Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement ego pedestrian sensor functions and testing framework #89

Merged

Conversation

ll7
Copy link
Owner

@ll7 ll7 commented Dec 6, 2024

Introduce sensor functions for the ego pedestrian environment and add a main block to facilitate testing. Remove unnecessary debug logging from sensor implementations.

Fixes #88

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced collision detection and sensor fusion for robots and pedestrians in the simulation environment.
    • Clarified sensor functions for ego pedestrians, improving specificity in sensor initialization.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated test structure to allow selective execution of tests, ensuring better control over test runs.
  • Documentation

    • Improved clarity in function naming for better understanding of sensor roles in the simulation.

@ll7 ll7 self-assigned this Dec 6, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2024

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@ll7 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 48 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5a4d2c6 and 85e8bd5.

Walkthrough

The changes primarily involve updates to the env_util.py file to enhance the initialization process for collision detection and sensor fusion for both robots and ego pedestrians in a simulation environment. This includes renaming sensor function definitions for clarity and ensuring proper association with the SensorFusion object. Additionally, the tests/env_test.py file has been modified to allow selective execution of tests, with some test functions commented out.

Changes

File Change Summary
robot_sf/gym_env/env_util.py Updated sensor function names for ego pedestrian, enhancing clarity. Modified parameters for SensorFusion.
tests/env_test.py Added a main execution guard to selectively run test_ego_ped_env(). Commented out previous test functions.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Refactor function redefenition in env_util for pedestrian env. (#88)

Poem

🐇 In the world of robots and pedestrians,
Sensors now dance with clearer intentions.
With names that shine, they guide the way,
In simulations bright, they play all day!
So hop along, let the tests run free,
For every change brings joy, you see! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ll7 ll7 requested a review from JuliusMiller December 6, 2024 11:50
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
robot_sf/gym_env/env_util.py (4)

10-10: Remove unused import

The loguru.logger import is not used in this file and should be removed.

-from loguru import logger
🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)

10-10: loguru.logger imported but unused

Remove unused import: loguru.logger

(F401)


285-288: Address TODO comment about next goal selection

The TODO comment indicates uncertainty about what next goal to choose for the ego pedestrian. This needs to be resolved as it could affect the sensor's functionality.

Would you like me to help design a solution for the next goal selection logic?


282-290: Add docstrings to new sensor functions

The new ego pedestrian sensor functions would benefit from docstrings describing their purpose, parameters, and return values, similar to other functions in the codebase.

Example for ray_sensor_ego_ped:

def ray_sensor_ego_ped():
    """
    Get lidar ray scan observations for the ego pedestrian.
    
    Returns:
        numpy.ndarray: Array of ray scan distances from the ego pedestrian's perspective
    """
    return lidar_ray_scan(sim.ego_ped.pose, occupancies[1], lidar_config)[0]

294-300: Consider using named constants for occupancy indices

The code uses hardcoded indices (1) to access occupancies. Consider using named constants to make the code more maintainable and less error-prone.

+ # At the top of the file with other constants
+ ROBOT_OCCUPANCY_INDEX = 0
+ EGO_PED_OCCUPANCY_INDEX = 1

  sensor_fusions.append(
      SensorFusion(
          ray_sensor_ego_ped,
          speed_sensor_ego_ped,
          target_sensor_ego_ped,
          orig_obs_space[1],
-         False,
+         use_next_goal=False,  # Named parameter for clarity
      )
  )
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 576c3f0 and 5a4d2c6.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • robot_sf/gym_env/env_util.py (2 hunks)
  • tests/env_test.py (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • tests/env_test.py
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.0)
robot_sf/gym_env/env_util.py

10-10: loguru.logger imported but unused

Remove unused import: loguru.logger

(F401)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
robot_sf/gym_env/env_util.py (1)

282-300: Verify test coverage for new sensor functions

The implementation looks good and aligns with the PR objectives. Please ensure that there are corresponding tests for the new ego pedestrian sensor functions.

@ll7 ll7 merged commit 65b9f95 into main Dec 6, 2024
2 checks passed
@ll7 ll7 deleted the 88-Refactor-function-redefenition-in-`env_util`-for-pedestrian-env branch December 6, 2024 13:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Refactor function redefenition in env_util for pedestrian env.
1 participant