Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove unused component #61

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

fmorency
Copy link
Contributor

@fmorency fmorency commented Nov 20, 2024

Contains #43

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced user interface and styling in various components, including MyDenoms, GroupProposals, and YourGroups.
    • Added new box shadow utilities and updated theme colors in the Tailwind configuration.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved rendering and interaction elements in the VoteDetailsModal to enhance user experience.
  • Documentation

    • Updated test assertions in the groupProposals test suite for clarity.
  • Chores

    • Removed obsolete test files and components related to AdminOptions and StakingParams.

@fmorency fmorency requested a review from chalabi2 November 20, 2024 15:43
@fmorency fmorency self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Walkthrough

This pull request involves the deletion of several files related to the AdminOptions and StakingParams components, including their associated tests. The removed components were responsible for rendering administrative options and staking parameters, while their tests validated their functionality. Additionally, modifications were made to the ValidatorList component, enhancing its styling and user interface. Changes to the tailwind.config.js file were also introduced, refining color schemes and adding new utility classes for improved visual styling.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
components/admins/components/tests/adminOptions.test.tsx Deleted unit tests for AdminOptions component, which included tests for loading state, rendering admin details, and modal functionality.
components/admins/components/tests/stakingParams.test.tsx Deleted unit tests for StakingParams component, covering rendering, loading state, and user interaction.
components/admins/components/adminOptions.tsx Deleted AdminOptions component, which displayed administrative options with loading states and modals.
components/admins/components/stakingParams.tsx Deleted StakingParams component, responsible for rendering staking parameters with loading and modal functionalities.
components/admins/components/index.tsx Removed exports for adminOptions and stakingParams.
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx Updated styling and layout for the ValidatorList component, improving visual consistency.
components/admins/modals/tests/updateStakingParamsModal.test.tsx Deleted unit tests for UpdateStakingParamsModal, which included rendering, input handling, and button state tests.
components/admins/modals/updateStakingParamsModal.tsx Deleted UpdateStakingParamsModal component, responsible for updating staking parameters through a modal interface.
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx Updated layout and styling of MyDenoms component for improved user experience.
components/groups/components/CountdownTimer.tsx Minor styling updates to CountdownTimer component for enhanced appearance.
components/groups/components/tests/groupProposals.test.tsx Modified assertion text in tests for ProposalsForPolicy component.
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx Updated layout and styling of GroupProposals component for better UI.
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx Enhanced styling for YourGroups component, focusing on table and row appearances.
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx Updated visual presentation and internal logic of VoteDetailsModal.
components/icons/BurnIcon.tsx Added strokeWidth to SVG paths in BurnIcon component.
components/icons/MintIcon.tsx Updated viewBox and strokeWidth in MintIcon component.
tailwind.config.js Enhanced theme configuration with new box shadow utilities and refined color schemes.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix: admin page layout & refactor #38: The changes in the ValidatorList component include the addition of an isLoading prop and improvements to loading state management, which aligns with the loading state tests in the adminOptions.test.tsx file that was deleted in the main PR.

Poem

🐇 In the land of code where rabbits play,
Components hop and tests fade away.
Admin options and stakes now gone,
But the Validator shines, carrying on.
With colors bright and shadows new,
A whimsical world awaits for you! 🌈


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 20, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 72.07207% with 62 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 58.45%. Comparing base (dbc6ca0) to head (44faef0).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx 37.20% 27 Missing ⚠️
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx 63.76% 25 Missing ⚠️
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx 91.17% 6 Missing ⚠️
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx 75.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #61      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   59.07%   58.45%   -0.62%     
==========================================
  Files         148      145       -3     
  Lines       13860    13581     -279     
==========================================
- Hits         8188     7939     -249     
+ Misses       5672     5642      -30     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (10)
tailwind.config.js (1)

109-128: LGTM: Consider documenting color scheme decisions

The dark theme updates maintain good consistency with the light theme while providing appropriate contrast. The semantic colors are well-aligned between themes.

