breakpoints #11
breakpoints #11
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Joseph Chalabi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joseph Chalabi <[email protected]>
test: more tests and refactor
fix: denom can be null
fix: various fixes
…balance with recipientBalance
Add BurnForm Validation
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 24
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (66)
components/react/StepIndicator.tsx (2)
3-9: Add validation for step numbersWhile the types are well-defined, consider adding runtime validation to ensure:
currentStepis within valid range (1 to steps.length)stepnumbers in the steps array are sequential and start from 1export default function StepIndicator({ currentStep, steps, }: Readonly<{ currentStep: number; steps: { label: ReactNode; mobileLabel?: ReactNode; step: number }[]; }>) { + if (currentStep < 1 || currentStep > steps.length) { + throw new Error('currentStep must be between 1 and steps.length'); + } + const isSequential = steps.every((s, i) => s.step === i + 1); + if (!isSequential) { + throw new Error('steps must be sequential starting from 1'); + }
10-30: Enhance mobile steps implementationConsider these improvements for better maintainability and performance:
- Replace magic number (-1) with a constant
- Memoize the function to prevent unnecessary recalculations
- Add more descriptive comments explaining the mobile view logic
+const ELLIPSIS_STEP = -1; +const MAX_MOBILE_STEPS = 3; + +const getMobileSteps = React.useMemo(() => { - if (steps.length <= 3) return steps; + if (steps.length <= MAX_MOBILE_STEPS) return steps; // Show current step and adjacent steps on mobile const mobileSteps = []; if (currentStep === 1) { - // At start, show first 2 steps + ellipsis - mobileSteps.push(steps[0], steps[1], { label: '...', step: -1 }); + // At start: Show steps 1-2 followed by ellipsis + // Example: [1, 2, ...] + mobileSteps.push(steps[0], steps[1], { label: '...', step: ELLIPSIS_STEP }); } else if (currentStep === steps.length) { - // At end, show ellipsis + last 2 steps + // At end: Show ellipsis followed by last two steps + // Example: [..., 4, 5] mobileSteps.push( - { label: '...', step: -1 }, + { label: '...', step: ELLIPSIS_STEP }, steps[steps.length - 2], steps[steps.length - 1] ); } else { - // In middle, show ellipsis + current step + next step - mobileSteps.push({ label: '...', step: -1 }, steps[currentStep - 1], steps[currentStep]); + // In middle: Show ellipsis, current step, and next step + // Example: [..., 3, 4] + mobileSteps.push( + { label: '...', step: ELLIPSIS_STEP }, + steps[currentStep - 1], + steps[currentStep] + ); } return mobileSteps; -}; +}, [steps, currentStep]);components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx (2)
Line range hint
42-43: Consider responsive design adjustments for mobileGiven this PR's focus on tablet and mobile breakpoints, the modal's max-width might need adjustment for smaller screens.
Consider updating the modal box classes to be more responsive:
- <div className="modal-box max-w-4xl mx-auto rounded-[24px] bg-[#F4F4FF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] shadow-lg"> + <div className="modal-box w-11/12 max-w-4xl mx-auto rounded-[24px] bg-[#F4F4FF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] shadow-lg sm:w-full">This change:
- Adds
w-11/12for better mobile spacing- Uses
sm:w-fullto reset width on larger screens- Maintains the max-width constraint for larger displays
Line range hint
41-82: Enhance modal accessibilityWhile the modal implementation is functional, it could benefit from improved accessibility features.
Consider these accessibility enhancements:
- <dialog id={`burn-modal-${denom?.base}`} className={`modal ${isOpen ? 'modal-open' : ''}`}> + <dialog + id={`burn-modal-${denom?.base}`} + className={`modal ${isOpen ? 'modal-open' : ''}`} + aria-labelledby="burn-modal-title" + aria-describedby="burn-modal-description" + role="dialog" + > <div className="modal-box max-w-4xl mx-auto rounded-[24px] bg-[#F4F4FF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] shadow-lg"> <form method="dialog" onSubmit={onClose}> - <button className="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2 text-[#00000099] dark:text-[#FFFFFF99] hover:bg-[#0000000A] dark:hover:bg-[#FFFFFF1A]"> + <button + className="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2 text-[#00000099] dark:text-[#FFFFFF99] hover:bg-[#0000000A] dark:hover:bg-[#FFFFFF1A]" + aria-label="Close modal" + > ✕ </button> </form> - <h3 className="text-xl font-semibold text-[#161616] dark:text-white mb-6"> + <h3 id="burn-modal-title" className="text-xl font-semibold text-[#161616] dark:text-white mb-6">These changes:
- Add proper ARIA attributes for screen readers
- Include descriptive labels for interactive elements
- Improve the semantic structure of the modal
components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx (1)
101-108: Consider improving mobile responsiveness of the button layoutWhile the current layout works well for desktop with
gap-6andw-[calc(50%-12px)], it might not provide the best experience on mobile devices. Consider stacking the buttons vertically on smaller screens.- <div className="flex gap-6 mt-6 mx-auto w-full"> - <Link href="/groups" className="w-[calc(50%-12px)]"> + <div className="flex flex-col sm:flex-row gap-4 sm:gap-6 mt-6 mx-auto w-full"> + <Link href="/groups" className="w-full sm:w-[calc(50%-12px)]"> <button className="btn btn-neutral w-full text-white">Back to Groups Page</button> </Link> <Link href={`/groups?policyAddress=${recentGroup?.policies[0].address}`} - className="w-[calc(50%-12px)]" + className="w-full sm:w-[calc(50%-12px)]" >Also, consider adding ARIA labels to improve accessibility:
- <button className="btn btn-neutral w-full text-white">Back to Groups Page</button> + <button className="btn btn-neutral w-full text-white" aria-label="Navigate back to groups page">Back to Groups Page</button> - <button className="btn btn-gradient w-full text-white">View Group</button> + <button className="btn btn-gradient w-full text-white" aria-label="View newly created group details">View Group</button>components/groups/forms/proposals/SuccessForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint
19-23: Improve grid layouts for better mobile responsivenessThe current grid layouts might be too cramped on mobile devices. Consider adjusting the column counts for different screen sizes.
Here are the suggested improvements:
- <div className="grid grid-cols-3 gap-4"> + <div className="grid grid-cols-1 sm:grid-cols-2 md:grid-cols-3 gap-4"> - <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-4"> + <div className="grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4"> - <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-4"> + <div className="grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4">Also, consider making the max-height constraints responsive:
- <div className="max-h-28 overflow-y-auto"> + <div className="max-h-40 md:max-h-28 overflow-y-auto"> - <div className="max-h-44 overflow-y-auto"> + <div className="max-h-56 md:max-h-44 overflow-y-auto"> - <div className="max-h-44 overflow-y-auto"> + <div className="max-h-56 md:max-h-44 overflow-y-auto">These changes will:
- Use single column on mobile for better readability
- Gradually increase columns as screen size grows
- Provide more vertical space on mobile for better content visibility
Also applies to: 45-54, 76-85
pages/factory/create.tsx (1)
104-104: Consider enhancing responsive layout classes for tablet/mobile.Given that this PR focuses on finalizing tablet and mobile breakpoints, consider adding explicit responsive classes to improve the layout at different screen sizes. For example:
- <div className="w-full justify-between space-y-8 min-h-screen items-center animate-fadeIn mt-4 overflow-hidden"> + <div className="w-full justify-between space-y-4 sm:space-y-6 md:space-y-8 min-h-screen items-center animate-fadeIn mt-2 sm:mt-4 overflow-hidden px-4 sm:px-6 md:px-8">This would provide better spacing and padding control across different screen sizes.
components/react/mobileNav.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-136: Consider implementing responsive breakpoints systematicallySince this PR focuses on tablet and mobile breakpoints, consider:
- Defining standard breakpoint constants
- Using CSS custom properties for consistent spacing
- Implementing a responsive testing strategy
Create a shared breakpoints configuration:
// constants/breakpoints.ts export const BREAKPOINTS = { mobile: '320px', mobileLarge: '425px', tablet: '768px', desktop: '1024px' } as const;Then use these in your components:
import { BREAKPOINTS } from '@/constants/breakpoints'; // Use in styled-components or CSS-in-JS const StyledNav = styled.nav` @media (min-width: ${BREAKPOINTS.tablet}) { // tablet styles } `;components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalDetailsForm.tsx (2)
126-129: Consider enhancing button accessibility.While the responsive padding improves touch targets, consider adding
aria-labelto provide more context about the action, especially when the text changes between breakpoints.<button type="submit" className="w-[calc(50%-12px)] btn py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 btn-gradient text-white disabled:text-black" + aria-label="Proceed to proposal messages section" onClick={nextStep} disabled={!isValid || !formData.proposers} >
Line range hint
1-138: Well-structured form component with good separation of concerns.The component demonstrates good architectural patterns:
- Form validation using Yup schema
- State management via React hooks and Formik
- Responsive UI with consistent breakpoints
- Clear separation between form logic and presentation
Consider extracting the button container into a reusable component since similar patterns might be used across other forms in the application.
pages/factory/index.tsx (2)
Line range hint
65-65: Enhance responsive design implementationGiven that this PR aims to finalize tablet and mobile breakpoints, consider adding more responsive design elements:
- Add appropriate padding/margin adjustments for different breakpoints
- Consider container width constraints for tablet/desktop
- Evaluate if the min-h-screen approach works well on mobile devices
Example improvements:
- <div className="min-h-screen relative py-4 px-2 mx-auto text-white mt-12 md:mt-0"> + <div className="min-h-screen relative py-4 px-4 md:px-6 lg:px-8 mx-auto text-white mt-8 md:mt-0 max-w-7xl">
76-107: Consider adding accessibility meta tagsWhile SEO meta tags are well covered, consider adding accessibility-related meta tags:
- Add language declaration
- Consider color contrast meta tags for dark mode
- Add aria-labels for interactive elements
Example additions:
+ <html lang="en" /> + <meta name="color-scheme" content="dark light" />pages/groups/create.tsx (1)
Line range hint
102-150: Add responsive breakpoints for tablet and mobile views.Given that this PR's objective is to finalize tablet and mobile breakpoints, the main content container and form components should include specific breakpoint classes for different screen sizes.
Consider adding responsive classes to the container div:
- <div className="w-full justify-between space-y-8 min-h-screen items-center animate-fadeIn mt-4 overflow-hidden"> + <div className="w-full justify-between space-y-8 md:space-y-6 sm:space-y-4 min-h-screen items-center animate-fadeIn mt-4 md:mt-3 sm:mt-2 overflow-hidden px-4 md:px-6 sm:px-3">Also consider adjusting the form containers for better mobile experience:
- <div className="transition-opacity duration-300 animate-fadeIn"> + <div className="transition-opacity duration-300 animate-fadeIn w-full max-w-2xl mx-auto px-4 md:px-6 sm:px-3">pages/groups/index.tsx (1)
Line range hint
31-31: Enhance responsive layout structureGiven this PR's focus on finalizing tablet and mobile breakpoints, consider enhancing the responsive layout:
- The main container only has basic responsive margin (
mt-12 md:mt-0)- Consider adding:
- Responsive padding for better content spacing
- Flexible grid/flex layouts for different screen sizes
- Touch-friendly spacing on mobile
-<div className="min-h-screen relative py-4 px-2 mx-auto text-white mt-12 md:mt-0"> +<div className="min-h-screen relative py-4 sm:py-6 px-2 sm:px-4 md:px-6 mx-auto text-white mt-12 md:mt-0">-<div className="flex-grow h-full animate-fadeIn h-screen transition-all duration-300"> +<div className="flex-grow h-full animate-fadeIn h-screen transition-all duration-300 container mx-auto px-2 sm:px-4 md:px-6">Also applies to: 71-71
components/factory/forms/TokenDetailsForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint
130-144: Consider adding hover/active states for better touch feedbackWhile the button layout is good, consider enhancing the touch feedback for mobile users.
- className="btn btn-neutral py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 w-[calc(50%-12px)]" + className="btn btn-neutral py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 w-[calc(50%-12px)] active:scale-95 transition-transform" - className="w-[calc(50%-12px)] btn px-5 py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 btn-gradient text-white disabled:text-black" + className="w-[calc(50%-12px)] btn px-5 py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 btn-gradient text-white disabled:text-black active:scale-95 transition-transform"pages/groups/submit-proposal/[policyAddress].tsx (3)
3-3: LGTM! Good architectural improvementMoving the StepIndicator to a shared react components folder improves reusability and maintains consistency across different sections of the application.
Line range hint
52-61: Good responsive implementation for the Confirmation stepThe responsive handling of the Confirmation step label is well implemented. Consider applying similar mobile-friendly labels to other steps for consistency.
const steps = [ - { label: 'Info', step: 1 }, - { label: 'Messages', step: 2 }, - { label: 'Metadata', step: 3 }, + { + label: ( + <> + <span className="hidden sm:inline">Information</span> + <span className="sm:hidden">Info</span> + </> + ), + step: 1 + }, + { + label: ( + <> + <span className="hidden sm:inline">Messages</span> + <span className="sm:hidden">Msgs</span> + </> + ), + step: 2 + }, + { + label: ( + <> + <span className="hidden sm:inline">Metadata</span> + <span className="sm:hidden">Meta</span> + </> + ), + step: 3 + }, { label: ( <>
Line range hint
114-116: Consider adding tablet-specific breakpointsWhile the mobile and desktop views are well handled, consider adding tablet-specific (
md:) breakpoints for optimal display on medium-sized screens, especially for the layout width and spacing.- <div className="w-full justify-between space-y-8 min-h-screen items-center animate-fadeIn mt-4 overflow-hidden"> + <div className="w-full md:w-11/12 lg:w-full justify-between space-y-6 md:space-y-8 min-h-screen items-center animate-fadeIn mt-4 overflow-hidden">components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx (1)
Line range hint
127-132: Consider adding responsive text for consistencyWhile the width calculation is good, consider matching the responsive text pattern used in the back button for consistency.
<button className="w-[calc(50%-12px)] btn px-5 py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 btn-gradient text-white disabled:text-black" onClick={() => handleSubmit()} disabled={!isValid || isSubmitting || isValidating} > - Next: Token Metadata + <span className="hidden sm:inline">Next: Token Metadata</span> + <span className="sm:hidden">Next</span> </button>components/factory/forms/ConfirmationForm.tsx (2)
156-157: Approve button layout improvements with responsive designThe changes improve the button layout and responsiveness:
- Consistent spacing using
gap-6- Equal width buttons with precise calculations
- Responsive padding for different screen sizes
Consider extracting these button styles into a shared component or utility class since similar button layouts are used across multiple forms in the application. This would maintain consistency and reduce code duplication.
Also applies to: 163-163
Line range hint
92-93: Consider adding responsive grid layouts for mobileThe current grid layout uses a fixed
grid-cols-2which might not be optimal for mobile screens. Consider making the grid responsive:- <div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-4"> + <div className="grid grid-cols-1 sm:grid-cols-2 gap-4">This would stack the information cards vertically on mobile screens for better readability while maintaining the two-column layout on larger screens.
pages/bank.tsx (1)
129-133: Improve description text formattingThe description text uses unnecessary template literal style and has potential spacing issues due to indentation.
Consider simplifying the text formatting:
<WalletNotConnected - description=" Use the button below to connect your wallet and start interacting with your - tokens." + description="Use the button below to connect your wallet and start interacting with your tokens." icon={<BankIcon className="h-60 w-60 text-primary" />} />tailwind.config.js (1)
12-16: The breakpoint values look good but need documentationThe new breakpoints follow common practices:
xxs: '320px'andxs: '375px'cover important mobile device widths'3xl': '2560px'supports ultra-wide displaysConsider adding comments to document the intended use case for each breakpoint:
screens: { + // Ultra-wide/4K displays '3xl': '2560px', + // Small mobile devices (iPhone SE, Galaxy S8+) xxs: '320px', + // Modern mobile devices (iPhone X/11/12/13) xs: '375px', },components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx (2)
Line range hint
98-99: Consider adding more responsive breakpointsGiven this PR's focus on tablet and mobile breakpoints, consider enhancing the responsive design:
- The modal width (
max-w-4xl) might need adjustment for smaller screens- The grid layout could benefit from more granular breakpoints
- <div className="modal-box max-w-4xl mx-auto p-6 bg-[#F4F4FF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] rounded-[24px] shadow-lg"> + <div className="modal-box w-full max-w-4xl mx-auto p-4 sm:p-6 bg-[#F4F4FF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] rounded-[24px] shadow-lg"> - <div className="grid gap-6 sm:grid-cols-2"> + <div className="grid gap-4 sm:gap-6 md:grid-cols-2">Also applies to: 128-129
Line range hint
149-150: Improve button layout responsivenessThe button layout could be more mobile-friendly:
- <div className="mt-4 flex justify-center w-full"> + <div className="mt-4 flex flex-col sm:flex-row justify-center w-full gap-2 sm:gap-4"> - <button className="btn btn-gradient ml-4 text-white" + <button className="btn btn-gradient text-white"Also applies to: 162-163
components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx (2)
99-99: Add aria-labelledby for better accessibilityWhile the modal implementation is correct, consider adding an aria-labelledby attribute to improve accessibility.
- <dialog id={modalId} className="modal"> + <dialog id={modalId} className="modal" aria-labelledby={`${modalId}-title`}>Then add the corresponding id to the title:
- <h3 className="font-bold text-lg">{group.ipfsMetadata?.title}</h3> + <h3 id={`${modalId}-title`} className="font-bold text-lg">{group.ipfsMetadata?.title}</h3>
180-188: Consider extracting slice lengths as named constantsThe implementation of responsive address display is good, but the magic numbers for slice lengths (24 and 14) could be extracted as named constants for better maintainability.
+const ADDRESS_SLICE_LENGTHS = { + DESKTOP: 24, + MOBILE: 14 +} as const; + function InfoItem({ // ... }) { return ( // ... - <TruncatedAddressWithCopy address={value} slice={24} /> + <TruncatedAddressWithCopy address={value} slice={ADDRESS_SLICE_LENGTHS.DESKTOP} /> // ... - <TruncatedAddressWithCopy address={value} slice={14} /> + <TruncatedAddressWithCopy address={value} slice={ADDRESS_SLICE_LENGTHS.MOBILE} />pages/_app.tsx (2)
58-70: Consider enhancing the drawer visibility state management.The implementation correctly handles SSR and persistence, but could benefit from some improvements:
Consider extracting this logic into a custom hook for better reusability and type safety:
+const usePersistedDrawerState = (key: string, defaultValue: boolean) => { + const [state, setState] = useState(() => { + try { + if (typeof window !== 'undefined') { + const saved = localStorage.getItem(key); + return saved !== null ? JSON.parse(saved) : defaultValue; + } + return defaultValue; + } catch { + return defaultValue; + } + }); + + useEffect(() => { + try { + localStorage.setItem(key, JSON.stringify(state)); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to save drawer state:', error); + } + }, [key, state]); + + return [state, setState] as const; +}; -const [isDrawerVisible, setDrawerVisible] = useState(() => { - if (typeof window !== 'undefined') { - const saved = localStorage.getItem('isDrawerVisible'); - return saved !== null ? JSON.parse(saved) : true; - } - return true; -}); - -useEffect(() => { - localStorage.setItem('isDrawerVisible', JSON.stringify(isDrawerVisible)); -}, [isDrawerVisible]); +const [isDrawerVisible, setDrawerVisible] = usePersistedDrawerState('isDrawerVisible', true);
Line range hint
246-259: Responsive layout implementation looks solid.The implementation properly handles different viewport sizes:
- Mobile: Full width with mobile navigation
- Tablet (md): Shows sidebar
- Desktop (lg): Adjustable sidebar width with smooth transitions
Consider documenting the breakpoint strategy in a shared configuration file to maintain consistency across the application. This would help other developers understand and follow the same patterns.
components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx (3)
Line range hint
221-229: Simplify form validation logicThe current implementation uses both local state tracking and Formik's built-in validation, which could lead to race conditions or inconsistencies.
Consider this simplified approach:
- disabled={ - !isValidForm || - !formData.authors || - formData.authors.length === 0 || - (Array.isArray(formData.authors) && - formData.authors.some(author => author.trim() === '')) - } + disabled={!isValid || !values.authors?.length || values.authors.some(author => !author.trim())}This change:
- Removes dependency on local state
- Uses Formik's
isValidflag- Simplifies the empty check logic
Line range hint
16-43: Add safeguards to authors managementThe current implementation lacks constraints on the number of authors and could benefit from optimization.
Consider these improvements:
authors: Yup.lazy(val => Array.isArray(val) ? Yup.array() .of( Yup.string().test( 'author-validation', 'Invalid author name or address', function (value) { if (value?.startsWith('manifest')) { return isValidManifestAddress(value); } return Yup.string() .max(50, 'Author name must not exceed 50 characters') .noProfanity('Profanity is not allowed') .isValidSync(value); } ) ) .min(1, 'At least one author is required') + .max(10, 'Maximum of 10 authors allowed')Also consider:
- Adding debounce to validation checks
- Implementing virtual scrolling for large author lists
- Adding batch validation for better performance
Line range hint
154-167: Optimize modal state managementThe current modal implementation manages state locally and updates multiple state sources on contact selection.
Consider these improvements:
- const [isContactsOpen, setIsContactsOpen] = useState(false); - const [activeAuthorIndex, setActiveAuthorIndex] = useState<number | null>(null); + const handleContactSelect = (selectedAddress: string, index: number) => { + const newAuthors = [...authors]; + newAuthors[index] = selectedAddress; + setFieldValue('authors', newAuthors); + updateField('authors', newAuthors); + }; // In the modal component - onSelect={(selectedAddress: string) => { - if (activeAuthorIndex !== null) { - const newAuthors = [...authors]; - newAuthors[activeAuthorIndex] = selectedAddress; - setFieldValue('authors', newAuthors); - updateField('authors', newAuthors); - setActiveAuthorIndex(null); - } - }} + onSelect={(selectedAddress: string) => handleContactSelect(selectedAddress, index)}This refactor:
- Encapsulates contact selection logic
- Reduces state management complexity
- Improves code maintainability
components/wallet.tsx (4)
Line range hint
124-139: Refactor duplicated copy functionalityThe copy-to-clipboard functionality is duplicated between buttons. Consider extracting this into a reusable function.
+ const handleCopy = (buttonId: string, text: string) => { + navigator.clipboard.writeText(text); + const button = document.getElementById(buttonId); + if (button) { + const originalContent = button.innerHTML; + button.innerHTML = '<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="w-4 h-4 text-primary" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="currentColor"><path d="M9 2a1 1 0 000 2h2a1 1 0 100-2H9z" /><path fill-rule="evenodd" d="M4 5a2 2 0 012-2 3 3 0 003 3h2a3 3 0 003-3 2 2 0 012 2v11a2 2 0 01-2 2H6a2 2 0 01-2-2V5zm9.707 5.707a1 1 0 00-1.414-1.414L9 12.586l-1.293-1.293a1 1 0 00-1.414 1.414l2 2a1 1 0 001.414 0l4-4z" clip-rule="evenodd" /></svg>'; + setTimeout(() => { + button.innerHTML = originalContent; + }, 2000); + } + };Then use it in both places:
- onClick={() => { - navigator.clipboard.writeText(address || ''); - const button = document.getElementById('copyButton2'); - if (button) { - const originalContent = button.innerHTML; - button.innerHTML = '...'; - setTimeout(() => { - button.innerHTML = originalContent; - }, 2000); - } - }} + onClick={() => handleCopy('copyButton2', address || '')}Also applies to: 182-197
Line range hint
108-114: Consider moving the background image URL to a configurationThe background image URL is hardcoded. Consider moving it to a configuration object or environment variable for better maintainability.
+ const WALLET_BACKGROUND_IMAGE = '/flower.svg'; style={{ - backgroundImage: 'url("/flower.svg")', + backgroundImage: `url("${WALLET_BACKGROUND_IMAGE}")`, backgroundSize: 'cover', backgroundPosition: 'center', backgroundRepeat: 'no-repeat', }}
Line range hint
207-211: Simplify onClick handler logicThe onClick handler assignment can be simplified by using the existing
onClickConnectfunction.- onClick={ - status === WalletStatus.Disconnected || status === WalletStatus.Rejected - ? onClick - : () => {} - } + onClick={status === WalletStatus.Disconnected || status === WalletStatus.Rejected ? onClickConnect : undefined}
Line range hint
266-268: Improve responsive design for wallet section widthThe hardcoded width of 50% might not be optimal for all screen sizes. Consider using Tailwind's responsive classes for better adaptability.
- <div className="w-[50%]"> + <div className="w-full md:w-3/4 lg:w-1/2">components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx (4)
102-102: Consider responsive font sizing for the token nameWhile truncation helps prevent overflow, consider adding responsive font sizes for better readability on mobile devices.
-<p className="font-semibold text-md truncate text-black dark:text-white"> +<p className="font-semibold text-md md:text-lg truncate text-black dark:text-white">
112-112: Ensure balance remains readable on narrow screensThe truncate class is appropriate here, but consider adding minimum width constraints for mobile views.
-<p className="font-semibold text-md text-black truncate dark:text-white"> +<p className="font-semibold text-md text-black truncate min-w-[120px] dark:text-white">
231-235: Improve button label responsivenessThe current implementation handles long token names well, but consider adding responsive padding and font sizes for better mobile display.
-className="btn btn-gradient btn-md flex-grow text-white" +className="btn btn-gradient btn-sm md:btn-md flex-grow text-white px-2 md:px-4"
Line range hint
1-267: Consider additional responsive improvementsWhile the current changes address text truncation, consider these additional improvements for better mobile/tablet experience:
- Add responsive spacing in the form layout
- Adjust input field sizes for touch targets
- Consider a more compact layout for the contacts button on mobile
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (3)
77-98: Enhance accessibility and styling consistencyWhile the responsive layout is well-structured, there are a few improvements that could be made:
- Add proper ARIA attributes to the search input
- Consider moving inline styles to Tailwind classes for consistency
<input type="text" placeholder="Search for a validator..." + aria-label="Search validators" className="input input-bordered w-full h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] pl-10" value={searchTerm} onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} /> <h1 - className="text-black dark:text-white" - style={{ fontSize: '20px', fontWeight: 700, lineHeight: '24px' }} + className="text-black dark:text-white text-xl font-bold leading-6" >
121-168: Improve loading state accessibility and code organizationThe loading state implementation could be enhanced with proper ARIA attributes and better organization.
- Add aria-busy state to the table during loading
- Consider making the skeleton count configurable
- Fix inconsistent spacing in className attributes
-<table className="table w-full border-separate border-spacing-y-3"> +<table + className="table w-full border-separate border-spacing-y-3" + aria-busy={isLoading} +> <thead> <tr className="text-sm font-medium text-[#808080]" role="row"> - <th className=" hidden lg:table-cell bg-transparent text-left sticky top-0 bg-base-100 z-10"> + <th className="hidden lg:table-cell bg-transparent text-left sticky top-0 bg-base-100 z-10">Consider extracting the skeleton count to a constant:
+const SKELETON_ROW_COUNT = 4; -{Array(4) +{Array(SKELETON_ROW_COUNT) .fill(0) .map((_, index) => (
241-255: Improve modal implementation robustnessThe modal implementation could be enhanced for better reliability and error handling.
- Use more predictable modal IDs
- Add error boundaries
- Consider using a modal context for better state management
+const getModalId = (address: string) => `validator-modal-${address}`; -modalId={modalId || ''} +modalId={selectedValidator ? getModalId(selectedValidator.operator_address) : ''} +<ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Something went wrong</div>}> <ValidatorDetailsModal key={modalKey} validator={selectedValidator} - modalId={modalId || ''} + modalId={selectedValidator ? getModalId(selectedValidator.operator_address) : ''} admin={admin} totalvp={totalvp.toString()} validatorVPArray={validatorVPArray} /> +</ErrorBoundary>components/groups/modals/memberManagmentModal.tsx (3)
Line range hint
175-180: Enhance modal accessibilityThe modal dialog should include proper ARIA attributes for better screen reader support.
Apply these accessibility improvements:
-<dialog id={modalId} className="modal z-[150]"> +<dialog + id={modalId} + className="modal z-[150]" + aria-labelledby={`${modalId}-title`} + aria-modal="true" +> <div className="flex flex-col items-center w-full h-full"> - <div className="modal-box dark:bg-[#1D192D] bg-[#FFFFFF] rounded-[24px] max-w-[39rem] p-6 dark:text-white text-black"> + <div className="modal-box dark:bg-[#1D192D] bg-[#FFFFFF] rounded-[24px] max-w-[39rem] p-6 dark:text-white text-black" role="document"> <form method="dialog"> - <button className="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2">✕</button> + <button className="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2" aria-label="Close modal">✕</button> </form>
Line range hint
198-344: Simplify form submission patternThe current implementation uses a ref to store the submit handler, which is an anti-pattern. Consider using the form's onSubmit handler directly.
Refactor the form submission logic:
-submitFormRef.current = handleSubmit; return ( <> <div className="z-[9999]"> <TailwindModal // ... existing props ... /> </div> - <Form> + <Form onSubmit={handleSubmit}> {/* ... form fields ... */} <div className="mt-4 gap-6 flex justify-center w-full"> <button type="button" className="btn w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-md focus:outline-none dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#0000000A]" onClick={() => (document.getElementById(modalId) as HTMLDialogElement)?.close()} > Cancel </button> <button - type="button" + type="submit" className="btn btn-md w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-gradient text-white" - onClick={() => submitFormRef.current?.()} disabled={isSigning || !isValid} > {isSigning ? 'Signing...' : 'Save'} </button> </div> </Form>
Line range hint
201-216: Improve modal interaction UXCurrently, the parent modal is closed when opening the contacts modal, which could lead to a disorienting user experience and potential state loss.
Consider these improvements:
- Keep the parent modal open but disable interaction with it
- Use a stacking context to show contacts modal above the parent modal
<div className="z-[9999]"> <TailwindModal isOpen={isContactsOpen} setOpen={setIsContactsOpen} showContacts={true} showMemberManagementModal={true} onSelect={(selectedAddress: string) => { if (activeIndex !== null) { const fieldName = `members.${activeIndex}.address`; setFieldValue(fieldName, selectedAddress); } setIsContactsOpen(false); - (document.getElementById(modalId) as HTMLDialogElement)?.close(); }} currentAddress={address} /> </div>Also, add CSS to handle modal stacking:
.modal-open .modal-box { pointer-events: none; opacity: 0.5; } .modal-open .tailwind-modal { pointer-events: auto; opacity: 1; }components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx (2)
85-98: Consider moving formatAmount to a shared utility fileThe
formatAmountfunction is well-implemented with proper error handling, but it could be reused across other components that need to format token amounts.Consider moving this function to a shared utility file (e.g.,
utils/format.ts) to promote code reuse:// utils/format.ts export function formatTokenAmount(amount: string | null | undefined, exponent: number): string { if (amount == null) { return '-'; } try { return Number(shiftDigits(amount, -exponent)).toLocaleString(undefined, { maximumFractionDigits: exponent, }); } catch (error) { console.warn('Error formatting amount:', error); return 'x'; } }
Line range hint
307-353: Enhance form layout for mobile devicesThe form layout needs improvements for mobile responsiveness.
Apply these changes for better mobile layout:
-<div className="flex space-x-4 mt-8"> +<div className="flex flex-col sm:flex-row space-y-4 sm:space-y-0 sm:space-x-4 mt-8"> -<div className="flex-grow relative"> +<div className="w-full sm:flex-grow relative"> -<button className="btn btn-error disabled:bg-error/40 disabled:text-white/40 btn-md flex-grow text-white" +<button className="btn btn-error disabled:bg-error/40 disabled:text-white/40 btn-md w-full text-white text-sm sm:text-base"This will:
- Stack inputs vertically on mobile
- Use full width for inputs on mobile
- Adjust text size for better readability
components/react/views/Contacts.tsx (1)
Line range hint
266-280: Consider improving modal managementThe current implementation uses direct DOM manipulation for modal handling, which could be improved:
if (showMemberManagementModal) { (document.getElementById('member-management-modal') as HTMLDialogElement).showModal(); } if (showMessageEditModal) { (document.getElementById('message_edit_modal') as HTMLDialogElement).showModal(); }Consider using a modal management system or context to handle modal states instead of direct DOM manipulation. This would:
- Improve testability
- Reduce coupling
- Make the code more maintainable
Consider implementing a modal context or using a modal management library to handle modal states declaratively instead of imperatively.
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx (3)
119-136: LGTM: Responsive layout improvements with a minor suggestionThe responsive layout changes effectively handle different screen sizes. Consider adding an aria-label to the search input for better accessibility.
<input type="text" placeholder="Search for a token..." + aria-label="Search for a token" className="input input-bordered w-full h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] pl-10" value={searchQuery} onChange={e => setSearchQuery(e.target.value)} />
165-204: LGTM: Improved loading state with a performance suggestionThe skeleton loader implementation matches the table structure well. Consider memoizing the skeleton rows to prevent unnecessary re-renders.
+ const SkeletonRows = memo(() => ( + <> + {Array(10).fill(0).map((_, index) => ( + <tr key={index}> + {/* ... existing skeleton structure ... */} + </tr> + ))} + </> + )); + {isLoading - ? Array(10).fill(0).map((_, index) => ( - // ... existing skeleton structure ... - )) + ? <SkeletonRows /> : filteredDenoms.map(denom => (
331-357: Consider improving the truncation logicWhile the responsive layout changes look good, the current truncation logic might cut off important information. Consider implementing an ellipsis with tooltip for truncated values.
+ const TruncatedText = ({ text, maxLength }) => { + const isTruncated = text.length > maxLength; + return ( + <span title={isTruncated ? text : undefined}> + {isTruncated ? `${text.slice(0, maxLength)}...` : text} + </span> + ); + }; - <span className="font-medium xxs:max-xs:hidden block"> - {denom.display.startsWith('factory') - ? denom.display.split('/').pop()?.toUpperCase() - : truncateString(denom.display, 12)} - </span> + <span className="font-medium xxs:max-xs:hidden block"> + <TruncatedText + text={denom.display.startsWith('factory') + ? denom.display.split('/').pop()?.toUpperCase() + : denom.display} + maxLength={12} + /> + </span>components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (2)
256-270: Enhance search input accessibilityWhile the responsive layout looks good, consider adding accessibility improvements to the search input:
<div className="relative w-full sm:w-[224px]"> + <label htmlFor="proposal-search" className="sr-only"> + Search proposals + </label> <input type="text" + id="proposal-search" + role="searchbox" + aria-label="Search proposals" placeholder="Search for a proposal..." className="input input-bordered w-full h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] pl-10" value={searchTerm} onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} /> <SearchIcon className="absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400" /> </div>
293-295: Improve table accessibility for responsive designWhile hiding columns on mobile works, consider adding aria attributes and ensuring screen readers understand the responsive behavior:
-<th className="bg-transparent px-4 py-2 w-[25%] hidden md:table-cell">Time Left</th> +<th className="bg-transparent px-4 py-2 w-[25%] hidden md:table-cell" aria-hidden="true">Time Left</th> -<td className="hidden md:table-cell dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFF] px-4 py-4 w-[25%]"> +<td className="hidden md:table-cell dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFF] px-4 py-4 w-[25%]" aria-hidden="true">Also, consider adding a mobile-friendly summary of hidden information:
+<td className="md:hidden dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFF] px-4 py-4"> + <span className="sr-only">Additional Details:</span> + <div className="text-sm text-gray-600"> + {timeLeft} • {status} + </div> +</td>Also applies to: 351-364
components/groups/modals/updateGroupModal.tsx (3)
452-470: Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility of action buttonsWhile the button layout is improved, consider these enhancements:
- For very small screens, stack buttons vertically using flex-col for better touch targets
- Add aria-label attributes to buttons for better screen reader support
- Consider adding hover/focus states for better interactive feedback
- <div className="mt-4 gap-6 flex justify-center w-full"> + <div className="mt-4 gap-6 flex flex-col sm:flex-row justify-center w-full"> <button type="button" - className="btn w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-md focus:outline-none dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#0000000A]" + className="btn w-full sm:w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-md focus:outline-none dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#0000000A] hover:opacity-80 focus:ring-2" + aria-label="Cancel group update" onClick={() => (document.getElementById('update-group-modal') as HTMLDialogElement).close() } > Cancel </button> <button type="submit" - className="btn btn-md w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-gradient text-white" + className="btn btn-md w-full sm:w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-gradient text-white hover:opacity-80 focus:ring-2" + aria-label="Update group settings" onClick={() => handleConfirm(values)} disabled={isSigning || !isValid || !hasAnyChanges(values)} > {isSigning ? 'Signing...' : 'Update'} </button> </div>
Line range hint
1-470: Improve modal dialog accessibilityThe modal implementation needs additional accessibility enhancements to comply with ARIA best practices:
- Add proper ARIA attributes for the modal dialog
- Implement focus trap within the modal
- Add keyboard navigation support
Consider using a battle-tested modal library like
@headlessui/reactthat handles these accessibility concerns out of the box, or implement the following changes:- <dialog id="update-group-modal" className="modal"> + <dialog + id="update-group-modal" + className="modal" + role="dialog" + aria-labelledby="modal-title" + aria-modal="true" + > <Formik initialValues={{ name: name, authors: authors, summary: summary, forum: forum, description: description, threshold: threshold, votingPeriod: votingPeriod, }} validationSchema={validationSchema} onSubmit={handleConfirm} enableReinitialize > {({ setFieldValue, values, isValid, dirty, errors, touched }) => ( <> <div className="flex flex-col items-center w-full h-full"> <div className="modal-box dark:bg-[#1D192D] bg-[#FFFFFF] rounded-[24px] max-w-4xl p-6 dark:text-white text-black"> <form method="dialog"> <button className="btn btn-sm btn-circle btn-ghost absolute right-2 top-2" + aria-label="Close modal" > ✕ </button> </form> - <h3 className="text-2xl font-semibold mb-4">Update Group</h3> + <h3 id="modal-title" className="text-2xl font-semibold mb-4">Update Group</h3>Also, consider adding a custom hook for focus management:
import { useEffect } from 'react'; function useFocusTrap(modalRef: React.RefObject<HTMLElement>) { useEffect(() => { const modal = modalRef.current; if (!modal) return; const focusableElements = modal.querySelectorAll( 'button, [href], input, select, textarea, [tabindex]:not([tabindex="-1"])' ); const firstFocusableElement = focusableElements[0] as HTMLElement; const lastFocusableElement = focusableElements[focusableElements.length - 1] as HTMLElement; function handleKeyDown(e: KeyboardEvent) { if (e.key === 'Tab') { if (e.shiftKey) { if (document.activeElement === firstFocusableElement) { lastFocusableElement.focus(); e.preventDefault(); } } else { if (document.activeElement === lastFocusableElement) { firstFocusableElement.focus(); e.preventDefault(); } } } if (e.key === 'Escape') { modal.close(); } } modal.addEventListener('keydown', handleKeyDown); firstFocusableElement.focus(); return () => { modal.removeEventListener('keydown', handleKeyDown); }; }, [modalRef]); }
Line range hint
1-470: Improve error handling and user feedbackThe current error handling implementation could be enhanced to provide better user feedback:
- Add toast notifications for transaction failures
- Show loading state during fee estimation
- Improve visual feedback for validation errors
Consider implementing these improvements:
const handleConfirm = async (values: any) => { setIsSigning(true); + setEstimatingFee(true); try { const encodedMessages = buildMessages(); if (encodedMessages.length === 0) { setIsSigning(false); + toast.error('No changes detected.'); return; } const { submitProposal } = cosmos.group.v1.MessageComposer.withTypeUrl; const msg = submitProposal({ groupPolicyAddress: policyAddress, proposers: [address], metadata: '', messages: encodedMessages, exec: 0, title: 'Update Group', summary: 'Update Group', }); let fee; try { fee = await estimateFee(address, [msg]); } catch (feeError) { setIsSigning(false); + setEstimatingFee(false); console.error('Error estimating fee:', feeError); + toast.error('Failed to estimate transaction fee. Please try again.'); throw new Error('Failed to estimate transaction fee. Please try again.'); } + setEstimatingFee(false); await tx([msg], { fee, onSuccess: () => { setIsSigning(false); + toast.success('Group updated successfully!'); onUpdate(); }, + onError: (error) => { + console.error('Transaction failed:', error); + toast.error('Failed to update group. Please try again.'); + } }); setIsSigning(false); } catch (error) { console.error('Error in handleConfirm:', error); setIsSigning(false); + toast.error('An unexpected error occurred. Please try again.'); } };Also, enhance the validation error display:
<NumberInput label="Threshold" name="threshold" placeholder="Threshold" value={values.threshold} onChange={(e: React.ChangeEvent<HTMLInputElement>) => { const value = Math.max(1, parseInt(e.target.value) || 1); setThreshold(value.toString()); setFieldValue('threshold', value); }} min={1} + error={touched.threshold && errors.threshold} + className={touched.threshold && errors.threshold ? 'border-red-500' : ''} />hooks/useQueries.ts (4)
783-788: Add type constraints for pagination parametersConsider adding type constraints to ensure the pagination parameters are positive numbers.
export const useSendTxIncludingAddressQuery = ( address: string, direction?: 'send' | 'receive', - page: number = 1, - pageSize: number = 10 + page: number = 1, + pageSize: number = 10 ) => { + if (page < 1 || pageSize < 1) { + throw new Error('Page and pageSize must be positive numbers'); + }
826-826: Remove debug console.log statementDebug logging should not be present in production code.
- console.log('Total count:', totalCount); // Debug log
Line range hint
783-854: Enhance error handling and API URL configurationSeveral improvements can be made to make the code more robust and maintainable:
- The API URL should be configurable through environment variables
- Error handling should be more specific to different types of errors
- Input validation for the address parameter should be added
+const API_BASE_URL = process.env.REACT_APP_INDEXER_API_URL || 'https://testnet-indexer.liftedinit.tech'; + export const useSendTxIncludingAddressQuery = ( address: string, direction?: 'send' | 'receive', page: number = 1, pageSize: number = 10 ) => { + // Validate address + if (!address || typeof address !== 'string') { + throw new Error('Invalid address provided'); + } + const fetchTransactions = async () => { - const baseUrl = 'https://testnet-indexer.liftedinit.tech/transactions'; + const baseUrl = `${API_BASE_URL}/transactions`; // ... rest of the code ... try { // ... existing try block ... } catch (error) { - console.error('Error fetching transactions:', error); - throw error; + if (axios.isAxiosError(error)) { + if (error.response?.status === 404) { + throw new Error('Transaction data not found'); + } + if (error.response?.status === 429) { + throw new Error('Rate limit exceeded. Please try again later'); + } + throw new Error(`Failed to fetch transactions: ${error.message}`); + } + throw new Error('An unexpected error occurred while fetching transactions'); } };
866-868: Consider adding data transformation typesThe return types for
sendTxs,totalCount, andtotalPagesshould be explicitly defined for better type safety.+interface Transaction { + tx_hash: string; + block_number: number; + formatted_date: string; + data: { + from_address: string; + to_address: string; + amount: Array<{ + amount: string; + denom: string; + }>; + }; +} +interface QueryResult { + sendTxs: Transaction[] | undefined; + totalCount: number | undefined; + totalPages: number; + isLoading: boolean; + isError: boolean; + error: Error | null; + refetch: () => void; +}components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMessages.tsx (1)
667-674: LGTM! Consider making the next button text responsive too.The button layout changes look good. The width calculation
w-[calc(50%-12px)]correctly accounts for the gap spacing, ensuring consistent button widths and spacing.For consistency with the prev button's responsive text, consider adding a responsive variant for the next button:
- Next: Proposal Metadata + <span className="hidden sm:inline">Next: Proposal Metadata</span> + <span className="sm:hidden">Next: Metadata</span>components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx (2)
36-36: MakepageSizeconfigurableThe
pageSizeis currently hardcoded to10on line 36~. Consider makingpageSizea prop or a configurable constant to allow flexibility in how many items are displayed per page.Apply this diff to make
pageSizea prop:And update the usage in
useSendTxIncludingAddressQuery:
172-261: Simplify nested conditional renderingThe rendering logic between lines 172~ and 261~ contains multiple nested ternary operators and conditional blocks, which may reduce readability and maintainability.
Consider refactoring this section by extracting parts into separate components or using early returns to simplify the conditionals. For example:
- Create separate components for the loading state, error state, and the main content.
- Use early returns to handle loading and error states before the main return statement.
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (2)
83-95: Refactor repeated member mapping logic into a reusable functionThe logic for transforming
group.membersis repeated in multiple places. Consider extracting this into a utility function or custom hook to improve code reuse and maintainability.Here's how you might refactor the code:
- Create a utility function
transformGroupMembers:function transformGroupMembers( group: ExtendedGroupType ): MemberSDKType[] { return group.members.map(member => ({ ...member.member, address: member.member?.address || '', weight: member.member?.weight || '0', metadata: member.member?.metadata || '', added_at: member.member?.added_at || new Date(), isCoreMember: true, isActive: true, isAdmin: member.member?.address === group.admin, isPolicyAdmin: member.member?.address === group.policies[0]?.admin, })); }
- Use the utility function in your code:
In the
useEffecthook (lines 83-95):if (group) { - setMembers( - group.members.map(member => ({ - ... // mapping logic - })) - ); + setMembers(transformGroupMembers(group)); setGroupId(group.id.toString()); setGroupAdmin(group.admin); }In the
MemberManagementModalcomponent (lines 256-266):<MemberManagementModal modalId={`member-management-modal-${group.id}`} - members={group.members.map(member => ({ - ... // mapping logic - }))} + members={transformGroupMembers(group)} groupId={group.id.toString()} // other props />Also applies to: 256-266
302-310: Use React refs instead ofdocument.getElementByIdDirectly manipulating the DOM with
document.getElementByIdis not recommended in React. Using React refs provides a more robust and React-friendly way to interact with DOM elements.Here's how you can refactor the modal handling:
- Create refs for the modals:
import React, { useRef } from 'react'; function GroupRow(...) { const infoModalRef = useRef<HTMLDialogElement | null>(null); const memberModalRef = useRef<HTMLDialogElement | null>(null); // Update open functions to use refs const openInfoModal = (e: React.MouseEvent) => { e.stopPropagation(); infoModalRef.current?.showModal(); }; const openMemberModal = (e: React.MouseEvent) => { e.stopPropagation(); memberModalRef.current?.showModal(); }; // rest of the code }
- Pass refs to the modal components:
// When rendering the modals (lines 247-273): <GroupInfo // other props + innerRef={infoModalRef} /> <MemberManagementModal // other props + innerRef={memberModalRef} />
- Modify modal components to accept refs:
In
GroupInfoandMemberManagementModal, forward the ref to the<dialog>element:// Example for GroupInfo component import React, { forwardRef } from 'react'; export const GroupInfo = forwardRef<HTMLDialogElement, GroupInfoProps>((props, ref) => { return ( <dialog ref={ref}> {/* modal content */} </dialog> ); });This approach ensures you're using React's way of handling DOM elements, which aligns with best practices.
Also applies to: 312-318
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (44)
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx(1 hunks)components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx(4 hunks)components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx(6 hunks)components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx(7 hunks)components/factory/forms/ConfirmationForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx(4 hunks)components/factory/forms/TokenDetailsForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx(2 hunks)components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx(4 hunks)components/groups/components/StepIndicator.tsx(0 hunks)components/groups/components/__tests__/StepIndicator.test.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx(6 hunks)components/groups/components/index.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx(10 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/ConfirmationForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/GroupPolicyForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/MemberInfoForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/proposals/ConfirmationForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalDetailsForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMessages.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMetadataForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/proposals/SuccessForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx(5 hunks)components/groups/modals/memberManagmentModal.tsx(7 hunks)components/groups/modals/updateGroupModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/StepIndicator.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/mobileNav.tsx(3 hunks)components/react/views/Contacts.tsx(2 hunks)components/wallet.tsx(1 hunks)hooks/useQueries.ts(4 hunks)pages/_app.tsx(3 hunks)pages/admins.tsx(1 hunks)pages/bank.tsx(2 hunks)pages/factory/create.tsx(3 hunks)pages/factory/index.tsx(1 hunks)pages/groups/create.tsx(2 hunks)pages/groups/index.tsx(4 hunks)pages/groups/submit-proposal/[policyAddress].tsx(2 hunks)tailwind.config.js(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- components/groups/components/StepIndicator.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (7)
- components/groups/components/tests/StepIndicator.test.tsx
- components/groups/components/index.tsx
- components/groups/forms/groups/ConfirmationForm.tsx
- components/groups/forms/groups/MemberInfoForm.tsx
- components/groups/forms/proposals/ConfirmationForm.tsx
- components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMetadataForm.tsx
- pages/admins.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (4)
components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#9
File: components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx:106-120
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T13:03:18.927Z
Learning: In the file `components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx`, the submit button is intentionally placed outside the `Form` component for stylistic reasons, as per the user's preference, even if it requires some workarounds.
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#9
File: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx:184-184
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T13:03:18.927Z
Learning: In `components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx`, it's acceptable to pass the entire `selectedGroup` object as the `policyThreshold` prop to the `GroupProposals` component, even if the expected type is `ThresholdDecisionPolicy`.
components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMessages.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#9
File: components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMessages.tsx:163-315
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T13:03:18.927Z
Learning: In `components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMessages.tsx`, the switch-case statement in the `handleChangeMessage` function is intentionally designed to support specific requests made by the team and should remain as is.
components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#9
File: components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx:121-155
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T13:03:18.927Z
Learning: When reviewing the `InfoItem` component in `components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx`, avoid suggesting enhancements for typings and accessibility if the current implementation is sufficient, as addresses and names are always fetched from the chain as implemented.
🔇 Additional comments (47)
components/react/StepIndicator.tsx (1)
35-35: Verify breakpoint consistency across the application
The component uses the sm breakpoint for responsive design. Ensure this aligns with the breakpoint strategy mentioned in the PR objectives for tablet and mobile views.
Also applies to: 53-53
✅ Verification successful
Breakpoint usage is consistent with Tailwind's default configuration
The sm breakpoint usage in the component aligns with Tailwind's default mobile-first approach, where sm represents the standard tablet breakpoint (640px and above). The codebase consistently uses sm: prefix for tablet-and-up responsive styles, with mobile styles as the default, which matches the PR objectives for tablet and mobile breakpoints.
Key findings from the verification:
- The
tailwind.config.jsuses standard Tailwind breakpoints without overriding thesmbreakpoint - The component's responsive pattern (
hidden sm:flexandflex sm:hidden) follows the same mobile-first approach used throughout the codebase - Similar responsive patterns are consistently used across other components for tablet/mobile views
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check breakpoint consistency across the codebase
# Search for sm: breakpoint usage
echo "Checking sm: breakpoint usage:"
rg "sm:" -A 2
# Search for tailwind config
echo "\nChecking tailwind configuration:"
fd "tailwind.config" -x cat {}
Length of output: 37067
components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-108: Verify alignment with PR objectives
This file contains changes related to denom display formatting, but the PR objectives mention tablet and mobile breakpoints. While the modal uses responsive classes like max-w-4xl, there don't appear to be any breakpoint-related changes.
Let's verify if there are any breakpoint-related changes that might have been missed:
components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx (1)
50-57: LGTM! Responsive grid layout implementation
The grid layout with md:grid-cols-2 properly handles both desktop and mobile views, aligning well with the PR's tablet and mobile breakpoints objectives.
pages/factory/create.tsx (3)
6-6: LGTM! Good architectural improvement.
Moving StepIndicator to a more generic location under react/ improves component reusability across different pages.
101-101: LGTM! Cleaner prop syntax.
Good simplification from JSX expression to string literal since no dynamic content is needed.
49-51: LGTM! Good mobile responsiveness improvement.
The addition of mobileLabel properties enhances the mobile experience with appropriate label lengths for smaller screens.
Let's verify that the StepIndicator component properly utilizes these mobile labels:
✅ Verification successful
Let me check the actual implementation of StepIndicator to verify the mobile label usage.
StepIndicator correctly implements mobile label support
The component properly handles the mobileLabel prop with responsive design:
- Desktop view (
hidden sm:flex) shows full labels - Mobile view (
flex sm:hidden) usesmobileLabel ?? labelfallback pattern - Tailwind responsive classes ensure correct breakpoint behavior
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify StepIndicator component handles mobile labels
# Expected: Find responsive design logic in StepIndicator that uses mobileLabel prop
ast-grep --pattern 'const StepIndicator = ({ steps, currentStep }) => {
$$$
}'
# Also check for any responsive classes or media queries
rg -l 'sm:|md:|lg:|xl:|2xl:' $(fd -e tsx -e jsx StepIndicator)
Length of output: 279
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the StepIndicator implementation
cat components/react/StepIndicator.tsx
Length of output: 2437
components/react/mobileNav.tsx (2)
107-109: LGTM!
The contacts button implementation follows React best practices.
121-126: Verify close button positioning across different screen sizes
While the close button implementation is semantically correct, the absolute positioning might cause issues on different mobile devices and screen sizes.
Consider testing the following breakpoints:
- Small mobile (320px)
- Mobile (375px)
- Mobile (425px)
- Tablet (768px)
Also, consider adding a fixed bottom margin to the content above to prevent overlap:
- <div className="absolute bottom-4 left-4">
+ <div className="sticky bottom-4 left-4 mt-auto">components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalDetailsForm.tsx (2)
119-123: LGTM! Well-structured responsive button layout.
The calculated width w-[calc(50%-12px)] combined with the flex container's gap-6 creates a robust responsive layout that maintains proper spacing and equal button widths across different screen sizes.
130-131: Verify text truncation across breakpoints.
The responsive text implementation looks good, using Tailwind's sm: breakpoint effectively. The shortened mobile text maintains clarity while conserving space.
Let's verify consistent breakpoint usage across components:
✅ Verification successful
Responsive text implementation is consistent across proposal form components
The text truncation pattern is consistently implemented across the proposal flow components:
- ProposalDetailsForm: "Next: Proposal Messages" → "Next: Messages"
- ProposalMessages: "Prev: Proposal Details" → "Prev: Details"
- ProposalMetadataForm: "Prev: Messages" → "Prev: TXs"
All components correctly use the hidden sm:inline and sm:hidden classes for responsive behavior, maintaining a cohesive user experience across breakpoints.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar responsive text patterns to ensure consistency
rg -l 'hidden sm:inline|sm:hidden' --type tsx
Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar responsive text patterns to ensure consistency, using just file extension
rg -l 'hidden sm:inline|sm:hidden' '*.tsx'
Length of output: 90
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# First find all tsx files, then search for responsive text patterns
fd -e tsx -x rg -l 'hidden sm:inline|sm:hidden' {}
Length of output: 417
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual implementation of responsive text in these files
rg 'hidden sm:inline|sm:hidden' -A 1 -B 1 ./components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalDetailsForm.tsx ./components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMetadataForm.tsx ./components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMessages.tsx
Length of output: 2127
pages/factory/index.tsx (1)
113-113: LGTM: Improved clarity in wallet connection message
The simplified description text is clear and concise.
pages/groups/create.tsx (2)
8-8: LGTM! Component moved to shared React components.
The StepIndicator component has been appropriately moved to a shared location, improving reusability across the application.
98-98: LGTM! Simplified string format.
The description prop has been simplified from a template literal to a plain string, which is more appropriate for static text.
pages/groups/index.tsx (2)
77-79: LGTM! Clear and concise description text
The description text is well-written and effectively communicates the action needed from the user.
Line range hint 99-108: Verify modal responsiveness on mobile/tablet
While the modalId prop addition is good, given that this PR focuses on finalizing tablet and mobile breakpoints, we should ensure the modal is properly responsive:
- Consider adding responsive padding/margin classes
- Verify content scaling on smaller screens
- Test modal interactions on touch devices
components/factory/forms/TokenDetailsForm.tsx (3)
130-134: LGTM: Improved button spacing and responsive padding
The changes to the button container and "Previous" button improve the layout and touch targets:
- Using
gap-6provides consistent spacing - Responsive padding (
py-2.5 sm:py-3.5) ensures better touch targets on mobile - Width calculation
w-[calc(50%-12px)]maintains equal button widths with proper gap
138-138: LGTM: Enhanced button styling with proper disabled state
Good improvements to the "Next" button:
- Added
disabled:text-blackfor better visibility in disabled state - Consistent width and padding with the "Previous" button
Line range hint 1-144: Verify consistent breakpoint usage across the application
The component uses the sm: breakpoint prefix consistently. Let's verify this aligns with other components.
✅ Verification successful
Breakpoint usage is consistent with Tailwind's default breakpoints
The codebase shows consistent usage of standard Tailwind breakpoints (sm, md, lg, xl) across components, with proper progressive enhancement patterns:
- Mobile-first approach with base styles
sm:prefix for small screens (640px+)md:prefix for medium screens (768px+)lg:prefix for large screens (1024px+)xl:prefix for extra large screens (1280px+)
The custom breakpoints defined in tailwind.config (xxs, xs, 3xl) are not actively used, maintaining clean and standard responsive patterns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for consistent breakpoint usage across components
echo "Checking breakpoint consistency..."
# Look for different breakpoint prefixes in use
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' '\b(sm|md|lg|xl|2xl):' --stats
# Check Tailwind config for breakpoint definitions
fd -g 'tailwind.config.*' -x cat {} \; | grep -A 10 'screens'
Length of output: 31588
pages/groups/submit-proposal/[policyAddress].tsx (1)
110-110: LGTM! Clean syntax improvement
The change from JSX expression to string literal improves code readability without affecting functionality.
components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx (3)
119-119: Improved button container spacing for responsive layouts
The switch to gap-6 from space-x-3 provides better spacing control and is more suitable for responsive layouts.
121-125: Good implementation of responsive button text
The button text adapts well for different screen sizes:
- Mobile: "Back"
- Desktop: "Back: Factory Page"
Line range hint 119-132: Verify breakpoint consistency across components
Let's ensure the breakpoint implementation is consistent with other components in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Breakpoint implementation is consistent with codebase patterns
The sm: breakpoint implementation in the button components is consistent across the codebase. The search results show that similar button components in forms (groups, factory, proposals) follow the same pattern:
- Using
py-2.5 sm:py-3.5for padding - Using
w-[calc(50%-12px)]for width - Consistent button styling with
btn-neutralandbtn-gradientclasses
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sm: breakpoint usage patterns in similar button containers
rg -U "flex.*gap-.*btn.*sm:" --type tsx
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sm: breakpoint usage patterns in similar button containers, using correct file extension
rg -U "flex.*gap-.*btn.*sm:" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
Length of output: 100
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for sm: breakpoint usage in button components
rg "sm:" --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js -A 2 -B 2 | rg -A 2 -B 2 "(btn|button)"
Length of output: 118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all React component files that might contain buttons
fd -e tsx -e jsx | xargs rg "className.*btn.*sm:"
Length of output: 2829
pages/bank.tsx (1)
1-1: Verify consistent usage of WalletNotConnected component
Let's ensure the new WalletNotConnected component is consistently implemented across other pages.
Also applies to: 129-133
✅ Verification successful
WalletNotConnected component is consistently implemented
The component is correctly and consistently used across all pages where wallet connection is checked:
- All pages that use
isWalletConnectedproperly render theWalletNotConnectedcomponent when the wallet is not connected - Implementation is consistent in bank, admins, groups (index, create, submit-proposal), and factory (index, create) pages
- The component is properly imported from the components directory in all cases
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other implementations of WalletNotConnected
rg "WalletNotConnected" --type tsx --type ts
# Search for potential places where it should be used
rg "isWalletConnected.*\?" --type tsx --type ts
Length of output: 150
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for WalletNotConnected component usage
rg "WalletNotConnected"
# Search for potential places where wallet connection check is performed
rg "isWalletConnected"
Length of output: 2230
tailwind.config.js (1)
12-16: Verify existing breakpoint configuration
Let's ensure these new breakpoints integrate well with the existing configuration.
✅ Verification successful
New breakpoints integrate well with existing configuration
The verification shows that:
- The new breakpoints (
xxs,xs,3xl) don't conflict with any existing breakpoints in the Tailwind config - These breakpoints are already being used appropriately in several components:
- Responsive text visibility in
components/react/views/Contacts.tsx - Group management UI in
components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx - Responsive button sizing in
components/groups/modals/memberManagmentModal.tsx - Responsive text display in
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx
- Responsive text visibility in
The breakpoint values follow mobile-first design principles and are being used effectively across the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any existing screen breakpoint definitions in the codebase
rg -l "screens.*:|sm:|md:|lg:|xl:|2xl:" --type js
# Search for responsive class usage with these specific breakpoints
rg "xxs:|xs:|3xl:" --type jsx --type tsx
Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the content of tailwind config to check existing breakpoints
cat tailwind.config.js
# Search for responsive class usage with these breakpoints in all files
rg "xxs:|xs:|3xl:" --type-add 'jsx:*.jsx' --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type jsx --type tsx
# Find all potential React files that might use these breakpoints
fd "\.(jsx|tsx)$"
Length of output: 14631
components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx (2)
9-9: LGTM! Type safety improvements
Good improvement replacing any with a proper type definition. The addition of ExtendedMetadataSDKType provides better type safety and code maintainability.
Also applies to: 27-27
119-121: Verify denom display behavior across the application
The display logic looks correct but let's verify consistent behavior across the application.
✅ Verification successful
Denom display logic is consistent across the application
The verification shows consistent handling of denom display across all components:
- Factory denoms: consistently extracts last segment with
.split('/').pop()?.toUpperCase() - Other denoms: uses
truncateStringwith either 10 or 12 character limits - Null safety is properly handled with optional chaining and fallback values
The implementation in updateDenomMetadata.tsx follows the same pattern used throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for similar denom display patterns to ensure consistency
echo "Searching for denom display patterns..."
rg -l "startsWith\('factory'\)" | while read -r file; do
echo "=== $file ==="
rg -A 2 "startsWith\('factory'\)" "$file"
done
echo "Searching for truncateString usage with denoms..."
rg -A 2 "truncateString\(.*?display"
Length of output: 8591
components/groups/modals/groupInfo.tsx (3)
10-10: LGTM: Good addition of modalId prop
The addition of the modalId prop improves component reusability and follows React best practices for dynamic modal identification.
17-17: LGTM: Consistent prop usage
The modalId prop is correctly destructured and matches the interface update.
168-170: LGTM: Good responsive layout implementation
The conditional styling based on isProposal or isAddress flags provides appropriate layout flexibility for different content types.
components/groups/forms/groups/GroupPolicyForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint 185-199: LGTM! Consistent button layout with proper responsive design.
The button container and button styles have been updated to maintain consistent spacing and width calculations. The responsive padding classes ensure proper sizing across different screen sizes.
Let's verify the responsive design implementation across other components:
✅ Verification successful
LGTM! The button layout pattern is consistently implemented across the codebase
The search results confirm that the button container layout with flex gap-6 and w-[calc(50%-12px)] is consistently used across multiple components in the codebase. The responsive padding pattern py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 is also applied consistently where needed. This shows that the changes in GroupPolicyForm follow the established design patterns in the project.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent button layout patterns across components
# Search for similar button layout patterns
rg -U 'flex (gap-6|space-x-3).*\n.*w-\[calc\(50%-12px\)\]' --type tsx
# Check for responsive padding patterns
rg 'py-2\.5 sm:py-3\.5' --type tsx
Length of output: 164
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent button layout patterns across components
# Search for similar button layout patterns with correct file extensions
rg -U 'flex (gap-6|space-x-3).*\n.*w-\[calc\(50%-12px\)\]' --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Check for responsive padding patterns
rg 'py-2\.5 sm:py-3\.5' --type ts --type tsx --type jsx --type js
# Alternative search using fd to find all potential React files then grep
fd -e tsx -e jsx -e js -e ts --exec rg -U 'flex (gap-6|space-x-3).*\n.*w-\[calc\(50%-12px\)\]' {}
# Search for button containers with flex and gap/space
fd -e tsx -e jsx -e js -e ts --exec rg -l 'flex.*(gap-6|space-x-3).*btn' {}
Length of output: 1709
pages/_app.tsx (2)
79-79: LGTM: Registry addition is properly integrated.
The addition of liftedinitProtoRegistry to the merged registry follows the established pattern and maintains consistency with the existing implementation.
170-170: Verify the removal of theme dependency for web3AuthWallets.
The removal of theme from the dependency array makes web3AuthWallets static, which appears correct as the configuration doesn't depend on theme changes. However, let's verify there are no theme-dependent UI elements within the wallet configuration.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the results, I can see the complete implementation of makeWeb3AuthWallets and confirm that it only contains static configuration for login methods, client settings, and a prompt sign handler. There are no theme-dependent properties or UI elements within the wallet configuration.
Removal of theme dependency is correct
The change to remove theme from the dependency array is appropriate since the web3auth wallet configuration is completely static and doesn't utilize any theme-related properties. The configuration only includes login provider details, logos, and authentication handling logic.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any theme-related properties in web3auth wallet configurations
rg -l "theme|dark|light" --type ts --type tsx | xargs ast-grep --pattern 'makeWeb3AuthWallets({$$$})'
Length of output: 2329
components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx (1)
212-214: LGTM: Improved button layout and responsiveness
The layout changes enhance the UI with:
- Better spacing using gap-6
- Precise button widths accounting for the gap
- Responsive text for different screen sizes
Also applies to: 221-221
components/wallet.tsx (2)
4-4: LGTM: Clean import refactoring
The refactoring to use local icon components improves code organization.
Line range hint 1-280: Verify consistent usage of breakpoints across the application
Let's verify that the breakpoint classes used in this component align with the project's responsive design system.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the comprehensive results from the shell scripts, I can now generate the final response:
Breakpoint usage is consistent with project's responsive design patterns
The codebase shows a consistent mobile-first approach with logical breakpoint progression:
- Mobile (default): Base styles
sm: Small devices (≥320px)md: Medium devices with tablet optimizationslg: Desktop layouts (showing/hiding navigation, grid adjustments)xl: Extra refinements for larger screens
The wallet component follows these established patterns:
- Mobile-optimized button icons and labels
- Proper
md:blockfor wallet icon visibility - Consistent
lg:grid-cols-12grid system usage - Matching flex/grid responsive behaviors
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of Tailwind breakpoint classes across the codebase
# Search for all Tailwind breakpoint classes
echo "Checking breakpoint usage patterns..."
rg -o '\b(sm|md|lg|xl|2xl):[a-zA-Z0-9-]+' --type tsx --type jsx | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
# Check tailwind config for custom breakpoints
echo "Checking Tailwind configuration..."
fd -t f "tailwind.config" -x cat {} \; | grep -A 10 "screens"
Length of output: 638
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach using ripgrep with the correct file extension
echo "Checking breakpoint usage patterns..."
rg -o '\b(sm|md|lg|xl|2xl):[a-zA-Z0-9-]+' . --type-add 'react:*.{tsx,jsx}' --type react | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
# Also check for any responsive design related classes
echo -e "\nChecking responsive design patterns..."
rg 'className="[^"]*\b(hidden|block|flex|grid)\b[^"]*"' . --type-add 'react:*.{tsx,jsx}' --type react
Length of output: 76321
components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx (1)
133-137: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Review grid layout for mobile responsiveness
The circulating supply section might benefit from a more responsive grid layout for smaller screens.
-<div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-6">
+<div className="grid grid-cols-1 md:grid-cols-2 gap-4 md:gap-6">This change will stack the elements vertically on mobile for better readability while maintaining the two-column layout on larger screens.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (1)
77-255: Verify responsive breakpoints implementation
The responsive implementation looks good with proper breakpoints for mobile and tablet views. Let's verify the breakpoint consistency across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Responsive breakpoints implementation is consistent
The implementation shows consistent usage of breakpoints across the codebase:
- Mobile-first approach with base styles
sm:breakpoint for small screens (640px+)md:breakpoint for medium screens (768px+)lg:breakpoint for large screens (1024px+)xl:breakpoint for extra large screens (1280px+)
The validator list component follows the same responsive patterns as other components in the codebase:
- Proper column hiding/showing with
hidden md:table-cellandhidden lg:table-cell - Responsive flex layouts with
flex-col md:flex-row - Consistent width adjustments with
w-full sm:w-[224px]
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for consistent usage of breakpoints across the codebase
# Check for breakpoint usage patterns
echo "Checking breakpoint usage patterns..."
rg -A 1 "hidden (lg|md|sm):" --type tsx
# Check for potential inconsistencies in responsive classes
echo "Checking for potential responsive class inconsistencies..."
rg "(?:sm|md|lg|xl):[a-zA-Z-]+" --type tsx | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
Length of output: 382
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try without file type restriction since tsx is not recognized
# Check for breakpoint usage patterns
echo "Checking breakpoint usage patterns..."
rg -A 1 "hidden (lg|md|sm):"
# Check for potential inconsistencies in responsive classes
echo "Checking for potential responsive class inconsistencies..."
rg "(?:sm|md|lg|xl):[a-zA-Z-]+" | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
Length of output: 41118
components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-1: Verify implementation of all breakpoints
The current responsive implementation needs to be verified against the standard breakpoints for the application.
Let's check the breakpoint definitions and usage across the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Responsive design implementation is correctly handled through Tailwind classes
The code shows proper implementation of responsive design through Tailwind's utility classes:
- The component uses Tailwind's built-in breakpoint system with standard breakpoints (
sm:,md:,lg:,xl:,2xl:) - The tailwind.config.js shows additional custom breakpoints (
xxs: '320px',xs: '375px',3xl: '2560px') - The component uses responsive classes for layout adjustments:
- Grid layout:
grid grid-cols-2 gap-6 - Flexbox utilities:
flex flex-col - Spacing utilities:
p-2,p-4 - Text utilities:
text-sm,text-md,text-xl
- Grid layout:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify breakpoint definitions and usage
# Check Tailwind config for breakpoint definitions
echo "Checking Tailwind config for breakpoint definitions..."
fd -e js -e ts -e json -H "tailwind.config" -x cat {}
# Check for responsive class usage in components
echo "\nChecking responsive class usage in components..."
rg -t tsx -t jsx "sm:|md:|lg:|xl:|2xl:" ./src/components
# Check for any hardcoded pixel values that might affect responsiveness
echo "\nChecking for hardcoded pixel values..."
rg -t tsx -t jsx "px|rem|em" ./src/components
Length of output: 7049
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check responsive classes in the components directory with the correct path
echo "Checking responsive class usage in components..."
rg -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact "sm:|md:|lg:|xl:|2xl:" ./components
# Check for any hardcoded pixel values
echo "\nChecking for hardcoded pixel values..."
rg -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact "px|rem|em" ./components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx
# Check for any media query usage
echo "\nChecking for media query usage..."
rg -t typescript -t javascriptreact -t typescriptreact "@media" ./components
Length of output: 662
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try with simpler grep patterns without file type specifications
echo "Checking responsive class usage in components..."
grep -r "sm:\|md:\|lg:\|xl:\|2xl:" ./components
echo "\nChecking for hardcoded pixel values in BurnForm..."
grep -r "px\|rem\|em" ./components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx
echo "\nChecking for media query usage..."
grep -r "@media" ./components
# Also check the specific file content
echo "\nChecking BurnForm.tsx content..."
cat ./components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx
Length of output: 40007
components/react/views/Contacts.tsx (2)
378-380: LGTM! Clean implementation of the empty state message
The centered alignment and color scheme implementation looks good, with proper dark mode support.
349-354: Verify breakpoint alignment with design system
The responsive implementation for address display looks good, but a few considerations:
- Ensure the
xsbreakpoint aligns with the design system's tablet/mobile breakpoints - Consider documenting why specific slice lengths (24 and 14) were chosen
- Verify these lengths work well with different address formats
Consider extracting these magic numbers (24, 14) into a configuration object or constants to make them more maintainable and self-documenting.
✅ Verification successful
Breakpoint usage aligns with design system
The implementation is correct and follows the project's design system. The xs breakpoint is properly defined in tailwind.config.js as 375px, which is a standard mobile breakpoint. The responsive implementation using xs:block/xs:hidden correctly switches between:
- 24 characters for screens ≥ 375px
- 14 characters for screens < 375px
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if the xs breakpoint matches the design system
rg -l "xs[:\[]" --type css --type html --type tsx
Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for xs breakpoint usage in all files
rg "xs:[a-zA-Z-]+"
# Also check for any tailwind config files that might define breakpoints
fd "tailwind.config" --type f
Length of output: 878
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check tailwind config for breakpoint definitions
cat tailwind.config.js
# Look for any design system related files that might define breakpoints
fd -e ts -e js -e json -E "node_modules" | rg -i "breakpoint|screen|theme"
Length of output: 6609
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx (3)
86-89: LGTM: Improved modal handling
The addition of event propagation control prevents unintended modal triggers when updating denom metadata.
229-235: LGTM: Well-implemented mobile create button
The mobile-specific create button implementation provides good UX for small screens while maintaining a clean layout on larger displays.
152-159: Verify table behavior on very small screens
The responsive table structure looks good, but we should verify the layout doesn't break on very small screens (< 320px).
✅ Verification successful
Table layout is well-handled for small screens
The implementation has proper safeguards for small screens:
- The table is wrapped in
overflow-x-autocontainer, preventing horizontal overflow - Only the "Token" column is visible by default on mobile screens
- Additional columns (Symbol, Total Supply, Balance) progressively appear at larger breakpoints (md/lg/xl)
- The table has a max height constraint with vertical scrolling (
max-h-[87vh]) - Column widths are proportionally distributed and adjust responsively
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for potential overflow issues in table styles
rg -g '*.{css,scss}' 'overflow-x|overflow-y|overflow:\s*hidden'
# Look for minimum width constraints that might affect small screens
rg -g '*.{css,scss}' 'min-width|min-w-'
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for table-related styles in the component and its parent directories
rg -g '*.{tsx,css,scss}' -B 2 -A 2 'table-cell|overflow|min-w' ./components/factory
# Look for responsive utility classes in the component
rg -g '*.tsx' -B 2 -A 2 'sm:|md:|lg:|xl:' ./components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx
# Check if there are any global table styles
fd -e css -e scss . -x cat {} | grep -A 3 -B 3 'table'
Length of output: 11051
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (2)
375-381: LGTM! Good responsive design practice
The mobile-specific new proposal button implementation follows good responsive design practices by:
- Using full width on mobile screens
- Maintaining consistent styling with the desktop version
- Proper conditional rendering based on screen size
25-25: Verify type simplification impact
The change from ThresholdDecisionPolicy to string type simplifies the interface but might reduce type safety. While this aligns with the previous accepted pattern, ensure all consumers of this component are updated accordingly.
✅ Verification successful
Type change from ThresholdDecisionPolicy to string is appropriate
The change from ThresholdDecisionPolicy to string type is correct and safe. The verification shows that:
- The component receives
selectedGroup.thresholdas a string value from its parent - The value is only used for numerical comparison after converting to BigInt
- No ThresholdDecisionPolicy-specific properties are accessed
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all usages of GroupProposals component to verify prop passing
ast-grep --pattern 'GroupProposals $$$policyThreshold={$_}'
Length of output: 61
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files containing GroupProposals component
fd ".*\.[tj]sx?$" | xargs rg "GroupProposals" -B 2 -A 2
# Also search for the import of GroupProposals to understand usage
rg "import.*GroupProposals"
Length of output: 2102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual usage of policyThreshold in myGroups.tsx
rg "policyThreshold" components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx -B 2 -A 2
# Also check how policyThreshold is used within groupProposals.tsx
rg "policyThreshold" components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx -B 2 -A 2
Length of output: 674
components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx (1)
207-223:
Ensure map callbacks return values
In the tx.data.amount.map callbacks on lines 211~ and 243~, ensure that the callbacks return the computed values to avoid rendering issues.
Apply this diff to add return statements:
Similarly, for lines 243~ to 250~:
This ensures that the values are correctly returned and rendered.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (1)
83-95:
Ensure group.members is defined before mapping
To prevent potential runtime errors, verify that group.members is defined before attempting to map over it.
Apply this diff to add a null check:
-if (group) {
+if (group && group.members) {
setMembers(transformGroupMembers(group));
setGroupId(group.id.toString());
setGroupAdmin(group.admin);
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #11 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 59.07% 58.38% -0.70%
==========================================
Files 148 148
Lines 13860 14334 +474
==========================================
+ Hits 8188 8369 +181
- Misses 5672 5965 +293 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚨 Try these New Features:
|
Tests are fixed, coderabbit recommendations have been implemented, ready for massive merge. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 15
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (26)
components/react/__tests__/StepIndicator.test.tsx (2)
1-8: Add TypeScript type definitions for better type safetyConsider adding type definitions to enhance type safety and developer experience.
+import { StepProps } from '@/components/react/StepIndicator'; import { describe, test, expect, afterEach } from 'bun:test'; import React from 'react'; import { render, screen, cleanup } from '@testing-library/react'; import StepIndicator from '@/components/react/StepIndicator'; import matchers from '@testing-library/jest-dom/matchers';
12-16: Consider adding edge cases to test dataThe current test data covers the basic case, but consider adding test cases for:
- Single step
- Large number of steps (e.g., 5+ steps)
- Steps with long labels
const steps = [ { label: 'Step 1', step: 1 }, { label: 'Step 2', step: 2 }, { label: 'Step 3', step: 3 }, ]; +const singleStep = [ + { label: 'Only Step', step: 1 } +]; +const manySteps = [ + { label: 'Step 1', step: 1 }, + { label: 'A Very Long Step Label 2', step: 2 }, + // ... more steps +];components/bank/components/__tests__/historyBox.test.tsx (3)
8-29: Consider extracting mock setup to a separate file.The hook mocks contain complex data structures that could be reused across different test files. Consider moving them to a dedicated mock file for better maintainability and reusability.
+// __mocks__/hooks.ts +export const mockTokenMetadata = { + metadatas: { + metadatas: [ + { + base: 'utoken', + display: 'TOKEN', + denom_units: [ + { denom: 'utoken', exponent: 0 }, + { denom: 'token', exponent: 6 }, + ], + }, + ], + }, +};
62-65: Make the null check more explicit in the modal interaction test.The current null check is implicit. Consider making it more explicit and adding an assertion for the case where the element is not found.
- if (transactionElement) { - fireEvent.click(transactionElement); - expect(screen.getByLabelText('tx_info_modal')).toBeTruthy(); - } + expect(transactionElement).not.toBeNull(); + fireEvent.click(transactionElement!); + expect(screen.getByLabelText('tx_info_modal')).toBeTruthy();
Line range hint
1-89: Add missing test coverage for critical scenarios.The test suite is missing coverage for several important scenarios:
- Pagination functionality (despite mock including totalPages)
- Error states (despite mock including isError)
- Loading states
- Empty transaction list
Here's a suggested structure for additional test cases:
test('handles pagination correctly', () => { // Test page navigation and data loading }); test('displays error state', () => { // Mock error state and verify error message }); test('displays loading state', () => { // Verify loading indicator }); test('handles empty transaction list', () => { // Verify empty state message });components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx (1)
53-58: Consider extracting the display logic into a separate functionThe display logic has been improved with proper null checks and consistent case handling. However, to improve maintainability, consider extracting this logic into a separate utility function.
+const formatDenomDisplay = (display: string | undefined): string => { + if (!display) return 'UNKNOWN'; + return display.startsWith('factory') + ? (display.split('/').pop()?.toUpperCase() ?? truncateString(display, 12).toUpperCase()) + : truncateString(display, 12).toUpperCase(); +}; <span className="font-light text-primary"> - {denom.display - ? denom.display.startsWith('factory') - ? (denom.display.split('/').pop()?.toUpperCase() ?? - truncateString(denom.display, 12).toUpperCase()) - : truncateString(denom.display, 12).toUpperCase() - : 'UNKNOWN'} + {formatDenomDisplay(denom.display)} </span>🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 53-58: components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx#L53-L58
Added lines #L53 - L58 were not covered by testscomponents/factory/components/__tests__/MyDenoms.test.tsx (1)
53-58: The test is more specific but could be more comprehensive.The change to check specific skeleton elements improves test readability and makes failures more descriptive. However, since the component shows multiple skeleton rows, consider adding a verification of the total number of skeletons to ensure it matches the component's implementation (10 rows).
Consider adding this verification:
// Check for presence of skeleton elements for first row expect(screen.getByLabelText('skeleton-0-avatar')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByLabelText('skeleton-0-name')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByLabelText('skeleton-0-symbol')).toBeInTheDocument(); expect(screen.getByLabelText('skeleton-0-supply')).toBeInTheDocument(); + +// Verify total number of skeleton rows +for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) { + expect(screen.getByLabelText(`skeleton-${i}-avatar`)).toBeInTheDocument(); +}components/groups/components/__tests__/myGroups.test.tsx (4)
1-1: Remove unused importbeforeEachThe
beforeEachis imported but never used in the test file.-import { describe, test, afterEach, expect, jest, mock, beforeEach } from 'bun:test'; +import { describe, test, afterEach, expect, jest, mock } from 'bun:test';
11-31: Consider enhancing mock setup for better maintainabilityThe mock setup could be improved in several ways:
- Move mock data to a separate constants file for reusability
- Add more comprehensive router mock cases (e.g., error states, different query parameters)
- Consider using beforeEach to reset mocks between tests
+// In a separate mock-constants.ts file +export const ROUTER_MOCK = { + query: {}, + push: jest.fn(), + // Add more router methods +}; +export const GROUP_MEMBER_MOCK = { + groupByMemberData: { groups: [mockGroup, mockGroup2] }, + isGroupByMemberLoading: false, + isGroupByMemberError: false, + refetchGroupByMember: jest.fn(), +};
34-49: Add TypeScript interface for mock propsConsider adding a TypeScript interface to better document and type-check the mock props structure.
interface GroupProps { groups: { groups: Array<{ id: string; ipfsMetadata: { title: string }; policies: Array<{ address: string; decision_policy: { threshold: string }; }>; admin: string; members: Array<{ member: { address: string } }>; total_weight: string; }>; }; proposals: Record<string, any[]>; isLoading: boolean; }
76-87: Enhance router navigation testingThe group selection test could be more comprehensive:
- Verify router state after navigation
- Test different navigation scenarios (e.g., with existing query params)
- Add error handling test cases
test('group selection handles navigation correctly', async () => { const router = require('next/router').useRouter(); router.query = { existingParam: 'value' }; renderWithChainProvider(<YourGroups {...mockProps} />); const groupRow = screen.getAllByRole('button', { name: /Select title1 group/i })[0]; fireEvent.click(groupRow); expect(router.push).toHaveBeenCalledWith( expect.stringContaining('/groups?existingParam=value&policyAddress=policy1'), undefined, { shallow: true } ); // Verify error handling router.push.mockImplementationOnce(() => Promise.reject(new Error('Navigation failed'))); fireEvent.click(groupRow); await expect(screen.findByText(/navigation error/i)).resolves.toBeInTheDocument(); });components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx (1)
Line range hint
27-46: Consider enhancing mobile responsivenessWhile the grid layout is responsive, consider these mobile UX improvements:
- Add padding adjustments for smaller screens using responsive classes
- Consider reducing text sizes on mobile using responsive typography
-<div className="modal-box max-w-4xl mx-auto rounded-[24px] bg-[#F4F4FF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] shadow-lg"> +<div className="modal-box max-w-4xl mx-auto rounded-[24px] bg-[#F4F4FF] dark:bg-[#1D192D] shadow-lg p-4 sm:p-6"> -<h3 className="text-xl font-semibold text-[#161616] dark:text-white mb-6"> +<h3 className="text-lg sm:text-xl font-semibold text-[#161616] dark:text-white mb-4 sm:mb-6">🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 58-59: components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx#L58-L59
Added lines #L58 - L59 were not covered by testscomponents/bank/components/historyBox.tsx (3)
35-37: Consider making pageSize configurableThe page size is currently hardcoded to 10. Consider making it configurable through props to allow for different use cases and screen sizes.
export function HistoryBox({ isLoading: initialLoading, send, address, + pageSize = 10, }: { isLoading: boolean; send: TransactionGroup[]; address: string; + pageSize?: number; }) { const [currentPage, setCurrentPage] = useState(1); - const pageSize = 10;
171-174: Enhance error message with more detailsThe current error message "Error loading transactions" is generic. Consider providing more context and potential actions.
- <div className="text-center text-red-500">Error loading transactions</div> + <div className="text-center text-red-500"> + <p>Failed to load transactions</p> + <p className="text-sm mt-1">Please check your connection and try again</p> + <button + onClick={() => window.location.reload()} + className="mt-2 text-sm underline" + > + Refresh page + </button> + </div>
234-245: Extract amount formatting logic to a utility functionThe amount formatting logic is complex and could be reused elsewhere. Consider extracting it to a utility function.
+ // utils/format.ts + export const formatTransactionAmount = ( + amount: { amount: string; denom: string }, + metadata: any + ) => { + const exponent = Number(metadata?.denom_units[1]?.exponent) || 6; + return `${Number(shiftDigits(amount.amount, -exponent)).toLocaleString(undefined, { + maximumFractionDigits: exponent + })} ${formatDenom(amount.denom)}`; + }; // In component: - {tx.data.amount - .map(amt => { - const metadata = metadatas?.metadatas.find( - m => m.base === amt.denom - ); - const exponent = Number(metadata?.denom_units[1]?.exponent) || 6; - return `${Number(shiftDigits(amt.amount, -exponent)).toLocaleString(undefined, { - maximumFractionDigits: exponent - })} ${formatDenom(amt.denom)}`; - }) - .join(', ')} + {tx.data.amount + .map(amt => { + const metadata = metadatas?.metadatas.find(m => m.base === amt.denom); + return formatTransactionAmount(amt, metadata); + }) + .join(', ')}components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (2)
129-170: Add tests for loading stateThe loading state implementation lacks test coverage. Consider adding tests for:
- Skeleton loader rendering
- Responsive column visibility
- Loading state transitions
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the loading state implementation?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 130-133: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L130-L133
Added lines #L130 - L133 were not covered by tests
[warning] 135-136: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L135-L136
Added lines #L135 - L136 were not covered by tests
[warning] 138-139: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L138-L139
Added lines #L138 - L139 were not covered by tests
[warning] 141-142: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L141-L142
Added lines #L141 - L142 were not covered by tests
[warning] 144-166: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L144-L166
Added lines #L144 - L166 were not covered by tests
[warning] 168-169: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L168-L169
Added lines #L168 - L169 were not covered by tests
216-222: Improve image accessibilityThe validator logo's alt text is empty, which may not be ideal for accessibility.
<Image height={32} width={32} src={validator.logo_url} - alt="" + alt={`${validator.description.moniker} logo`} className="w-8 h-8 rounded-full" />🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 216-221: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L216-L221
Added lines #L216 - L221 were not covered by teststests/mock.ts (1)
385-392: Consider consolidating redundant type URL fieldsThe message object contains three fields with the same type URL value:
@type$typeUrltype_urlThis redundancy could lead to confusion about which field should be used. Consider consolidating these fields based on the Cosmos SDK's Any message type specification.
messages: [ { ...anyMessage, - '@type': '/cosmos.bank.v1beta1.MsgSend', - $typeUrl: '/cosmos.bank.v1beta1.MsgSend', - type_url: '/cosmos.bank.v1beta1.MsgSend', + typeUrl: '/cosmos.bank.v1beta1.MsgSend', }, ],components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx (3)
Line range hint
198-214: Refactor modal closing logic to prevent potential runtime errorsThe modal closing logic is duplicated and uses unsafe type casting. Consider creating a reusable function with proper error handling.
+ const closeModal = () => { + const modal = document.getElementById(modalId) as HTMLDialogElement; + if (modal?.close) { + modal.close(); + } + }; - (document.getElementById(modalId) as HTMLDialogElement)?.close(); + closeModal();Also applies to: 283-285
324-342: Improve form submission logic and validation
- The
!touchedcondition in the disabled state might prevent valid form submissions when no changes are made.- Using a ref for form submission could be simplified.
Consider these improvements:
- submitFormRef.current = handleSubmit; + const onSave = () => { + if (!isValid || isSigning) return; + handleSubmit(); + }; - <button - type="button" - className="btn btn-md w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-gradient text-white" - onClick={() => submitFormRef.current?.()} - disabled={isSigning || !isValid || !touched} - > + <button + type="submit" + className="btn btn-md w-[calc(50%-8px)] btn-gradient text-white" + onClick={onSave} + disabled={isSigning || !isValid} + >
Custom breakpoint
xs:max-3xlis invalid and needs correctionThe
xs:max-3xlclass in the button styling is incorrect as Tailwind CSS doesn't support this syntax. While the config shows bothxs(375px) and3xl(2560px) breakpoints are defined, themax-variant can only be used with standard breakpoint names (sm, md, lg, xl, 2xl). The current syntax will not work as expected.Consider using either:
- Standard max-width breakpoint syntax like
max-xl:w-[140px]- Or a combination of min-width queries like
xs:w-[140px] 3xl:w-auto🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
175-185: Verify custom breakpoint class compatibilityThe
xs:max-3xlclass in the button styling needs verification to ensure it's properly configured in your Tailwind setup.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the custom breakpoint is defined in Tailwind config fd -t f "tailwind.config" -x cat {} | grep -A 5 "screens"Length of output: 170
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx (1)
152-216: Well-structured responsive table with improved loading statesGood improvements to the table structure:
- Progressive disclosure of columns based on screen size
- Reduced skeleton count from 12 to 10 for better performance
- Added aria labels for better accessibility
Consider one enhancement:
The skeleton width values could be made more dynamic to match actual content width:
- className="skeleton h-2 w-24" + className="skeleton h-2 w-[80%]"components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (1)
306-314: Add error handling for modal operationsThe modal open handlers should handle cases where the modal element isn't found.
Consider adding error handling:
const openInfoModal = (e: React.MouseEvent) => { e.stopPropagation(); const modal = document.getElementById( `group-info-modal-${group.id}` ) as HTMLDialogElement | null; - if (modal) { - modal.showModal(); - } + try { + if (!modal) { + console.error(`Modal not found: group-info-modal-${group.id}`); + return; + } + modal.showModal(); + } catch (error) { + console.error('Failed to open modal:', error); + } };Also applies to: 316-324
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 306-312: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L306-L312
Added lines #L306 - L312 were not covered by testscomponents/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (3)
112-112: Add test coverage for threshold calculationWhile the
BigIntconversion is safe (as confirmed by previous learnings), this critical calculation lacks test coverage. Consider adding test cases for various threshold scenarios.Would you like me to help generate test cases for the
isProposalPassingfunction?🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 112-112: components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx#L112
Added line #L112 was not covered by tests
292-307: Great accessibility improvements, but needs test coverageExcellent additions for accessibility:
- Proper ARIA roles and labels
- Keyboard navigation support
- Loading state indicators
However, these interactions lack test coverage. Consider adding tests for:
- Keyboard navigation (Enter/Space handling)
- Loading state rendering
- Screen reader compatibility
Would you like me to help generate accessibility tests using
@testing-library/react?Also applies to: 375-384, 400-404
310-324: LGTM: Well-structured responsive table designThe table implementation effectively handles different screen sizes while maintaining accessibility. Consider adding a
<caption>element to provide more context about the table's purpose for screen readers.<table className="table w-full border-separate border-spacing-y-3" aria-label="Group proposals" > + <caption className="sr-only">List of group proposals with their status and details</caption> <thead>Also applies to: 389-429
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (22)
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx(1 hunks)components/bank/components/__tests__/historyBox.test.tsx(2 hunks)components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx(4 hunks)components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx(6 hunks)components/factory/components/__tests__/MyDenoms.test.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/forms/__tests__/BurnForm.test.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx(2 hunks)components/groups/components/__tests__/StepIndicator.test.tsx(0 hunks)components/groups/components/__tests__/myGroups.test.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx(6 hunks)components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx(10 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/proposals/__tests__/ProposalDetailsForm.test.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/modals/index.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx(8 hunks)components/react/StepIndicator.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/__tests__/StepIndicator.test.tsx(1 hunks)pages/bank.tsx(3 hunks)pages/groups/index.tsx(4 hunks)tests/mock.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- components/groups/components/tests/StepIndicator.test.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/groups/modals/index.tsx
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx
- components/react/StepIndicator.tsx
- pages/bank.tsx
- pages/groups/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (2)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#11
File: components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx:112-112
Timestamp: 2024-11-22T02:01:33.043Z
Learning: In `components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx`, the `policyThreshold` prop will always be passed as a valid string from the parent component, so converting it to `BigInt` does not require additional error handling.
