fix: group creation form theme #110
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several updates across multiple form components, primarily focusing on enhancing styling and presentation without altering core functionalities. Changes include standardizing text and background colors for improved visual consistency, refining validation logic in forms, and ensuring better visibility of buttons in both light and dark modes. The modifications aim to create a more cohesive user interface while maintaining the existing logic and functionality of the forms. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #110 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 60.20% 60.23% +0.03%
==========================================
Files 146 146
Lines 14473 14479 +6
==========================================
+ Hits 8713 8722 +9
+ Misses 5760 5757 -3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
components/groups/forms/groups/MemberInfoForm.tsx (2)
272-275: Consider simplifying button stylingWhile the current implementation works, consider these improvements:
- The width calculation
w-[calc(50%-12px)]could be simplified using Tailwind's built-in grid or flex utilities- The padding classes
py-2.5 sm:py-3.5could be consolidated into a single responsive class-<button - onClick={prevStep} - className="btn btn-neutral text-black dark:text-white py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 w-[calc(50%-12px)]" -> +<div className="grid grid-cols-2 gap-6"> + <button + onClick={prevStep} + className="btn btn-neutral text-black dark:text-white py-3.5" + >
Line range hint
1-290: Well-structured form component with clean separation of concernsThe component demonstrates good practices:
- Clear separation of styling and functionality
- Proper form validation with Formik and Yup
- Consistent state management with dispatch actions
- Responsive design considerations
The styling updates improve visual consistency while maintaining the component's robust functionality.
components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx (2)
Line range hint
223-235: Consider improving disabled button state contrastWhile the button styling is generally good, the
disabled:text-blackclass might not provide sufficient contrast when the button is disabled, especially in dark mode.Consider updating the disabled state styling:
- className="w-[calc(50%-12px)] btn px-5 py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 btn-gradient text-white disabled:text-black" + className="w-[calc(50%-12px)] btn px-5 py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 btn-gradient text-white disabled:text-gray-500 dark:disabled:text-gray-400"
Line range hint
69-69: Consider using Tailwind's color system for consistencyThe form's background uses custom color values (
#FFFFFF0Fand#FFFFFFCC). Consider using Tailwind's built-in colors for better maintainability and consistency across the application.Example refactor using Tailwind's color system:
- <div className="flex items-center mx-auto w-full dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFFCC] p-[24px] rounded-[24px]"> + <div className="flex items-center mx-auto w-full dark:bg-white/5 bg-white/80 p-6 rounded-2xl">components/groups/forms/groups/GroupPolicyForm.tsx (1)
186-189: Consider standardizing button width calculationsThe button width calculation
w-[calc(50%-12px)]is correct but could be extracted into a shared class for consistency across forms.Consider creating a shared class in your CSS/Tailwind configuration:
- className="btn btn-neutral text-black dark:text-white py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 w-[calc(50%-12px)]" + className="btn btn-neutral text-black dark:text-white py-2.5 sm:py-3.5 form-button-half-width"Then in your CSS/Tailwind configuration:
.form-button-half-width { width: calc(50% - 12px); }components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx (2)
63-70: Consider enhancing the Qualified Majority displayWhile the styling updates look good, the qualified majority display could be more descriptive for users.
Consider this enhancement:
- {formData.votingThreshold} / {formData.members.length} + {formData.votingThreshold} out of {formData.members.length} members required
102-104: Consider handling loading state for policy addressWhile the button styling looks good, the view group link might benefit from handling the loading state of
recentGroup.Consider this enhancement:
- href={`/groups${recentGroup?.policies[0]?.address ? `?policyAddress=${recentGroup.policies[0].address}` : ''}`} + href={`/groups${recentGroup?.policies[0]?.address ? `?policyAddress=${recentGroup.policies[0].address}` : ''}`} + className={`w-[calc(50%-12px)] ${!recentGroup ? 'opacity-50 pointer-events-none' : ''}`}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
components/groups/forms/groups/ConfirmationForm.tsx(5 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/GroupPolicyForm.tsx(2 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/MemberInfoForm.tsx(3 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx(6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx
[warning] 17-17: components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx#L17
Added line #L17 was not covered by tests
components/groups/forms/groups/ConfirmationForm.tsx
[warning] 147-147: components/groups/forms/groups/ConfirmationForm.tsx#L147
Added line #L147 was not covered by tests
🔇 Additional comments (10)
components/groups/forms/groups/MemberInfoForm.tsx (2)
51-53: LGTM: Header styling improvements
The header styling changes improve visual hierarchy and readability with appropriate color contrast in both light and dark modes.
81-81: LGTM: Consistent theming with base colors
Good use of Tailwind's base color system for better theme consistency. The bg-base-300 class ensures proper contrast in both light and dark modes.
components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx (1)
214-214: LGTM: Button styling enhancement improves visibility
The addition of dark:text-white text-black classes ensures proper text contrast in both light and dark modes, aligning with the PR's objective of improving the color scheme.
components/groups/forms/groups/GroupPolicyForm.tsx (2)
85-87: LGTM: Header styling improvements enhance readability
The header styling changes appropriately handle both light and dark modes with proper color contrast. The border and spacing improvements create better visual hierarchy.
Line range hint 85-189: Verify color scheme consistency across form components
Let's ensure the new color values are consistently applied across other form components.
✅ Verification successful
Color scheme is consistently applied across form components
The color values used in GroupPolicyForm.tsx are consistently used throughout the codebase:
- The heading style with
text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400is used consistently across form components and modals - The form label style with
dark:text-[#FFFFFF99]is consistently used in form inputs - The background colors
dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F] bg-[#FFFFFFCC]are consistently applied to form containers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for color values in other form components
rg --type tsx --type jsx 'text-gray-[45]00|dark:text-gray-400|dark:text-\[#FFFFFF' components/
rg --type tsx --type jsx 'dark:bg-\[#FFFFFF0F\]|bg-\[#FFFFFFCC\]' components/
Length of output: 232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for color values in other form components using ripgrep without file type filters
rg 'text-gray-[45]00|dark:text-gray-400|dark:text-\[#FFFFFF' components/
rg 'dark:bg-\[#FFFFFF0F\]|bg-\[#FFFFFFCC\]' components/
Length of output: 38058
components/groups/forms/groups/ConfirmationForm.tsx (3)
Line range hint 109-134: LGTM: Consistent styling updates for Group Information section
The styling changes align well with the PR objectives, implementing a consistent color scheme while maintaining the existing layout and functionality.
170-180: LGTM: Consistent styling updates for Members section
The styling changes maintain consistency with other sections and follow the established design patterns.
187-190: LGTM: Proper dark mode handling for button text
The text color implementation properly handles both light and dark modes, ensuring button visibility across themes.
components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx (2)
50-54: LGTM! Clear user guidance with consistent styling
The text color updates maintain readability in both light and dark modes while providing clear instructions for next steps.
89-92: LGTM! Consistent member card styling
The member card styling maintains visual consistency with other sections while clearly presenting member information.
| @@ -152,7 +154,7 @@ | |||
| </div> | |||
| )) | |||
| ) : ( | |||
| <div className="bg-[#2A2A38] p-4 dark:text-[#FFFFFF99] rounded-lg flex items-center"> | |||
| <div className="bg-[#2A2A38] p-4 text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 rounded-lg flex items-center"> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace hardcoded background color with Tailwind class
The background color #2A2A38 is hardcoded while other similar elements use the bg-base-300 class. Consider using Tailwind classes for consistency.
-<div className="bg-[#2A2A38] p-4 text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 rounded-lg flex items-center">
+<div className="bg-base-300 p-4 text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 rounded-lg flex items-center">📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <div className="bg-[#2A2A38] p-4 text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 rounded-lg flex items-center"> | |
| <div className="bg-base-300 p-4 text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400 rounded-lg flex items-center"> |
| key={index} | ||
| className="dark:bg-[#2A2A38] bg-[#FFFFFF] p-4 rounded-lg flex items-center" | ||
| > | ||
| <div key={index} className="bg-base-300 p-4 rounded-lg flex items-center"> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Test coverage exists but needs enhancement for renderAuthors edge cases
The Success component already has test coverage in components/groups/forms/groups/__tests__/Success.test.tsx, but it only partially covers the renderAuthors functionality:
- ✓ Tests the array case with manifest addresses
- ❌ Missing test for single author case
- ❌ Missing test for non-manifest address formats
- ❌ Missing test for empty/whitespace handling
Add the following test cases to Success.test.tsx:
- Single author rendering
- Non-manifest address format
- Author string with leading/trailing whitespace
- Empty authors array
🔗 Analysis chain
Add test coverage for author rendering logic
The renderAuthors function handles both array and single author cases, but lacks test coverage. This is critical functionality that should be tested to prevent regressions.
Would you like me to help generate test cases for the author rendering scenarios?
Also applies to: 27-27
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing tests
rg -l "renderAuthors|Success.test" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 85
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for existing tests with correct file extensions
rg -l "renderAuthors|Success.test" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx
# Find all test files in the components directory
fd ".*\.(test|spec)\.(ts|tsx|jsx)$" components/
# Look for Success component test files specifically
fd "Success\.(test|spec)\.(ts|tsx|jsx)$" components/
Length of output: 2510
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the existing Success test file
cat components/groups/forms/groups/__tests__/Success.test.tsx
# Look for renderAuthors function implementation
ast-grep --pattern 'function renderAuthors' -l ts,tsx
Length of output: 1828
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for renderAuthors function with correct ast-grep syntax
ast-grep --pattern 'const renderAuthors = $_'
# Check the Success component implementation
cat components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx
Length of output: 6657
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 17-17: components/groups/forms/groups/Success.tsx#L17
Added line #L17 was not covered by tests
This PR fixes the group creation form color scheme.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style
Documentation