Consider adding a comment block at the top of the themes section documenting:

  • The color scheme design decisions
  • The relationship between light and dark theme colors
  • The usage guidelines for semantic colors
  themes: [
+    // Color Scheme Documentation:
+    // - Primary: Main brand color used for key UI elements
+    // - Secondary: Supporting color for backgrounds and less prominent elements
+    // - Semantic colors (info, success, warning, error): Standard indicators
+    // - Base colors: Hierarchical background system (100 lightest to 300 darkest)
      {
        light: {
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (3)

Line range hint 83-99: Improve header styling consistency and accessibility

Consider the following improvements:

  1. Replace inline styles with Tailwind classes
  2. Add proper ARIA labels for the search input
 <h2
-  className="text-secondary-content"
-  style={{ fontSize: '20px', fontWeight: 700, lineHeight: '24px' }}
+  className="text-secondary-content text-xl font-bold leading-6"
 >
   Validators
 </h2>
 <div className="relative">
   <input
     type="text"
+    aria-label="Search validators"
     placeholder="Search for a validator..."
     className="input input-bordered w-[224px] h-[40px] rounded-[12px] border-none bg-secondary text-secondary-content pl-10"
     value={searchTerm}
     onChange={e => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)}
   />

Line range hint 100-116: Enhance toggle buttons accessibility

The toggle buttons should be wrapped in a role="group" with proper ARIA attributes to improve accessibility for screen readers.

-<div className="flex mb-6 w-full h-[3.5rem] rounded-xl p-1 bg-secondary">
+<div 
+  role="group" 
+  aria-label="Validator status filter"
+  className="flex mb-6 w-full h-[3.5rem] rounded-xl p-1 bg-secondary"
+>
   <button
+    aria-pressed={active}
     onClick={() => setActive(true)}
     className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl  ${
       active ? 'bg-base-300 text-secondary-content' : 'text-gray-500'
     }`}
   >
     Active
   </button>
   <button
+    aria-pressed={!active}
     onClick={() => setActive(false)}
     className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl  ${
       !active ? 'bg-base-300 text-secondary-content' : 'text-gray-500'
     }`}
   >
     Pending
   </button>
 </div>

147-161: Make skeleton loaders more responsive

The skeleton loaders use fixed widths which might not scale well across different screen sizes.

-<div className="skeleton w-10 h-8 rounded-full shrink-0"></div>
-<div className="skeleton h-3 w-24"></div>
+<div className="skeleton w-8 md:w-10 h-8 rounded-full shrink-0"></div>
+<div className="skeleton h-3 w-16 md:w-24"></div>
components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (1)

124-152: Consider optimizing skeleton loading implementation

The skeleton loading looks good, but consider these improvements:

  1. Extract the magic number 12 into a named constant
  2. Consider using a skeleton component to reduce repetition
  3. Match skeleton widths with actual content widths for a smoother transition

Example implementation:

const SKELETON_ROW_COUNT = 12; // Adjust based on typical page size

const SkeletonCell = ({ width = 'w-24', rounded = '' }) => (
  <td className={`bg-secondary ${rounded}`}>
    <div className={`skeleton h-2 ${width}`}></div>
  </td>
);

// Usage
Array(SKELETON_ROW_COUNT).fill(0).map((_, index) => (
  <tr key={index}>
    <SkeletonCell width="w-10" rounded="rounded-l-[12px]" />
    {/* ... other cells ... */}
  </tr>
))
components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx (1)

158-179: Consider memoizing the skeleton array

The skeleton array is recreated on every render. Consider memoizing it for better performance.

+const SKELETON_ROWS = Array(12).fill(0);
+
 export default function MyDenoms({
   // ...
   return (
     // ...
     {isLoading
-      ? Array(12)
-          .fill(0)
+      ? SKELETON_ROWS
           .map((_, index) => (
components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (1)

388-388: Consider enhancing the empty state message

The current message "No proposal was found." could be more informative and provide guidance to users.

Consider updating the message to be more descriptive and actionable:

-          <div className="text-center py-8 text-gray-500">No proposal was found.</div>
+          <div className="text-center py-8 text-gray-500">
+            No proposals found. Click "New proposal" to create one.
+          </div>
components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (3)

424-428: Consider using a z-index management system

While the modal styling improvements are good, using a hardcoded z-index value (1000) could lead to stacking context issues. Consider implementing a z-index management system using CSS variables or a configuration file.

Example approach:

-      <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 max-h-[80vh] overflow-y-hidden flex flex-col md:flex-row md:ml-20 -mt-12 rounded-[24px] shadow-lg bg-secondary transition-all duration-300 z-[1000]">
+      <div className="modal-box relative max-w-4xl min-h-96 max-h-[80vh] overflow-y-hidden flex flex-col md:flex-row md:ml-20 -mt-12 rounded-[24px] shadow-lg bg-secondary transition-all duration-300 z-modal">

Add to your theme system:

:root {
  --z-modal: 100;
  /* other z-index values */
}

520-534: Enhance table accessibility

While the table styling is good, consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility for screen readers.

-                <table className="table-auto w-full text-sm">
+                <table className="table-auto w-full text-sm" aria-label="Group members and their votes">

Line range hint 1-624: Consider component decomposition for better maintainability

The VoteDetailsModal component handles multiple responsibilities (vote display, member list, chart rendering, etc.). Consider breaking it down into smaller, focused components:

  • VoteChart
  • MemberList
  • MessageDisplay
  • VoteActions

This would improve:

  • Code organization
  • Testing
  • Reusability
  • Maintenance
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dbc6ca0 and 44faef0.

📒 Files selected for processing (17)
  • components/admins/components/__tests__/adminOptions.test.tsx (0 hunks)
  • components/admins/components/__tests__/stakingParams.test.tsx (0 hunks)
  • components/admins/components/adminOptions.tsx (0 hunks)
  • components/admins/components/index.tsx (0 hunks)
  • components/admins/components/stakingParams.tsx (0 hunks)
  • components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (4 hunks)
  • components/admins/modals/__tests__/updateStakingParamsModal.test.tsx (0 hunks)
  • components/admins/modals/updateStakingParamsModal.tsx (0 hunks)
  • components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx (4 hunks)
  • components/groups/components/CountdownTimer.tsx (1 hunks)
  • components/groups/components/__tests__/groupProposals.test.tsx (1 hunks)
  • components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (4 hunks)
  • components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (5 hunks)
  • components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (10 hunks)
  • components/icons/BurnIcon.tsx (1 hunks)
  • components/icons/MintIcon.tsx (2 hunks)
  • tailwind.config.js (2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (7)
  • components/admins/components/tests/adminOptions.test.tsx
  • components/admins/components/tests/stakingParams.test.tsx
  • components/admins/components/adminOptions.tsx
  • components/admins/components/index.tsx
  • components/admins/components/stakingParams.tsx
  • components/admins/modals/tests/updateStakingParamsModal.test.tsx
  • components/admins/modals/updateStakingParamsModal.tsx
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • components/groups/components/CountdownTimer.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (19)
components/icons/BurnIcon.tsx (1)

16-16: LGTM! Consistent stroke width improvements.

The addition of strokeWidth="1.5" to both paths improves visual clarity and maintains consistency with other icon components like MintIcon.

Also applies to: 21-21

components/groups/components/__tests__/groupProposals.test.tsx (1)

111-111: LGTM: Text update is correct

The assertion text update from "No proposals found" to "No proposal was found." is consistent with the changes mentioned in the AI summary.

tailwind.config.js (2)

15-18: LGTM: Well-structured shadow utilities

The new box shadow utilities are well-implemented using CSS variables, making them flexible for theme switching while maintaining consistent shadow values.


85-104: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility

While the color scheme updates look good, please ensure that the new color combinations meet WCAG accessibility guidelines for contrast ratios, particularly:

  • Primary (#A087FF) on various backgrounds
  • Secondary (#FBFBFF) with secondary-content (#161616)
  • Base colors with their content colors
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (1)

Line range hint 1-1: Verify removal of unused components

Let's ensure there are no remaining references to the removed AdminOptions and StakingParams components.

✅ Verification successful

No issues found with component removal

The verification shows that AdminOptions component has been completely removed with no remaining references. The StakingParams references found are not related to the removed component but instead refer to message types, API parameters, and form handling for blockchain transactions (specifically for updating staking parameters in the protocol). These are different from the UI component that was removed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to removed components

# Search for AdminOptions references
echo "Checking for AdminOptions references..."
rg -l "AdminOptions|admin-options" --type-add 'web:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -t web

# Search for StakingParams references
echo "Checking for StakingParams references..."
rg -l "StakingParams|staking-params" --type-add 'web:*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}' -t web

Length of output: 553


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual content of files that still reference StakingParams
# to determine if these are actual component imports or just type references

echo "Checking StakingParams usage in files..."
rg "StakingParams" -A 2 -B 2 tests/mock.ts hooks/useQueries.ts helpers/formReducer.tsx components/groups/forms/proposals/messages.ts components/groups/forms/proposals/ConfirmationForm.tsx components/groups/forms/proposals/ProposalMessages.tsx

Length of output: 4568

components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx (3)

Line range hint 227-269: Improve click handler and balance formatting

  1. The row click handler might interfere with the address copy functionality in TruncatedAddressWithCopy. Consider stopping event propagation in the copy button's click handler.

  2. Add error handling for balance formatting:

-      <td className="bg-secondary group-hover:bg-base-300 px-4 py-4 w-1/6">
-        {Number(shiftDigits(balance?.amount ?? '0', -6)).toLocaleString(undefined, {
-          maximumFractionDigits: 6,
-        })}{' '}
-        MFX
+      <td className="bg-secondary group-hover:bg-base-300 px-4 py-4 w-1/6">
+        {balance?.amount
+          ? `${Number(shiftDigits(balance.amount, -6)).toLocaleString(undefined, {
+              maximumFractionDigits: 6,
+            })} MFX`
+          : '-'}
       </td>

112-122: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Ensure consistent column widths between header and rows

The header uses w-1/6 for all columns, but the row cells use different widths (e.g., w-[25%], w-[15%]). This inconsistency might cause layout shifts. Consider aligning the widths:

-<th className="bg-transparent w-1/6">Group Name</th>
-<th className="bg-transparent w-1/6">Active proposals</th>
+<th className="bg-transparent w-[25%]">Group Name</th>
+<th className="bg-transparent w-[15%]">Active proposals</th>

Likely invalid or redundant comment.


Line range hint 86-95: Consider replacing inline styles with Tailwind classes

The heading uses inline styles which reduces maintainability. Consider using Tailwind classes for consistency:

-className="text-secondary-content"
-style={{ fontSize: '20px', fontWeight: 700, lineHeight: '24px' }}
+className="text-secondary-content text-xl font-bold leading-6"

Also, verify that the search input's text and background colors (text-secondary-content on bg-secondary) meet WCAG contrast requirements for accessibility.

✅ Verification successful

Consider using Tailwind classes for consistent styling

Based on the codebase analysis:

  • The color combination bg-secondary with text-secondary-content is consistently used across multiple components for input fields and table cells
  • The Tailwind config shows these colors are properly defined in both light and dark themes with appropriate contrast:
    • Light theme: secondary: '#FBFBFF' with secondary-content: '#161616'
    • Dark theme: secondary: '#1D192D' with secondary-content: '#FFFFFF'

For the heading styles, you can replace the inline styles with:

-className="text-secondary-content"
-style={{ fontSize: '20px', fontWeight: 700, lineHeight: '24px' }}
+className="text-secondary-content text-xl font-bold leading-6"
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if these color combinations are used elsewhere in the codebase
rg "text-secondary-content.*bg-secondary|bg-secondary.*text-secondary-content" --type tsx

Length of output: 119


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if these color combinations are used elsewhere in the codebase, using a more generic file extension
rg "text-secondary-content.*bg-secondary|bg-secondary.*text-secondary-content" -t ts -t jsx -t tsx

# Also check for any tailwind config files that might define these colors
fd -e js -e ts "tailwind.config"

Length of output: 180


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the tailwind config for color definitions
cat tailwind.config.js

# Try searching with just ripgrep's default behavior
rg "text-secondary-content.*bg-secondary|bg-secondary.*text-secondary-content"

# Also check for any usage of these color classes separately
rg "text-secondary-content|bg-secondary"

Length of output: 14196

components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx (4)

131-131: LGTM!

The search input styling is consistent with the theme and maintains good accessibility with both placeholder text and a visual icon.


147-156: LGTM! Well-structured table implementation

Good implementation of:

  • Sticky header with proper background
  • Responsive column visibility
  • Semantic table structure with proper headers

117-118: Consider mobile viewport height handling

Using h-screen can cause issues on mobile browsers due to dynamic viewport height changes when the address bar shows/hides. Consider using min-h-screen or the newer dvh unit for better mobile support.

-    <div className="relative w-full h-screen overflow-hidden">
-      <div className="h-full flex flex-col p-4">
+    <div className="relative w-full min-h-screen overflow-hidden">
+      <div className="h-full flex flex-col p-4 sm:min-h-[calc(100dvh-theme(spacing.16))]">
✅ Verification successful

Using h-screen is consistent with the codebase pattern

The codebase shows a consistent pattern where components like MyDenoms, myGroups, and validatorList use h-screen with overflow-hidden for full-height scrollable containers. Other pages use min-h-screen primarily for page-level layouts. Since this component follows the established pattern for similar list components and includes proper overflow handling, the current implementation is appropriate.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if there are any mobile-specific styles or height adjustments
rg -l "dvh|min-h-screen|mobile.*height" --type css --type tsx

Length of output: 91


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for viewport height related styles in TypeScript and CSS files
rg -l "dvh|min-h-screen|mobile.*height|h-screen" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type-add 'css:*.css' --type tsx --type css

# Check for responsive design patterns in the MyDenoms component
rg -A 2 "sm:|md:|lg:|xl:" components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx

# Look for other components using h-screen to understand the pattern
rg "h-screen" --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type tsx

Length of output: 4642


327-337: Verify business logic for disabled buttons

The buttons are disabled for tokens with 'umfx' in their base name, but this business logic isn't documented. Consider adding a comment explaining why these operations are restricted for 'umfx' tokens.

           <button
-            disabled={denom.base.includes('umfx')}
+            // Disable burn and update operations for native MFX tokens
+            disabled={denom.base.includes('umfx')}
             className="btn btn-md bg-base-300 text-primary btn-square group-hover:bg-secondary hover:outline hover:outline-primary hover:outline-1"
             onClick={onBurn}
✅ Verification successful

Add documentation for native MFX token restrictions

The search results confirm that 'umfx' is the native MFX token of the Manifest chain, and burn/update operations are intentionally disabled for it. This is a common practice for native blockchain tokens which should not be modifiable through the token factory. Adding a comment will help clarify this business logic.

  • components/factory/components/MyDenoms.tsx: Add documentation for the disabled state
          <button
+            // Disable burn operations for native MFX token which cannot be modified through token factory
            disabled={denom.base.includes('umfx')}
            className="btn btn-md bg-base-300 text-primary btn-square group-hover:bg-secondary hover:outline hover:outline-primary hover:outline-1"
            onClick={onBurn}
          >
            <BurnIcon className="w-7 h-7 text-current" />
          </button>

          <button
+            // Disable update operations for native MFX token which cannot be modified through token factory
            disabled={denom.base.includes('umfx')}
            className="btn btn-md bg-base-300 text-primary btn-square group-hover:bg-secondary hover:outline hover:outline-primary hover:outline-1"
            onClick={e => {
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation or related logic about umfx token restrictions
rg -A 5 "umfx" --type ts --type tsx --type md

Length of output: 73


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for documentation or related logic about umfx token restrictions with correct file type
rg -t typescript -t markdown -A 5 "umfx"

# Also search for MFX token related documentation
rg -t typescript -t markdown -A 5 "MFX.*token"

Length of output: 159


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search with correct ripgrep file type flags
rg --type-list  # First, let's see available file types

# Then search for umfx and MFX tokens
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx,md}" -A 5 "umfx"
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx,md}" -A 5 "MFX.*token"

# Also look for any comments near the disabled button logic
rg -g "*.{ts,tsx}" -A 5 "disabled.*umfx"

Length of output: 24759

components/icons/MintIcon.tsx (1)

32-32: LGTM: Stroke width change improves visibility

The increased strokeWidth improves icon visibility and maintains consistency with similar changes in the BurnIcon component.

components/groups/components/groupProposals.tsx (3)

Line range hint 244-268: LGTM! Well-structured header with consistent styling

The header section demonstrates good layout practices with proper spacing and alignment. The styling is consistent across buttons and text elements.