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#9
File: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx:184-184
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T13:03:18.927Z
Learning: In `components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx`, it's acceptable to pass the entire `selectedGroup` object as the `policyThreshold` prop to the `GroupProposals` component, even if the expected type is `ThresholdDecisionPolicy`.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx
[warning] 130-133: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L130-L133
Added lines #L130 - L133 were not covered by tests
[warning] 135-136: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L135-L136
Added lines #L135 - L136 were not covered by tests
[warning] 138-139: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L138-L139
Added lines #L138 - L139 were not covered by tests
[warning] 141-142: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L141-L142
Added lines #L141 - L142 were not covered by tests
[warning] 144-166: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L144-L166
Added lines #L144 - L166 were not covered by tests
[warning] 168-169: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L168-L169
Added lines #L168 - L169 were not covered by tests
[warning] 172-173: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L172-L173
Added lines #L172 - L173 were not covered by tests
[warning] 203-206: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L203-L206
Added lines #L203 - L206 were not covered by tests
[warning] 216-221: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L216-L221
Added lines #L216 - L221 were not covered by tests
[warning] 241-241: components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx#L241
Added line #L241 was not covered by tests
components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx
[warning] 98-115: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L98-L115
Added lines #L98 - L115 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-122: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L117-L122
Added lines #L117 - L122 were not covered by tests
[warning] 138-155: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L138-L155
Added lines #L138 - L155 were not covered by tests
[warning] 157-160: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L157-L160
Added lines #L157 - L160 were not covered by tests
[warning] 162-163: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L162-L163
Added lines #L162 - L163 were not covered by tests
[warning] 168-169: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L168-L169
Added lines #L168 - L169 were not covered by tests
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx
[warning] 86-86: components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx#L86
Added line #L86 was not covered by tests
[warning] 89-89: components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx#L89
Added line #L89 was not covered by tests
[warning] 98-98: components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
[warning] 106-106: components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx#L106
Added line #L106 was not covered by tests
components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx
[warning] 53-58: components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx#L53-L58
Added lines #L53 - L58 were not covered by tests
components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx
[warning] 69-71: components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx#L69-L71
Added lines #L69 - L71 were not covered by tests
components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx
[warning] 58-59: components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx#L58-L59
Added lines #L58 - L59 were not covered by tests
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx
[warning] 112-112: components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx#L112
Added line #L112 was not covered by tests
[warning] 375-378: components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx#L375-L378
Added lines #L375 - L378 were not covered by tests
[warning] 400-403: components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx#L400-L403
Added lines #L400 - L403 were not covered by tests
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx
[warning] 83-97: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L83-L97
Added lines #L83 - L97 were not covered by tests
[warning] 306-312: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L306-L312
Added lines #L306 - L312 were not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (19)
components/react/__tests__/StepIndicator.test.tsx (1)
21-22: Verify mobile breakpoint implementation aligns with PR objectives
Given that this PR focuses on finalizing tablet and mobile breakpoints, we should verify the breakpoint implementation in the component.
components/factory/forms/__tests__/BurnForm.test.tsx (1)
46-46: Verify consistent label usage across the UI
Let's ensure this label change is consistently applied across related components and documentation.
components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx (1)
69-71: LGTM! The display logic aligns with mobile/tablet requirements.
The implementation correctly handles null cases and uses a shorter truncation length (12 chars) which is more suitable for mobile/tablet displays.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 69-71: components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx#L69-L71
Added lines #L69 - L71 were not covered by tests
components/groups/forms/proposals/__tests__/ProposalDetailsForm.test.tsx (1)
80-80:
Fix inconsistent label usage in tests
The label "Proposers" is inconsistent with other tests in this file that use "Proposal Title" (see lines 87 and 96). This inconsistency could lead to test failures.
- const titleInput = screen.getByLabelText('Proposers');
+ const titleInput = screen.getByLabelText('Proposal Title');Let's verify the correct label by checking the component implementation:
components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx (1)
47-68: Implementation looks good!
The Additional Information section maintains consistency with the existing layout patterns and includes proper accessibility features.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 58-59: components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx#L58-L59
Added lines #L58 - L59 were not covered by tests
components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx (2)
38-45: LGTM: Improved loading state management
Good separation of loading states between initial loading and transaction loading. The combined loading state provides better UX by showing loading indicators appropriately.
88-134: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add accessibility improvements to pagination controls
The pagination controls need accessibility enhancements:
- Add
aria-labelto buttons - Add
aria-current="page"to current page button - Add keyboard navigation support
<button
onClick={() => setCurrentPage(prev => Math.max(1, prev - 1))}
disabled={currentPage === 1 || isLoading}
+ aria-label="Previous page"
className="p-2 hover:bg-[#FFFFFF1A] rounded-lg transition-colors disabled:opacity-50 disabled:cursor-not-allowed"
>
‹
</button>
// ...
<button
key={pageNum}
onClick={() => setCurrentPage(pageNum)}
+ aria-label={`Page ${pageNum}`}
+ aria-current={currentPage === pageNum ? 'page' : undefined}
+ tabIndex={0}
className={`w-8 h-8 flex items-center justify-center rounded-lg transition-colors
${currentPage === pageNum ? 'bg-[#FFFFFF1A] text-white' : 'hover:bg-[#FFFFFF1A]'}`}
>Additionally, the pagination controls lack test coverage.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the pagination functionality?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 98-115: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L98-L115
Added lines #L98 - L115 were not covered by tests
[warning] 117-122: components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx#L117-L122
Added lines #L117 - L122 were not covered by tests
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (1)
258-272: LGTM: Modal implementation
The modal implementation is clean and well-structured with proper prop passing and type safety.
tests/mock.ts (2)
413-420: Same redundant type URL fields as above
This segment has the same redundancy issue as discussed in the previous comment.
385-392: Verify message type field usage across the codebase
Let's verify how these message type fields are used across the codebase to ensure the proposed consolidation won't break any existing code.
Also applies to: 413-420
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the usage of message type fields across the codebase to ensure consistency.
Multiple message type fields are used consistently in their respective contexts
Based on the verification results:
@typeis used specifically for runtime type checking and validation in hooks and componentstypeUrl(without $) is used consistently across components for message composition- The duplicate fields in the test mock (
@type,$typeUrl,type_url) are only used in test fixtures and don't affect production code
The multiple type fields in the test mock appear to be intentional to test different serialization formats, and their usage is isolated to the test context only.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of different message type URL field names
# Search for type URL field usage
echo "Searching for @type usage..."
rg -p "@type.*cosmos\.bank\.v1beta1"
echo "Searching for \$typeUrl usage..."
rg -p "\$typeUrl.*cosmos\.bank\.v1beta1"
echo "Searching for type_url usage..."
rg -p "type_url.*cosmos\.bank\.v1beta1"
echo "Searching for typeUrl usage..."
rg -p "typeUrl.*cosmos\.bank\.v1beta1"
Length of output: 1315
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual implementation where these fields are used
# Check for any field access or destructuring of these fields
echo "Checking field access patterns..."
rg -p "(\.|destructure|spread).*(@type|\$typeUrl|type_url|typeUrl)"
# Look for message type validation or checks
echo "Checking message type validation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($_.messages[$_]["@type"]'
Length of output: 2498
components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx (1)
20-20: LGTM: Clean interface extension
The addition of the modalId prop enhances the component's reusability and aligns with proper modal management practices.
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx (3)
119-127: LGTM: Responsive layout improvements
The layout changes effectively handle different screen sizes:
- Stacked layout on mobile (
flex-col) that switches to row layout (md:flex-row) on larger screens - Full-width search on mobile that constrains to 224px on larger screens
- Smart placement of "Create New Token" button at the bottom for mobile view
Also applies to: 241-247
343-369: LGTM: Improved token information display
Good improvements to token information display:
- Smart handling of factory token names
- Safe number formatting with error handling
- Responsive alignment of token information using
flex-col/sm:flex-row
Line range hint 86-106: Add test coverage for modal event handlers
The new modal event handlers are currently not covered by tests. This includes:
handleUpdateModal(lines 86-89)handleSwitchToMultiMint(lines 98)handleSwitchToMultiBurn(lines 106)
Would you like me to help generate test cases for these event handlers?
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 98-98: components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx#L98
Added line #L98 was not covered by tests
[warning] 106-106: components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx#L106
Added line #L106 was not covered by tests
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (3)
150-203: Well-implemented table structure with accessibility and loading states!
Great improvements with:
- Proper ARIA labels and roles
- Responsive column visibility
- Skeleton loading states
- Semantic HTML structure
222-228: Good implementation of mobile-responsive create button!
The mobile-specific button implementation maintains UI consistency while improving usability on smaller screens.
Line range hint 328-352: Excellent implementation of keyboard accessibility!
The row implementation includes:
- Proper keyboard navigation
- ARIA roles and labels
- Click and keydown handlers
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (2)
25-25: LGTM: Type change is safe and intentional
The change from ThresholdDecisionPolicy to string type for policyThreshold is appropriate as confirmed by previous learnings that the value will always be passed as a valid string from the parent component.
244-284: LGTM: Enhanced responsive design and accessibility
The changes improve the UI by:
- Adding proper focus states for better keyboard navigation
- Implementing responsive design for different screen sizes
- Including appropriate ARIA labels
| test('renders steps correctly', () => { | ||
| const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={1} steps={steps} />); | ||
|
|
||
| // Check desktop view steps | ||
| const stepElements = container.querySelectorAll('.hidden.sm\\:flex .px-6'); | ||
|
|
||
| steps.forEach(step => { | ||
| const stepText = `${step.step}. ${step.label}`; | ||
| const hasStep = Array.from(stepElements).some( | ||
| el => el.textContent?.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim() === stepText | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(hasStep).toBe(true); | ||
| }); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve test selector maintainability and add mobile view tests
The current selectors are tightly coupled to the CSS classes. Consider using test IDs or aria labels for more maintainable selectors.
- const stepElements = container.querySelectorAll('.hidden.sm\\:flex .px-6');
+ const stepElements = container.querySelectorAll('[data-testid^="step-"]');Also, add tests for mobile view rendering:
test('renders mobile view correctly', () => {
const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={2} steps={steps} />);
const mobileSteps = container.querySelectorAll('[data-testid="mobile-step"]');
expect(mobileSteps).toHaveLength(3); // Verify only 3 steps are shown on mobile
});| test('highlights the current step correctly', () => { | ||
| const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={2} steps={steps} />); | ||
|
|
||
| const currentStepElement = container.querySelector('.dark\\:bg-\\[\\#FFFFFF1F\\] .px-6'); | ||
| expect(currentStepElement).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| expect(currentStepElement?.textContent?.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim()).toBe('2. Step 2'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('display the step before the current step correctly', () => { | ||
| const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={2} steps={steps} />); | ||
|
|
||
| const stepElements = container.querySelectorAll('.hidden.sm\\:flex .px-6'); | ||
| const previousStep = Array.from(stepElements).find( | ||
| el => el.textContent?.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim() === '1. Step 1' | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(previousStep).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('display the step after the current step correctly', () => { | ||
| const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={2} steps={steps} />); | ||
|
|
||
| const stepElements = container.querySelectorAll('.hidden.sm\\:flex .px-6'); | ||
| const nextStep = Array.from(stepElements).find( | ||
| el => el.textContent?.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim() === '3. Step 3' | ||
| ); | ||
| expect(nextStep).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add accessibility and error case tests
The component should be accessible and handle error cases gracefully.
Add the following test cases:
test('meets accessibility requirements', () => {
const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={1} steps={steps} />);
expect(container).toHaveNoViolations();
});
test('handles invalid currentStep gracefully', () => {
const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={99} steps={steps} />);
// Verify it defaults to first step or shows error state
});
test('handles empty steps array', () => {
const { container } = render(<StepIndicator currentStep={1} steps={[]} />);
// Verify appropriate empty state handling
});| renderWithChainProvider( | ||
| <HistoryBox | ||
| isLoading={false} | ||
| send={mixedTransactions} | ||
| address="manifest123akjshjashdjkashjdahskjdhjakshdjkashkdjasjdhadajsdhkajsd" | ||
| /> | ||
| <HistoryBox isLoading={false} send={mockTransactions} address="address1" /> | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(screen.getByText('+1 TOKEN')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('Sent')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| const sentText = screen.getByText('Sent'); | ||
| const receivedText = screen.getByText('Received'); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(sentText).toBeTruthy(); | ||
| expect(receivedText).toBeTruthy(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove redundant test case.
The last test case "displays both sent and received transactions" duplicates assertions already covered in the "displays transactions" test case. Consider removing this redundant test or expanding it to test different scenarios.
| {denom.display | ||
| ? denom.display.startsWith('factory') | ||
| ? (denom.display.split('/').pop()?.toUpperCase() ?? | ||
| truncateString(denom.display, 12).toUpperCase()) | ||
| : truncateString(denom.display, 12).toUpperCase() | ||
| : 'UNKNOWN'} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add tests for denomination display logic in BurnModal component
The codebase shows that while there are tests for various factory components, including MyDenoms, DenomImage, MintForm, and BurnForm, there are no specific tests for the denomination display logic in the BurnModal component. Add unit tests to verify:
- Handling of factory-prefixed denominations (e.g.,
factory/...) - Truncation of non-factory denominations
- Null/undefined handling for display property
- Case conversion behavior
Example test locations:
- Create
components/factory/modals/__tests__/BurnModal.test.tsx - Add test cases for the denomination display logic
🔗 Analysis chain
Add unit tests for the denomination display logic
The static analysis indicates that the new display logic lacks test coverage. Please add unit tests to verify:
- Handling of factory-prefixed denominations
- Truncation of non-factory denominations
- Null/undefined handling
- Case conversion
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing test files
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx BurnModal
# Check for any existing tests of denomination display logic
rg -l "test|describe|it.*display.*factory|truncate" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 141
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing test files with broader extension patterns
fd ".*test.*|.*spec.*" components/factory/modals/
# Search for test files containing denomination-related tests with proper file type
rg -t ts "test|describe|it.*display.*factory|truncate" components/factory/modals/
rg -t ts "test|describe|it.*denom" components/factory/modals/
# Check if truncateString utility has tests
fd truncate
rg -t ts "truncateString" -A 5 -B 5
Length of output: 35893
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for test files in utils directory since truncateString is defined there
fd "test|spec" utils/
# Look for any tests of string utilities
rg -t ts "describe.*truncate|test.*truncate|it.*truncate" utils/
# Check if there are any tests in components/factory/modals directory
fd "test|spec" components/factory/modals/
# Look for any tests related to denomination display
rg -t ts "describe.*denom|test.*denom|it.*denom" components/factory/
Length of output: 2617
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 53-58: components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx#L53-L58
Added lines #L53 - L58 were not covered by tests
| describe('YourGroups Component', () => { | ||
| afterEach(cleanup); | ||
| afterAll(() => { | ||
| afterEach(() => { | ||
| mock.restore(); | ||
| cleanup(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('renders empty group state correctly', () => { | ||
| renderWithProps({ groups: { groups: [] } }); | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<YourGroups {...{ ...mockProps, groups: { groups: [] } }} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('My groups')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText('Search for a group...')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('renders loading state correctly', () => { | ||
| renderWithProps(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('My groups')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByPlaceholderText('Search for a group...')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('title1')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('title2')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| renderWithChainProvider(<YourGroups {...{ ...mockProps, isLoading: true }} />); | ||
| expect(screen.getAllByTestId('skeleton-row')[0]).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('search functionality works correctly', () => { | ||
| renderWithProps(); | ||
|
|
||
| renderWithChainProvider(<YourGroups {...mockProps} />); | ||
| const searchInput = screen.getByPlaceholderText('Search for a group...'); | ||
| fireEvent.change(searchInput, { target: { value: 'title1' } }); | ||
|
|
||
| expect(screen.getByText('title1')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.queryByText('title2')).not.toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| // Use getAllByRole to find the specific row with the aria-label | ||
| const groupRows = screen.getAllByRole('button', { name: /Select title1 group/i }); | ||
| expect(groupRows).toHaveLength(1); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add test coverage for error states and accessibility
The test suite would benefit from additional test cases:
- Error state handling
- Accessibility checks (keyboard navigation, screen reader support)
- Edge cases for search (empty search, special characters)
test('renders error state correctly', () => {
renderWithChainProvider(<YourGroups {...{ ...mockProps, error: new Error('Test error') }} />);
expect(screen.getByText(/error/i)).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('supports keyboard navigation', () => {
renderWithChainProvider(<YourGroups {...mockProps} />);
const searchInput = screen.getByPlaceholderText('Search for a group...');
searchInput.focus();
fireEvent.keyDown(searchInput, { key: 'Tab' });
// Verify focus moves to first group
expect(screen.getAllByRole('button')[0]).toHaveFocus();
});| <button | ||
| onClick={() => setActive(false)} | ||
| className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl focus:outline-none focus:ring-1 focus:ring-primary/50 ${ | ||
| !active | ||
| ? 'dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] bg-[#FFFFFF] text-[#161616] dark:text-white' | ||
| : 'text-[#808080]' | ||
| }`} | ||
| > | ||
| Pending | ||
| </button> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Complete tab accessibility attributes
The second tab button is missing ARIA attributes that are present on the first button.
<button
onClick={() => setActive(false)}
+ role="tab"
+ aria-selected={!active}
+ aria-controls="pending-validators"
className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl focus:outline-none focus:ring-1 focus:ring-primary/50 ${
!active
? 'dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] bg-[#FFFFFF] text-[#161616] dark:text-white'
: 'text-[#808080]'
}`}
>
Pending
</button>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <button | |
| onClick={() => setActive(false)} | |
| className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl focus:outline-none focus:ring-1 focus:ring-primary/50 ${ | |
| !active | |
| ? 'dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] bg-[#FFFFFF] text-[#161616] dark:text-white' | |
| : 'text-[#808080]' | |
| }`} | |
| > | |
| Pending | |
| </button> | |
| <button | |
| onClick={() => setActive(false)} | |
| role="tab" | |
| aria-selected={!active} | |
| aria-controls="pending-validators" | |
| className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl focus:outline-none focus:ring-1 focus:ring-primary/50 ${ | |
| !active | |
| ? 'dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] bg-[#FFFFFF] text-[#161616] dark:text-white' | |
| : 'text-[#808080]' | |
| }`} | |
| > | |
| Pending | |
| </button> |
| <div className="relative w-full sm:w-[224px]"> | ||
| <input | ||
| type="text" | ||
| placeholder="Search for a validator..." | ||
| className="input input-bordered w-full h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] pl-10" | ||
| value={searchTerm} | ||
| onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} | ||
| /> | ||
| <SearchIcon className="h-6 w-6 absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400" /> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance search input accessibility
The search input needs proper labeling for screen readers.
<div className="relative w-full sm:w-[224px]">
+ <label htmlFor="validator-search" className="sr-only">
+ Search for a validator
+ </label>
<input
+ id="validator-search"
type="text"
placeholder="Search for a validator..."
className="input input-bordered w-full h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] pl-10"
value={searchTerm}
onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)}
/>
<SearchIcon className="h-6 w-6 absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400" />
</div>📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div className="relative w-full sm:w-[224px]"> | |
| <input | |
| type="text" | |
| placeholder="Search for a validator..." | |
| className="input input-bordered w-full h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] pl-10" | |
| value={searchTerm} | |
| onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} | |
| /> | |
| <SearchIcon className="h-6 w-6 absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400" /> | |
| <div className="relative w-full sm:w-[224px]"> | |
| <label htmlFor="validator-search" className="sr-only"> | |
| Search for a validator | |
| </label> | |
| <input | |
| id="validator-search" | |
| type="text" | |
| placeholder="Search for a validator..." | |
| className="input input-bordered w-full h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1F] pl-10" | |
| value={searchTerm} | |
| onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} | |
| /> | |
| <SearchIcon className="h-6 w-6 absolute left-3 top-1/2 transform -translate-y-1/2 text-gray-400" /> |
| </button> | ||
| </div> | ||
| <div className="flex-1 overflow-auto"> | ||
| <div className="max-w-8xl mx-auto"> | ||
| <table | ||
| className="table w-full border-separate border-spacing-y-3" | ||
| role="grid" | ||
| aria-label="Validators list" | ||
| > | ||
| <thead> | ||
| <tr className="text-sm font-medium text-[#808080]" role="row"> | ||
| <th className="bg-transparent text-left sticky top-0 bg-base-100 z-10"> | ||
| Moniker | ||
| </th> | ||
| <th className="bg-transparent text-left sticky top-0 bg-base-100 z-10"> | ||
| Address | ||
| </th> | ||
| <th className="bg-transparent text-left sticky top-0 bg-base-100 z-10"> | ||
| Consensus Power | ||
| </th> | ||
| <th className="bg-transparent text-right sticky top-0 bg-base-100 z-10"> | ||
| Remove | ||
| </th> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| </thead> | ||
| <tbody className="space-y-4"> | ||
| {isLoading | ||
| ? Array(4) | ||
| .fill(0) | ||
| .map((_, index) => ( | ||
| <tr key={index}> | ||
| <td className="dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFF] rounded-l-[12px] w-1/6"> | ||
| <div className="flex items-center space-x-3"> | ||
| <div className="skeleton w-10 h-8 rounded-full shrink-0"></div> | ||
| <div className="skeleton h-3 w-24"></div> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td className="dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFF] w-1/6"> | ||
| <div className="skeleton h-2 w-24"></div> | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td className="dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFF] w-1/6"> | ||
| <div className="skeleton h-2 w-8"></div> | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td className="dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFF] w-1/6 rounded-r-[12px] text-right"> | ||
| <div className="skeleton h-2 w-8 ml-auto"></div> | ||
| </td> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| )) | ||
| : filteredValidators.map(validator => ( | ||
| <tr | ||
| key={validator.operator_address} | ||
| className="bg-[#FFFFFFCC] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] hover:bg-[#FFFFFF66] dark:hover:bg-[#FFFFFF1A] text-black dark:text-white rounded-lg cursor-pointer" | ||
| onClick={() => handleRowClick(validator)} | ||
| role="row" | ||
| aria-label={`Validator ${validator.description.moniker}`} | ||
| > | ||
| <td className="rounded-l-[12px] py-4"> | ||
| <div className="flex items-center space-x-3"> | ||
| {validator.logo_url ? ( | ||
| <Image | ||
| height={32} | ||
| width={32} | ||
| src={validator.logo_url} | ||
| alt="" | ||
| className="w-8 h-8 rounded-full" | ||
| /> | ||
| ) : ( | ||
| <ProfileAvatar | ||
| walletAddress={validator.operator_address} | ||
| size={32} | ||
| /> | ||
| )} | ||
| <span className="font-medium">{validator.description.moniker}</span> | ||
| </div> | ||
| </td> | ||
|
|
||
| <td className="py-4"> | ||
| <TruncatedAddressWithCopy | ||
| slice={10} | ||
| address={validator.operator_address} | ||
| /> | ||
| </td> | ||
| <td className="py-4">{validator.consensus_power?.toString() ?? 'N/A'}</td> | ||
| <td className="rounded-r-[12px] py-4 text-right"> | ||
| <button | ||
| onClick={e => { | ||
| e.stopPropagation(); | ||
| handleRemove(validator); | ||
| }} | ||
| className="btn btn-error btn-sm text-white " | ||
| > | ||
| <TrashIcon className="w-5 h-5" /> | ||
| </button> | ||
| </td> | ||
| </tr> | ||
| ))} | ||
| </tbody> | ||
| </table> | ||
| Validators | ||
| </h1> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the shell script results, I can now see the parent component Admins and its structure. The ValidatorList component is rendered within the Admins page component, which already contains its own h1 heading "Access Denied" in the error state. Since ValidatorList is a child component and not the main page component, using an h1 for "Validators" would create an incorrect document hierarchy.
Change heading level to maintain proper document outline
The "Validators" heading should be an h2 since it's a subsection of the admin page. Having multiple h1 headings on the same page breaks the semantic structure and impacts accessibility.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify heading hierarchy
The change from h2 to h1 suggests this is the main heading of the page. Please verify this aligns with the overall page hierarchy to maintain proper document outline.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other h1 headings in the same view/page
rg -U "h1.*>.*</h1" --type tsx
Length of output: 60
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for h1 headings in TSX/JSX files using a more flexible pattern
rg -U -t jsx -t typescript -t tsx "<h1.*>.*</h1"
# Also search for potential parent components that might contain h1
fd -e tsx -e jsx -e ts "admin.*\.tsx$|admin.*\.jsx$" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 11069
| {/* Render modals outside table structure */} | ||
| {filteredGroups.map((group, index) => ( | ||
| <React.Fragment key={`modals-${index}`}> | ||
| <GroupInfo | ||
| modalId={`group-info-modal-${group.id}`} | ||
| group={group} | ||
| address={address ?? ''} | ||
| policyAddress={group.policies[0]?.address ?? ''} | ||
| onUpdate={() => {}} | ||
| /> | ||
| <MemberManagementModal | ||
| modalId={`member-management-modal-${group.id}`} | ||
| members={group.members.map(member => ({ | ||
| ...member.member, | ||
| address: member?.member?.address || '', | ||
| weight: member?.member?.weight || '0', | ||
| metadata: member?.member?.metadata || '', | ||
| added_at: member?.member?.added_at || new Date(), | ||
| isCoreMember: true, | ||
| isActive: true, | ||
| isAdmin: member?.member?.address === group.admin, | ||
| isPolicyAdmin: member?.member?.address === group.policies[0]?.admin, | ||
| }))} | ||
| groupId={group.id.toString()} | ||
| groupAdmin={group.admin} | ||
| policyAddress={group.policies[0]?.address ?? ''} | ||
| address={address ?? ''} | ||
| onUpdate={() => {}} | ||
| /> | ||
| </React.Fragment> | ||
| ))} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Extract duplicated member mapping logic
The member mapping logic is duplicated between the useEffect hook and modal rendering. Consider extracting it into a utility function.
Create a new utility function:
const mapGroupMembers = (
member: any,
groupAdmin: string,
policyAdmin: string
) => ({
...member.member,
address: member?.member?.address || '',
weight: member?.member?.weight || '0',
metadata: member?.member?.metadata || '',
added_at: member?.member?.added_at || new Date(),
isCoreMember: true,
isActive: true,
isAdmin: member?.member?.address === groupAdmin,
isPolicyAdmin: member?.member?.address === policyAdmin,
});Then use it in both locations:
- members={group.members.map(member => ({
- ...member.member,
- address: member?.member?.address || '',
- weight: member?.member?.weight || '0',
- metadata: member?.member?.metadata || '',
- added_at: member?.member?.added_at || new Date(),
- isCoreMember: true,
- isActive: true,
- isAdmin: member?.member?.address === group.admin,
- isPolicyAdmin: member?.member?.address === group.policies[0]?.admin,
- }))}
+ members={group.members.map(member =>
+ mapGroupMembers(
+ member,
+ group.admin,
+ group.policies[0]?.admin
+ )
+ )}| useEffect(() => { | ||
| if (groupByMemberData && selectedGroup?.policyAddress) { | ||
| const group = groupByMemberData?.groups?.find( | ||
| g => g?.policies?.length > 0 && g.policies[0]?.address === selectedGroup.policyAddress | ||
| ); | ||
| if (group) { | ||
| setMembers( | ||
| group.members.map(member => ({ | ||
| ...member.member, | ||
| address: member?.member?.address || '', | ||
| weight: member?.member?.weight || '0', | ||
| metadata: member?.member?.metadata || '', | ||
| added_at: member?.member?.added_at || new Date(), | ||
| isCoreMember: true, | ||
| isActive: true, | ||
| isAdmin: member?.member?.address === group.admin, | ||
| isPolicyAdmin: member?.member?.address === group.policies[0]?.admin, | ||
| })) | ||
| ); | ||
| setGroupId(group.id.toString()); | ||
| setGroupAdmin(group.admin); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, [groupByMemberData, selectedGroup?.policyAddress]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add test coverage for member mapping logic in useEffect
The existing test file lacks coverage for the new member mapping logic in the useEffect hook. Specifically:
- No tests for member data transformation with default values
- Missing coverage for admin and policy admin checks
- No validation of member state updates
Key areas to test in components/groups/components/__tests__/myGroups.test.tsx:
- Member mapping with complete data
- Member mapping with missing fields (defaulting)
- Admin role assignments
- GroupId and GroupAdmin state updates
🔗 Analysis chain
Add test coverage for member management logic
The new useEffect hook contains complex mapping logic for member management that requires test coverage to ensure reliability.
Let's verify existing test coverage:
Would you like me to help create test cases for:
- Member mapping with all fields present
- Member mapping with missing fields (using default values)
- Group selection scenarios
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing test files
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx "myGroups"
Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the existing test file
cat components/groups/components/__tests__/myGroups.test.tsx
Length of output: 3064
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 83-97: components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx#L83-L97
Added lines #L83 - L97 were not covered by tests
This PR will focus on finalizing tablet & mobile breakpoints in the web app.
PAGES
UI ELEMENTS
RESLOVE MERGE CONFLICTS
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
ValidatorList,HistoryBox, andMyDenomscomponents.HistoryBoxfor improved transaction history navigation.MyDenoms.StepIndicatorcomponent introduced for step navigation.Bug Fixes
Documentation
Style
Tests