fix: mint/burn form data display #78
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes made in this pull request focus on the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx (3)
105-117: LGTM! Consider adding ARIA attributes for better accessibility.The changes align well with the PR objectives, correctly displaying the total supply instead of balance. The number formatting is properly handled using
shiftDigits.Consider adding ARIA attributes to improve accessibility:
- <p className="text-sm font-light text-gray-500 truncate dark:text-gray-400 mb-2"> + <p className="text-sm font-light text-gray-500 truncate dark:text-gray-400 mb-2" aria-label="Circulating Supply Label"> CIRCULATING SUPPLY </p> - <div className="bg-base-300 p-4 rounded-md"> + <div className="bg-base-300 p-4 rounded-md" role="region" aria-label="Supply Information"> - <p className="font-semibold text-md truncate text-black dark:text-white"> + <p className="font-semibold text-md truncate text-black dark:text-white" aria-live="polite">
Line range hint
38-42: Consider enhancing validation messages and adding rate limiting.The validation schema could benefit from:
- More specific error messages for manifest address validation
- Rate limiting for mint operations to prevent accidental multiple submissions
const MintSchema = Yup.object().shape({ amount: Yup.number() .positive('Amount must be positive') .required('Amount is required') - .max(1e12, 'Amount is too large'), + .max(1e12, 'Amount exceeds maximum allowed value of 1 trillion'), - recipient: Yup.string().required('Recipient address is required').manifestAddress(), + recipient: Yup.string() + .required('Recipient address is required') + .manifestAddress('Invalid manifest address format. Please check the address and try again.'), });
Line range hint
192-202: Enhance button states and loading feedback.The UI could be more informative during different states:
- {isSigning ? ( - <span className="loading loading-dots loading-xs"></span> + {isSigning ? ( + <div className="flex items-center gap-2"> + <span className="loading loading-dots loading-xs"></span> + <span>Processing Mint...</span> + </div> ) : ( `Mint ${ denom.display.startsWith('factory') ? denom.display.split('/').pop()?.toUpperCase() : truncateString(denom.display, 12) }` )}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx (1)
112-114: Verify number formatting edge cases.
The current implementation might need additional handling for:
- Very large numbers (scientific notation)
- Negative exponents (precision)
- Undefined totalSupply
fmorency
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-489: Consider component splitting and error handling improvementsWhile the current changes are correct, here are some suggestions for future improvements:
- Consider splitting the regular burn and multi-burn functionality into separate components to improve maintainability
- Enhance the error handling in the formatAmount function to provide more specific error messages
Example improvement for the formatAmount function:
function formatAmount(amount: string | null | undefined): string { if (amount == null) { return '-'; } try { return Number(shiftDigits(amount, -exponent)).toLocaleString(undefined, { maximumFractionDigits: exponent, }); } catch (error) { - console.warn('Error formatting amount:', error); - return 'x'; + if (error instanceof Error) { + console.warn(`Error formatting amount: ${error.message}`); + } else { + console.warn('Unknown error formatting amount'); + } + return 'Invalid Amount'; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/forms/__tests__/BurnForm.test.tsx(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- components/factory/forms/tests/BurnForm.test.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (2)
components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx (2)
230-230: Label change aligns with PR objectives
The label change from "YOUR BALANCE" to "CIRCULATING SUPPLY" correctly implements the requirements from issue #24, making the display more accurate for the total token supply information.
234-236: Verify total supply formatting
The implementation correctly formats the total supply with proper decimal places using the token's exponent. However, let's verify the behavior when total supply is zero, as specified in issue #24.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more information about the number formatting implementation, particularly focusing on the shiftDigits utility and zero handling.
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Total supply formatting handles zero values correctly
The implementation is safe and correctly handles zero values through multiple layers:
- The
shiftDigitsutility has proper zero-value handling, returning '0' for invalid inputs - The component uses null coalescing to default to '0' when totalSupply is undefined
- The number formatting with
toLocaleStringandmaximumFractionDigitswill properly format zero values according to the token's exponent
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if there are any special cases for zero total supply handling
# Look for conditional rendering or formatting of zero values
# Search for zero supply handling
rg -A 3 "totalSupply.*[=?].*0"
# Search for number formatting conditions
ast-grep --pattern 'toLocaleString($$$)'
Length of output: 1829
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for shiftDigits implementation and usage
rg -A 5 "shiftDigits"
# Look for number formatting utilities and zero handling
rg -A 3 "toLocaleString.*maximumFractionDigits"
# Check for any specific zero value handling in BurnForm
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($totalSupply === "0") { $$$ }'
Length of output: 16021
fixes #24
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
MintFormandBurnFormcomponents to display "CIRCULATING SUPPLY" instead of "YOUR BALANCE," reflecting total supply metrics.adminprop, enhancing clarity and usability.Bug Fixes
Refactor
MintFormandMintModalcomponents, while preserving core functionality.MintFormandBurnFormto align with the updated display logic.