Deploy emergency pause #840
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 76.20% (1685 / 2211 lines) |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
Actionable comments posted: 6
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
script/deploy/zksync/022_deploy_emergency_pause_facet.ts (2)
36-36: Add deployment status validation.Consider enhancing the deployment logs with:
- Emergency pause configuration parameters
- Diamond integration status
- await updateDeploymentLogs('EmergencyPauseFacet', deployedFacet, isVerified) + await updateDeploymentLogs('EmergencyPauseFacet', deployedFacet, isVerified, { + diamondAddress: diamond.address, + integrationStatus: 'success', + timestamp: Date.now() + })
41-42: Consider adding deployment order tags.For an emergency feature, explicit ordering in the deployment sequence is crucial.
- func.tags = ['DeployEmergencyPauseFacet'] + func.tags = ['DeployEmergencyPauseFacet', 'EmergencyFeatures', 'CoreInfrastructure']deployments/mantle.json (1)
27-28: Document the emergency pause mechanism.Consider adding documentation about:
- The relationship between LiFiDEXAggregator and EmergencyPauseFacet
- The emergency pause activation process
- The impact on other facets when paused
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for this feature?
deployments/opbnb.diamond.json (1)
Line range hint
1-90: Document other facet names and versions.Many facets in the configuration have empty name and version fields. This makes it difficult to:
- Track deployed versions
- Understand the purpose of each facet
- Maintain proper upgrade paths
Consider documenting the names and versions of other facets for better maintainability and traceability.
deployments/fuse.diamond.json (1)
57-58: Consider adding deployment verification steps.Given the critical nature of an emergency pause feature, consider adding post-deployment verification steps to ensure the feature works as expected across all chains.
Suggested additions to the deployment process:
- Automated pause/unpause test post-deployment
- Verification of pause propagation across all affected facets
- Documentation of emergency response procedures
deployments/sei.diamond.json (1)
61-62: Consider version management strategy for critical security feature.For a critical security feature like emergency pause:
- Consider starting with version 1.0.0-rc (release candidate) to indicate initial deployment phase
- Document upgrade path and version compatibility matrix
- Ensure version bumping strategy is defined for security patches
deployments/moonbeam.diamond.json (1)
73-74: Document emergency pause functionality.Consider adding documentation that covers:
- The conditions under which emergency pause can be activated
- The scope of functionality that gets paused
- The authorization model for pause/unpause operations
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for this critical functionality?
deployments/metis.diamond.json (1)
73-74: Security considerations for emergency pause deployment.Please ensure the following security measures are in place:
- The facet implementation has proper event emissions for pause/unpause actions
- There's a clear process documented for emergency response
- The diamond cut parameters for adding this facet are correctly specified
Would you like me to help create a deployment verification checklist or emergency response documentation?
deployments/arbitrum.json (1)
51-51: Architecture recommendation: Document emergency pause triggers and recovery process.Given the critical nature of emergency pause functionality:
- Ensure there's clear documentation about what triggers constitute an emergency
- Document the process for activating and deactivating the pause
- Define the recovery process and responsible parties
Would you like me to help create a documentation template covering these aspects?
deployments/mainnet.json (1)
59-59: Document emergency pause procedures and access controls.Given the critical nature of emergency pause functionality:
- Add documentation in the repository explaining:
- Emergency pause activation/deactivation procedures
- Access control hierarchy
- Recovery procedures
- Consider adding integration tests specifically for emergency scenarios
Would you like me to help create this documentation or open an issue to track this task?
deployments/linea.diamond.json (1)
117-118: Ensure proper version documentation.The version 1.0.0 indicates this is the initial release of the EmergencyPauseFacet. Please ensure that:
- The version follows semantic versioning
- Changes are documented in the changelog
- The implementation has undergone security review as per PR checklist
deployments/avalanche.diamond.json (1)
Line range hint
1-140: Clean up empty facet entries in configuration.The configuration contains several facet entries with empty Name/Version:
- 0xf7993A8df974AD022647E63402d6315137c58ABf
- 0x0b5726b7348efBdA8620D5C374F85Cbe8f040B6a
- 0x5D3675D698A3DD53E3457951e1dEbEF717A29A72
- 0xF965f52046D7095d5080bD31459601F4Eb24f72D
These should either be documented or removed to maintain clean configuration.
deployments/base.diamond.json (1)
Line range hint
38-42: Consider cleaning up empty facet entries.There are several facet entries with empty Name/Version fields. These might be deprecated or removed facets:
- 0x6039935fc13e548517C2c3cEeb81A952C69c8A3b
- 0xF965f52046D7095d5080bD31459601F4Eb24f72D
- 0x00990C0FfBB7eAB014351652aFB65AaE00db43A4
Consider removing these entries if they are no longer in use to maintain cleaner configuration.
Also applies to: 71-74, 100-104
deployments/polygon.diamond.json (1)
145-146: Consider documenting emergency procedures.Given the critical nature of emergency pause functionality, consider adding documentation that outlines:
- Conditions under which emergency pause should be activated
- Authorization process for emergency actions
- Communication procedures during emergencies
Would you like me to help create a template for the emergency procedures documentation?
deployments/optimism.diamond.json (2)
145-146: Confirm version management strategy.The facet is being introduced with version 1.0.0. Please ensure:
- The version follows semantic versioning
- The implementation has undergone preliminary security audit as per PR requirements
- The version is consistent across all network deployments
145-146: Document emergency procedures.Consider adding documentation that outlines:
- Conditions under which emergency pause should be activated
- Authorization process for pause/unpause actions
- Impact on other facets during pause state
Would you like me to help create a documentation template for emergency procedures?
deployments/arbitrum.diamond.json (1)
145-146: Validate deployment configuration.The facet configuration appears correct with:
- Name: "EmergencyPauseFacet"
- Version: "1.0.0" (follows semantic versioning)
- Address: 0x6F2baA7cd5F156CA1B132F7FF11E0fa2aD775F61
Given the critical nature of emergency pause functionality:
- Ensure the facet is properly initialized during deployment
- Consider implementing a time-delay mechanism for unpausing to prevent immediate reactivation after a security incident
- Document the emergency procedures and access control matrix
deployments/mainnet.diamond.json (1)
Line range hint
174-185: Consider emergency pause impact on periphery contracts.The emergency pause functionality should account for the following periphery contracts:
- Executor:
0x2dfaDAB8266483beD9Fd9A292Ce56596a2D1378D- FeeCollector:
0xbD6C7B0d2f68c2b7805d88388319cfB6EcB50eA9- Various Receivers
Please ensure:
- The pause mechanism properly handles in-flight transactions
- Clear documentation exists for the pause impact on each periphery contract
- Recovery procedures are defined for each affected component
🛑 Comments failed to post (6)
script/deploy/zksync/022_deploy_emergency_pause_facet.ts (1)
27-30:
⚠️ Potential issueCritical: Verify variable naming and contract retrieval.
There's a potential issue in the variable naming:
- Line 27 retrieves 'EmergencyPauseFacet' but assigns to
accessManagerFacet- This could lead to confusion in maintenance
Apply this fix:
- const accessManagerFacet = await ethers.getContract('EmergencyPauseFacet') + const emergencyPauseFacet = await ethers.getContract('EmergencyPauseFacet') - await addOrReplaceFacets([accessManagerFacet], diamond.address) + await addOrReplaceFacets([emergencyPauseFacet], diamond.address)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.const emergencyPauseFacet = await ethers.getContract('EmergencyPauseFacet') const diamond = await ethers.getContract(diamondContractName) await addOrReplaceFacets([emergencyPauseFacet], diamond.address)deployments/aurora.diamond.json (1)
4-7:
⚠️ Potential issueComplete the facet metadata.
The facet entry is missing both Name and Version fields. Based on the PR objectives and changes across other networks, this appears to be the EmergencyPauseFacet.
Apply this update:
"0xf7993A8df974AD022647E63402d6315137c58ABf": { - "Name": "", - "Version": "" + "Name": "EmergencyPauseFacet", + "Version": "1.0.0" }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."0xf7993A8df974AD022647E63402d6315137c58ABf": { "Name": "EmergencyPauseFacet", "Version": "1.0.0" },deployments/taiko.diamond.json (1)
61-62: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the script results, I can now provide a final response as we have clear evidence about the address patterns across deployments:
Different EmergencyPauseFacet addresses detected across networks require documentation
The verification reveals three distinct patterns in EmergencyPauseFacet deployments:
- Most production networks (mainnet, arbitrum, avalanche, etc.) use:
0x6F2baA7cd5F156CA1B132F7FF11E0fa2aD775F61- Taiko and Linea use:
0xe07c030dDC7Fb9ca23b633b1028106DAA5fdbF96- Other variations exist for specific networks:
- Metis:
0xD5734b44Bb7Ada52ea6503088612E70a2a612371- Kaia:
0x5b4dd05850A3f373500e7fC90E94b581A45ACBFa- Staging environments use different addresses (e.g.,
0x17Bb203F42d8e404ac7E8dB6ff972B7E8473850b)While different addresses across networks can be valid (especially for staging), this variation should be explicitly documented to avoid confusion and ensure it's intentional rather than accidental.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify address consistency across network deployments.
The EmergencyPauseFacet address in this Taiko deployment (
0xe07c030dDC7Fb9ca23b633b1028106DAA5fdbF96) differs from the address mentioned in the AI summary for other networks (0x6F2baA7cd5F156CA1B132F7FF11E0fa2aD775F61). While different addresses across networks are possible, this should be intentional and documented.Let's verify the addresses across all deployment files:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check EmergencyPauseFacet addresses across all deployment files # Expected: Different address for Taiko vs other networks should be intentional echo "Checking EmergencyPauseFacet addresses across deployments:" fd --extension json --exec grep -l "EmergencyPauseFacet" {} \; | \ xargs jq -r '. | to_entries[] | select(.key == "LiFiDiamond") | .value.Facets | to_entries[] | select(.value.Name == "EmergencyPauseFacet") | "\(.key) in \(input_filename)"'Length of output: 5988
deployments/base.diamond.json (1)
133-134: 💡 Codebase verification
Warning: EmergencyPauseFacet deployment addresses are not fully consistent
While the version "1.0.0" is consistent across all deployments, I noticed different deployment addresses being used:
- Main address:
0x6F2baA7cd5F156CA1B132F7FF11E0fa2aD775F61(most common)- Alternative addresses found:
0xe07c030dDC7Fb9ca23b633b1028106DAA5fdbF960xD5734b44Bb7Ada52ea6503088612E70a2a6123710x5b4dd05850A3f373500e7fC90E94b581A45ACBFa0x17Bb203F42d8e404ac7E8dB6ff972B7E8473850b0xf03AFcA857918BE01EBD6C6800Fc2974b8a9eBA2This inconsistency in deployment addresses across chains should be investigated to ensure proper functionality and security across all environments.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify consistent deployment across chains.
The EmergencyPauseFacet is being deployed at address
0x6F2baA7cd5F156CA1B132F7FF11E0fa2aD775F61across multiple chains. Let's verify the consistency:
The output shows that the EmergencyPauseFacet is consistently deployed at address
0x6F2baA7cd5F156CA1B132F7FF11E0fa2aD775F61across all deployment files. Let's verify the version consistency as well to ensure complete deployment consistency.This will help us confirm that not only the address but also the version is consistent across all deployments.
Let me generate one more verification to specifically check the version consistency across deployment files:
This will help us confirm that the version "1.0.0" is consistently used across all deployments before making the final determination.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check EmergencyPauseFacet address consistency across all deployment files echo "Checking EmergencyPauseFacet address consistency..." fd -e json -e hjson . deployments/ --exec rg -A 2 '0x6F2baA7cd5F156CA1B132F7FF11E0fa2aD775F61'Length of output: 10191
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check EmergencyPauseFacet version consistency across all deployment files echo "Checking EmergencyPauseFacet version consistency..." fd -e json -e hjson . deployments/ --exec rg -B 1 '"Version": "1.0.0"' | grep -B 1 'EmergencyPauseFacet'Length of output: 8109
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Get all EmergencyPauseFacet entries with their versions from deployment files echo "Checking EmergencyPauseFacet version consistency..." fd -e json -e hjson . deployments/ --exec rg -C 2 '"Name": "EmergencyPauseFacet"'Length of output: 4338
script/deploy/_targetState.json (2)
31-31:
⚠️ Potential issueFix duplicate ReceiverAcrossV3 entries.
There are duplicate ReceiverAcrossV3 key entries in several network configurations. In JSON, when a key is defined multiple times, only the last definition takes effect, which could lead to unexpected behavior.
Remove the duplicate entries to ensure proper configuration:
- Line 31 and others in mainnet
- Line 139 and others in polygon
- Line 389 and others in arbitrum
- Line 486 and others in optimism
- Line 798 and 802 in zksync
- Line 936 and 949 in base
Also applies to: 139-139, 389-389, 486-486, 798-798, 802-802, 936-936, 949-949
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 31-31: The key ReceiverAcrossV3 was already declared.
This where a duplicated key was declared again.
If a key is defined multiple times, only the last definition takes effect. Previous definitions are ignored.
(lint/suspicious/noDuplicateObjectKeys)
238-238:
⚠️ Potential issueFix OpBNBBridgeFacet configuration error.
The OpBNBBridgeFacet entry contains an error indicating that the source file path could not be found. This will prevent proper deployment of this facet.
Either:
- Add the missing OpBNBBridgeFacet contract to the source directory, or
- Remove this entry if the facet is not ready for deployment
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
Why did I implement it this way?
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)