-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: umfx denom metadata migration #103
Conversation
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to multiple files related to versioning and upgrade mechanisms in the application. The Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant App
participant Upgrades
participant BankKeeper
participant ModuleManager
App->>Upgrades: Initialize Upgrades
Upgrades->>BankKeeper: Create Metadata
BankKeeper->>ModuleManager: Set Denom Metadata
ModuleManager->>BankKeeper: Run Migrations
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/upgrades/next/upgrades.go (1)
13-22
: Add function documentation for better maintainability.Consider adding a doc comment explaining the purpose of this upgrade and why no store upgrades are needed.
+// NewUpgrade creates a new upgrade handler for setting umfx denom metadata. +// This is a non-breaking upgrade that only adds metadata to the bank module. func NewUpgrade() upgrades.Upgrade {
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
- Makefile (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades.go (2 hunks)
- app/upgrades/next/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades/types.go (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Makefile
🔇 Additional comments (6)
app/upgrades/types.go (2)
6-6
: LGTM: Required import for BankKeeper.The addition of the bankkeeper import is necessary to support the new BankKeeper field and aligns with the PR's objective of managing denom metadata.
13-14
: LGTM: Keeper additions for metadata management.The changes appropriately:
- Make the AccountKeeper type explicit
- Add BankKeeper which is required for managing denomination metadata
These modifications provide the necessary infrastructure for the umfx denom metadata migration.
Let's verify the BankKeeper usage in the upgrade handler:
✅ Verification successful
Let's search more broadly for BankKeeper usage in the upgrades directory to understand how it's being utilized.
BankKeeper is correctly used for setting denomination metadata
The verification confirms that BankKeeper is properly utilized in the upgrade handler (
app/upgrades/next/upgrades.go
) to set denomination metadata for the "umfx" token. Specifically:
- The upgrade is named "umfx-denom-metadata"
- BankKeeper.SetDenomMetaData is called with appropriate metadata configuration
- The metadata includes description and denomination units for "umfx"
This validates that the BankKeeper addition in the types.go file is necessary and correctly implemented for its intended purpose of managing denomination metadata during the upgrade.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that BankKeeper is used for metadata operations in the upgrade handler # Expected: Find usage of BankKeeper.SetDenomMetadata or similar methods # Search for BankKeeper usage in upgrade-related files rg -A 5 "BankKeeper.*SetDenomMetadata" app/upgrades/Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any BankKeeper usage in upgrade-related files rg -A 5 "BankKeeper" app/upgrades/ # Also search for any metadata-related operations rg -A 5 "metadata" app/upgrades/ -iLength of output: 1796
app/upgrades.go (2)
23-23
: Verify BankKeeper initialization and error handling.The addition of
BankKeeper
is necessary for managing token denominations and metadata. However, we should ensure proper initialization and error handling.Let's verify the BankKeeper setup:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify BankKeeper initialization and usage in the upgrade handler # Test 1: Check BankKeeper initialization in the app ast-grep --pattern 'type ManifestApp struct { $$$ BankKeeper $$$ $$$ }' # Test 2: Verify error handling in the upgrade handler rg -A 5 'BankKeeper.*SetDenomMetadata'
14-14
: LGTM: Upgrade registration for umfx denom metadata.The initialization of
Upgrades
withnext.NewUpgrade()
aligns with the PR objective of adding bank denom metadata for the umfx token.Let's verify the upgrade registration:
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to verify the upgrade implementation and metadata configuration, as the previous search didn't yield the expected results.
Based on the shell script results, I can now provide a final response as we have found clear evidence of the upgrade implementation and its purpose.
Verified: The upgrade registration is correctly implemented for umfx denom metadata
The
next.NewUpgrade()
implementation inapp/upgrades/next/upgrades.go
properly sets up the upgrade handler to:
- Add metadata for the
umfx
token- Configure proper denomination units (umfx at exponent 0, mfx at exponent 6)
- Set display properties (name, symbol, description)
- Use
BankKeeper.SetDenomMetaData
to register the metadataThe upgrade is appropriately named "umfx-denom-metadata" and aligns with the PR's objective of adding bank denom metadata for the umfx token.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the upgrade implementation exists and contains the expected metadata # Test 1: Verify the upgrade implementation ast-grep --pattern 'func NewUpgrade() Upgrade { $$$ }' # Test 2: Check for umfx metadata configuration rg -A 10 'umfx.*metadata'Length of output: 3032
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Let's try different approaches to locate the upgrade implementation and metadata # Check for upgrade implementation in the next package fd -e go -E "vendor" . | xargs rg -l "NewUpgrade" # Look for any metadata-related code in upgrade handlers rg -A 5 "SetDenomMetadata|DenomMetadata" # Search for umfx token configuration rg -A 5 "umfx" # Look specifically in app/upgrades directory fd . app/upgrades -t f -E "vendor" | xargs catLength of output: 27734
app/upgrades/next/upgrades.go (2)
1-11
: LGTM: Package and imports are well-structured.The imports are appropriate and necessary for implementing a Cosmos SDK upgrade handler.
53-53
: LGTM: Proper migration execution.Running migrations after setting metadata is the correct order of operations.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #103 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 77.98% 76.40% -1.58%
==========================================
Files 33 34 +1
Lines 2189 2225 +36
==========================================
- Hits 1707 1700 -7
- Misses 395 436 +41
- Partials 87 89 +2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This PR adds the
umfx-denom-metadata
migration that adds the following bank denom metadata for theumfx
tokenSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes