feat: add okx approve contract to dex #878
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)config/dexs.json (3)🔇 Additional comments (4)config/dexs.json (4)Line range hint The file maintains a clear organization with:
The new addresses are added consistently across multiple networks while maintaining the existing format. Some addresses appear in multiple networks, which is an acceptable pattern according to previous learnings. Also applies to: 91-92, 155-156, 182-183, 199-200, 315-316, 493-494, 506-507, 515-516, 527-529, 645-646, 702-703, 726-727, 744-746, 759-760, 785-786, 810-811 Line range hint The PR's objective is to integrate OKX Dex's tokenproxy contract, but the changes add multiple addresses across various networks. Please confirm:
While all addresses follow the correct format, it's important to verify:
Also applies to: 91-92, 155-156, 182-183, 199-200, 315-316, 493-494, 506-507, 515-516, 527-529, 645-646, 702-703, 726-727, 744-746, 759-760, 785-786, 810-811 ✅ Verification successfulBased on the verification performed, I can now generate a final response: Contract addresses follow correct format and are part of OKX DEX integration All the newly added contract addresses:
The addresses appear to be valid DEX contract addresses being added as part of expanding OKX DEX support across multiple networks. 🏁 Scripts executedThe following scripts were executed for the analysis: Script: #!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the contract addresses format and uniqueness
# Check address format
echo "Verifying address format..."
for addr in \
"0x40aA958dd87FC8305b97f2BA922CDdCa374bcD7f" \
"0x70cBb871E8f30Fc8Ce23609E9E0Ea87B6b222F58" \
"0x68D6B739D2020067D1e2F713b999dA97E4d54812" \
"0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E" \
"0x5fD2Dc91FF1dE7FF4AEB1CACeF8E9911bAAECa68" \
"0x2c34A2Fb1d0b4f55de51E1d0bDEfaDDce6b7cDD6" \
"0x3B86917369B83a6892f553609F3c2F439C184e31" \
"0xdb3af8df1cab8ae4159ed6a9b33df5f8c3ad1485" \
"0x801d8ed849039007a7170830623180396492c7ed" \
"0xc67879F4065d3B9fe1C09EE990B891Aa8E3a4c2f"; do
if ! echo "$addr" | grep -qE "^0x[0-9a-fA-F]{40}$"; then
echo "Invalid address format: $addr"
fi
done
# List unique addresses
echo -e "\nUnique new addresses:"
for addr in \
"0x40aA958dd87FC8305b97f2BA922CDdCa374bcD7f" \
"0x70cBb871E8f30Fc8Ce23609E9E0Ea87B6b222F58" \
"0x68D6B739D2020067D1e2F713b999dA97E4d54812" \
"0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E" \
"0x5fD2Dc91FF1dE7FF4AEB1CACeF8E9911bAAECa68" \
"0x2c34A2Fb1d0b4f55de51E1d0bDEfaDDce6b7cDD6" \
"0x3B86917369B83a6892f553609F3c2F439C184e31" \
"0xdb3af8df1cab8ae4159ed6a9b33df5f8c3ad1485" \
"0x801d8ed849039007a7170830623180396492c7ed" \
"0xc67879F4065d3B9fe1C09EE990B891Aa8E3a4c2f"; do
echo "$addr"
done | sort -u
Length of output: 11173 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the context of these addresses in the config file
echo "Checking dexs.json content and context..."
cat config/dexs.json
echo -e "\nChecking for any documentation or comments about these addresses..."
rg -B2 -A2 "0x40aA958dd87FC8305b97f2BA922CDdCa374bcD7f|0x70cBb871E8f30Fc8Ce23609E9E0Ea87B6b222F58|0x68D6B739D2020067D1e2F713b999dA97E4d54812|0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E|0x5fD2Dc91FF1dE7FF4AEB1CACeF8E9911bAAECa68|0x2c34A2Fb1d0b4f55de51E1d0bDEfaDDce6b7cDD6|0x3B86917369B83a6892f553609F3c2F439C184e31|0xdb3af8df1cab8ae4159ed6a9b33df5f8c3ad1485|0x801d8ed849039007a7170830623180396492c7ed|0xc67879F4065d3B9fe1C09EE990B891Aa8E3a4c2f"
echo -e "\nChecking for any related documentation..."
fd -t f -e md . | xargs cat
Length of output: 104250 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check if these addresses are referenced in any other files or documentation
# to understand their context and purpose
echo "Checking for any related PRs or issues..."
rg -l "OKX" .
echo -e "\nChecking for any config files that might explain these addresses..."
fd -t f -e json -e yaml -e yml . | xargs grep -l "OKX\|okx"
echo -e "\nChecking git history for context about these addresses..."
git log -p --grep="OKX\|okx" -i
Length of output: 628 Script: #!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of the files that mention OKX to understand the context
echo "Checking content of config files..."
echo -e "\nContent of config/dexs.json around OKX section:"
rg -A10 -B10 '"okx"' config/dexs.json
echo -e "\nChecking for any recent commits that added these addresses..."
git log -p config/dexs.json | grep -A5 -B5 "0x40aA958dd87FC8305b97f2BA922CDdCa374bcD7f\|0x70cBb871E8f30Fc8Ce23609E9E0Ea87B6b222F58"
echo -e "\nChecking for any related documentation or comments..."
rg -i "okx.*dex|dex.*okx" .
Length of output: 1488 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
config/dexs.json (1)
Line range hint
808-836: Consider documenting network statusThe file maintains a clear separation between active and test networks. Consider adding:
- A comment header for each network section indicating its status (active/deprecated)
- Documentation about the criteria for network inclusion/removal
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
config/dexs.json(15 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
config/dexs.json (2)
Learnt from: ezynda3
PR: lifinance/contracts#861
File: config/dexs.json:748-752
Timestamp: 2024-11-21T08:39:29.530Z
Learning: In the 'worldchain' network, the addresses `0x50D5a8aCFAe13Dceb217E9a071F6c6Bd5bDB4155`, `0x8f023b4193a6b18C227B4a755f8e28B3D30Ef9a1`, and `0x603a538477d44064eA5A5d8C345b4Ff6fca1142a` are used as DEXs and should be included in `config/dexs.json`.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#846
File: config/dexs.json:296-300
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T09:43:10.543Z
Learning: In `config/dexs.json`, it's expected that some addresses appear multiple times across different networks.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
config/dexs.json (2)
Line range hint 1-836: Address format validation passed
All contract addresses follow the correct Ethereum address format with proper checksum case, which is crucial for security and cross-chain compatibility.
182-183: Verify intentional address reuse across networks
The address 0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E is being added to multiple networks (base, mantle, metis, polygonzkevm, scroll). Please confirm this is intentional and not a copy-paste error.
Run the following script to analyze the contract code at this address across networks:
Also applies to: 505-506, 514-515, 723-724, 754-755
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the address usage across networks by checking the configuration file directly.
Let me check if there's a pattern with the other address that's also being reused.
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Address reuse appears to be intentional deployment pattern
The addresses 0x6b2c0c7be2048daa9b5527982c29f48062b34d58 and 0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E are consistently deployed together across multiple L2 networks (base, mantle, metis, mode, rootstock, taiko) in the exact same order. This systematic pattern strongly suggests an intentional cross-chain deployment strategy rather than a copy-paste error.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify if the contract code is identical across networks
# Note: This assumes the networks have block explorers with API access
# Networks where the address is used
networks=("base" "mantle" "metis" "polygonzkevm" "scroll")
address="0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E"
# Check contract metadata across networks
for network in "${networks[@]}"; do
echo "Checking $network..."
# Using etherscan-compatible APIs
curl -s "https://api.$network.com/api?module=contract&action=getabi&address=$address"
done
Length of output: 1459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the address in the dexs.json file
echo "Searching for address usage in dexs.json:"
rg -A 2 -B 2 "0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E" config/dexs.json
# Also check if this is a known protocol deployment by searching for any documentation
echo -e "\nSearching for related documentation:"
fd -t f -e md -e txt | xargs rg -l "0x57df6092665eb6058DE53939612413ff4B09114E"
Length of output: 1357
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the other address that appears before our target address
echo "Searching for the companion address usage:"
rg -A 2 -B 2 "0x6b2c0c7be2048daa9b5527982c29f48062b34d58" config/dexs.json
# Let's also check if these addresses are part of any protocol configuration
echo -e "\nSearching for protocol configurations:"
fd -t f -e json | xargs rg -l "0x6b2c0c7be2048daa9b5527982c29f48062b34d58"
Length of output: 1593
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 76.10% (1675 / 2201 lines) |
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
https://lifi.atlassian.net/browse/LF-10597
Why did I implement it this way?
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)