SC2155)
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
Why did I implement it this way?
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
1.0.1entries for theLiFiDEXAggregator, updating deployment logs for multiple environments.Bug Fixes
Chores