Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chore
: Add unit tests for architectural and AOP analysis #36Chore
: Add unit tests for architectural and AOP analysis #36Changes from 10 commits
417bdab
06c2869
bf59d91
f8ad126
a8caee0
d95e6a0
4a6055b
a2cc647
ccbeb53
1ed9070
bbd632c
9e19949
9bdd5c0
17ef7ce
34c1b27
fc41619
747bc16
b256b13
98b667c
5eae8b9
acb7e64
11cc0e9
0086010
8e21062
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Enhance null-safety consistency and validation.
While adding @nonnull is good, there are several improvements needed:
Here's the suggested implementation:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
ClassLoader rule needs test coverage and method list enhancement
The implementation has two issues that need attention:
classloader-methods.txt
file only contains the class namejava.lang.ClassLoader
but lacks the actual method signatures that should be restrictedNO_CLASSES_SHOULD_USE_CLASSLOADERS
rule inJavaArchitectureTestCaseCollectionTest.java
Required actions:
classloader-methods.txt
(e.g.,loadClass
,defineClass
, etc.)JavaArchitectureTestCaseCollectionTest.java
to verify the rule's behavior🔗 Analysis chain
Implementation looks good, but needs test coverage.
The new ClassLoader rule follows the established pattern and is well-structured. However, since this PR is about adding tests, we should ensure proper test coverage for this new rule.
Let's verify the constant and its potential test coverage:
Let me try a different search strategy to verify the constant and test coverage:
This should help us:
Let me check the content of the classloader-methods.txt file and look for related test cases:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 311
Script:
Length of output: 7925
Script:
Length of output: 985
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Keep TransitiveAccessPath as a private inner class
The class
TransitiveAccessPath
is only used internally withinTransitivelyAccessesMethodsCondition
and has a single test usage. Making it public exposes unnecessary implementation details. The test can still access the inner class using package-private visibility since the test is in the same package hierarchy (de.tum.cit.ase.ares.api.architecture
).public class TransitiveAccessPath
back toprivate class TransitiveAccessPath
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider keeping TransitiveAccessPath as an internal implementation detail.
Making this inner class public exposes implementation details and could make future refactoring more difficult. If this change is solely for testing purposes, consider using alternative testing approaches that don't require breaking encapsulation.
Let's check if this class is only used in tests:
Alternative approaches to consider:
Let me verify if this class is used in test files as well to understand the complete usage pattern.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 1797
Script:
Length of output: 385
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove duplicate ClassLoader entry.
The
java.lang.ClassLoader
entry appears to be redundant since specific ClassLoader methods are already listed above (e.g.,getParent()
,getSystemClassLoader()
,getPlatformClassLoader()
).-java.lang.ClassLoader
📝 Committable suggestion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Extract magic numbers and add documentation for file operations.
The verification counts (13 and 2) appear to be magic numbers. Consider:
Also applies to: 43-51
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve testFileValues with meaningful test data.
The test uses a hardcoded package name and doesn't verify the actual content of the generated arrays.
📝 Committable suggestion