Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: devnet, again #272

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025
Merged

fix: devnet, again #272

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 13, 2025

Conversation

fmorency
Copy link
Contributor

@fmorency fmorency commented Feb 13, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Consolidated the management of asset and chain configurations, streamlining how data is handled across the application.

@fmorency fmorency self-assigned this Feb 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the configuration for chain and asset management within the ManifestAppProviders module. It removes the previous imports of manifestAssets and manifestChain from the testnet-specific module and replaces them with imports from a centralized configuration (@/config/manifestChain). The component structure remains the same, with only the source of the manifest data being altered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
contexts/manifestAppProviders.tsx Updated import sources: replaced imports of manifestAssets and manifestChain from chain-registry/testnet/manifesttestnet with imports from @/config/manifestChain.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: devnet #270: Adjusts the manifestChain module usage by centralizing the configuration, directly relating to the updated import paths.

Suggested reviewers

  • chalabi2

Poem

Hi, I'm your code rabbit, hopping with delight,
I’ve found a new path in the config’s light.
Old imports are now left in the dust,
Our manifest runs smooth — in us, you trust!
Carrots and clean code make every bug take flight.
🥕 Hop, hop, hooray for our refactored insight!


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca63212 and f7543e0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • contexts/manifestAppProviders.tsx (1 hunks)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@fmorency fmorency merged commit 81435e4 into liftedinit:main Feb 13, 2025
3 checks passed
@fmorency fmorency deleted the fix-devnet-again branch February 13, 2025 14:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 13, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 53.33%. Comparing base (ca63212) to head (f7543e0).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #272   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   53.33%   53.33%           
=======================================
  Files         209      209           
  Lines       17234    17234           
=======================================
  Hits         9192     9192           
  Misses       8042     8042           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant