bugfix in types action #885
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request includes modifications to the workflow file Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (2)
65-69: Enhance debug step visibility.While adding git status debugging is helpful, consider making the output more visible and informative.
- name: Verify File Status (for debugging) run: | cd lifi-contract-types + echo "=== BEGIN FILE STATUS ===" git status + echo "=== END FILE STATUS ===" + echo "=== BEGIN DIRECTORY STRUCTURE ===" + ls -la + echo "=== END DIRECTORY STRUCTURE ==="
Line range hint
3-4: Optimize workflow trigger conditions.The workflow currently runs on all pushes. Consider adding path filters to run only when relevant files change.
on: push: + paths: + - 'src/**' + - 'contracts/**' + - 'package.json' + - '.github/workflows/types.yaml'
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/types.yaml(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/types.yaml (2)
60-62: LGTM! Clean directory management approach.
The sequence of operations (remove, create, then copy) is correct and uses appropriate flags (-p for mkdir).
176-180: Improved git staging approach.
Replacing individual git add commands with git add -A is more robust as it:
- Captures all changes including deletions
- Ensures no files are accidentally missed
- Maintains consistency between the working directory and the commit
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 76.59% (1725 / 2252 lines) |
Pull request was closed
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
Why did I implement it this way?
The action that generates types was failing as it was not correctly adding deleted files to git staging.
The new code changes this behaviour
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)