Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sync to upstream/release/640 #1374

Merged
merged 141 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024
Merged

Sync to upstream/release/640 #1374

merged 141 commits into from
Aug 23, 2024

Conversation

vegorov-rbx
Copy link
Collaborator

What's new

  • Fixed many of the false positive errors in indexing of table unions and table intersections
  • It is now possible to run custom checks over Luau AST during typechecking by setting customModuleCheck in FrontendOptions
  • Fixed codegen issue on arm, where number->vector cast could corrupt that number value for the next time it's read

New Solver

  • error type now behaves as the bottom type during subtyping checks
  • Fixed the scope that is used in subtyping with generic types
  • Fixed astOriginalCallTypes table often used by LSP to match the old solver

Internal Contributors

Co-authored-by: Aaron Weiss [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Andy Friesen [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Vighnesh Vijay [email protected]
Co-authored-by: Vyacheslav Egorov [email protected]

aatxe and others added 30 commits November 3, 2023 12:47
- Add SUBRK and DIVRK bytecode instructions
    - Enables future performance optimizations

Miscellaneous
- Small performance improvements to new non-strict mode
- Introduce more scripts for fuzzing
- Improcements to dataflow analysis
Co-authored-by: Alexander McCord <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Andy Friesen <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Aviral Goel <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: David Cope <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Lily Brown <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Vyacheslav Egorov <[email protected]>
@vegorov-rbx vegorov-rbx merged commit d518d14 into master Aug 23, 2024
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants