addressed comments #593
majisourav99
Matrix: Clients / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Controller / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Integrations / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Internal / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Router / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: Server / UT & CodeCov
Matrix: StaticAnalysis
ValidateGradleWrapper
10s
StaticAnalysisAndUnitTestsCompletionCheck
0s
Annotations
30 errors
|
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement:
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L46
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (32.50928) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.187; maxAllowedDelta: 0.031. No more attempts left.
|
|
InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.testInstanceMeasurement:
internal/venice-common/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/memory/InstanceSizeEstimatorTest.java#L46
java.lang.AssertionError: Class KafkaKey has a memoryAllocatedPerInstance (32.50928) which is too far from the predictedUsage (40); delta: 0.187; maxAllowedDelta: 0.031. No more attempts left.
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2656)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 36 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
14.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.006061d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002716d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.102872d,
1740788400083L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.056804999999999994d,
1740788400086L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002324d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.05849d,
1740788400098L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002434d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngesti
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L140
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2656)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 36 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
14.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.006061d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002716d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.102872d,
1740788400083L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.056804999999999994d,
1740788400086L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002324d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.05849d,
1740788400098L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002434d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngesti
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L140
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2656)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2656)
|
|
SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.testOffsetSyncBeforeGracefulShutDown[0](AA_ON):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseWithoutBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
java.lang.AssertionError: pcs.getLatestProcessedLocalVersionTopicOffset() for PARTITION_FOO is expected to be zero! expected [0] but found [2]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1624)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@5bd15903
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@5fca31b2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478170, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478171, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478170, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478171, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@1b0775c5
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@4a46a1c0
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2656)
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1624)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$736/1876813667@786e2ddd
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$736/1876813667@2f49777c
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487512, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487512, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$736/1876813667@298428cf
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 21 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
1.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003797d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.11571500000000001d,
1740788492120L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.067418d,
1740788492123L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002754d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.069049d,
1740788492134L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.014106d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.013515d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestio
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2656)
|
|
NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.testNativeMetadataRepositoryStats:
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/repository/NativeMetadataRepositoryTest.java#L140
java.lang.AssertionError: expected [2000.0] but found [1000.0]
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1624)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@5bd15903
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@5fca31b2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478170, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478171, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478170, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788478171, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@1b0775c5
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_4f374440f4_4245d762_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$560/515760527@4a46a1c0
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
|
|
SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithPWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.TooFewActualInvocations:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
Wanted 2 times:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
But was 1 time:
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2656)
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testNotifier[1](AA_OFF):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
org.mockito.exceptions.verification.ArgumentsAreDifferent: Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=0, eventTimeEpochMs=-1, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTaskTest.lambda$testNotifier$35(StoreIngestionTaskTest.java:1624)
Actual invocations have different arguments:
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.getLastOffset(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.getLastOffset(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:49)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$736/1876813667@786e2ddd
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$736/1876813667@2f49777c
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487512, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=1, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487512, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
1,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=2, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=false, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyOffsetManager.put(DeepCopyOffsetManager.java:38)
storageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService$$Lambda$736/1876813667@298428cf
);
-> at com.linkedin.venice.offsets.DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.computeStoreVersionState(DeepCopyStorageMetadataService.java:34)
storageMetadataService.put(
"TestTopic_5164a77758_9bf2fa2a_v1",
2,
OffsetRecord{localVersionTopicOffset=3, upstreamOffset=-1, leaderTopic=null, offsetLag=9223372036854775807, eventTimeEpochMs=1740788487513, latestProducerProcessingTimeInMs=0, isEndOfPushReceived=true, databaseInfo={}, realTimeProducerState={}, recordTransformerClassHash=null}
);
-> at com
|
|
SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.testRecordLevelMetricForCurrentVersion[0](false):
clients/da-vinci-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/davinci/kafka/consumer/SITWithTWiseAndBufferAfterLeaderTest.java#L1
Wanted but not invoked:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(
<any long>
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.stats.HostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalBytesConsumed(HostLevelIngestionStats.java:499)
However, there were exactly 21 interactions with this mock:
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
1.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.003797d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.11571500000000001d,
1740788492120L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.067418d,
1740788492123L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.002754d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordConsumerRecordsQueuePutLatency(
0.069049d,
1740788492134L
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1314)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.produceToStoreBufferServiceOrKafka(StoreIngestionTask.java:1319)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordTotalRecordsConsumed();
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerRecord(StoreIngestionTask.java:2648)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.014106d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.checkLongRunningTaskState(LeaderFollowerStoreIngestionTask.java:773)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordStorageQuotaUsed(
NaNd
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.recordQuotaMetrics(StoreIngestionTask.java:1647)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordProcessConsumerActionLatency(
0.0d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.StoreIngestionTask.processConsumerActions(StoreIngestionTask.java:1981)
hostLevelIngestionStats.recordCheckLongRunningTasksLatency(
0.013515d
);
-> at com.linkedin.davinci.kafka.consumer.LeaderFollowerStoreIngestio
|
|
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet:
clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
|
|
|
|
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet:
clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
|
|
|
|
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet:
clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
|
|
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient:
clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1010
java.lang.AssertionError: Unknown version number: 1 for store: test_store expected [true] but found [false]
|
|
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet:
clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L654
org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadTimeoutException: Method com.linkedin.venice.fastclient.DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGet() didn't finish within the time-out 10000
|
|
DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.testBatchGetToUnreachableClient:
clients/venice-client/src/test/java/com/linkedin/venice/fastclient/DispatchingAvroGenericStoreClientTest.java#L1010
java.lang.AssertionError: Unknown version number: 1 for store: test_store expected [true] but found [false]
|
Artifacts
Produced during runtime
| Name | Size | |
|---|---|---|
|
StaticAnalysis
|
664 KB |
|
|
clients-jdk11
|
2.57 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk17
|
2.61 MB |
|
|
clients-jdk8
|
2.53 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk11
|
1.6 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk17
|
1.55 MB |
|
|
controller-jdk8
|
1.6 MB |
|
|
integrations-jdk11
|
522 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk17
|
526 KB |
|
|
integrations-jdk8
|
507 KB |
|
|
internal-jdk11
|
3.46 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk17
|
3.47 MB |
|
|
internal-jdk8
|
3.45 MB |
|
|
router-jdk11
|
1.05 MB |
|
|
router-jdk17
|
1.04 MB |
|
|
router-jdk8
|
1.03 MB |
|
|
server-jdk11
|
9.28 MB |
|
|
server-jdk17
|
8.99 MB |
|
|
server-jdk8
|
9.23 MB |
|