269-287: LGTM! Search and action section properly implemented

The search functionality and new proposal button are well-implemented with consistent styling and proper text alignment. The search input's placeholder text accurately reflects its purpose.


357-375: LGTM! Table styling is well-implemented

The table rows demonstrate proper use of Tailwind's group hover functionality and consistent styling across cells. The rounded corners and background colors create a cohesive look.

components/groups/modals/voteDetailsModal.tsx (3)

69-69: LGTM: Theme and chart styling improvements

The changes improve visual consistency with dynamic theming and enhance chart readability. The color scheme follows semantic meanings (success, error, warning, info).

Also applies to: 133-135, 188-188


Line range hint 355-382: LGTM: Improved message field rendering

The changes enhance readability and maintain visual consistency with the theme system while preserving the existing functionality.


433-435: LGTM: Consistent text styling improvements

The text styling changes follow good practices:

  • Consistent use of theme-aware classes
  • Proper heading hierarchy
  • Semantic class names

Also applies to: 463-465, 476-477

Comment on lines +198 to +201
<td className="bg-secondary group-hover:bg-base-300 py-4">
{validator.consensus_power?.toString() ?? 'N/A'}
</td>
<td className="bg-secondary group-hover:bg-base-300 rounded-r-[12px] py-4 text-right">
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance data display and user safety

  1. The consensus power value should be formatted for better readability
  2. The remove button should have a tooltip warning about the action
 <td className="bg-secondary group-hover:bg-base-300 py-4">
-  {validator.consensus_power?.toString() ?? 'N/A'}
+  {validator.consensus_power 
+    ? new Intl.NumberFormat().format(Number(validator.consensus_power))
+    : 'N/A'
+  }
 </td>
 <td className="bg-secondary group-hover:bg-base-300 rounded-r-[12px] py-4 text-right">
   <button
     onClick={e => {
       e.stopPropagation();
       handleRemove(validator);
     }}
-    className="btn btn-error btn-sm text-white "
+    className="btn btn-error btn-sm text-white tooltip tooltip-left"
+    data-tip="Remove validator"
+    aria-label={`Remove validator ${validator.description.moniker}`}
   >
     <TrashIcon className="w-5 h-5" />
   </button>
 </td>

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines 5 to +8
<svg
width="24"
height="24"
viewBox="0 0 24 24"
viewBox="0 0 26 26"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Adjust viewBox to match width/height dimensions

The SVG's viewBox (26x26) doesn't match its width/height dimensions (24x24). This mismatch should be fixed as it could cause scaling issues. Looking at BurnIcon.tsx, we can see it maintains consistent dimensions with viewBox="0 0 24 24". Please update the viewBox to "0 0 24 24" to match the width/height attributes and maintain consistency with other icons in the codebase.

🔗 Analysis chain

Consider updating width/height to match viewBox dimensions

The SVG has width/height set to "24" but viewBox is "0 0 26 26". This mismatch could cause unexpected scaling issues. Consider either:

  • Updating width/height to "26" to match viewBox, or
  • Adjusting viewBox back to "0 0 24 24" to match width/height
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if other icon components have matching width/height and viewBox
rg -A 1 'width=".+" height=".+".*\n.*viewBox' --type tsx

Length of output: 250


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if other icon components have matching width/height and viewBox
rg -U -A 1 'width=".+" height=".+".*\n.*viewBox' --type tsx

Length of output: 89


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Find all icon components first
fd -e tsx -e jsx "Icon.tsx$|Icon.jsx$" | while read -r file; do
  echo "=== $file ==="
  # Extract SVG attributes
  cat "$file" | grep -A 1 '<svg.*width.*height'
done

Length of output: 4619


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to extract SVG attributes
echo "=== MintIcon.tsx ==="
cat components/icons/MintIcon.tsx | grep -A 3 '<svg'

echo -e "\n=== BurnIcon.tsx (for comparison) ==="
cat components/icons/BurnIcon.tsx | grep -A 3 '<svg'

Length of output: 375

@fmorency
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by #66

@fmorency fmorency closed this Nov 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant