Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hooks pro pods add image pull secrets #338

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kmadel
Copy link
Contributor

@kmadel kmadel commented Oct 30, 2024

Although the vCluster vcluster.yaml configuration provides the workloadServiceAccount that allows including imagePullSecrets, it is limited as that serviceAccount is superseded when using sync.toHost.pods.serviceAccounts.enabled: true.

This allows setting imagePullSecrets at the pod level instead of via a serviceAccount - although it does rely on a Pro feature.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 30, 2024

Deploy Preview for vcluster-docs-site ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 0a85558
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/vcluster-docs-site/deploys/672e80f5db48af00081662f6
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-338--vcluster-docs-site.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@Piotr1215
Copy link
Contributor

Could you please allow edits by maintainers, so I can help you with vale?

Removed all 'we'
Removed the word 'functionality'
@kmadel
Copy link
Contributor Author

kmadel commented Nov 8, 2024

The Vale issue is related to using "Hooks (Pro)". I believe we use this formatting in multiple places. If we are going to change it to satisfy Vale, what should it be changed to? "Hooks (pro)"? Also, can't add comment in source as this Vale issue is for something that was not changed in the PR.

@Piotr1215 Piotr1215 self-requested a review November 8, 2024 18:03
@Piotr1215
Copy link
Contributor

Piotr1215 commented Nov 11, 2024

@kmadel, apologies for back and forth on this one, I had to add the vale exception in different file. If you rebase again the rule should work correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants